Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Control (3)
- Externalities (3)
- Permit Markets (3)
- Curbside Recycling (2)
- Emissions (2)
-
- Estimating (2)
- Estimation (2)
- GIS (2)
- Global (2)
- Housing Amenities (2)
- Hypothetical Bias (2)
- Public Goods (2)
- Stagnant Streams (2)
- A Bayesian Examination of Information and Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation (1)
- A Contingent Ranking Analysis of Curbside Waste Disposal Options (1)
- Abatement Units (1)
- Africa (1)
- Agriculture Activities (1)
- Analysis (1)
- Beef heifer (1)
- Benefit (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bioceonomic model (1)
- Can Fighting Grade Inflation Help the Bottom Line? (1)
- Carbon Dioxide (1)
- Carbon sequestration (1)
- Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence from CVM (1)
- Choice experiment (1)
- Coexistence (1)
- Comparison (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Agricultural and Resource Economics
Estimating Willingness To Pay For Curbside Recycling With Detection And Mitigation Of Hypothetical Bias, Arthur J. Caplan
Estimating Willingness To Pay For Curbside Recycling With Detection And Mitigation Of Hypothetical Bias, Arthur J. Caplan
Applied Economics Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Household Valuation Of Curbside Recycling, David M. Aadland, Arthur J. Caplan
Household Valuation Of Curbside Recycling, David M. Aadland, Arthur J. Caplan
Applied Economics Faculty Publications
This paper looks at the willingness to pay for and participate in a curbside recycling program based on a survey of 401 residents in Ogden, Utah. Modifying the Cameron and James (1987) econometric model to fit ordered-interval data, we estimate that the mean willingness to pay for curbside recycling is $2.05 per month, and that 72% of the residents would willingly participate in such a program. Furthermore, females, young people, college-educated, those currently recycling without monetary reward, those regarding recycling as beneficial to the community and nation, and those with relatively high incomes are willing to pay the most for …
Winners And Losers In A World With Global Warming: Noncooperation, Altruism, And Social Welfare, Arthur J. Caplan, Christopher J. Ellis, Emilson C. D. Silva
Winners And Losers In A World With Global Warming: Noncooperation, Altruism, And Social Welfare, Arthur J. Caplan, Christopher J. Ellis, Emilson C. D. Silva
Applied Economics Faculty Publications
In this paper, global warming is an asymmetric transboundary externality which benefits some countries or regions and harms others. We use a simple two-country model to analyze the effects of global warming on resource allocations, the global-warming stock, and national and global welfare.