Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Contracts (22)
- Litigation (8)
- Banking and Finance Law (7)
- Legal Remedies (7)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
-
- Criminal Law (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Agency (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Evidence (4)
- Insurance Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Securities Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- Other Law (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Tax Law (3)
- Accounting Law (2)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Estates and Trusts (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (42)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- BLR (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Wyoming College of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (38)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 69
Full-Text Articles in Torts
The Law Of Interspousal Immunity In Ohio, James L. Deese
The Law Of Interspousal Immunity In Ohio, James L. Deese
Cleveland State Law Review
The purpose of this note will be to discuss Ohio's current position on interspousal immunity as well as the problems that are created by the retention of that doctrine.
Products Liability--The Expansion Of Fraud, Negligence, And Strict Tort Liability, John A. Sebert Jr.
Products Liability--The Expansion Of Fraud, Negligence, And Strict Tort Liability, John A. Sebert Jr.
Michigan Law Review
While judicial acceptance of this concept of strict tort liability has been proceeding apace, far less dramatic but equally significant developments have been occurring with respect to both negligence and fraud liability. The possibility of recovering for a seller's misrepresentations concerning his product has been enhanced by a plaintiff-oriented judicial redefinition of two elements of a cause of action for fraud: defendant's knowledge of the falsity of his representation and plaintiff's reliance upon the deception. At the same time, negligence liability has often come to resemble liability without fault as courts continue to deemphasize, as a prerequisite to the application …
Survey Of North Carolina Case Law: Torts: Part Two, Philip C. Thorpe
Survey Of North Carolina Case Law: Torts: Part Two, Philip C. Thorpe
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Negligent Misrepresentation: Fraud Or Negligence, June W. Wiener
Negligent Misrepresentation: Fraud Or Negligence, June W. Wiener
Cleveland State Law Review
Although there was no remedy for negligent misrepresentation at common law, and English law apparently still provides none, the American courts have all, in one way or another, accepted the thesis that "conscience, fair dealing and the usages of business require" some type of liability. But the nature and limits of that liability have never been clearly defined by the majority of American jurisdictions.
Torts-Negligent Misrepresentation-Abolition Of The Privity Requirement, Leon E. Irish
Torts-Negligent Misrepresentation-Abolition Of The Privity Requirement, Leon E. Irish
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, professional consulting engineers, contracted with the city of Chattanooga to design a sewage system. As part of their performance of the contract they prepared a report of geological conditions which was to be distributed by the city to prospective bidders. Plaintiff, a tunneling subcontractor, had no dealings with the defendants, but did rely on their report in making its bid. Because one of defendant's draftsmen carelessly omitted pertinent geological information from the report, it took plaintiff three weeks longer to complete the work than had been anticipated. Plaintiff sued defendant for damages for misrepresentation; held, plaintiff may recover. …
Rights Of Defrauded Quiz Show Contestants, Robert A. Sedler
Rights Of Defrauded Quiz Show Contestants, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Proximate Cause As A Primary Element Of Fraud, Karl P. Seuthe
Proximate Cause As A Primary Element Of Fraud, Karl P. Seuthe
Cleveland State Law Review
The legal criterion by which fraudulent or predatory motivation is judged is not the "conscience" of the actor. Rather the external manifestations of conscience constitute the test of this motivation. Conduct, rather than subjective thought, is most frequently the standard or test employed by the community. In modern legal systems, conduct is of small significance unless it has some outward consequence which is actually or potentially harmful to the actor or others; fraud is such a consequence.
Limitation Of Actions- Substantive And Remedial Statutes - Extension Of Statutory Period For Fraud, Max H. Bergman S.Ed.
Limitation Of Actions- Substantive And Remedial Statutes - Extension Of Statutory Period For Fraud, Max H. Bergman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought an action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act to recover damages from the defendant employer for an industrial disease allegedly contracted more than three years prior to bringing suit. Plaintiff alleged that defendant misrepresented the time within which this action could be brought and thereby tolled the three-year statute of limitations in the FELA. Held, defendant's motion to dismiss granted. The time limitation is an integral part of the statute creating a substantive right and is not extended by fraud or misrepresentation. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, (S.D. N.Y. 1957) 154 F. Supp. 863.
Contracts - Damages - Punitive Damages Awarded For Breach Accompanied By Fraudulent Act, Theodore G. Koerner
Contracts - Damages - Punitive Damages Awarded For Breach Accompanied By Fraudulent Act, Theodore G. Koerner
Michigan Law Review
Defendants contracted to purchase a crop of alfalfa from plaintiff, harvesting and processing to be done by defendants and payment to be ascertained according to the processed weight of the alfalfa. When defendants harvested the entire crop but failed to pay for the major part of it, plaintiff brought action for breach of contract. In addition to the non-payment, plaintiff alleged fraud on defendants' part in falsifying weight records and in otherwise scheming to cheat and defraud him. On defendants' appeal from a judgment including both compensatory and punitive damages, held, affirmed. Although punitive damages are not ordinarily recoverable …
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a minor child, brought a tort action against defendant for enticing her mother to desert her, thereby depriving plaintiff of support, maintenance, and maternal care and affection. The trial court sustained defendant's demurrer. On appeal, held, affirmed. The statutes of the state provide other means of support of the child, and he has no right of action for the deprivation of a parent's love and affection. Nelson v. Richwagen, (Mass. 1950) 95 N.E. (2d) 545.
Corporations-Blue Sky Laws-Liability Of Officers And Directors Of Corporation For Violation, L. W. Larson, Jr.
Corporations-Blue Sky Laws-Liability Of Officers And Directors Of Corporation For Violation, L. W. Larson, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued a corporation and its president to recover money paid for purchase of stock sold in violation of the ''blue sky" laws of Michigan. The president, through correspondence, had induced plaintiff to complete the purchase. Plaintiff had judgment below against both defendants. The president alone appealed, contending among other things that he was not an "agent" within the meaning of the statute. Held, affirmed. The word "agent" in the Michigan statute1 includes officers and directors of the corporation whether they are authorized "agents" or are holding themselves out as "agents" of the corporation. Cleland v. Smart, 321 …
Contracts-Remedies For Misrepresentation-Measure Of Recovery, Richard J. Archer S.Ed.
Contracts-Remedies For Misrepresentation-Measure Of Recovery, Richard J. Archer S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In a preceding comment in this series, the various remedies affording relief for misrepresentation were examined for the purpose of determining what remedies are available in case of an innocent misrepresentation. Discussion was directed toward actions for damages for deceit, actions at law and in equity for restitution, the recovery of damages for breach of warranty, and the action based on the enforcement of representations on a theory of estoppel. The purpose of the present comment is to re-examine these remedies to determine what relief can be obtained by each of them, assuming for this purpose that all of the …
Damages - Effect Of Defendant's Tender Of Specific Restitution Upon Plaintiff's Action To Recover The Value Of Property, William H. Kinsey
Damages - Effect Of Defendant's Tender Of Specific Restitution Upon Plaintiff's Action To Recover The Value Of Property, William H. Kinsey
Michigan Law Review
A person who has appropriated the land or chattels of another may prefer to return the subject matter rather than be held liable for its money equivalent in a law suit brought by the rightful owner. Whether the appropriator will improve his position by tendering specific restitution presents an interesting question. Because of the numerous remedies at the owner's disposal, it is impossible to formulate a single, concise answer.
Fraud - Negligent Misrepresentation - Liability Without Fault - Contributory Negligence As A Defense, Roy L. Rogers
Fraud - Negligent Misrepresentation - Liability Without Fault - Contributory Negligence As A Defense, Roy L. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff purchased a pearl necklace from the defendant. In a suit for fraud, plaintiff alleged that the defendant had misrepresented the quality of the necklace and his own expert ability. Before purchasing, plaintiff had secured the services of another expert. The trial court found that there was no reliance by the plaintiff on the defendant's misrepresentation and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Held, by the trial court, (1) that lack of reliance barred recovery for fraud; (2) that contributory negligence barred recovery for negligent misrepresentation; and (3) that if New York courts recognize a liability without …
Torts - Unfair Competition - Preventing Formation Of Contract, Anthony L. Dividio
Torts - Unfair Competition - Preventing Formation Of Contract, Anthony L. Dividio
Michigan Law Review
The Supreme Court of Minnesota was recently confronted with an interesting problem in the case of Johnson v. Gustafson. Real property was listed by the owner with the plaintiff, a real estate broker, who was to receive a $300 commission if she found a purchaser therefor. The plaintiff interested one Clarity in the property, but no offer to purchase was made. Desiring the property but being unwilling to pay the full price of $6,000, Clarity induced his friend Gustafson to purchase it for $5,700 with Clarity's money, directly from the owner, who had a right to sell it himself …
Torts - Violation Of Penal Statute As Civil Wrong - Bucketing - Intentional Wrong, Michigan Law Review
Torts - Violation Of Penal Statute As Civil Wrong - Bucketing - Intentional Wrong, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A statute prohibited bucketing operations by dealers in securities and commodities, and provided penalties for such offenses. Plaintiff alleges that, acting without knowledge of defendant's illegal operations, he gave the defendant an order for the purchase of stock, which, he says, was not executed, as defendant reported, but "bucketed" in a manner prohibited by statute. Plaintiff sued to recover damages. Defendant demurred on the grounds (1) that the transaction referred to was not bucketing, but (2) that if it was, defendants were not liable to this plaintiff as the latter was not within the class of persons intended to be …
Damage As Requisite To Rescission For Misrepresentation: Ii, Glenn A. Mccleary
Damage As Requisite To Rescission For Misrepresentation: Ii, Glenn A. Mccleary
Michigan Law Review
For the purpose of an analytical study of the decisions involving rescission for misrepresentation in which the damage problem has been considered, it seems convenient to classify the cases into three groups: (1) where the representee obtains the very thing that he expected to get, but it is worth less than he was led reasonably to expect under the representations made to him; (2) where the representee obtains something substantially different than he was led to expect; and (3) where the representee obtains the very thing that he expected and it is as valuable as he expected it to be, …
Damage As Requisite To Rescission For Misrepresentation, Glenn A. Mccleary
Damage As Requisite To Rescission For Misrepresentation, Glenn A. Mccleary
Michigan Law Review
The decadence of equity during the nineteenth century has long been an accepted phenomenon. The attempt to make law coincide with morals in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was followed in the nineteenth century by the gradual fixing of rules and a consequent stiffening of the legal systems, in which moral principles became lost in a mass of rules derived from such principles. What were once equitable doctrines tended to become mechanical rules. The former strength of equity has been weakened in the various jurisdictions, due in a large measure to the administration of law and equity by the same …
Torts - Fraudulent Interference With Testamentary Benefits, Michigan Law Review
Torts - Fraudulent Interference With Testamentary Benefits, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Instituting a suit for damages, plaintiff alleged by way of application for order of examination that defendants had, by fraudulent misrepresentations, diverted the established intention of decedent to provide for plaintiff in the testamentary disposition of decedent's estate, and consequently no disposition in plaintiff's favor was made, to plaintiff's loss. Held, that plaintiff stated a cause of action in tort. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 210 N. C. 679, 188 S. E. 390 (1936).
Automobiles - Statutory Liability Of Owner - Registered Titleholder Estopped To Deny Ownership, Michigan Law Review
Automobiles - Statutory Liability Of Owner - Registered Titleholder Estopped To Deny Ownership, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, injured in New York by an automobile driven by defendant's minor son, sued under a New York statute which makes the owner of an automobile liable for damages for injuries resulting from negligence of its operator. The automobile was registered in Connecticut in defendant's name to avoid compliance with the Connecticut statute which requires proof of financial responsibility as a prerequisite of registration for minors over sixteen years of age. Held, defendant estopped to prove ownership of the automobile in his son. Shuba v. Greendonner, 271 N. Y. 189, 2 N. E. (2d) 536 (1936), reversing 245 …
Quasi-Contract As An Alternative Remedy For Inducing Breach Of Tort
Quasi-Contract As An Alternative Remedy For Inducing Breach Of Tort
Michigan Law Review
In an action for money had and received, plaintiff alleged that the International Railroad Company owed plaintiff $40,000 as compensation for services rendered under an existing and valid contract of employment; that with knowledge of this fact defendant corporation, representing that it, and not plaintiff, was entitled to this sum, fraudulently conspired with International Railway Company that this sum be paid defendant instead of plaintiff, and that said amount was paid defendant, resulting in unjust enrichment under circumstances in which the law implies a promise on defendant's part to pay said sum to plaintiff. In reversing a judgment sustaining a …
Quasi-Contracts-Joinder Of Misrepresenting Agent In Purchaser's Action Against Principal For Rescission
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was induced to purchase stock in defendant corporation through representations as to its previous earning power made by agents of the corporation who were also joined as defendants. Plaintiff sued on a theory of rescission to recover the value of property transferred in exchange for the stock in question. Held, the agents of the corporation were properly joined as defendants. Kaufman v. Jaffee, 244 App. Div. 344,279 N. Y. S. 392 (1935).
Torts-Release Of Joint Tortfeasor
Torts-Release Of Joint Tortfeasor
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, vendee, sued defendant, vendor, upon an alleged fraudulent warranty that the cows, which were the subject matter of the sale, had been immunized against hemorrhagic septicaemia, or "shipping fever." While in transit, through the negligence of the railroad, the cows were injured. Their resistance to the disease was consequently lowered and they became infected, whereby plaintiff was damaged by consequent sterility, unmarketable milk, and abortions. Plaintiff accepted $1,500 from the railroad as "settlement in full for any liability you may be under." This settlement was pleaded as a bar to the action against the vendor. Held, that plaintiff's …
Quasi-Contracts -- Sufficiency Of Technical Benefit
Quasi-Contracts -- Sufficiency Of Technical Benefit
Michigan Law Review
A brokerage house, the R. Co., having purchased stock on margin for the plaintiff, requested a payment of $1100 in order to protect themselves in carrying the account. Doubting the financial stability of R. Co. the plaintiff decided to transfer the account to another firm, the defendant, and accordingly delivered to R. Co. a personal check naming the defendant as payee, at the same time orally directing R. Co. to transfer the stock and check to the defendant and from them receive payment in full. R. Co., however, falsely represented that the check was really theirs and that the plaintiff …
Agency- Liability Of Principal For Torts Of Agent-Apparent Authority
Agency- Liability Of Principal For Torts Of Agent-Apparent Authority
Michigan Law Review
Defendant regularly delivered goods to plaintiff C. O. D. Lambert was employed by defendant to deliver such goods and collect for them, and for this purpose he was given blank re6eipts which he was authorized to fill out and sign upon being paid for the goods. The usual course of business was for Lambert to deliver to plaintiff's shipping clerk who signed the delivery bill, and then collect from plaintiff's cashier who was stationed in another room. Plaintiff's cashier never asked to see this delivery bill, but always took Lambert's word as to the amount due. For a period of …
Torts - Federal Employers Liability Act - Misrepresentation To Gain Employment
Torts - Federal Employers Liability Act - Misrepresentation To Gain Employment
Michigan Law Review
P applied for a position as switchman with the defendant company. Defendant company had a rule that no one should be employed over the age of 45. Employees who had reached the age of 65 were pensioned but this limit was extended in some cases to 70. To gain employment, P, who was 49, represented that he was 38. He was accepted, and worked for 7 years when he was injured through defendant's negligence while engaged in interstate commerce. Held, his misrepresentation to gain employment did not bar recovery under the Federal Employers Liability Act, it not appearing that …
Torts - Fraud - Spoliation Of Will
Torts - Fraud - Spoliation Of Will
Michigan Law Review
In a suit in tort for damages, plaintiff alleged that defendant, heir-at-law of the decedent, suppressed a genuine will under which the plaintiff was devisee, and forged and fraudulently probated a will which did not contain the devise to the plaintiff who remained in ignorance of both the fraud and the existence of the genuine will for more than twenty years. The defendant demurred. Held, that the plaintiff has a cause of action in tort. Morton v. Pettit, 38 Ohio App. 348, 176 N.E. 494 (1930), aff'd., (Ohio 1931) 177 N.E. 591.
A Comparative Study Of The Statutory Survival Of Tort Claims For And Against Executors And Administrators, Alvin E. Evans
A Comparative Study Of The Statutory Survival Of Tort Claims For And Against Executors And Administrators, Alvin E. Evans
Michigan Law Review
The problem of the survival of actions after death of one of the parties is unfortunately not merely a mater of history. Like the poor, it is always with us. We can no longer profitably wave aside the problems likely to be presented by a comparative study of American legislation on survival by stating that our legislation covers the same general field as do the English statutes of 4 Edward III and 3 and 4 William IV and others of less importance. There is a need for an outline of these American statutes and for a rationalization of the principles …
Torts--Fraudulent Misrepresentations-Expression Of Opinion
Torts--Fraudulent Misrepresentations-Expression Of Opinion
Michigan Law Review
On an exchange of property the defendant's agent, to induce the trade, fraudulently overvalued the defendant's property, and fraudulently undervalued certain taxes and assessments for which the plaintiff would be liable. Held, such statements by a vendor amounted to mere sales talk and opinion, and would be no basis for an action for fraud. Deshatreaux v. Batson (Miss. 1930) 131 So. 346.
Review: A Textbook On Law And Business, J. Wayne Ley
Review: A Textbook On Law And Business, J. Wayne Ley
Michigan Law Review
A Book Review on A TEXTBOOK ON LAW AND BUSINESS By William H. Spencer