Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Agriculture (1)
- Agronomy and Crop Sciences (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Behavior and Ethology (1)
- Botany (1)
-
- Child Psychology (1)
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (1)
- Food Processing (1)
- Food Science (1)
- History (1)
- History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Native American Studies (1)
- Other Plant Sciences (1)
- Plant Sciences (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Biological and Physical Anthropology
Ua37/13 Plants Used By The Prehistoric Indians Of Kentucky, Chuck Crume
Ua37/13 Plants Used By The Prehistoric Indians Of Kentucky, Chuck Crume
Faculty/Staff Personal Papers
No one knows exactly when the Indians first entered the area we now call Kentucky, but there is an approximation. Archeologists have found evidence of Clovis camps and living sites in the state (9,000 to 12,000 B.P.), This would have been during the Paleo Stage, toward the end of the last ice age. The climate of the area would have been much cooler then. The selection of plants and animals would also have been different than those found in modern times.
Paleo Indians used plants for food, utility and medical uses. It seems that plant use during this period is …
Sex Differences In The Recognition Of Infant Facial Expressions Of Emotion: The Primary Caretaker Hypothesis, Raymond B. Hames, Wayne A. Babchuk
Sex Differences In The Recognition Of Infant Facial Expressions Of Emotion: The Primary Caretaker Hypothesis, Raymond B. Hames, Wayne A. Babchuk
Department of Anthropology: Faculty Publications
Although much research has been devoted to studying sex differences In functioning (e.g., Maccoby and Jacklin 1974), most efforts have been directed toward documenting or elucidating the proximate causes of sex differences. Few attempts have been made, however, to explain the ultimate causes of these differences or the selective pressures that have led to the development or psychological differences between males and females [for exception see Symons (1979) and Daly and Wilson (1983)]. Toward this end of blending psychology with evolutionary theory we develop what we call the " primary caretaker hypothesis," which predicts that the sex that through evolutionary …