Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Commercial Law

Journal

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication

Articles 271 - 284 of 284

Full-Text Articles in Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Unfair Competition—Public Will Be Protected Although Plaintiff Has No Standing In Court, John L. Goodell Apr 1951

Unfair Competition—Public Will Be Protected Although Plaintiff Has No Standing In Court, John L. Goodell

Buffalo Law Review

Stably, Inc. v. M. H. Jacobs Co., 183 F. 2d 914 (7th.Cir. 1950), cert. denied 95 L. Ed. 146.

Go to article

The Structure Of American Industry, Edited By Walter Adams, Norman Bursler Jan 1951

The Structure Of American Industry, Edited By Walter Adams, Norman Bursler

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Interstate V. Intrastate Commerce Apr 1950

Interstate V. Intrastate Commerce

Indiana Law Journal

Recent Cases: Interstate Commerce

Go to article

Cartels Or Competition? The Economics Of International Controls By Business And Government, By George W. Stocking And Myron W. Watkins, Theodore J. Kreps Jan 1949

Cartels Or Competition? The Economics Of International Controls By Business And Government, By George W. Stocking And Myron W. Watkins, Theodore J. Kreps

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Price Discriminations And Their Justifications Under The Robinson-Patman Act Of 1936, John T. Haslett Feb 1948

Price Discriminations And Their Justifications Under The Robinson-Patman Act Of 1936, John T. Haslett

Michigan Law Review

The Robinson-Patman Act was approved by the President on June 19, 1936. The purpose of the act was to amend section 2 of the Clayton Act, which prohibited price discriminations in interstate commerce. Congress, by amending section 2 of the Clayton Act, broadened the scope of the section by extending its purposes and prohibitions to price discriminations not formerly covered and by prohibiting other forms of discrimination which give favored purchasers undue cost advantages over their non-favored competitors. It also reduced the extent of requisite competitive injury.

Go to article

Interstate Commerce-Freight-Rate Discrimination-Action By The Interstate Commerce Commission And The Supreme Court, John F. Buchman, Iii Feb 1948

Interstate Commerce-Freight-Rate Discrimination-Action By The Interstate Commerce Commission And The Supreme Court, John F. Buchman, Iii

Michigan Law Review

The attack upon alleged discrimination against industrial development of the South, Southwest, and West by the maintenance of higher freight-rates on shipments from those sections to the greater markets of the North and East has followed two plans: (1) complaint to the Interstate Commerce Commission to remedy the discrimination by the exercise of its power over the rates themselves; (2) anti-trust action against the agencies through which the rates are initiated. The second plan of attack is illustrated by prosecutions brought by the Department of Justice Anti-Trust Division against forty-seven western railroads for illegal conspiracy to set unfair freight-rates, and …

Go to article

Trade Restraints - Unlawful Trade Statutes - Sales By Employers To Employees Of Goods Not Handled In Regular Course Of Business, Jay W. Sorge Apr 1942

Trade Restraints - Unlawful Trade Statutes - Sales By Employers To Employees Of Goods Not Handled In Regular Course Of Business, Jay W. Sorge

Michigan Law Review

The title of that once popular tune may soon be changed to "I Can't Get It For You Wholesale." During the last two years the legislatures of four states have passed laws making it unlawful for employers, either individuals, corporations, or other associations, to sell merchandise or other products to their employees unless these articles were actually manufactured by the employer or sold by him in the regular course of his business. It is the purpose of this comment to discuss the need and advisability of such legislation, the statutes which have been enacted, and their enforcement and constitutionality.

Go to article

Trade Restraints - Is The United States A Person Within The Treble Damages Provision Of The Sherman Antitrust Act?, William C. Whitehead Nov 1941

Trade Restraints - Is The United States A Person Within The Treble Damages Provision Of The Sherman Antitrust Act?, William C. Whitehead

Michigan Law Review

The United States filed a complaint charging that defendants had attempted collusively to fix prices in bids submitted by them to the federal government. A judgment for three times the money damages sustained was sought under the Sherman Antitrust Act. Held, that the United States is not a person within section 7 of the act under which relief was demanded. United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U. S. 600, 61 S. Ct. 742 (1941).

Go to article

Trade Barriers Created By Business, Corwin D. Edwards Dec 1940

Trade Barriers Created By Business, Corwin D. Edwards

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Constitutional Law-Interstate Commerce Apr 1937

Constitutional Law-Interstate Commerce

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Federal Trade Commission - False And Misleading Advertising Apr 1933

Federal Trade Commission - False And Misleading Advertising

Michigan Law Review

The law provided neither practical remedies nor suitable means of preventing false and misleading advertising before the passage of the Federal Trade Commission Act in 1914. The doctrine of caveat emptor had long prevented the effectual protection of misled customers and of competitors consequently injured. True, competitors could enjoin or recover damages-for injury by misleading advertising which took the form of common law "unfair competition." The courts had found no great difficulty in extending established common law principles to make unlawful such obvious violations of the proprietary rights of particular competitors as "simulation" and "disparagement." Although there is little question …

Go to article

Note And Comment, Edwin C. Goddard, George Seletto, Edson R. Sunderland, Victor H. Lane, Burke Shartel, George E. Longstaff May 1922

Note And Comment, Edwin C. Goddard, George Seletto, Edson R. Sunderland, Victor H. Lane, Burke Shartel, George E. Longstaff

Michigan Law Review

Carriers - Second Cummins Amendment - It was seven years after the Carmack Amendment of the Hepburn Act of i9o6 before the Supreme Court began that series of decisions, extending from Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491 (1913), to George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 236 U. S. 278 (1915), which directly resulted in the First Cummins Amendment of March, 1915. One has only to read those cases, reviewed in 13 Micn. L. REv. 59o, and other notes referred to in 17 MICH. L. Rzv. 183, to see that the language of the Cummins …

Go to article

Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review Mar 1909

Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Assignment for Creditors--Validity of Common Law Assignment Under State Statutes--Assignee May Maintain Replevin; Bills and Notes--Fraud--Ability to Read; Bills and Notes--Signature by Agent or Representative--Personal Liability; Boundaries--Meander Line as Boundary in Government Grants--Mistake in Survey; Carriers--Liability as Carriers of Live Stock; Contracts--Antenuptial Agreements--Performance Prevented by Party; Courts--Supreme Court--Review of Decisions of State Courts; Courts--United States Courts Enjoining Proceedings in State Courts--establishment of Railroad Rates by Commission; Criminal Law--Larceny--Fraudulent Use of Legal Process; Criminal Law--Reception of Verdict--Accused's Right to be Present; Dead Bodies--Power of Court to Order Exhumation to Procure Evidence; Evidence--Burden of Proof; Evidence--compelling Accused to Criminate Himself--Waiver of Privilege; …

Go to article

Note And Comment, Edward S. Rogers, Horace Lafayette Wilgus, Edward A. Macdonald, Floyd Olds, J. Fred Bingham, Michael F. Shannon, Sidney F. Duffey Mar 1909

Note And Comment, Edward S. Rogers, Horace Lafayette Wilgus, Edward A. Macdonald, Floyd Olds, J. Fred Bingham, Michael F. Shannon, Sidney F. Duffey

Michigan Law Review

The Doctrine of Unfair Trade; Valuing Property and Franchises of Public Service Corporations for Fixing Rates; Right of the Interstate Commerce Commission to Adduce Testimony; Rule in Shelley's Case controls Estate Created by Deed to Trustee; The Right of the Garnishee to Dispose of Goods in His Possession While the Litigation is Pending; The Police Power, Billboards and Sky Signs; How Far the Record of Voting Machines is Conclusive;

Go to article

First Prev