Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Biostatistics
Estimating The Impact Of Community-Level Interventions: The Search Trial And Hiv Prevention In Sub-Saharan Africa, Laura Balzer, Maya Petersen, Joshua Schwab, Mark Van Der Laan
Estimating The Impact Of Community-Level Interventions: The Search Trial And Hiv Prevention In Sub-Saharan Africa, Laura Balzer, Maya Petersen, Joshua Schwab, Mark Van Der Laan
Laura B. Balzer
Evaluation of community level interventions to prevent HIV infection presents significant methodological challenges. Even when it is feasible to randomly assign a treatment versus control level of the intervention to each community in a sample, measurement of incident HIV infection remains difficult. In this talk we describe an experimental design developed for the SEARCH Trial, a large community randomized trial that will evaluate the impact of expanded treatment on incident HIV and other outcomes. Regular community-wide testing campaigns are conducted and a random sample of community members who fail to attend a campaign are tracked. The data generated by this …
Why Match In Individually And Cluster Randomized Trials?, Laura B. Balzer, Maya L. Petersen, Mark J. Van Der Laan
Why Match In Individually And Cluster Randomized Trials?, Laura B. Balzer, Maya L. Petersen, Mark J. Van Der Laan
Laura B. Balzer
The decision to match individuals or clusters in randomized trials is motivated by both practical and statistical concerns. Matching protects against chance imbalances in baseline covariate distributions and is thought to improve study credibility. Matching is also implemented to increase study power. This article compares the asymptotic efficiency of the pair-matched design, where units are matched on baseline covariates and the treatment randomized within pairs, to the independent design, where units are randomly paired and the treatment randomized within pairs. We focus on estimating the average treatment effect and use the efficient influence curve to understand the information provided by …
Why Match In Individually And Cluster Randomized Trials?, Laura Balzer, Maya Petersen, Mark Van Der Laan
Why Match In Individually And Cluster Randomized Trials?, Laura Balzer, Maya Petersen, Mark Van Der Laan
Laura B. Balzer
The decision to match individuals or clusters in randomized trials is motivated by both practical and statistical concerns. Matching protects against chance imbalances in baseline covariate distributions and is thereby thought to improve study credibility. Matching is also implemented to increase study power. Analogue to Rose and van der Laan (2009), this article investigates the asymptotic efficiency of pair-matching individuals or clusters relative to not matching in randomized trials. We focus on estimating the average treatment effect. We use the efficient influence curve to understand the information provided by each design for estimation of the target causal parameter. Our approach …
Sample Size Calculations For Roc Studies: Parametric Robustness And Bayesian Nonparametrics, Dunlei Cheng, Adam J. Branscum, Wesley O. Johnson
Sample Size Calculations For Roc Studies: Parametric Robustness And Bayesian Nonparametrics, Dunlei Cheng, Adam J. Branscum, Wesley O. Johnson
Dunlei Cheng
Methods for sample size calculations in ROC studies often assume independent normal distributions for test scores among the diseased and non-diseased populations. We consider sample size requirements under the default two-group normal model when the data distribution for the diseased population is either skewed or multimodal. For these two common scenarios we investigate the potential for robustness of calculated sample sizes under the mis-specified normal model and we compare to sample sizes calculated under a more flexible nonparametric Dirichlet process mixture model. We also highlight the utility of flexible models for ROC data analysis and their importance to study design. …