Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civic and Community Engagement (1)
- Cognition and Perception (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Community-Based Learning (1)
- Community-Based Research (1)
-
- Criminal Law (1)
- Demography, Population, and Ecology (1)
- Human Factors Psychology (1)
- Inequality and Stratification (1)
- Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Other Sociology (1)
- Politics and Social Change (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Psychology and Interaction (1)
- Sociology of Culture (1)
- Theory, Knowledge and Science (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Apologies Of The Rich And Famous: Cultural, Cognitive, And Social Explanations Of Why We Care And Why We Forgive, Janet M. Ruane, Karen Cerulo
Apologies Of The Rich And Famous: Cultural, Cognitive, And Social Explanations Of Why We Care And Why We Forgive, Janet M. Ruane, Karen Cerulo
Department of Sociology Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works
In recent years, U.S. and other Western media have inundated the public with celebrity apologies. The public (measured via representative opinion polls) then expresses clear ideas about who deserves forgiveness. Is forgiveness highly individualized or tied to broader social, cultural, and cognitive factors? To answer this question, we analyzed 183 celebrity apologies offered between October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2012. Results are twofold and based in both cultural and social psychological perspectives. First, we found that public forgiveness is systematically tied to discursive characteristics of apologies—particularly sequential structures. Certain sequences appear to cognitively prime the public, creating associative links …
Invasions Of Conscience And Faked Apologies, Stephanos Bibas
Invasions Of Conscience And Faked Apologies, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
This comment responds to an essay by Jeffrie Murphy, which powerfully notes the limitations and dangers of using remorse and apology as metrics for punishment. But the state is more justified in teaching lessons than Murphy suggests, and retributivism ought to make more room for victim vindication and satisfaction. Gauging sincerity, while difficult, is not impossible. In the end, Murphy offers strong reasons to be cautious. But a humane society ought to be more willing to take chances and, having punished, to forgive. The essay by Jeffrie Murphy to which this comment responds, as well as other authors' comments on …