Science and Technology Law Commons^™

Social Scientists Take The Stand: A Review And Appraisal Of Their Testimony In Litigation, Jack Greenberg

Michigan Law Review

"How to inform the judicial mind, as you know, is one of the most complicated problems,'' said Justice Frankfurter during argument of the school segregation cases. And as law deals more and more with issues of great public consequence the judiciary's need for knowledge increases. Much of this knowledge is within the realm of what are called the social sciences.

Although jurisprudents and social scientists have long complained of a gulf between law and social science, little notice has been given to the recent, recurrent collaboration between the two at the trial level. In a variety of cases social scientists' …

Technological Change: Management Prerogative Vs. Job Security

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Vaughan: The United States Patent System. Legal And Economic Conflicts In American Patent History, Bernard F. Garvey

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The United States Patent System. Legal and Economic Conflicts in American Patent History. By Floyd L. Vaughan.

Patent Office Performance In Perspective, George E. Frost

Michigan Law Review

" the only patent that is valid is one which this Court has not been able to get its hands on."

Justice Jackson's note of despair reflects all too accurately the treatment patents have seemingly received in the hands of the courts since the "new trend" of recent years. It has become the legal fashion to characterize letters patent as something the Patent Office issues and the courts strike down. Statistical support for this conclusion can be readily assembled.

Evidence - Validity Of Statutory Presumption Of Intoxication From A Finding Of 0.15 Percent Concentration Of Alcohol In The Blood, Donald F. Oosterhouse S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was tried and convicted of the statutory crime of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The state introduced into evidence the result of a blood test, voluntarily submitted to by the defendant, which showed 0,20% concentration of alcohol in the defendant's blood. Arizona statutes established a rebuttable presumption of no intoxication if such tests showed a concentration of 0.05%, or less, of alcohol in one's blood, and of intoxication if the tests showed a concentration of 0.15%, or more. Breath, urine, and direct blood tests are authorized by the statute. Defendant argued that the statute …

Alsop: We Accuse!, George S. Flint S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

A Review of We Accuse! By Joseph and Stewart Alsop

The Compulsory Use Of Chemical Tests For Alcoholic Intoxication - A Symposium, Russell S. Fisher

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Control Of Health And Safety Standards In Peacetime Private Atomic Energy Activities, Samuel D. Estep

Michigan Law Review

This article is directed to the question of the power of Congress to provide for such regulation of those who handle radioactive materials in private industry and not to the policy question of whether Congress ought to attempt such regulation.

The Socio-Legal Problems Of Artificial Insemination

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Lectures On Atomic Energy Industrial And Legal Problems, University Of Michigan Law School

Summer Institute on International and Comparative Law

Since 1948 the University of Michigan Law School has, as a part of its program of public service, sponsored a series of Summer Institutes, intended to provide a medium for high-level discussions of important problems in areas of public concern. The Institutes held in previous years are as follows:

• The First Summer Institute, July 15-23, 1948, "Current Problems in International Law"
• The Second Summer Institute, August 5-21, 1949, "Legal Problems of World Trade"
• The Third Summer Institute, June 26-July 1, 1950, "The Law and Labor-Management Relations"
• The Fourth Summer Institute, June 25-28, 1951, "Taxation of Business Enterprise"

The Fifth Summer …

Sex Offenses And Scientific Investigation, Frank Edward Horack Jr.

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Legislative Adaptation Of Scientific Discovery, Frank Edward Horack Jr.

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Blood Grouping Tests In Evidence

Indiana Law Journal

Notes and Comments: Evidence

The Importance Of Scientific Analysis Of Evidence In The Prosecution Of Crime, E. P. Coffey

Indiana Law Journal

Address by E. P. Coffey, Director of Federal Technical Laboratory of the Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., before the Indiana State Bar Association, September 6, 1935.

Law As A Science, George W. Goble

Indiana Law Journal

Reprinted from The Scientific Monthly, with the permission of that periodical.

Patent Rights For Scientific Discoveries, By C. J. Hamsom, Alvin C. Johnson

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, Edward S. Rogers, John Barker Waite

Michigan Law Review

Patent Law. by John Barker Waite, Professor of Law in the University of Michigan Law School. Princeton University Press, x92o.

The Patentability Of A Principle Of Nature, John B. Waite

Articles

The extent to which courts will go in conceding patentability to a natural law, or principle of nature, is evidenced in the case of Minerals Separation Co. v. Hyde, 37 Sup. Ct. -, decided by the Supreme Court, December 11, 1916. It has always been more or less an axiom of patent law that the discovery of a principle of nature does not entitle the discoverer to a patent for it. The case usually thought of first as authority therefor, is that of Morton v. New York Eye Infirmary, 5 Blatch. 116, 2 Fisher 320. The patentees in that case …

Restrictions On The Use Of Patented Articles, Edward S. Rogers

Michigan Law Review

The case of Henry v. Dick recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, has occasioned considerable unfavorable comment in the public press. It seems to be the opinion of many that the decision lays down a new principle of law, particularly adaptable to the working of a monopoly, and that the public is, under the supposed new principle, exposed to a practically unlimited exploitation by any patentee. It is believed that neither of these contentions is correct.