Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (141)
- Seattle University School of Law (79)
- University of Michigan Law School (20)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (17)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (6)
-
- Selected Works (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Stephen F. Austin State University (1)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Mississippi (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (102)
- Capital punishment (28)
- Due process (21)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Police (14)
-
- Fifth Amendment (13)
- Miranda v. Arizona (12)
- Supreme Court (12)
- Law (11)
- Constitution (9)
- Dickerson v. United States (9)
- Due Process Clause (8)
- Incarceration (8)
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (7)
- Eighth Amendment (7)
- Evidence (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Equal protection (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Race (6)
- Racism (6)
- SFFA (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Capital punishment sentencing (5)
- Criminal law (5)
- Custodial interrogation (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Exclusionary rule (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (137)
- Seattle University Law Review (79)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (11)
- Touro Law Review (6)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Articles (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Publications (3)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects (1)
- Derek R VerHagen (1)
- Electronic Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Honors Theses (1)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Jeffrey Bellin (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 315
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Arizona V. Fulminante 111 S. Ct. 1246, (1991)
Arizona V. Fulminante 111 S. Ct. 1246, (1991)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Litigating The "Vileness" Factor In Virginia, Victor A. Lago
Litigating The "Vileness" Factor In Virginia, Victor A. Lago
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Lankford V. Idaho 111 S. Ct. 1723 (1991)
Lankford V. Idaho 111 S. Ct. 1723 (1991)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Yates V. Evatt 111 S. Ct. 1884 (1991)
Schad V. Arizona 111 S. Ct. 2491 (1991)
The Virginia Supreme Court And Thirteen Years Of Death Sentence Review, Anne E. Mcinerney
The Virginia Supreme Court And Thirteen Years Of Death Sentence Review, Anne E. Mcinerney
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Shell V. Mississippi 111 S. Ct. 313, 112 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990)
Shell V. Mississippi 111 S. Ct. 313, 112 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Cage V. Louisiana 111 S. Ct. 328 (1990)
Evans V. Muncie 916 F.2d 163 (1990)
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Bassette V. Thompson 915 F.2d 932 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Getting The Most And Giving The Least From Virginia's "Mental Mitigation Expert" Statute, Helen L. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Status Of Supreme Court Case Law Helpful To Capital Defendants, Steven K. Herndon, Ginger M. Jonas
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Gaskins V. Mckellar 916 F.2d 941 (1990)
Clozza V. Murray 913 F.2d 1092 (1990)
How To Look The Virginia Gift Horse In The Mouth: Federal Due Process And Virginia's Arbitrary Abrogation Of Capital Defendant's State-Created Rights, Otto W. Konrad
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women Of Color, Equality, And The Right Of Privacy, Dorothy E. Roberts
Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women Of Color, Equality, And The Right Of Privacy, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Walton V. Arizona 110 S. Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
Walton V. Arizona 110 S. Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Boggs V. Bair 892 F.2d 1193 (4th Cir. 1989)
Boggs V. Bair 892 F.2d 1193 (4th Cir. 1989)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Capital Punishment In Missouri: Recent Developments In The Interpretation And Administration Of The Death Penalty, Ellen Y. Suni
Capital Punishment In Missouri: Recent Developments In The Interpretation And Administration Of The Death Penalty, Ellen Y. Suni
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
South Carolina V. Gathers 109 S. Ct. 2207,104 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1989) United States Supreme Court
South Carolina V. Gathers 109 S. Ct. 2207,104 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Penry V. Lynaugh 109 S. Ct. 2934,106 L. Ed. 2d 256 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Penry V. Lynaugh 109 S. Ct. 2934,106 L. Ed. 2d 256 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Arizona V. Youngblood: Does The Criminal Defendant Lose His Right To Due Process When The State Loses Exculpatory Evidence?, Willis C. Moore
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ross V. Oklahoma 108 S.Ct. 2273 (1988)
Yates V. Aiken 108 S.Ct. 534 (1988)
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
Mccleskey V. Kemp: The Supreme Court Pulls The Switch On Future Judicial Challenges To The Death Penalty, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 215 (1988), William H. Jones
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.