Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (18)
- Political Science (14)
- Sociology (13)
- Economic Policy (11)
- International Economics (10)
-
- International and Area Studies (10)
- Economic Theory (9)
- Growth and Development (8)
- Public Policy (8)
- Arts and Humanities (7)
- Inequality and Stratification (7)
- Law (7)
- Politics and Social Change (7)
- American Politics (5)
- Business (5)
- Economic History (5)
- Environmental Studies (5)
- Geography (5)
- Political Theory (5)
- Asian Studies (4)
- History (4)
- Macroeconomics (4)
- Political History (4)
- Public Economics (4)
- Race and Ethnicity (4)
- Regional Economics (4)
- Social Policy (4)
- Institution
-
- City University of New York (CUNY) (9)
- Singapore Management University (8)
- University of Richmond (8)
- Claremont Colleges (3)
- Mississippi State University (3)
-
- UFM Madrid (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Macalester College (2)
- Northern Michigan University (2)
- University of Denver (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Boise State University (1)
- Center for the Blue Economy (1)
- Clark University (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Colby College (1)
- Fordham University (1)
- Gettysburg College (1)
- Illinois Wesleyan University (1)
- Institute of Business Administration (1)
- Michigan Technological University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Syracuse University (1)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (1)
- University of Mississippi (1)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (6)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects (5)
- Publications and Research (4)
- Emancipations: A Journal of Critical Social Analysis (3)
- Journal of New Finance (3)
-
- Research Collection School Of Economics (3)
- Research Collection School of Social Sciences (3)
- Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Honors Theses (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Political Science Faculty Publications (2)
- Asian Management Insights (1)
- Books (1)
- CMC Faculty Publications and Research (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Department of Economics: Faculty Publications (1)
- Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports (1)
- Economics Honors Projects (1)
- Faculty Research - Newspaper and Magazine Articles (1)
- Geography Honors Projects (1)
- Gettysburg Social Sciences Review (1)
- Global Tides (1)
- Harvey M. Applebaum ’59 Award (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Political Science Theses and Capstones (1)
- Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee (1)
- Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business (1)
- Scripps Faculty Publications and Research (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 65 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Political Economy
A Rejoinder To Abraham Hirsch, Samuel Hollander, Sandra J. Peart
A Rejoinder To Abraham Hirsch, Samuel Hollander, Sandra J. Peart
Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications
The dispute between Hollander and Peart, and Hirsch, turns on the nature and role of verification in Mill’s perception of the appropriate method for Political Economy. Professor Hirsch maintains against us that, for Mill, the models constructed by political economists are insulated from verification. His case is based on two counterclaims. First, that when Mill writes of “verification” in Book III of the Logic, he has in mind a procedure differing from that appropriate for Political Economy, which allows only “indirect verification” (outlined in Book VI). Hirsch finds that Hollander and Peart confuse the two. Secondly, since the contexts …
John Stuart Mill's Method In Principle And In Practice: A Review Of The Evidence, Samuel Hollander, Sandra J. Peart
John Stuart Mill's Method In Principle And In Practice: A Review Of The Evidence, Samuel Hollander, Sandra J. Peart
Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications
We believe an additional, and contrasting, interpretation of Mill’s method is supported by the evidence. For in our view Mill insisted on the possibility of theory modification in the light of inadequacies revealed by empirical evidence, and also held that the central behavioral axiom is not of universal relevance but is pertinent only to the local circumstances of contemporary Great Britain and America—and, even so, qualified as we shall see—that axiom itself is empirically based. On our reading, there is more in common between his research strategy and that of Milton Friedman than is sometimes granted, at least when Friedman’s …
Jean Ensminger. Making A Market: The Institutional Transformation Of An African Society (Book Review), Sandra F. Joireman
Jean Ensminger. Making A Market: The Institutional Transformation Of An African Society (Book Review), Sandra F. Joireman
Political Science Faculty Publications
The publication of Making a Market marks yet another excellent contribution to the field from the Cambridge Series on Political Economy. Similar to the other volumes in the series, it emphasizes the interaction of political structures and institutions with economic change. Yet whereas most of the previous volumes in the series have been written by political scientists or economists, this book stands out as unique in that it is written from an anthropological perspective. Unusual as this is, the book gives an extremely sophisticated and readable application of the new institutional economics to the developing world.
Book Review: The Poor And The Powerless: Economic Policy And Change In The Caribbean, By Clive Y. Thomas, Winston Langley
Book Review: The Poor And The Powerless: Economic Policy And Change In The Caribbean, By Clive Y. Thomas, Winston Langley
Trotter Review
With only brief interludes, the Caribbean area has for the past five centuries been a center of global power struggles and internal sociopolitical upheavals of the first order. Those struggles and upheavals show no signs of abating as we move into the twenty-first century. Indeed, there appears to be a consensus among scholars and political leaders in the region that the area now faces problems of crisis proportions.
Puerto Rico: Colonialism Revisited, Sherrie Baver
Puerto Rico: Colonialism Revisited, Sherrie Baver
Publications and Research
Because Puerto Rico is not systematically consulted on issues central to its development and because this situation has become so obvious to all island officials during the last decade, elites across the entire Puerto Rican political spectrum felt pressured to ""come out of the colonial closet," tentatively in August 1977 and forthrightly in 1978.3 Every summer since, spokespersons from all political parties have gone before the UN Decolonization Committee to protest the status quo in Puerto Rico. Before 1977, only Puerto Rican Independentistas (who win only a small percentage in island elections), Cuba, and the Soviet Union had labeled Puerto …