Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Navigation, Guidance, Control and Dynamics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (21)
- Computer Sciences (19)
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (10)
- Computer Engineering (8)
- Aeronautical Vehicles (7)
-
- Astrodynamics (7)
- Mechanical Engineering (7)
- Systems Engineering and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (7)
- Electrical and Computer Engineering (6)
- Space Vehicles (6)
- Other Aerospace Engineering (5)
- Robotics (4)
- Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics (3)
- Controls and Control Theory (3)
- Digital Communications and Networking (3)
- Graphics and Human Computer Interfaces (3)
- Physics (3)
- Propulsion and Power (3)
- Acoustics, Dynamics, and Controls (2)
- Astrophysics and Astronomy (2)
- Automotive Engineering (2)
- Computer-Aided Engineering and Design (2)
- Electro-Mechanical Systems (2)
- Fluid Dynamics (2)
- Instrumentation (2)
- Materials Science and Engineering (2)
- Multi-Vehicle Systems and Air Traffic Control (2)
- Institution
-
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (20)
- Air Force Institute of Technology (10)
- California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (5)
- Old Dominion University (5)
- West Virginia University (5)
-
- University of South Alabama (4)
- Florida Institute of Technology (3)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Clemson University (1)
- Fort Hays State University (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- LSU New Orleans (1)
- Purdue University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of New Mexico (1)
- University of Texas at Arlington (1)
- Keyword
-
- Machine learning (4)
- Adaptive control (2)
- Astrodynamics (2)
- Guidance (2)
- Integral Concurrent Learning (2)
-
- Manipulators (2)
- Mobile robots (2)
- Motion control (2)
- Navigation (2)
- System Identification (2)
- #antcenter (1)
- #antecenter (1)
- 3D Environment Coverage (1)
- ADCS (1)
- AI (1)
- AUV (1)
- Adaptive (1)
- Adaptive Control (1)
- Adaptive Control; Adaptive Allocation; Implementation; Experimental Validation; spacecraft dynamics; thruster actuation (1)
- Adaptive filtering (1)
- Aerodynamic Modeling (1)
- Aeronautics—Research (1)
- Aerospace (1)
- Aerospace engineering (1)
- Age of Information (AoI) (1)
- Air traffic control—Human factors (1)
- Aircraft (1)
- Aircraft Handling (1)
- Airplanes—Automatic control (1)
- Altruistic (1)
- Publication
-
- Doctoral Dissertations and Master's Theses (17)
- Theses and Dissertations (10)
- Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports (ETD) (5)
- Master's Theses (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
-
- Publications (3)
- Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2019 - present) (2)
- Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Faculty Publications (2)
- Psychology Faculty Publications (2)
- All Theses (1)
- Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering: Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research (1)
- Electrical & Computer Engineering Faculty Publications (1)
- Honors Theses (1)
- LSU New Orleans Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Mechanical Engineering ETDs (1)
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Theses - Archive (1)
- SACAD: Scholarly Activities (1)
- Shelby Hall Graduate Research Forum Presentations (1)
- Symposium of Student Scholars (1)
- The Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research (1)
- Theses and Dissertations--Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (1)
- Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 63 of 63
Full-Text Articles in Navigation, Guidance, Control and Dynamics
An Operational Field Study: A Comparison Of Piloting Uncrewed Underwater Vehicles And Uncrewed Aircraft Systems, David Thirtyacre, Joseph Cerreta, Pete Miller, Kimberly Luthi, Jolee Thirtyacre
An Operational Field Study: A Comparison Of Piloting Uncrewed Underwater Vehicles And Uncrewed Aircraft Systems, David Thirtyacre, Joseph Cerreta, Pete Miller, Kimberly Luthi, Jolee Thirtyacre
Publications
and operations, the ability to cross-train personnel in both Uncrewed Underwater Vehicles and Small Uncrewed Aircraft System operations has become a focal point for efficiency and workforce optimization. This study presents a comparative analysis of the operational and human factor considerations involved in piloting mini UUV and sUASs, highlighting the key similarities and differences in control methods, environmental influences, navigation, emergency procedures, and situational awareness. A qualitative experimental field study was conducted between July 2024 and October 2024, involving real-world deployments of both systems in maritime and aerial environments. Findings indicated that while UUV and sUAS operators relied on remote …
Investigation Of A Busemann Intake At Negative Angle Of Attack, Mark E. Noftz, Andrew N. Bustard, Nicholas J. Bisek, Thomas J. Juliano, Joseph S. Jewell
Investigation Of A Busemann Intake At Negative Angle Of Attack, Mark E. Noftz, Andrew N. Bustard, Nicholas J. Bisek, Thomas J. Juliano, Joseph S. Jewell
Publications
A high-speed, shape-transitioned, inward-turning intake was tested in Purdue’s Boeing/AFOSR Mach 6 Quiet Tunnel. The inlet model, called the Indiana Inlet (INlet), had a total contraction ratio of 4.68:1 and a design point of Mach 6 at 0° angle of attack. The model was outfitted with a suite of high-frequency pressure transducers, and the external flowfield was imaged with high-speed schlieren photography. The INlet was tested under low freestream disturbance levels for a variety of freestream unit Reynolds numbers and at-4° angle of attack. An unsteady shockwave near the leading edge of the inlet forebody, indicative of boundary layer separation, …
Navigating Together: The Conav Testbed And Framework For Benchmarking Cooperative Localization, Rohith Boyinine, Jayanth Ammapalli, Anusna Chakraborty, Rajnikant Sharma, Kevin Brink, Clark N. Taylor
Navigating Together: The Conav Testbed And Framework For Benchmarking Cooperative Localization, Rohith Boyinine, Jayanth Ammapalli, Anusna Chakraborty, Rajnikant Sharma, Kevin Brink, Clark N. Taylor
Faculty Publications
This paper presents CoNaV, a comprehensive framework for creating a multi-vehicle cooperative localization (CL) testbed designed to support the benchmarking, development, and deployment of cooperative navigation algorithms. Given the essential role of CL in improving localization accuracy for both defense and civilian applications, CoNaV provides a robust environment for rigorously validating algorithms under real-world conditions. By establishing a benchmark for CL algorithms, CoNaV lays a foundation for advancing research into more sophisticated and distributed CL solutions. This framework highlights the potential of cooperative navigation to enhance multi-vehicle operations and offers a scalable, practical approach for future developments in CL technology.