Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Business Organizations Law (72)
- Banking and Finance Law (56)
- Law and Economics (45)
- Commercial Law (33)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (28)
-
- Economics (27)
- International Law (24)
- Accounting Law (20)
- Administrative Law (20)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- Law and Society (17)
- Contracts (16)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (15)
- Bankruptcy Law (15)
- Criminal Law (15)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (13)
- Secured Transactions (13)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Legal History (12)
- Legal Profession (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Consumer Protection Law (11)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (11)
- Organizations Law (11)
- Criminal Procedure (10)
- Insurance Law (10)
- International Trade Law (10)
- Institution
-
- BLR (73)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (34)
- William & Mary Law School (29)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (13)
-
- Pace University (12)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- The University of Notre Dame Australia (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Washington University in St. Louis (1)
- Yale University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (72)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- William & Mary Law Review (15)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (12)
- Working Paper Series (12)
-
- Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009 (9)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (8)
- Supreme Court Case Files (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (6)
- William & Mary Business Law Review (6)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- American University International Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Graduate Paper Series (2)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (1)
- Georgetown Law Student Series (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 239
Full-Text Articles in Securities Law
Clawing Back Fraudulent Profits—Investor Protection Or Regulatory Overreach: The Disgorgement Dilemma In Securities Law, Jessica Sun
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
This comment explores the legal complexities surrounding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) use of disgorgement as an enforcement tool, specifically addressing the tension between investor protection and regulatory overreach. Sun examines the evolution of disgorgement from a court-created equitable remedy to a power formally codified by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2021, while highlighting the significant limitations imposed by Supreme Court rulings in Kokesh v. SEC and Liu v. SEC. The comment centers on a current circuit split between the Second Circuit’s decision in SEC v. Govil—which requires a showing of "pecuniary harm" to victims before awarding disgorgement—and …
Regulating Congressional Insider Trading: The Rotten Egg Approach, Sarah J. Williams
Regulating Congressional Insider Trading: The Rotten Egg Approach, Sarah J. Williams
Cardozo Law Review
A 2004 study revealed that the stock portfolios of members of Congress were consistently outperforming those of the investing public. The financial success of federal lawmakers was statistically correlated to the use of nonpublic information obtained while performing legislative responsibilities—reasonably characterizable as insider trading. Cries of dismay over such profiteering by lawmakers have been echoing in the public domain since Samuel Chase, Maryland’s representative in the Continental Congress, directed colleagues to corner the flour market in 1778 after learning that copious quantities of it would be purchased by the government to support the Continental Army. Notwithstanding efforts to apply insider …
Data Privacy By Contract, Ifeoma Ajunwa, Austin Kamer
Data Privacy By Contract, Ifeoma Ajunwa, Austin Kamer
Cardozo Law Review
Protecting consumer privacy rights presents a particular challenge given the prevalence of data breaches. This Article notes that current law is woefully inadequate in protecting the privacy rights of consumers. Notably, the law fails in the following four areas: (1) classification of consumer data, (2) lack of a comprehensive approach, (3) after-the-fact focus, and (4) limited accountability for third parties. Although it may be impossible to eliminate all data breaches, more regulations can bolster protection without restricting technological advancements. This Article proposes a contractual approach to privacy protection for consumers. It argues that the creation of mandatory implied contractual terms …
Shareholder Primacy Versus Shareholder Accountability, William Wilson Bratton
Shareholder Primacy Versus Shareholder Accountability, William Wilson Bratton
Articles
When corporations inflict injuries in the course of business, shareholders wielding environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") principles can, and now sometimes do, intervene to correct the matter. In the emerging fact pattern, corporate social accountability expands out of its historic collectivized frame to become an internal subject matter-a corporate governance topic. As a result, shareholder accountability surfaces as a policy question for the first time. The Big Three index fund managers, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, responded to the accountability question with ESG activism. In so doing, they defected against corporate legal theory's central tenet, shareholder primacy. Shareholder primacy builds …
The Pioneers, Waves, And Random Walks Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court, Elizabeth Pollman
The Pioneers, Waves, And Random Walks Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court, Elizabeth Pollman
Seattle University Law Review
After the pioneers, waves, and random walks that have animated the history of securities laws in the U.S. Supreme Court, we might now be on the precipice of a new chapter. Pritchard and Thompson’s superb book, A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court, illuminates with rich archival detail how the Court’s view of the securities laws and the SEC have changed over time and how individuals have influenced this history. The book provides an invaluable resource for understanding nearly a century’s worth of Supreme Court jurisprudence in the area of securities law and much needed context for …
Three Stories: A Comment On Pritchard & Thompson’S A History Of Securities Laws In The Supreme Court, Harwell Wells
Three Stories: A Comment On Pritchard & Thompson’S A History Of Securities Laws In The Supreme Court, Harwell Wells
Seattle University Law Review
Adam Pritchard and Robert Thompson’s A History of Securities Laws in the Supreme Court should stand for decades as the definitive work on the Federal securities laws’ career in the Supreme Court across the twentieth century.1 Like all good histories, it both tells a story and makes an argument. The story recounts how the Court dealt with the major securities laws, as well the agency charged with enforcing them, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the rules it promulgated, from the 1930s into the twenty-first century. But the book does not just string together a series of events, “one …
Why U.S. States Need Their Own Cannabis Industry Banks, Christoph Henkel, Randall K. Johnson
Why U.S. States Need Their Own Cannabis Industry Banks, Christoph Henkel, Randall K. Johnson
Faculty Works
The legal cannabis trade is the fastest growing industry in the United States. In 2019, about 48.2 million Americans used the drug at least once. As such, it is easy to see why the legal cannabis trade may generate annual revenues exceeding $30 billion in Fiscal Year 2022 alone.
One inconvenient truth, however, is that the parties to any cannabis trade may face a range of difficulties due to conflicts between federal and state laws. These difficulties include the fact that many financial institutions are reluctant to handle cannabis proceeds. One reason is that a lack of alignment in terms …
Beneficial Conflicts Of Interest, Anita K. Krug
Beneficial Conflicts Of Interest, Anita K. Krug
Cardozo Law Review
Conflicts of interest exist in both professional and private settings, and everyone experiences them from time to time. If a person harboring a conflict acts on it—meaning the person acts against interests she ought to uphold—innocent parties may be harmed. Accordingly, the key to addressing a conflict in most settings is to eliminate it, such as by prohibiting conflicted behavior or recusing oneself from a deliberative process. However, conflicts of interest have a special character in the securities realm, both because they are ubiquitous given financial firms’ myriad competing interests and because the goal of the agency charged with addressing …
The Panuwat Snowball: Correlation Does Not Equal Materiality, Tanner Gattuso
The Panuwat Snowball: Correlation Does Not Equal Materiality, Tanner Gattuso
Catholic University Law Review
Insider trading is a term of art referencing the fraudulent practice of trading securities in a company on the basis of material, nonpublic information about that same company in breach of some duty owed to another. The practice erodes the public’s trust in the integrity of our capital markets for a reason that is rather intuitive: it is inherently unfair to allow an individual to make a quick and certain profit by exploiting material, nonpublic information to which he privy due solely to his position in a company or some other relationship of trust and confidence. In this context, unrelenting …
The Solution To Shadow Trading Is Not Found In Current Insider Trading Law: A Proposed Amendment To Rule 10b5-2, Jamel Gross-Cassel
The Solution To Shadow Trading Is Not Found In Current Insider Trading Law: A Proposed Amendment To Rule 10b5-2, Jamel Gross-Cassel
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
Shadow trading is a lucrative way to exploit a loophole in insider trading law. Insiders abuse this loophole to make six-figure profits and escape liability when done at the right companies. Those who shadow trade use material, nonpublic information to trade not in the securities of their own company, which would be illegal, but in the securities of a closely related company where the information is just as impactful. Efforts to close this loophole rely on the individual insider trading policies of the involved companies. These policies vary in language, making liability for shadow trading dependent on specific language or …
Stakeholderism Silo Busting, Aneil Kovvali
Stakeholderism Silo Busting, Aneil Kovvali
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The fields of antitrust, bankruptcy, corporate, and securities law are undergoing tumultuous debates. On one side in each field is the dominant view that each field should focus exclusively on a specific constituency—antitrust on consumers, bankruptcy on creditors, corporate law on shareholders, and securities regulation on financial investors. On the other side is a growing insurgency that seeks to broaden the focus to a larger set of stakeholders, including workers, the environment, and political communities. But these conversations have largely proceeded in parallel, with each debate unfolding within the framework and literature of a single field. Studying these debates together …
Landlord Liability For Tenant-On-Tenant Harassment Under The Fair Housing Act, Mary Karapogosian
Landlord Liability For Tenant-On-Tenant Harassment Under The Fair Housing Act, Mary Karapogosian
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Bitcoin Prudent? Is Art Diversified? Offering Alternative Investments To 401(K) Participants, Edward A. Zelinsky
Is Bitcoin Prudent? Is Art Diversified? Offering Alternative Investments To 401(K) Participants, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
Whether 401(k) plans’ investment menus should feature “alternative” investments is a fact-driven inquiry applying ERISA’s fiduciary standards of prudence, loyalty, and diversification. Central to this fact-driven inquiry is whether the alternative investment class in question is broadly accepted by investors in general and by professional defined benefit trustees in particular. A similarly salient concern when making this inquiry is the financial unsophistication of many, perhaps most, 401(k) participants. Accounting for these considerations, this Article concludes that REITs, private equity funds, and hedge funds can, with limits, today be offered as investment choices to 401(k) participants, but that cryptocurrencies (including Bitcoin), …
Section 546(E) Redux—The Proper Framework For The Construction Of The Terms Financial Institution And Financial Participant Contained In The Bankruptcy Code After The U.S. Supreme Court’S Holding In Merit, Peter V. Marchetti
Cardozo Law Review
This Article discusses and analyzes the proper framework for the construction of the terms “financial institution” and “financial participant” as defined in Sections 101(22)(A) and 101(22A) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code), as they work in tandem with Section 546(e) of the Code. In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Merit, which held that the language regarding transfers “made by or to (or for the benefit of) . . . a financial institution” contained in Section 546(e) does not insulate the ultimate transferee of a constructive fraudulent action (a CFTA) simply because the company being …
Separating Governance Tokens From Securities: How The Utility Token May Fall Short Of The Investment Contract, Kyle Bersani
Separating Governance Tokens From Securities: How The Utility Token May Fall Short Of The Investment Contract, Kyle Bersani
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Kirschner V. J.P. Morgan: How Securities And Banking Laws Should Apply To Syndicated Loans, Joel Crank
Rethinking Kirschner V. J.P. Morgan: How Securities And Banking Laws Should Apply To Syndicated Loans, Joel Crank
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
War & The Constitution: Chemical Agents And The Rights Of Protestors, Yomidalys GüIchardo Morel
War & The Constitution: Chemical Agents And The Rights Of Protestors, Yomidalys GüIchardo Morel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Treat Thy Neighbor As Thyself? Equal Protection And The Scope Of Rluipa’S Equal Terms Clause, Noah Kane
Treat Thy Neighbor As Thyself? Equal Protection And The Scope Of Rluipa’S Equal Terms Clause, Noah Kane
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Winning, Defined? Text-Mining Arbitration Decisions, Charlotte S. Alexander, Nicole G. Iannarone
Winning, Defined? Text-Mining Arbitration Decisions, Charlotte S. Alexander, Nicole G. Iannarone
Cardozo Law Review
Who wins in consumer arbitration? Historically, this question has been nearly impossible to answer, as most arbitration proceedings are a private black box, and arbitral forums release only limited summary statistics. One exception is the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which arbitrates virtually all disputes between investors and stockbroker-dealers, and makes all of its nearly 60,000 written arbitration decisions publicly available in an online database. This Article is the first to use computational text analysis tools to study these decisions, and to construct a measure of the claimants’ win, loss, and settlement rates. It is the first installment in an …
Duties, Disclosure, And Discord: Necessity To Resolve Circuit Split And Certainty Leidos Could Have Clarified For Litigation Strategy And Risk Allocation, Damian P. Gallagher
Duties, Disclosure, And Discord: Necessity To Resolve Circuit Split And Certainty Leidos Could Have Clarified For Litigation Strategy And Risk Allocation, Damian P. Gallagher
William & Mary Business Law Review
Securities litigation is a complex, specialized, and detailed practice of the law that depends on the expertise of courts and the Securities and Exchange Commission. From its inception, the securities laws, namely the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provided a baseline expectation and prescription for the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules to fulfill the organic statute’s demands. Through time, technology, and the law generally, the securities laws have expanded significantly, not only asking, but also requiring, the courts to answer questions never contemplated by the original drafters of the laws to guide …
Basel Iii F: Callable Commercial Paper, Christian M. Mcnamara, Rosalind Bennett, Andrew Metrick
Basel Iii F: Callable Commercial Paper, Christian M. Mcnamara, Rosalind Bennett, Andrew Metrick
Journal of Financial Crises
One of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s responses to the global financial crisis of 2007-09 was to introduce the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), a short-term measure that evaluates whether a bank has enough liquidity to meet expected cash outflows during a 30-day stress scenario. One area in which this incentive has already resulted in changed practices is in the market for commercial paper. Banks often provide backup liquidity facilities to the issuers of commercial paper that the issuers can draw upon to repay a maturing issue of commercial paper if they are unable to sell a new issue to …
De Facto Shareholder Primacy, Jeff Schwartz
Stay In The Fight With Civility And Professionalism, David Spratt
Stay In The Fight With Civility And Professionalism, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Information Asymmetry And The Protection Of Ordinary Investors, Kevin S. Haeberle
Information Asymmetry And The Protection Of Ordinary Investors, Kevin S. Haeberle
Faculty Publications
To some, the reductions in information asymmetry provided by the main securities-specific disclosure, fraud, and insider-trading laws help ordinary investors in meaningful ways. To others, whatever their larger social value, such reductions do little, if anything for these investors. For decades, these two sides of this investor-protection divide have mostly talked past each other.
This Article builds on economic theory to reveal something striking: The reductions in information asymmetry provided by the core securities laws likely impose a long-overlooked cost on buy-and-hold ordinary investors. More specifically, I explain why there is much reason to believe that the reductions take away …
Blockchain-Based Token Sales, Initial Coin Offerings, And The Democratization Of Public Capital Markets, Jonathan Rohr, Aaron Wright
Blockchain-Based Token Sales, Initial Coin Offerings, And The Democratization Of Public Capital Markets, Jonathan Rohr, Aaron Wright
Articles
Best known for their role in the creation of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, blockchains are revolutionizing the way technology entrepreneurs finance their business enterprises. In 2017 alone, tech entrepreneurs raised over $6 billion through the sale of blockchain-based digital tokens, with some sales lasting mere seconds before selling out. In a token sale, also referred to as an “initial coin offering” or “ICO,” organizers of a project sell digital tokens to members of the public to finance the development of new technological platforms and services. After the initial sale, cryptocurrency exchanges scattered across the globe list tokens for trading and facilitate …
First Principles For Forum Provisions, Daniel B. Listwa, Bradley J. Polivka
First Principles For Forum Provisions, Daniel B. Listwa, Bradley J. Polivka
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
In this Essay, the authors argue that the Delaware Chancery Court's opinion in Sciabacucchi v. Salzberg, which appeals to territoriality as a decisive “first principle,” is deeply misguided. The notion that each state’s legislative jurisdiction is bounded by its territorial limits is a formalist and arbitrary notion that has been broadly rejected by various jurisdictions, including Delaware. Moreover, an opinion truly grounded in “first principles” would take comity—the basic framework for choice of law in the early Republic—as its lodestar, necessitating a functionally and strategically sensitive approach to determining the validity of the federal forum provisions. In this case, comity …
The Regulatory Accountability Act Loses Steam But The Trump Executive Order On Alj Selection Upturned 71 Years Of Practice, Jeffrey Lubbers
The Regulatory Accountability Act Loses Steam But The Trump Executive Order On Alj Selection Upturned 71 Years Of Practice, Jeffrey Lubbers
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Nonvoting Shares And Efficient Corporate Governance, Dorothy S. Lund
Nonvoting Shares And Efficient Corporate Governance, Dorothy S. Lund
Faculty Scholarship
A growing number of technology companies, including Google, Zillow, and Snap, have issued stock that does not allow investors to vote on corporate decisions. But there is fundamental disagreement among scholars and investors about whether nonvoting stock is beneficial or harmful. Critics argue that nonvoting shares perpetually insulate corporate insiders from influence and oversight, and therefore increase agency costs. By contrast, proponents contend that nonvoting shares may provide benefits that exceed these agency costs, such as enabling corporate insiders to pursue their long-term vision for the company without interference from outside shareholders.
This Article offers a novel perspective on this …
A New Market-Based Approach To Securities Law, Kevin S. Haeberle
A New Market-Based Approach To Securities Law, Kevin S. Haeberle
Faculty Publications
Modern securities regulation has three main areas, each of which is plagued by a core problem. Mandatory disclosure law leaves society with suboptimal disclosure, as the government calls for too little of some information (for example, management analysis of company prospects) and too much of other information (for example, data about trivial executive perks). Securities fraud law (specifically, its central fraud-on-the-market theory of reliance) yields damages at odds with any reasonable theory of compensation and deterrence. And insider trading law fails to achieve its ends because incentives to police illegal trading and tipping by executives are currently weak.
In this …
Making A Market For Corporate Disclosure, Kevin S. Haeberle, M. Todd Henderson
Making A Market For Corporate Disclosure, Kevin S. Haeberle, M. Todd Henderson
Faculty Publications
It has long been said that market forces alone will result in a problematic under-sharing of information by public companies. Since the 1930s, the main regulatory response to this market failure has come in the form of the massive mandatory-disclosure regime that sits at the foundation of modern securities law. But this regime—especially when viewed along with its speech-chilling antifraud overlay—no doubt leaves society without all the corporate information from which it would benefit. The typical fix offered to the problem has been more of the same: add to the 100-plus-page list of what firms must disclose, often based on …