Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Design of Experiments and Sample Surveys Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Design of Experiments and Sample Surveys
The Usefulness Of Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments For The Design Of Preclinical And Clinical Studies, Rob B.M. De Vries, Kimberley E. Weaver, Marc T. Avey, Martin Stephens, Emily S. Sena, Marlies Leenaars
The Usefulness Of Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments For The Design Of Preclinical And Clinical Studies, Rob B.M. De Vries, Kimberley E. Weaver, Marc T. Avey, Martin Stephens, Emily S. Sena, Marlies Leenaars
Experimentation Collection
The question of how animal studies should be designed, conducted, and analyzed remains underexposed in societal debates on animal experimentation. This is not only a scientific but also amoral question. After all, if animal experiments are not appropriately designed, conducted, and analyzed, the results produced are unlikely to be reliable and the animals have in effect been wasted. In this article, we focus on one particular method to address this moral question, namely systematic reviews of previously performed animal experiments. We discuss how the design, conduct, and analysis of future (animal and human) experiments may be optimized through such systematic …
Initiation And Continuation Of Randomized Trials After The Publication Of A Trial Stopped Early For Benefit Asking The Same Study Question: Stopit-3 Study Design, Gabriela J. Prutsky, Juan Domecq, Patricia J. Erwin, Matthias Briel, Victor M. Montori, Elie A. Akl, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Dirk Bassler, Stefan Schandelmaier, Stephen D. Walter, Qi Zhou, Pablo Coello, Lorenzo Moja, Martin Walter, Kristian Thorlund, Paul Glasziou, Regina Kunz, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Jason Busse, Xin Sun, Annette Kristiansen, Benjamin Kasenda, Osama Qasim-Agha, Gennaro Pagano, Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Gerard Urrutia, Mohammad Murad, Gordon Guyatt
Initiation And Continuation Of Randomized Trials After The Publication Of A Trial Stopped Early For Benefit Asking The Same Study Question: Stopit-3 Study Design, Gabriela J. Prutsky, Juan Domecq, Patricia J. Erwin, Matthias Briel, Victor M. Montori, Elie A. Akl, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Dirk Bassler, Stefan Schandelmaier, Stephen D. Walter, Qi Zhou, Pablo Coello, Lorenzo Moja, Martin Walter, Kristian Thorlund, Paul Glasziou, Regina Kunz, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Jason Busse, Xin Sun, Annette Kristiansen, Benjamin Kasenda, Osama Qasim-Agha, Gennaro Pagano, Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Gerard Urrutia, Mohammad Murad, Gordon Guyatt
Wayne State University Associated BioMed Central Scholarship
Abstract
Background
Randomized control trials (RCTs) stopped early for benefit (truncated RCTs) are increasingly common and, on average, overestimate the relative magnitude of benefit by approximately 30%. Investigators stop trials early when they consider it is no longer ethical to enroll patients in a control group. The goal of this systematic review is to determine how investigators of ongoing or planned RCTs respond to the publication of a truncated RCT addressing a similar question.
Methods/design
We will conduct systematic reviews to update the searches of 210 truncated RCTs to identify similar trials ongoing at the time of publication, or started …
Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments Demonstrate Poor Contributions To Human Healthcare, Andrew Knight
Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments Demonstrate Poor Contributions To Human Healthcare, Andrew Knight
Experimentation Collection
Widespread reliance on animal models during preclinical research and toxicity testing assumes their reasonable predictivity for human outcomes. However, of 20 published systematic reviews examining human clinical utility located during a comprehensive literature search, animal models demonstrated significant potential to contribute toward clinical interventions in only two cases, one of which was contentious. Included were experiments expected by ethics committees to lead to medical advances, highly-cited experiments published in major journals, and chimpanzee experiments—the species most generally predictive of human outcomes. Seven additional reviews failed to demonstrate utility in reliably predicting human toxicological outcomes such as carcinogenicity and teratogenicity. Results …
Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments Demonstrate Poor Human Clinical And Toxicological Utility, Andrew Knight
Systematic Reviews Of Animal Experiments Demonstrate Poor Human Clinical And Toxicological Utility, Andrew Knight
Experimentation Collection
The assumption that animal models are reasonably predictive of human outcomes provides the basis for their widespread use in toxicity testing and in biomedical research aimed at developing cures for human diseases. To investigate the validity of this assumption, the comprehensive Scopus biomedical bibliographic databases were searched for published systematic reviews of the human clinical or toxicological utility of animal experiments. In 20 reviews in which clinical utility was examined, the authors concluded that animal models were either significantly useful in contributing to the development of clinical interventions, or were substantially consistent with clinical outcomes, in only two cases, one …