Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Agency discretion (1)
- Algorithmic regulation (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Canons of construction (1)
-
- Congressional nullification (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Dodd-Frank Act (1)
- Enabling legislation (1)
- Government regulation (1)
- Information technology (1)
- Law enforcement (1)
- Legislative oversight (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Mandated regulation (1)
- Organic statute (1)
- Public administration (1)
- Public opinion (1)
- Resource extraction disclosure rule (1)
- Risk assessment (1)
- Securities & Exchange Commission (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Public Administration
Solving The Congressional Review Act’S Conundrum, Cary Coglianese
Solving The Congressional Review Act’S Conundrum, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
Congress routinely enacts statutes that require federal agencies to adopt specific regulations. When Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010, for example, it mandated that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopt an anti-corruption regulation requiring energy companies to disclose payments they make to foreign governments. Although the Dodd-Frank Act specifically required the SEC to adopt this disclosure requirement, the agency’s eventual regulation was also, like other administrative rules, subject to disapproval by Congress under a process outlined in a separate statute known as the Congressional Review Act (CRA).
After the SEC issued its …
From Negative To Positive Algorithm Rights, Cary Coglianese, Kat Hefter
From Negative To Positive Algorithm Rights, Cary Coglianese, Kat Hefter
All Faculty Scholarship
Artificial intelligence, or “AI,” is raising alarm bells. Advocates and scholars propose policies to constrain or even prohibit certain AI uses by governmental entities. These efforts to establish a negative right to be free from AI stem from an understandable motivation to protect the public from arbitrary, biased, or unjust applications of algorithms. This movement to enshrine protective rights follows a familiar pattern of suspicion that has accompanied the introduction of other technologies into governmental processes. Sometimes this initial suspicion of a new technology later transforms into widespread acceptance and even a demand for its use. In this paper, we …