Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Statistical Models (3)
- Statistical Theory and Methods (2)
- Bayesian methods (1)
- ChIP-Seq (1)
- Clinical Trials (1)
-
- Computational Biology/Bioinformatics (1)
- Confidence region (1)
- Counting process (1)
- Decision Theory (1)
- Estimating equation (1)
- High Throughput Sequencing (1)
- High-dimensional Time Series (1)
- League Tables (1)
- Media Publications (1)
- Mixed models (1)
- Percentiles (1)
- Proportional mean residual life model (1)
- Random effect block bootstrap (1)
- Rare outcomes; case-control; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; targeted minimum loss-based estimation; causal inference; average treatment effect (1)
- Right-censoring (1)
- Robust estimation (1)
- Survival Analysis (1)
- Unit-level models (1)
- Variance components (1)
- Wilks's theorem (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Statistical Models
An Outlier Robust Block Bootstrap For Small Area Estimation, Payam Mokhtarian, Ray Chambers
An Outlier Robust Block Bootstrap For Small Area Estimation, Payam Mokhtarian, Ray Chambers
Payam Mokhtarian
Small area inference based on mixed models, i.e. models that contain both fixed and random effects, are the industry standard for this field, allowing between area heterogeneity to be represented by random area effects. Use of the linear mixed model is ubiquitous in this context, with maximum likelihood, or its close relative, REML, the standard method for estimating the parameters of this model. These parameter estimates, and in particular the resulting predicted values of the random area effects, are then used to construct empirical best linear unbiased predictors (EBLUPs) of the unknown small area means. It is now well known …
Spectral Density Shrinkage For High-Dimensional Time Series, Mark Fiecas, Rainer Von Sachs
Spectral Density Shrinkage For High-Dimensional Time Series, Mark Fiecas, Rainer Von Sachs
Mark Fiecas
Estimating Effects On Rare Outcomes: Knowledge Is Power, Laura B. Balzer, Mark J. Van Der Laan
Estimating Effects On Rare Outcomes: Knowledge Is Power, Laura B. Balzer, Mark J. Van Der Laan
Laura B. Balzer
Many of the secondary outcomes in observational studies and randomized trials are rare. Methods for estimating causal effects and associations with rare outcomes, however, are limited, and this represents a missed opportunity for investigation. In this article, we construct a new targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) for the effect of an exposure or treatment on a rare outcome. We focus on the causal risk difference and statistical models incorporating bounds on the conditional risk of the outcome, given the exposure and covariates. By construction, the proposed estimator constrains the predicted outcomes to respect this model knowledge. Theoretically, this bounding provides …
Big Data And The Future, Sherri Rose
Loss Function Based Ranking In Two-Stage, Hierarchical Models, Rongheng Lin, Thomas A. Louis, Susan M. Paddock, Greg Ridgeway
Loss Function Based Ranking In Two-Stage, Hierarchical Models, Rongheng Lin, Thomas A. Louis, Susan M. Paddock, Greg Ridgeway
Rongheng Lin
Several authors have studied the performance of optimal, squared error loss (SEL) estimated ranks. Though these are effective, in many applications interest focuses on identifying the relatively good (e.g., in the upper 10%) or relatively poor performers. We construct loss functions that address this goal and evaluate candidate rank estimates, some of which optimize specific loss functions. We study performance for a fully parametric hierarchical model with a Gaussian prior and Gaussian sampling distributions, evaluating performance for several loss functions. Results show that though SEL-optimal ranks and percentiles do not specifically focus on classifying with respect to a percentile cut …
Curriculum Vitae, Tatiyana V. Apanasovich
Curriculum Vitae, Tatiyana V. Apanasovich
Tatiyana V Apanasovich
No abstract provided.
A Statistical Framework For The Analysis Of Chip-Seq Data, Pei Fen Kuan, Dongjun Chung, Guangjin Pan, James A. Thomson, Ron Stewart, Sunduz Keles
A Statistical Framework For The Analysis Of Chip-Seq Data, Pei Fen Kuan, Dongjun Chung, Guangjin Pan, James A. Thomson, Ron Stewart, Sunduz Keles
Sunduz Keles
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq) has revolutionalized experiments for genome-wide profiling of DNA-binding proteins, histone modifications, and nucleosome occupancy. As the cost of sequencing is decreasing, many researchers are switching from microarray-based technologies (ChIP-chip) to ChIP-Seq for genome-wide study of transcriptional regulation. Despite its increasing and well-deserved popularity, there is little work that investigates and accounts for sources of biases in the ChIP-Seq technology. These biases typically arise from both the standard pre-processing protocol and the underlying DNA sequence of the generated data.
We study data from a naked DNA sequencing experiment, which sequences non-cross-linked DNA after deproteinizing and …
A Note On Empirical Likelihood Inference Of Residual Life Regression, Ying Qing Chen, Yichuan Zhao
A Note On Empirical Likelihood Inference Of Residual Life Regression, Ying Qing Chen, Yichuan Zhao
Yichuan Zhao
Mean residual life function, or life expectancy, is an important function to characterize distribution of residual life. The proportional mean residual life model by Oakes and Dasu (1990) is a regression tool to study the association between life expectancy and its associated covariates. Although semiparametric inference procedures have been proposed in the literature, the accuracy of such procedures may be low when the censoring proportion is relatively large. In this paper, the semiparametric inference procedures are studied with an empirical likelihood ratio method. An empirical likelihood confidence region is constructed for the regression parameters. The proposed method is further compared …
Ensuring The Comparability Of Comparison Groups: Is Randomization Enough?, Vance Berger, Sherri Rose
Ensuring The Comparability Of Comparison Groups: Is Randomization Enough?, Vance Berger, Sherri Rose
Sherri Rose
It is widely believed that baseline imbalances in randomized trials must necessarily be random. In fact, there is a type of selection bias that can cause substantial, systematic and reproducible baseline imbalances of prognostic covariates even in properly randomized trials. It is possible, given complete data, to quantify both the susceptibility of a given trial to this type of selection bias and the extent to which selection bias appears to have caused either observable or unobservable baseline imbalances. Yet, in articles reporting on randomized trials, it is uncommon to find either these assessments or the information that would enable a …