Law Commons^™

Compensation Under The Microscope: Pardons And Compensation, Jeffrey Gutman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

A governor’s pardon power is a potentially double-edged sword. On the one hand, a governor can provide justice for a deserving criminal defendant when the judicial branch cannot or does not act. On the other hand, the governor can use the pardon power for less altruistic purposes, such as to benefit friends or political allies.

The most recent controversial use of the pardon power occurred in Kentucky. According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, Governor Matt Bevin of Kentucky issued 670 pardons and commutations during his last two months of office, including 254 pardons issued in the month between his re-election defeat …

U.S. Department Of Justice Executive Branch Engagement On Litigating The Administrative Procedure Act, Aram Gavoor, Steven A. Pratt

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The Administrative Procedure Act is a broadly worded statute that has benefitted from caselaw to fill many of its gaps, ambiguities, and inconsistencies. But the case method directs judicial attention to slivers of APA inquiry that are required to resolve cases in as-applied challenges to rules and adjudications. There is another method of APA interpretation that has never been deployed in the statute’s 77-year life—that of intentional collaboration between the executive branch and the judiciary. Acting on their litigation and case management authorities as well as their unique power to persuade the judiciary on questions of administrative procedure, the Attorney …

Compensation Under The Microscope: Michigan, Jeffrey Gutman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Michigan’s state compensation statute took effect in 2017. It has been in effect long enough to allow pre-statute exonerees to file and resolve state claims. But, the statute is not so old such that prior processes for resolving claims skew the statistics. There was, however, initial uncertainty over the proper statute of limitations by which a claim must be filed in the Michigan Court of Claims. The Court of Claims’ interpretation led to the dismissal of about ten claims. Those were appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, the legislature amended the statute retroactively to impose a more generous …

Data Is What Data Does: Regulating Use, Harm, And Risk Instead Of Sensitive Data, Daniel J. Solove

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Heightened protection for sensitive data is becoming quite trendy in privacy laws around the world. Originating in European Union (EU) data protection law and included in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), sensitive data singles out certain categories of personal data for extra protection. Commonly recognized special categories of sensitive data include racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, health, sexual orientation and sex life, biometric data, and genetic data.

Although heightened protection for sensitive data appropriately recognizes that not all situations involving personal data should be protected uniformly, the sensitive data approach …

The Digital Services Act And The Brussels Effect On Platform Content Moderation, Dawn C. Nunziato

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The EU’s latest regulation of social media platforms – the recently enacted Digital Services Act – will create tensions and conflicts with the US speech regime applicable to social media platforms. The DSA, like the precursor regulations of social media platforms by the EU, will further instantiate the Brussels Effect, whereby EU regulators wield powerful influence on how social media platforms moderate content on the global scale. This is because the DSA’s regulatory regime (with its huge penalties for noncompliance) will incentivize the platforms to skew their global content moderation policies toward the EU’s instead of the United States’s balance …

First Amendment Protections For “Good Trouble”, Dawn C. Nunziato

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In the classical era of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, activists and protestors sought to march, demonstrate, stage sit-ins, speak up, and denounce the system of racial oppression in our country. This was met not just by counterspeech—the preferred response within our constitutional framework—but also by efforts by the dominant power structure to censor and shut down those forms of public rebuke of our nation’s racist practices. Fast forward seventy years, and the tactics of the dominant power structure have essentially remained the same in response to today’s civil rights activists who seek to protest …

Who Are Quality Shareholders And Why You Should Care, Lawrence A. Cunningham

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Delaware may be the country's last best hope for maintaining balance and rationality in the country's system of corporate governance, as its policies advance the interests of quality shareholders, those with a deep and abiding interest in a particular corporation, rather than the agendas of assorted interest groups seeking to use the corporate form for parochial purposes. The text is based upon the 37th Annual Francis X. Pileggi Distinguished Lecture in Law which Professor Cunningham presented in February 2023 to the Delaware bench and bar and to the faculty and students of Delaware Law School.

Firearms And Initial Aggressors, Cynthia Lee

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Under the initial aggressor doctrine, an “initial aggressor” loses the right to claim self-defense. Until recently, judges, legal scholars, and others have paid relatively little attention to this doctrinal limitation on the defense of self-defense. Two high-profile criminal trials in 2021 put the initial aggressor doctrine front and center of the national conversation on issues concerning self-defense and racial justice. One involved Kyle Rittenhouse, the 17-year-old teenager who brought an AR-15 style rifle to Kenosha, Wisconsin during the third night of racial protests in August 2020, and ended up shooting three men, killing two and injuring the third. The other …

The Limitations Of Privacy Rights, Daniel J. Solove

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Individual privacy rights are often at the heart of information privacy and data protection laws. The most comprehensive set of rights, from the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), includes the right to access, right to rectification (correction), right to erasure, right to restriction, right to data portability, right to object, and right to not be subject to automated decisions. Privacy laws around the world include many of these rights in various forms.

In this article, I contend that although rights are an important component of privacy regulation, rights are often asked to do far more work than they …

Compensation Under The Microscope: Florida, Jeffrey Gutman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Of the states with more than ten exonerees and with long-standing wrongful compensation statutes, Florida has the second-lowest percentage of exonerees who apply for compensation after Missouri. This edition of “Compensation Under the Microscope” explores some explanations for the low rate of filing and, thus, the low level of compensation awarded in Florida.

Medicare For All, Health Justice, And The Laboratories Of Democracy, Elenore Wade

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

A growing majority of Americans support the implementation of a national single-payer healthcare program, also known as Medicare for All, which would shift payments for healthcare services to a single public payer and provide care based on need rather than ability to pay. However, legislators, scholars, and advocates have suggested state governments rather than the federal government should take the lead by implementing state-based single-payer programs. Dozens of single-payer proposals have been introduced in state legislatures across the country, and proposed legislation in Congress would remove the federal roadblocks to state-based single-payer’s implementation. Proponents of state-based single-payer rely on the …

Organizational Conflicts Of Interest: Cautionary Tales, Jessica Tillipman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

A recent, high-profile investigation involving McKinsey & Company (McKinsey) and its contracts with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reminded us that organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs) are an integrity issue that never should be written off as a check-the-box exercise during the procurement process. This incident highlighted the need to address critical gaps in this area of the law. This article appeared in the August 2022 issue of Contract Management magazine published by the National Contract Management Association. Used with permission.

Between A Rock And A Hard Place? Ict Companies, Armed Conflict, And International Law, Arturo J. Carrillo

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

What is an ICT company to do when operating in the midst of international armed conflict like the one raging in Ukraine? How should tech company executives respond to urgent government demands – often conflicting -- to propagate or censor online content arising in the context of war, including disinformation? And what of their demands to access the personal data or communications of users, ostensibly to safeguard security but nonetheless presenting the potential for abuse? Governments make difficult demands of ICT companies by seeking to impose heavy restrictions on the free flow of information and data privacy via the latter’s …

The Democratic (Il)Legitimacy Of Assembly-Line Litigation, Jessica Steinberg, Colleen F. Shanahan, Anna E. Carpenter, Alyx Mark

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In response to Daniel Wilf-Townsend’s Assembly-Line Plaintiffs we take a panoramic picture of state civil courts, and debt cases in particular, and name specific features of the courts that must be taken into account in crafting reform prescriptions. In doing so, we question both the democratic legitimacy of debt collection courts and the adequacy of incremental reform that targets the structure of litigation. Part I contributes two critical components to Wilf-Townsend’s rich description of consumer debt cases: pervasive intersectional inequality among pro se defendants and a record of fraud among top filers. We add a sharper focus on the racial, …

The Field Of State Civil Courts, Anna E. Carpenter, Alyx Mark, Colleen F. Shanahan, Jessica Steinberg

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This symposium Issue of the Columbia Law Review marks a moment of convergence and opportunity for an emerging field of legal scholarship focused on America’s state civil trial courts. Historically, legal scholarship has treated state civil courts as, at best, a mere footnote in conversations about civil law and procedure, federalism, and judicial behavior. But the status quo is shifting. As this Issue demonstrates, legal scholars are examining our most common civil courts as sites for understanding law, legal institutions, and how people experience civil justice. This engagement is essential for inquiries into how courts shape and respond to social …

How Should The Court Respond To The Combination Of Political Polarity, Legislative Impotence, And Executive Branch Overreach?, Richard J. Pierce Jr

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In this essay, Professor Pierce discusses two related problems that the Supreme Court must address—the large increase in nationwide preliminary injunctions issued by district judges to prohibit the executive branch from implementing major federal actions and the large increase in the number of cases in which the Supreme Court either stays or refuses to stay preliminary injunctions without providing an adequate explanation for its action. He begins by describing the sources of the two problems and the many ways in which they threaten our system of justice. He then urges the Court to issue an opinion in which it provides …

Taking Stock Of The “Compatibility Requirement”: What Limitations Does It Impose For High Seas Fishing?, Sean D. Murphy

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Under the contemporary law of the sea, coastal States enjoy sovereign rights within their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) to manage and exploit fishery resources. At the same time, States maintain the traditional freedom to fish on the high seas subject to some treaty obligations, including those arising from regional management fisheries organizations (RMFOs) and other treaties, such as (once it enters into force) the agreement on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ agreement). Given that straddling stocks and highly migratory species of fish move with ease between EEZs and the high …

Harman And Lorandos’ False Critique Of Meier Et Al.’S Family Court Study, Joan S. Meier, Sean Dickson, Chris S. O'Sullivan, Leora N. Rosen

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Jennifer Harman and Demosthenes Lorandos purport to have identified numerous methodological flaws in our 2019 study of family court outcomes in cases involving abuse and alienation allegations (“FCO study”; Meier et al., 2019). At least half of the supposed flaws they itemized relate to one claim - that they were unable to access our methods and data. They treat the claimed lack of public access as evidence that our study is unreliable, while speculating about other potential flaws. Yet we note - and they acknowledge - that most of the methodological information they sought was in fact available before publication …

The Trouble With Harman And Lorandos’S Attempted Refutation Of The Meier Et Al. Family Court Study, Joan S. Meier, Sean Dickson, Chris S. O'Sullivan, Leora N. Rosen

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Harman and Lorandos assert that they have produced a study analyzing custody cases involving alienation allegations, which “disconfirms” the findings from our study of family court out- comes in cases involving abuse and alienation. In addition to pointing out the authors’ misrepresentation and mis-reporting of some of their findings, this Response details a series of profound flaws in their study’s design, dataset construction and variable coding, interpretations and analytic approach, as well as a series of statistical errors. The statistical analyses demonstrate that Harman and Lorandos’s five findings of a gender bias in favor of fathers are not supported by …

The Failure Of Data Security Law, Daniel J. Solove, Woodrow Hartzog

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

In this book chapter, we survey the law and policy of data security and analyze its strengths and weaknesses. Broadly speaking, there are three types of data security laws: (1) breach notification laws; (2) security safeguards laws that require substantive measures to protect security; and (3) private litigation under various causes of action. We argue that despite some small successes, the law is generally failing to combat the data security threats we face.

Breach notification laws merely require organizations to provide transparency about data breaches, but the laws don’t provide prevention or a cure. Security safeguards laws are often enforced …

Breached! Why Data Security Law Fails And How To Improve It (Chapter 1), Daniel J. Solove, Woodrow Hartzog

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Digital connections permeate our lives—and so do data breaches. Given that we must be online for basic communication, finance, healthcare, and more, it is remarkable how difficult it is to secure our personal information. Despite the passage of many data security laws, data breaches are increasing at a record pace. In their book, BREACHED! WHY DATA SECURITY LAW FAILS AND HOW TO IMPROVE IT (Oxford University Press 2022), Professors Daniel Solove and Woodrow Hartzog argue that the law fails because, ironically, it focuses too much on the breach itself.

Drawing insights from many fascinating stories about data breaches, Solove and …

Appointing Arbitrators: Tenure, Public Confidence, And A Middle Road For Isds Reform, Thomas D. Grant, F. Scott Kieff

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

When parties bring claims under investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”) procedures, who should serve as decision-maker? Relevant par- ties ask the question in different settings and with different criteria in mind. A party in a dispute, contemplating ISDS proceedings, whether by it or against it, likely will focus on the qualities of particular individuals available to serve as arbitrators. Party-appointed panelists charged under the applicable instrument with choosing a neutral or chair, and institutional appointing authorities charged with that task or with choosing arbitrators in default of party choice, will also turn their minds to candidate assessment. Different individuals or institutions …

Academic Brands And Online Education, Paul S. Berman

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Online education both does and does not radically transform higher education and higher education brands. On the one hand, providing courses online potentially allows universities to reach a worldwide audience, helps them globalize their brand, changes the cost structure for both students and institutions, and could reshape the competitive branding landscape among universities. On the other hand, university brands are surprisingly regional, low student–faculty ratios are still necessary for truly high-quality education, and the online competitive landscape might ultimately simply replicate reputational hierarchies forged over decades in the world of on-campus education. Thus, although the idea that online learning will …

Strange Bedfellows? Representative Democracy And Academic Engagement With The Defense Industry, Steven L. Schooner, Evan Matsuda

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This chapter concludes a book that grew out of 2015 a conference hosted by the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law, which brought together defense industry leaders, academics, and lawyers to discuss ethical challenges to the defense industry. Authors from the academy, practitioners, and policy-makers offer perspectives and insights such that the collection spans a broad range of disciplines, from philosophy, economics, law, and political science, to the management of corporate compliance.

In addition to attempting (no doubt unsuccessfully) to tie many of the book's themes together, the chapter itself asserts that the academic community …

Comment Letter On Sec Climate Disclosure Proposal By 21 Law And Finance Professors, Lawrence A. Cunningham

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This comment letter, by a group of 21 professors of law and finance, expresses concern that the SEC’s recent proposal to impose extensive mandatory climate-related disclosure rules on public companies (the “Proposal”) exceeds the SEC’s authority. In addition, rather than provide “investor protection,” the Proposal seems to be heavily influenced by a small but powerful cohort of institutional investors, mostly index funds and asset managers, promoting climate consciousness as part of their business models. The analysis raises concerns that the Proposal is neither necessary nor appropriate for either investor protection or the public interest and will not promote other statutory …

Temporal Issues Relating To Bit Dispute Resolution, Sean D. Murphy

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

An investor–State tribunal formed under a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) may be called upon to determine its jurisdiction ratione temporis based on various “critical dates” such as: the date of entry into force of the BIT; the date when the investment was made; the date when the investor acquired the requisite nationality; the date of the alleged breach; the date when the investor first acquired knowledge of the alleged breach and of its loss; and/or the date when the dispute arose. When confronted with such temporal issues, tribunals over the past two decades have often reverted to the “secondary” rules …

Judicial Review Of Scientific Uncertainty In Climate Change Lawsuits: Deferential And Nondeferential Evaluation Of Agency Factual And Policy Determinations, Robert L. Glicksman, Daniel Kim, Keziah Groth-Tuft

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

Scientific determinations are often at the heart of environmental disputes. When those disputes take the form of litigation, the courts may be called on to determine whether an administrative agency’s treatment of the science warrants deference. For several reasons, judges are inclined to apply deferential review to agency factual and policy science-based determinations. Most judges are not trained in the language and methods of science. They may be reluctant to intervene on matters on which their lack of expertise risks producing uninformed judgments. If a statute delegates to an agency the responsibility of making those determinations, courts may be loath …

The New Separation Of Powers Formalism And Administrative Adjudication, Robert L. Glicksman, Richard E. Levy

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The Supreme Court has entered a new era of separation of powers formalism. Others have addressed many of the potentially profound consequences of this return to formalism for administrative law. This paper focuses on an aspect of the new formalism that has received little attention—its implications for the constitutionality of administrative adjudication. The Court has not engaged in an extensive discussion or reformulation of its separation of powers jurisprudence concerning administrative adjudication since its highly functionalist decision in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor more than three decades ago, but recent opinions of individual Justices show signs that such a …

Comment Letter To The U.S. Treasury Department Regarding The Risks Of Stablecoins, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This letter responds to the U.S. Treasury Department’s request for public comments on President Biden’s Executive Order No. 14067, “Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets” (Mar. 9, 2022). This letter contends that (1) digital stablecoins currently pose significant risks to U.S. financial markets and investors, (2) stablecoins will create great dangers for our financial system, economy, and society if they become a widely-accepted form of payment for consumer and commercial transactions, and (3) allowing Big Tech firms and other commercial enterprises to issue and distribute stablecoins would seriously undermine our nation’s longstanding policy of separating banking and commerce.

In view …

Copyright: A Contemporary Approach, Robert Brauneis, Roger Schechter

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This Fall 2022 Supplement is the product of our effort to capture important developments in copyright law since the publication of the second edition of Copyright: A Contemporary Approach. It includes three new principal cases. The first two are Supreme Court decisions: the 2021 fair use decision in Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (p. 18), and the 2020 decision about copyright protection for state statutes in Georgia v. Public.Resources.Org (p. 58).. The third is an excerpt from the Second Circuit’s fair use decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (p.37), a decision that the Supreme Court has decided to …