Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative procedure (1)
- BWC (1)
- Bias (1)
- Body Camera Perspective Effects (1)
- Body-Worn Cameras (1)
-
- CSI Effects (1)
- Camera Perspective Bias (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Criminal Video Evidence (1)
- Data (1)
- Dispositional Bias (1)
- Due process (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Good time (1)
- Incomplete Deprivation Theory (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Judicial Scrutiny (1)
- Limitations of Technology (1)
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co. (1)
- Monroe v. Pape (1)
- Noise (1)
- Parole (1)
- Parole Release Decisionmaking (1)
- Parole board (1)
- Parole board hearing (1)
- Pragmatic Inquiry (1)
- Prison and prisoners (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
The Noisy "Silent Witness": The Misperception And Misuse Of Criminal Video Evidence, Aaron M. Williams
The Noisy "Silent Witness": The Misperception And Misuse Of Criminal Video Evidence, Aaron M. Williams
Indiana Law Journal
This Note examines recent developments in the research of situational video evidence biases. Part I examines the current and growing body of psychological research into the various situational biases that can affect the reliability of video evidence and the gaps in this research that require further attention from researchers and legal academics. Because these biases do not “operate in a vacuum,” Part I also examines some of the recent and exciting research into the interaction between situational and dispositional biases. Part II examines the development of camera and video processing technology and its limitations as a means of mitigating such …
Prisoner Property Deprivations: Section 1983 And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven H. Hazelrigg
Prisoner Property Deprivations: Section 1983 And The Fourteenth Amendment, Steven H. Hazelrigg
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
Judicial Review Of Parole Release Decisionmaking, Thomas B. Grier
IUSTITIA
An inmate at a federal penal institution "is entitled only to be released after full service of his sentence less good time earned during incarceration." He or she is not entitled to parole, for parole is not a right but a privilege, a matter of "legislative grace". The United States Board of Parole has "absolute discretion" in deciding whether and when to grant parole. The judiciary will not interfere with the Board, as "courts are without power to grant a parole or to determine judicially eligibility for parole." And since the Board is statutorily authorized to exercise broad discretion, and …