Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (28)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Law and Politics (8)
-
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (7)
- State and Local Government Law (7)
- Legal Profession (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Legal Writing and Research (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Torts (3)
- Agriculture Law (2)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Earth Sciences (2)
- Institution
-
- New York Law School (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
-
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (7)
- Roger J Miner (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Federal courts (5)
-
- Judiciary (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Judicial discretion (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Negligence (3)
- Public opinion (3)
- Book review (2)
- Burden of proof (2)
- Cause of action (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Community (2)
- Conservation (2)
- Constitutional theory (2)
- Courts (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Eulogy (2)
- George H.W. Bush Administration (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Judicial role (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law clerks (2)
- Media (2)
- Original intent (2)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (7)
- BYU Law Review (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Publications (4)
-
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- Alec Stone Sweet (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Federal Courts and Federal Practice (1)
- Federalist Society (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law Practice (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 70 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Judges
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Progressive And Conservative Constitutionalism, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
American constitutional law in general, and fourteenth amendment jurisprudence in particular, is in a state of profound transformation. The "liberal-legalist" and purportedly politically neutral understanding of constitutional guarantees that dominated constitutional law and theory during the fifties, sixties, and seventies, is waning, both in the courts and in the academy. What is beginning to replace liberal legalism in the academy, and what has clearly replaced it on the Supreme Court, is a very different conception - a new paradigm - of the role of constitutionalism, constitutional adjudication, and constitutional guarantees in a democratic state. Unlike the liberal-legal paradigm it is …
Makers And Receivers: Judicial Heresy And The Tempting Of America, Charles Kelbley
Makers And Receivers: Judicial Heresy And The Tempting Of America, Charles Kelbley
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Essay examines "The Tempting of America" in three stages: Section II briefly summarizes the major themes of the book along three principal lines that parallel the book's three parts: Bork's critique of the Supreme Court, his concept of correct and incorrect legal theory and his assessment of the treatment he received from the media and the Senate Judiciary Committee. Each of these topics deserves serious consideration, but the ultimate concern of this Essay is Bork's theoretical chapters, not his historical and political arguments. Section III examines problems that Bork's judicial philosophy raises from the perspectives of history, jurisprudence, and, …
Book Review. Judicial Rhetoric And Administrative Law, John S. Applegate
Book Review. Judicial Rhetoric And Administrative Law, John S. Applegate
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Perceived Authority Of Law In Judging Constitutional Cases, Kent Greenawalt
The Perceived Authority Of Law In Judging Constitutional Cases, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judges have many opportunities to read what scholars think, and scholars don't very often have this kind of chance to hear judges reflect on their own experiences and perspectives, I expect the main benefit to go to us scholars. However, for many questions of jurisprudential interest, figuring out what relevance different judicial experiences might have is complicated, and extensive discussion may be necessary to learn what really matters.
I shall focus on a question that has lain at. the center of jurisprudential discussion in the …
The Meaning Of Equality And The Interpretive Turn, Robin West
The Meaning Of Equality And The Interpretive Turn, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The turn to hermeneutics and interpretation in contemporary legal theory has contributed at least two central ideas to modern jurisprudential thought: first, that the "meaning" of a text is invariably indeterminate -- what might be called the indeterminacy claim -- and second, that the unavoidably malleable essence of texts -- their essential inessentiality -- entails that interpreting a text is a necessary part of the process of creating the text's meaning. These insights have generated both considerable angst, and considerable excitement among traditional constitutional scholars, primarily because at least on first blush these two claims seem to inescapably imply a …
Remarks On Writing Separately, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Remarks On Writing Separately, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Washington Law Review
Judge Ginsburg compares the styles of appellate opinion writing in United States courts and in those of Great Britain and the civil law countries. She describes as a "middle way" the United States practice of opinions for the court, sometimes accompanied by separate concurrences and dissents. This practice, she observes, contrasts with the British tradition of seriatim opinions by each member of the bench, and with the single, anonymous judgment characteristic of civil law systems. While noting that the Anglo-United States practice of writing separately has gained adherents in the civil law world, she concludes that judges in the United …
Justice Harlan's Conservatism And Altenative Possibilities, Kent Greenawalt
Justice Harlan's Conservatism And Altenative Possibilities, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
Bruce Ackerman and Charles Fried's rich essays address the subject of Justice Harlan as a conservative. One who comes to this topic has in mind questions like: Was Justice Harlan a conservative? If so, what kind of a conservative was he? How did his judicial actions exemplify a conservative approach? Most importantly, is his conservatism an appealing model for modern judicial practice?
Professors Ackerman and Fried's slices on this topic reflect their own casts of mind and philosophies of judging. Fried looks at a broad range of Justice Harlan's opinions and sets them against particular conservative qualities that Fried commends. …
The Birth And Development Of Abstract Review: Constitutional Courts And Policy-Making In Western Europe, Alec Stone Sweet
The Birth And Development Of Abstract Review: Constitutional Courts And Policy-Making In Western Europe, Alec Stone Sweet
Alec Stone Sweet
No abstract provided.