Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology (1)
- Biology (1)
- Biomechanical Engineering (1)
- Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering (1)
- Cell Biology (1)
-
- Cell and Developmental Biology (1)
- Chemical Engineering (1)
- Cognitive Neuroscience (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Cognitive Science (1)
- Computational Engineering (1)
- Dynamics and Dynamical Systems (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Engineering Mechanics (1)
- Engineering Science and Materials (1)
- Mechanical Engineering (1)
- Mechanics of Materials (1)
- Membrane Science (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Computational Neuroscience
Nanoscale Modeling Of Membrane Systems Under Mechanical Deformation In Traumatic Brain Injury Using Molecular Dynamics, Anh Thi Ngoc Vo
Nanoscale Modeling Of Membrane Systems Under Mechanical Deformation In Traumatic Brain Injury Using Molecular Dynamics, Anh Thi Ngoc Vo
Theses and Dissertations
Neuronal membrane disruption and mechanoporation are nanoscale damage mechanisms that critically affect brain cell viability during traumatic brain injury (TBI). These nanoscale cellular impairments are elusive in experiments and necessitate in silico approaches such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Implementing MD, this research aims to investigate the effects of different key factors related to membrane deformation and damage, including force field resolutions, lipid compositions, and loading conditions.
To examine the impact of force field resolution, MD deformation simulations were conducted on 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) lipid bilayer membranes, using all-atom (AA), united-atom (UA), and coarse-grained Martini (CG-M) force fields. The mechanical responses …
Individual Differences In Structure Learning, Philip Newlin
Individual Differences In Structure Learning, Philip Newlin
Theses and Dissertations
Humans have a tendency to impute structure spontaneously even in simple learning tasks, however the way they approach structure learning can vary drastically. The present study sought to determine why individuals learn structure differently. One hypothesized explanation for differences in structure learning is individual differences in cognitive control. Cognitive control allows individuals to maintain representations of a task and may interact with reinforcement learning systems. It was expected that individual differences in propensity to apply cognitive control, which shares component processes with hierarchical reinforcement learning, may explain how individuals learn structure differently in a simple structure learning task. Results showed …