Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Biostatistics
A Comparison Of 12 Algorithms For Matching On The Propensity Score, Peter C. Austin
A Comparison Of 12 Algorithms For Matching On The Propensity Score, Peter C. Austin
Peter Austin
Propensity-score matching is increasingly being used to reduce the confounding that can occur in observational studies examining the effects of treatments or interventions on outcomes. We used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the following algorithms for forming matched pairs of treated and untreated subjects: optimal matching, greedy nearest neighbor matching without replacement, and greedy nearest neighbor matching without replacement within specified caliper widths. For each of the latter two algorithms, we examined four different sub-algorithms defined by the order in which treated subjects were selected for matching to an untreated subject: lowest to highest propensity score, highest to lowest propensity …
The Performance Of Different Propensity Score Methods For Estimating Absolute Effects Of Treatments On Survival Outcomes: A Simulation Study, Peter C. Austin
The Performance Of Different Propensity Score Methods For Estimating Absolute Effects Of Treatments On Survival Outcomes: A Simulation Study, Peter C. Austin
Peter Austin
Observational studies are increasingly being used to estimate the effect of treatments, interventions and exposures on outcomes that can occur over time. Historically, the hazard ratio, which is a relative measure of effect, has been reported. However, medical decision making is best informed when both relative and absolute measures of effect are reported. When outcomes are time-to-event in nature, the effect of treatment can also be quantified as the change in mean or median survival time due to treatment and the absolute reduction in the probability of the occurrence of an event within a specified duration of follow-up. We describe …
Comparing Paired Vs. Non-Paired Statistical Methods Of Analyses When Making Inferences About Absolute Risk Reductions In Propensity-Score Matched Samples., Peter C. Austin
Peter Austin
Propensity-score matching allows one to reduce the effects of treatment-selection bias or confounding when estimating the effects of treatments when using observational data. Some authors have suggested that methods of inference appropriate for independent samples can be used for assessing the statistical significance of treatment effects when using propensity-score matching. Indeed, many authors in the applied medical literature use methods for independent samples when making inferences about treatment effects using propensity-score matched samples. Dichotomous outcomes are common in healthcare research. In this study, we used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the effect on inferences about risk differences (or absolute risk …
The Performance Of Different Propensity-Score Methods For Estimating Differences In Proportions (Risk Differences Or Absolute Risk Reductions) In Observational Studies, Peter C. Austin
Peter Austin
Propensity score methods are increasingly being used to estimate the effects of treatments on health outcomes using observational data. There are four methods for using the propensity score to estimate treatment effects: covariate adjustment using the propensity score, stratification on the propensity score, propensity-score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score. When outcomes are binary, the effect of treatment on the outcome can be described using odds ratios, relative risks, risk differences, or the number needed to treat. Several clinical commentators suggested that risk differences and numbers needed to treat are more meaningful for clinical …