Pharmacy Administration, Policy and Regulation Commons^™

Promoting Scientific Impact At The Nih, Fred D. Ledley M.D.

CISI Publication

We are honored to offer our comments on Promoting Scientific Impact at the NIH in response to NOT-OD-26-087: Request for Information on Measuring and Rewarding Scientific Impact.

These comments are informed by my professional experience as the founding director of the Center for Integration of Science and Industry at Bentley University, which has a mission to “advance the translation of scientific discoveries for public value by engaging science, business, and policy in transdisciplinary dialogue, scholarship, and education.” Our approach is to bring together the perspectives of natural science, business, analytics, economics, law, and policy to better understand, and advance, the …

Comments Re: Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program And Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Fred D. Ledley M.D., Edward Zhou Pharm. D.

CISI Publication

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written comments in response to the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program proposed rule published on June 16, 2026 in the Federal Register. [1] We are answering as academic researchers with experience in medicine, pharmacy, biomedical research, and the biopharmaceutical industry. Our perspective is informed by extensive, published research on the economics and finance of pharmaceutical innovation, the value created by new medicines, and the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

We applaud the accomplishment of the IRA in establishing the precedent for the government to negotiate “fair market prices” for drugs on …

Comments Re: Commonsense Policy Options To Lower Drug Prices For Patients, Fred D. Ledley M.D., Edward Zhou Pharm. D.

CISI Publication

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written comment in response to the Senate Finance Committee Minority Staff’s “Request for Information: Commonsense Policy Options to Lower Drug Prices for Patients.” We are answering as academic researchers with experience in medicine and the biopharmaceutical industry. This comment will focus on sections I and III of the RFI.

We applaud the accomplishment of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in establishing the precedent for the government to negotiate “fair market” prices for drugs on terms that address both patients’ needs for affordability and industry’s need for a reasonable return on investment. Our analysis …

Mergers And Acquisitions (M&As) In Pharmaceutical Markets: Associations With Market Concentration, Prices, Drug Quantity Sold, And Shortages, J. Daniel Mcgeeney M.S., Aylin Sertkaya Ph.D., Leah Ross M.A., Fred Ledley M.D., Cody Hyman Ph.D.

CISI Publication

In recent decades, the pharmaceutical industry has become increasingly concentrated in the United States, in part due to mergers and acquisitions (M&As) between drug manufacturers. This consolidation from M&As has been cited as a key factor affecting drug prices and drug shortages (U.S. Federal Trade Commission, 2022). In this study, we assessed trends in pharmaceutical M&As during 2010–2023 and evaluated the characteristics of drugs and companies involved in those M&As. We considered the effects of M&As on market concentration, drug prices, drug quantity sold, and drug shortages. We also considered how these associations vary by drug characteristics, including brand drugs …

Comments Re: Draft Nih Intramural Research Program Policy: Promoting Equity Through Access Planning, Fred Ledley M.D., Edward Zhou Pharmd., Paula Chaves Da Silva Ph.D.

CISI Publication

We commend the NIH initiative to require that licensees of technologies that enable discovery or development of FDA-approved products arising from the NIH intramural program to include an Access Plan to promote “product affordability, availability, acceptability, and sustainability” and recognition that such protections are essential to ensuring a “return on taxpayers' investment in biomedical research.” Recognizing the complexity of anticipating appropriate terms for products that are in pre-clinical or early clinical development at the time of licensing, we also support the proposal that the Access Plan be submitted in late-stage clinical development, though we argue that …

Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program Draft Guidance, Fred Ledley M.D., Edward Zhou Pharmd, Paula Chaves Da Silva Ph.D.

CISI Publication

This comment focuses on Section 50.1, provisions 1 & 3 of the draft guidance regarding the negotiation of a “maximum fair price” under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), research and development (R&D) costs of the primary manufacturer, and prior federal financial support for novel therapeutic discovery and development. Specifically, we argue that a negotiated, “maximum fair price” must consider both public sector (federal) and private sector (manufacturer) investments and provide returns to both commensurate with the scale and risk of their investments. This comment addresses three issues and makes specific recommendations regarding each:

1. In negotiating a “maximum fair price,” both …

Tech Note 2024-1 A Novel Framework To Estimate Social And Private Value Created Through Commercialization Of A Pharmaceutical Product, Paula Chaves De Silva, Fred D. Ledley

CISI Publication

This framework posits that the value created by a new medicine is embodied in the total health value (health benefit) provided to those using the products. This value is then distributed between social value and private value by the price paid for the product and how these revenues are expensed for different purposes. In this framework, the social value created includes the residual health value (net price paid) along with the scientific value, jobs creation, and social payments to public sector organizations. The private value created includes shareholder value (change in market capitalization plus cash distributions to shareholders) as well …

Association Between Expedited Review Designations And The Us Or Global Burden Of Disease For Drugs Approved By The Us Food And Drug Administration, 2010–2019: A Cross-Sectional Analysis, Matthew J. Jackson, Gregory Vaughan, Fred D. Ledley

Natural & Applied Sciences Faculty Publications

Pharmaceutical innovation can contribute to reducing the burden of disease in human populations. This research asks whether products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2010 to 2019 and expedited review programmes incentivising development of products for serious disease were aligned with the US or global burden of disease.

Considering Returns On Federal Investment In The Negotiated “Maximum Fair Price” Of Drugs Under The Inflation Reduction Act: An Analysis, Edward W. Zhou, Paula G. Chaves Da Silva, Debbie Quijada, Fred D. Ledley

Natural & Applied Sciences Faculty Publications

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 contained landmark provisions authorizing government to negotiate a “maximum fair price” for selected Medicare Part D drugs considering the manufacturer’s research and development costs, federal support for discovery and development, the extent to which the drugs address unmet medical needs, and other factors. This working paper describes federal investment in the discovery and development of the ten drugs selected for price negotiation in the first year of the IRA as well as the health value created through Medicare Part D spending on these drugs. We identified $11.7 billion in NIH funding for basic …

Comments Re: Workshop On Transforming Discoveries Into Products: Maximizing Nih’S Levers To Catalyze Technology Transfer, Fred D. Ledley M.D., Edward Zhou Pharm. D, Paula Chaves Da Silva, Ph. D.

CISI Publication

We are pleased to offer written comments to this workshop focused on “… making federally funded inventions more accessible to the public… .” These comments are informed by recent research from the Center for Integration of Science and Industry at Bentley University that has:

• Quantified the scope of NIH funding for basic or applied research, clinical development, or patents associated with drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2019. This work identified $187 billion in NIH-funded research directly related to these drugs (applied research – 17%) or their biological targets (basic research – 83%), representing a (discounted) investment comparable to reported levels …

Spending On Phased Clinical Development Of Approved Drugs By The Us National Institutes Of Health Compared With Industry, Edward W. Zhou, Matthew J. Jackson, Fred D. Ledley

Natural & Applied Sciences Faculty Publications

The launch of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health to advance new cures and address public concern regarding drug prices has raised questions about the roles of government and industry in drug development.

This cross-sectional study examined NIH funding for published research reporting the results of phased clinical trials of drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 and compared the findings with reported industry spending estimates. Data analysis was performed between May 2021 and August 2022 using PubMed data from January 1999 through October 2021 and NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results data from January 1999 through …

Tech Note 2023-1 Nih Contribution To Phased Clinical Development Of Drugs Approved From 2010-2019, Edward Zhou, Matthew Jackson, Fred Ledley

CISI Publication

This report describes the methods and preliminary results for the manuscript titled, “Spending on Phased Clinical Development of Approved Drugs by the US National Institutes of Health Compared With Industry.”

Will Reducing Drug Prices Slow Innovation?, Gregory Vaughan, Fred Ledley

Mathematical Sciences Faculty Publications

The pharmaceutical industry has long argued that high drug prices reflect the high cost of innovation and that reducing drug prices would necessarily slow the pipeline of new drugs. These arguments have been bolstered by studies of large pharmaceutical companies showing statistical associations between the projected market size or revenue for pharmaceutical products and research & development (R&D) activity. Our analysis recognizes the increasingly important role of small biopharmaceuticals in drug development , companies that typically have little revenue and negative earnings, but are now responsible for more than 40% of new drug approvals. We examine the relationship between changes …

Will Reducing Drug Prices Slow Innovation?, Gregory Vaughan, Fred Ledley

Natural & Applied Sciences Faculty Publications

The pharmaceutical industry has long argued that high drug prices reflect the high cost of innovation and that reducing drug prices would necessarily slow the pipeline of new drugs. These arguments have been bolstered by studies of large pharmaceutical companies showing statistical associations between the projected market size or revenue for pharmaceutical products and research & development (R&D) activity. Our analysis recognizes the increasingly important role of small biopharmaceuticals in drug development , companies that typically have little revenue and negative earnings, but are now responsible for more than 40% of new drug approvals. We examine the relationship between changes …

Government As The First Investor In Biopharmaceutical Innovation: Evidence From New Drug Approvals 2010–2019, Ekaterina Galkina Cleary, Matthew J. Jackson, Fred D. Ledley

Natural & Applied Sciences Faculty Publications

The discovery and development of new medicines classically involves a linear process of basic biomedical research to uncover potential targets for drug action, followed by applied, or translational, research to identify candidate products and establish their effectiveness and safety.

This Working Paper describes the public sector contribution to that process by tracing funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) related to published research on each of the 356 new drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from 2010-2019 as well as research on their 218 biological targets.

Characterizing The Public Sector Contribution To Drug Discovery And Development: The Role Of Government As A First Investor, Ekaterina Galkina Cleary, Matthew Jackson, Andrew Acevedo, Fred D. Ledley

CISI Publication

This research is focused on examining the role of the public sector as an early investor in biopharmaceutical discovery and development. In the United States, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary source of funding for basic biomedical research designed to elucidate fundamental mechanisms of biology, health, and disease. This research is expected to establish the scientific foundation for the discovery and development of new biopharmaceutical products. This interim report reviews the linear model of innovation underlying these expectations, and evidence for the effectiveness of this pathway. We also describe new data demonstrating that every new drug approved …