Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Kennesaw State University (16)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (7)
- Claremont Colleges (4)
- Loyola University Chicago (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
-
- University of Richmond (4)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- The University of San Francisco (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- American University in Cairo (2)
- Bellarmine University (2)
- Liberty University (2)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Syracuse University (2)
- University of Connecticut (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Ursinus College (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- Antioch University (1)
- Arcadia University (1)
- California State University, Monterey Bay (1)
- California State University, San Bernardino (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Clark University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Dartmouth College (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (9)
- Democracy (5)
- Legitimacy (4)
- Sovereignty (4)
- Terrorism (4)
-
- Ethics (3)
- European Union (3)
- Globalization (3)
- Human rights (3)
- Justice (3)
- Punishment (3)
- Rawls (3)
- United States (3)
- 14th Amendment (2)
- Abortion (2)
- Canada (2)
- Capitalism (2)
- Citizenship (2)
- Competency (2)
- Constitutionalism (2)
- Crime (2)
- Cultural heritage (2)
- Fair play (2)
- Habermas (2)
- Humanitarian intervention (2)
- Immigration (2)
- International Criminal Court (2)
- International Law (2)
- International law (2)
- Interviews (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Maya Heritage (16)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects (4)
- Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- CMC Senior Theses (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
-
- International Bulletin of Political Psychology (3)
- Theses and Dissertations (3)
- Undergraduate Honors Theses (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- Global Tides (2)
- Honors Scholar Theses (2)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (2)
- Philosophy Faculty Publications (2)
- Political Science Faculty Publications (2)
- Politics Honors Papers (2)
- San Diego Law Review (2)
- Undergraduate Theses (2)
- Antioch University Dissertations & Theses (1)
- Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Capstone Projects and Master's Theses (1)
- Capstone Showcase (1)
- Capstones (1)
- Catalyst: A Social Justice Forum (1)
- College of Law - Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Departmental Honors & Graduate Capstone Projects (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 102 of 102
Full-Text Articles in Legal Theory
Of Sweatshops And Human Subsistence: Habermas On Human Rights, David Ingram
Of Sweatshops And Human Subsistence: Habermas On Human Rights, David Ingram
Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works
In this paper I argue that the discourse theoretic account of human rights defended by Jürgen Habermas contains a fruitful tension that is obscured by its dominant tendency to identify rights with legal claims. This weakness in Habermas’s account becomes manifest when we examine how sweatshops diminish the secure enjoyment of subsistence, which Habermas himself (in recognition of the UDHR) recognizes as a human right. Discourse theories of human rights are unique in tying the legitimacy of human rights to democratic deliberation and consensus. So construed, their specific meaning and force is the outcome of historical political struggle. However, unlike …
Perpetual Conflict Or Compromise? The Cost Of Domestic Legitimacy In The Realm Of Women's Human Rights: A Case Study On The Right To An Abortion, Kim Andrea Kelly
Perpetual Conflict Or Compromise? The Cost Of Domestic Legitimacy In The Realm Of Women's Human Rights: A Case Study On The Right To An Abortion, Kim Andrea Kelly
Honors Scholar Theses
With its turbulent and volatile legal evolution, the right to an abortion in the United States still remains a highly contested issue and has developed into one of the most divisive topics within modern legal discourse. By deconstructing the political underpinnings and legal rationale of the right to an abortion through a systematic case law analysis, I will demonstrate that this right has been incrementally destabilized. This instability embedded in abortion jurisprudence has been primarily produced by a combination of textual ambiguity in the case law and judicial ambivalence regarding this complex area of law. In addition, I argue that …
The Duty To Obey The Law, David Lefkowitz
The Duty To Obey The Law, David Lefkowitz
Philosophy Faculty Publications
Under what conditions, if any, do those the law addresses have a moral duty or obligation to obey it simply because it is the law? In this essay, I identify five general approaches to carrying out this task, and offer a somewhat detailed discussion of one or two examples of each approach. The approaches studied are: relational-role approaches that appeal to the fact that an agent occupies the role of member in the political community; attempts to ground the duty to obey the law in individual consent or fair play; natural duty approaches; instrumental approaches; and philosophical anarchism, an approach …
On Moral Arguments Against A Legal Right To Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention, David Lefkowitz
On Moral Arguments Against A Legal Right To Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention, David Lefkowitz
Philosophy Faculty Publications
As the international response to recent events in Darfur demonstrates, the restriction of authority to intervene to the United Nations poses the greater legal barrier to intervention. From a practical perspective, then, the more pressing question may be whether international law ought to be modified to permit states, or multi-state organizations, to carry out unilateral humanitarian interventions; that is, interventions that are not authorized by the United Nations. The issue here is essentially a moral one: would the incorporation of a right to unilateral humanitarian intervention entail a moral improvement to international law – for example, a decrease in the …
Conscientious Communities: The Question Of The Government Legislation Of Morality, Lindsay Nicole Jenkins
Conscientious Communities: The Question Of The Government Legislation Of Morality, Lindsay Nicole Jenkins
Honors Program Theses
Clearly, the issue of government legislation of morality is a relevant issue in American society today. It is a complicated issue, to be sure, but it is a question that is deserving of time and contemplation. In this paper, I will argue that not only should the government be allowed to legislate morality, but that it is imperative that it does. Additionally, I will refute common disputes against this stance, as well as delve into the intricacies of the implementation of this policy. Finally, I will paint a picture of how a modem United States would function while allowing the …
The Black And White Of Profiling: Sniping On The Sniper Case, Ibpp Editor
The Black And White Of Profiling: Sniping On The Sniper Case, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article analyzes the construct of profiling in the aftermath of the arrest of two suspects in the recent sniper attacks perpetrated in the greater Washington, D.C. area.
Terrorism And Legal Competence: A Reader's Opinion, Ibpp Editor
Terrorism And Legal Competence: A Reader's Opinion, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
A reader, a police officer from a Pacific Basin Country, wishing to remain anonymous, reacts to IBPP article "Terrorism and Legal Competence" (V. 1, No. 1, November 8, 1996), discussing that article's treatment of terrorism and versions of legal competency. Religious as well as intolerance are likewise discussed.
Terrorism And Legal Competence, Ibpp Editor
Terrorism And Legal Competence, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
The editor examines the concept of legal concept of competency in context of terrorism.
No-Fault Marital Dissolution: The Bitter Triumph Of Naked Divorce, J Herbie Difonzo
No-Fault Marital Dissolution: The Bitter Triumph Of Naked Divorce, J Herbie Difonzo
San Diego Law Review
In this Article, the author examines the origins of the no-fault divorce movement, concluding that the abandonment of fault grounds was conceived as a conservative measure intended to facilitate the reversal of the escalating divorce rate and to replace traditional marital dissolution with therapeutic divorce. This reform collapsed at mid-point, achieving only the jettisoning of divorce grounds. The author argues that an unintended consequence of the reform battle was the transformation from mutual consent divorce, the operating milieu for most of the twentieth century, into divorce on demand. The author concludes that this transformation has resulted in a significant loss …
Religious Contributions In Public Deliberation, Jeremy Waldron
Religious Contributions In Public Deliberation, Jeremy Waldron
San Diego Law Review
This Article commences with an excerpt from a "Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy" published in 1986 by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Through this letter, the author leads us to the question, "What part should doctrines and arguments rooted in religious beliefs play in public debate?" The author views such religious contributions as relevant to secular politics. He recommends that people value rethinking the structure of their premises, and see the value of an open, challenging, and indeterminate form of public deliberation in which nothing is taken for granted. He concludes that we can …
Play Fair With Punishment, Richard Dagger
Play Fair With Punishment, Richard Dagger
Political Science Faculty Publications
If we want to provide a justification for legal punishment, then, we must answer two distinct questions: (1) What justifies punishment as a social practice? and (2) What justifies punishing particular persons? The principle of fair play is an especially attractive theory of punishment, I shall agree, because it offers plausible and compelling answers to both these questions. I shall also suggest that there is a third question - How should we punish those who commit crimes? - that fair play cannot answer without help from other sources.
Conflict In Context: The Sanctioning Of Draft Resisters, 1963-76, Ilene Nagel Bernstein, John Hagan
Conflict In Context: The Sanctioning Of Draft Resisters, 1963-76, Ilene Nagel Bernstein, John Hagan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this paper we examine the sanctioning of one type of political deviance, draft resistance, in two different social and political contexts: an era of coercive control and a period of cooptive control. A focus on the sanctioning of draft resisters allows a unique opportunity to examine the societal response to what the New Criminologists (Taylor et al., 1973:267) describe as the "purposive creator and innovator of action" whose crimes are the product of ". . . individual or collective action taken to Resolve... inequalities of power and interest." Our data cover a fourteen year period and consist of information …