Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (31)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- First Amendment (13)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (12)
- Internet Law (12)
-
- Legislation (11)
- Commercial Law (10)
- Business (9)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (6)
- Consumer Protection Law (6)
- Courts (6)
- International Trade Law (5)
- Marketing Law (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Business Intelligence (4)
- Food and Drug Law (4)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Technology and Innovation (4)
- Advertising and Promotion Management (3)
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations (3)
- Computer Law (3)
- Contracts (3)
- Economics (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (33)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- American University Washington College of Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Marquette University Law School (10)
-
- University of Richmond (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of New Hampshire (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (30)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (24)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- American University Law Review (6)
-
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (6)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (5)
- Court Briefs (4)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (3)
- Cybaris® (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Kentucky Law Journal (3)
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (3)
- Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Intellectual Property Brief (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- St. John's Law Review (2)
- Supreme Court Case Files (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 194 of 194
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
The Trademark Counterfeiting Act Of 1984: A Sensible Legislative Response To The Ills Of Commercial Counterfeiting, Brian J. Kearney
The Trademark Counterfeiting Act Of 1984: A Sensible Legislative Response To The Ills Of Commercial Counterfeiting, Brian J. Kearney
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This student note explores the recently passed Trademark Counterfeit Act of 1984, viewing it in the context of ever-growing counterfeiting of commercial, agricultural, and aeronautical trademarks. The author examines the history of US trademark regulation, beginning with the Lanham Act of 1946, and then predicts the effects the 1984 Act will have on commercial practice, antitrust law, the sale of goods on the "gray market," and due process implications. The author concludes that though ex parte remedies will be necessary to maintain trademark practices, the 1984 Act does not represent any sort of infringement on due process or commercial practice, …
Parallel Importation--Legitimate Goods Or Trademark Infringement?, W. Weldon Wilson
Parallel Importation--Legitimate Goods Or Trademark Infringement?, W. Weldon Wilson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Conflicts in interpretations of section 42 of the Lanham Act and section 526 of the Tariff Act of 1930 have led to divergent results in several federal courts. Although advocates on each side of the controversy present valid arguments supporting their positions, the dispute should be resolved by analyzing the purpose of the Lanham Act and the Tariff Act. The goal of these acts is protection of consumers and United States industry. Strict application of these statutes would achieve this result. Parallel imports provide goods at lower prices but confuse the consumer as to the origin of the goods and …
Death Of A Salesman's Doctrine : A Critical Look At Trademark Use, Michael Henry Davis
Death Of A Salesman's Doctrine : A Critical Look At Trademark Use, Michael Henry Davis
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
A trademark is a salesman. It does the work of its owner by wearing a smile, by presenting a good image, and in Willy Loman's words, by being well liked. It is, of course, the usual view that the death of the salesman, Willy Loman, was a suicide. Due to the assault upon the requirement of prior trademark use and the growth of a token use doctrine, what happened to Willy Loman has happened to the trademark use doctrine. In the end, it seemed too expensive and it was killed off—partially by its own hand, due to its own internal …
Park 'N Fly, Inc. V. Dollar Park And Fly, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Park 'N Fly, Inc. V. Dollar Park And Fly, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Note On Caselaw Showing The “Property” Issue - 1984, Wendy J. Gordon
Note On Caselaw Showing The “Property” Issue - 1984, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
The "misappropriation as property" issue has surfaced in Lanham Act
Likelihood Of Confusion Under The Lanham Act: A Question Of Fact, A Question Of Law, Or Both?, Janet Shiffler Thomas
Likelihood Of Confusion Under The Lanham Act: A Question Of Fact, A Question Of Law, Or Both?, Janet Shiffler Thomas
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Moral Rights For Artists Under The Lanham Act: Gilliam V. American Broadcasting Cos.
Moral Rights For Artists Under The Lanham Act: Gilliam V. American Broadcasting Cos.
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trademark Law - The First User Of An Abandoned Trademark Acquires The Secondary Meaning Associated With The Abandoned Mark By Virtue Of His First Use, Robert A. Kargen
Trademark Law - The First User Of An Abandoned Trademark Acquires The Secondary Meaning Associated With The Abandoned Mark By Virtue Of His First Use, Robert A. Kargen
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Trademarks-Successful Plaintiffs In Trademark Infringement Actions Under The Lanham Act May Not Recover Attorney's Fees-Maier Brewing Co. V. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In an action for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and for unfair competition, the District Court enjoined the defendant company from further use of the trademark and awarded the plaintiff $60,000 in attorney's fees. On appeal, held, reversed in part. The issuance of the injunction was upheld but the court declared that attorney's fees are not recoverable in trademark infringement cases prosecuted under the Lanham Act since Congress had not expressly provided for such awards.
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Several independent franchised soft ice-cream outlets brought suit for treble damages against Carvel Corporation, the franchising company, alleging that the contract between them constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of section 3 of the Clayton Act and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The contract bound the dealers to purchase from Carvel-appointed suppliers all commodities sold as part of the retail dairy composite. Plaintiffs stipulated that they would rely on per se violations at trial. The district court found that the plaintiffs had failed to show the alleged violations and, in any case, the defendant had proved …
Trademarks-Unfair Competition-Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction Under Section 43(A) Of The Lanham Act, Harry T. Edwards
Trademarks-Unfair Competition-Scope Of Federal Jurisdiction Under Section 43(A) Of The Lanham Act, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a manufacturer and distributor of engine bearings and connecting rods for internal combustion engines, brought suit in a federal district court to enjoin the defendant from marketing and distributing the latter's products in containers which closely resembled those of the plaintiff, thereby falsely representing that the goods were produced by and originated with the plaintiff. The cause of action was based solely on section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. In dismissing the complaint, the district court ruled that any attempt to characterize the complaint as charging a "false description or representation" was without merit, and that "false designation of …
Trademarks - Extraterritorial Application Of The Lanham Act, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Trademarks - Extraterritorial Application Of The Lanham Act, William R. Luney S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, an American corporation, had manufactured and sold women's undergarments in the United States and Canada since 1917, under a U.S. registered trademark, "Vanity Fair." Defendant, a Canadian corporation, had registered the same trademark in Canada in 1915, and for this reason plaintiff's application for a Canadian trademark was denied in 1919. From 1945 to 1953, defendant purchased plaintiff's trademarked goods for resale in Canada. In 1953, defendant began selling goods of Canadian manufacture with its own Vanity Fair trademark, and threatened its competitors in Canada with infringement suits if they continued to sell plaintiff's trademarked goods. In an action …
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Federal Jurisdiction In Trade-Mark Infringement Proceedings Under The Lanham Act, Richard R. Dailey
Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - Federal Jurisdiction In Trade-Mark Infringement Proceedings Under The Lanham Act, Richard R. Dailey
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's trade-mark, "Minute Maid," had been registered under the Lanham Act in 1952 and had been used in interstate commerce in connection with the sale of frozen fruit juice concentrates since that time. Defendant's trade-mark consisted in part of the words "Minute Made." Defendant used its mark wholly within the State of Florida in the processing and sale of frozen meat products. Both plaintiff and defendant were Florida corporations. In a suit for trade-mark infringement, jurisdiction of the federal district court depended. on the provisions of the Lanham Act. The complaint alleged damage to plaintiff's good will established in interstate …
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Woe Unto You Trade-Mark Owners, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
THE new Trade-Mark Act,1 widely heralded as giving added protection to trade-mark owners, has in its nearly four years of operation resulted, in several spectacular instances, in narrowing the rights conferred by the registration and use of trade-marks. Text author Rudolph Callmann remarked after the act's first birthday: "Despite all the efforts of the bar, our courts still cling to the familiar anachronisms."2 Where do trade-mark owners stand today? The Supreme Court has to date failed to answer this question, and the federal courts have refused to consider the import of the new legislation. Many commentators, attorneys and scholars thought …