Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Fraud

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 61 - 69 of 69

Full-Text Articles in Torts

Torts-Negligent Misrepresentation-Duty Arising From Contract To Persons Not Parties Mar 1931

Torts-Negligent Misrepresentation-Duty Arising From Contract To Persons Not Parties

Michigan Law Review

The defendants, accountants, examined the books of the Stern Co., knowing that their balance sheet and 32 certified copies would be exhibited as a basis for future credit, but not knowing of the plaintiff particularly. Through negligence they failed to discover and report insolvency. Relying upon the report showing a solvent concern plaintiff extended credit to the Stem Co. He sued for his loss in two counts, negligence and fraud. Held, defendants had no duty to plaintiff to exercise due care, so he can not recover for negligence in the examination. But defendants might be liable for fraud as …


Vicarious Liability For Fraud And Deceit In Iowa, Frank Edward Horack Jan 1931

Vicarious Liability For Fraud And Deceit In Iowa, Frank Edward Horack

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Quasi-Contracts--Duress--Tort Action For Dec 1930

Quasi-Contracts--Duress--Tort Action For

Michigan Law Review

The court in the instant case implied by way of dictum that the plaintiff could have recovered if duress had existed. Perhaps as to the commissions sufficient benefit was conferred upon the defendant to form the basis of quasicontractual liability. WOODWARD, LAW OF QUASI-CONTRACTS, sec. 211; Astley v. Reynolds, 2 Strange 915; Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. Oriental Navigation Co., 127 Or. 655, 272 Pac. 275.


Recent Important Decisions Jun 1929

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.


Recent Important Decisions May 1926

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.


Infants' Contracts--Application Of Doctrine Of Estoppel When Infant Has Mispresented Age Feb 1926

Infants' Contracts--Application Of Doctrine Of Estoppel When Infant Has Mispresented Age

Michigan Law Review

It has been laid down that as a general rule the doctrine of estoppel has no application to infants. 31 C. J. 1005; 22 CYC. 512. But many cases recognize an exception to this general rule, where the infant has reached the age of discretion and has intentionally and fraudulently made misrepresentations. A common case is that in which the infant has induced a person to enter into a contract with him, by fraudulently representing himself to be of age. As to whether or not he will be estopped from setting up his infancy, in a suit on such contract, …


Recent Important Decisions Feb 1926

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.


Recent Important Decisions Apr 1925

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.


Recent Important Decisions Jun 1923

Recent Important Decisions

Michigan Law Review

A collection of recent important court decisions.