Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Earth Sciences (1)
- Energy Policy (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Environmental Health and Protection (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- Hydrology (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Life Sciences (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Natural Resource Economics (1)
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (1)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado Law School professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Mark Squillace.
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers will be the theme for this year's water conference, June 6-8 at the Law School in Boulder. The conference will consider the changing demands for water in the West and the need to reallocate a portion of the existing uses of water to new uses.
The first day will provide the background by looking at the most likely sources of water to meet these demands, including agriculture, federal water projects, interstate transfers, and …
The Meaning Of Equality And The Interpretive Turn, Robin West
The Meaning Of Equality And The Interpretive Turn, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The turn to hermeneutics and interpretation in contemporary legal theory has contributed at least two central ideas to modern jurisprudential thought: first, that the "meaning" of a text is invariably indeterminate -- what might be called the indeterminacy claim -- and second, that the unavoidably malleable essence of texts -- their essential inessentiality -- entails that interpreting a text is a necessary part of the process of creating the text's meaning. These insights have generated both considerable angst, and considerable excitement among traditional constitutional scholars, primarily because at least on first blush these two claims seem to inescapably imply a …