Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (720)
- Law and Society (626)
- Courts (572)
- Constitutional Law (561)
- Litigation (528)
-
- Legislation (511)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (510)
- State and Local Government Law (482)
- Criminal Law (453)
- Contracts (433)
- Civil Procedure (402)
- Legal History (401)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (376)
- Jurisprudence (369)
- Law and Economics (368)
- Criminal Procedure (364)
- Civil Law (362)
- Legal Profession (361)
- Property Law and Real Estate (357)
- International Law (349)
- Supreme Court of the United States (349)
- Jurisdiction (346)
- Labor and Employment Law (341)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (339)
- Law and Politics (339)
- Human Rights Law (333)
- Administrative Law (332)
- Intellectual Property Law (329)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (463)
- Seattle University School of Law (258)
- St. Mary's University (219)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (207)
- New York Law School (122)
-
- Pepperdine University (111)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (108)
- Brooklyn Law School (66)
- University of Colorado Law School (57)
- University of Georgia School of Law (51)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (50)
- UIC School of Law (49)
- Cleveland State University (47)
- Cornell University Law School (47)
- American University Washington College of Law (44)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (43)
- William & Mary Law School (39)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (33)
- Roger Williams University (32)
- University of Richmond (32)
- BLR (31)
- University of Washington School of Law (29)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (28)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (23)
- Columbia Law School (22)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (22)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- Brigham Young University Law School (19)
- University of Kentucky (19)
- Keyword
-
- Remedies (297)
- Damages (208)
- Liability (95)
- Restitution (78)
- Compensation (75)
-
- Punitive damages (70)
- Negligence (60)
- Injuries (59)
- Torts (59)
- United States Supreme Court (46)
- Contracts (45)
- Equity (44)
- Constitutional Law (42)
- Injunctions (40)
- Law reform (39)
- Discrimination (36)
- Litigation (36)
- Regulation (35)
- Supreme Court (34)
- Texas (33)
- Arbitration (32)
- Due process (32)
- Jurisdiction (32)
- Recovery (32)
- First Amendment (31)
- Constitutional law (30)
- Courts (30)
- Immigration (30)
- Jurisprudence (29)
- Fraud (28)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (268)
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Articles (143)
- NYLS Law Review (120)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (97)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (93)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (75)
- Pepperdine Law Review (73)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (64)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (63)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (57)
- UIC Law Review (43)
- Cardozo Law Review (42)
- Cleveland State Law Review (41)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (41)
- Publications (39)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (33)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (32)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (28)
- ExpressO (28)
- Faculty Publications (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Scholarly Articles (25)
- Scholarly Works (24)
- Washington Law Review (24)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (22)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- William & Mary Law Review (20)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2521 - 2550 of 2821
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Admiralty- Shipowner's Right To Indemnification For Loss Caused By Latently Defective Gear Supplied By Nonnegligent Stevedoring-Compnay, John W. Erickson
Admiralty- Shipowner's Right To Indemnification For Loss Caused By Latently Defective Gear Supplied By Nonnegligent Stevedoring-Compnay, John W. Erickson
Michigan Law Review
Defendant stevedoring company contracted to perform stevedoring services for plaintiff shipowner. Pursuant to its agreement to supply gear for the job, the stevedoring company supplied a latently defective rope, the breaking of which caused injury to a longshoreman, an employee of the stevedoring company. The longshoreman obtained a judgment against the shipowner under the doctrine of unseaworthiness, and in a separate action the shipowner sought indemnification from the stevedoring company. The district court, finding the stevedoring company not negligent, denied recovery. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, one judge dissenting. On certiorari to the United States Supreme …
Federal Civil Procedure-Existence Of Federal Cause Of Action For Abuse Of Federal Process, Laurence D. Connor
Federal Civil Procedure-Existence Of Federal Cause Of Action For Abuse Of Federal Process, Laurence D. Connor
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner was served with a subpoena ordering him to appear before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. He subsequently brought an action in federal district court asking for damages and injunctive relief and praying that the subpoena be declared void and of no effect. He alleged it had been signed in blank by the Committee chairman and that respondent, an investigator for the Committee without delegated subpoena power, had filled in petitioner's name without authorization and caused it to be served on him at his place of employment. Petitioner also alleged that respondent intended to subject him to public shame …
Management And Labor Appraisals And Criticisms Of The Arbitration Process: A Report With Comments, Dallas L. Jones, Russell A. Smith
Management And Labor Appraisals And Criticisms Of The Arbitration Process: A Report With Comments, Dallas L. Jones, Russell A. Smith
Michigan Law Review
Although arbitration as a means of resolving disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements has received widespread acceptance in this country/ in recent years there has been some evidence of increasing criticism of the process. As part of a research project dealing with the impact of the 1960 Supreme Court decisions in the Warrior & Gulf "trilogy" and the 1962 Sinclair "trilogy," we decided to ascertain how parties are appraising the arbitration process. We report here the more significant results of this survey along with our evaluation of the criticisms and suggestions which were received.
Torts-Joint Tort-Feasors--Release Of One Not Release Of All, Karen M. Swift
Torts-Joint Tort-Feasors--Release Of One Not Release Of All, Karen M. Swift
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a woman who had been struck by a taxicab, underwent treatment by defendant-physician. After eight months under defendant's care, she accepted his assurances that she would fully recover, and executed a general release in favor of the taxi driver. Plaintiff subsequently discovered, however, that the defendant had been negligent in his treatment of her both before and after the execution of the release. In a malpractice action before the Supreme Court of New York judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appealed. The Appellate Division dismissed the original complaint, holding that the general release discharging the …
Public Regulation And Private Rights Of Action, Robert M. O'Neil
Public Regulation And Private Rights Of Action, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Damages In Fraud Actions, Howard M. Rossen, Howard H. Fairweather
Damages In Fraud Actions, Howard M. Rossen, Howard H. Fairweather
Cleveland State Law Review
Two distinct legal theories have been developed in determining the amount of damages to be awarded in an action for fraud and deceit. The majority view is the "benefit-of-the-bargain" rule (also known as the "warranty rule"), and the minority view is known as the "tort rule" (or more commonly, the "out-of-pocket" rule). Both rules have limited use. In Hines v. Brode the California court made it clear that the two rules should be applied only where a contract is fully executed or where the plaintiff stands on his contract and has not rescinded it. The rationale behind this holding is …
Soviet Tort Law: The New Principles Annotated, Whitmore Gray
Soviet Tort Law: The New Principles Annotated, Whitmore Gray
Articles
In 1961, the federal legislature, the USSR Supreme Soviet, finally adopted a skeleton code of fundamental principles of civil law.10 This recodification, which incorporates 40 years of case law and doctrinal development as well as some major innovations, will be the basis for individual civil codes to be adopted in each of the 15 union republics. While there may be some slight modifications, and certainly some variety in the degree of additional detail included in the individual codes by each republic,11 these Principles present already a fairly comprehensive picture of the shape of the future law. They are about as …
Radiation Injuries And Time Limitations In Workmen's Compensation Cases, Samuel D. Estep, Walter R. Allan
Radiation Injuries And Time Limitations In Workmen's Compensation Cases, Samuel D. Estep, Walter R. Allan
Michigan Law Review
The increasing use of radioactive materials and radiation-producing devices in industry and elsewhere makes it clear that injuries from exposure to radiation must be anticipated. It becomes relevant, therefore, to inquire into the extent to which the present workmen's compensation statutes will be able to cope with the injuries which may arise from the use of this new source of energy.
The Judicial Treatment Of The Automobile Dealer Franchise Act, J. Patrick Martin
The Judicial Treatment Of The Automobile Dealer Franchise Act, J. Patrick Martin
Michigan Law Review
The representatives of the auto industry initially viewed the act with a jaundiced eye and warned that this special class legislation6 would radically change the existing case law by allowing the dealer to win where formerly he would have lost. However, the court decisions under the act have not borne out such dire predictions. This discussion will examine what has, in fact, been the judicial interpretation and treatment of the act.
Antitrust-Clayton Act-Admissibilty Of Criminal Conviction Entered On A Plea Of Guilty As Prima Facie Evidence In Civil Suit For Treble Damage, Arthur M. Sherwood
Antitrust-Clayton Act-Admissibilty Of Criminal Conviction Entered On A Plea Of Guilty As Prima Facie Evidence In Civil Suit For Treble Damage, Arthur M. Sherwood
Michigan Law Review
In a civil action for treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, the plaintiff sought to allege as prima facie evidence of a Sherman Act violation a criminal conviction entered on a plea of guilty by the defendant in an earlier prosecution by the government. The trial court sustained a motion by the defendant to strike from plaintiff's complaint any reference to the criminal prosecution. On appeal, held, reversed, one judge dissenting. A judgment entered on a plea of guilty is not a consent judgment within the meaning of the proviso to section 5(a) of the Clayton …
Effect Of The Uniform Commercial Code On Virginia Commercial Law: Buyer's Remedies And Article 2
Effect Of The Uniform Commercial Code On Virginia Commercial Law: Buyer's Remedies And Article 2
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Effect Of The Uniform Commercial Code On Virginia Commercial Law: Seller's Remedies And Article 2
Effect Of The Uniform Commercial Code On Virginia Commercial Law: Seller's Remedies And Article 2
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Enhancement Of Value As Element Of Artisan's Lien
Enhancement Of Value As Element Of Artisan's Lien
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equity Award Of Punitive Damages—A Rare But Recurrable Instance, Robert W. Stephens
Equity Award Of Punitive Damages—A Rare But Recurrable Instance, Robert W. Stephens
Buffalo Law Review
I.H.P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp., 27 Misc.2d 964, 212 N.Y.S.2d 136 (Sup. Ct. 1961), modified, 16 A.D.2d 461, 228 N.Y.S.2d 883 (1st Dep't 1962).
Administrative Law-Primary Jurisdiction-Availability Of Common-Law Reparations Remedy Following Commission Finding Of Unreasonable Practice Under The Motor Carrier Act, James D. Zirin
Michigan Law Review
The petitioner delivered goods to respondent, a common carrier by motor vehicle, for shipment from Buffalo, New York, to New York City, with the route of shipment left unspecified. The goods were shipped over the carrier's interstate route at a higher tariff filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission rather than over its intrastate route at the lower tariff filed with the New York Public Service Commission. Alleging causes of action under the Motor Carrier Act and at common law, the petitioner brought a postshipment action in a federal district court seeking reparation of the difference paid. The court, after a …
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Cml Remedies Based Upon Illegal Extension Of Credit In Violation Of Regulation T, Robert G. Lane
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934--Cml Remedies Based Upon Illegal Extension Of Credit In Violation Of Regulation T, Robert G. Lane
Michigan Law Review
Following the stock market crash of 1929, there was considerable agitation for the regulation, and even the elimination, of the purchasing of securities on credit. Indeed, the extension of credit for the purchasing of securities became an issue in the 1932 presidential campaign and finally, in 1934, came under direct federal control. Although the federal regulations were intended to eliminate the hazards associated with the extension of credit for the purchasing of securities, all the available evidence indicates that the substantial amount of credit in the stock market was a significant factor in pushing up prices during the bull market, …
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
Michigan Law Review
Conventional doctrine does not address itself directly to the choice among valuation techniques, although the various parochial damage formulae give some clues. Underlying this series of articles is an assumption that the doctrine makes more sense when restated in valuation terms. These articles involve an effort to restate in such terms one sector of expectation damage law-the part that governs cases in which plaintiff is a "seller."
Advocating The Rights Of The Injured, Benjamin Marcus
Advocating The Rights Of The Injured, Benjamin Marcus
Michigan Law Review
When workmen's compensation was first introduced a half century ago, it was felt necessary to cushion the shock in a number of ways. One of these was the idea of a bargain, an exchange, in which the worker, to obtain the new remedy based on liability without fault, gave up his existing remedy, the right to a tort action against his employer for a negligent injury. It is time that the terms of that bargain be re-examined.
Botta V. Brunner - A Restraint Upon Advocacy, Craig Spangenberg
Botta V. Brunner - A Restraint Upon Advocacy, Craig Spangenberg
Cleveland State Law Review
No single decision in recent years has had wider repercussions nor greater impact upon trial advocacy than the decision in Botta v. Brunner. It is probable that within the next few years every state jurisdiction will review the philosophy of the Botta case, and come to a conclusion that will control the method of final argument, in each state, on all the intangible elements of damages.
Longshoreman-Shipowner-Stevedore: The Circle Of Liability, Harney B. Stover, Jr.
Longshoreman-Shipowner-Stevedore: The Circle Of Liability, Harney B. Stover, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
It is universally recognized that in the past two decades the United States Supreme Court has substantially revised the law under which seamen, longshoremen and harbor workers (or their survivors) may recover damages for personal injury and death. One of the more recent and most authoritative texts in the field of admiralty and maritime law devotes an entire chapter, 147 pages in length, to the subject of the rights of seamen and maritime workers (or their survivors) of recovery for injury and death. The introduction to that chapter likens the Court's rewriting of the law in this field to a …
Criteria Employed By Appellate Courts In Determining Adequacy Of Damages, Philip B. Austin
Criteria Employed By Appellate Courts In Determining Adequacy Of Damages, Philip B. Austin
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Damages - Uniform Commercial Code - Loss Of Profits Not Within Contemplation Of Parties In Sale Of Diesel Engine To Contract Carrier In Claim For Breach Of Warranty Damages Under Section 2-715, Robert Mickler
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Sales - Implied Warranty - Final Parts Assembler But Not Parts Manufacturer Liable For Death Of Passenger In Airplane Crash, Malcolm J. Gross
Sales - Implied Warranty - Final Parts Assembler But Not Parts Manufacturer Liable For Death Of Passenger In Airplane Crash, Malcolm J. Gross
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Equitable Protection By Injunction For Business Reputation
Equitable Protection By Injunction For Business Reputation
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission: Its Functions And Jurisdiction, Edward D. Re
The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission: Its Functions And Jurisdiction, Edward D. Re
Michigan Law Review
Even the casual student of nationalizations and confiscations must be aware of the fact that whereas nationalizations were formerly isolated occurrences, they have today become matters of almost common practice. The Mexican expropriations, the Soviet nationalizations, and the Iranian nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company are in modern times merely landmarks of an apparently ever-widening path. A reading of the daily newspapers has offered adequate warning to the American investor abroad that no part of the world has been immune from this phenomenon. Whether under the label of "agrarian reform" or "socialization," these nationalizations are of the greatest importance, and, …
Federal Antitrust Law--Price Discrimination--Proof And Measurement Of Damages In Treble Damage Action, Richard A. Miller S.Ed.
Federal Antitrust Law--Price Discrimination--Proof And Measurement Of Damages In Treble Damage Action, Richard A. Miller S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Section 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act makes it unlawful for a seller to charge buyers who compete with each other different prices for commodities of like grade and quality. Price discrimination which violates this section operates to confer an unlawful benefit upon a favored buyer by making his costs of obtaining, using, or reselling the particular commodities involved lower than the similar costs of non-favored buyers and puts non-favored buyers at a competitive disadvantage to the extent that the difference in costs affects the ability of favored and non-favored buyers to compete with one another. If this wrongfully induced competitive …
Procedural Problems Of Class Suits, Joseph J. Simeone
Procedural Problems Of Class Suits, Joseph J. Simeone
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is to discuss numerous aspects of the class device, to discuss the many procedural problems confronting court and counsel, to determine the effectiveness of one type of class suit-the spurious-and in the conclusion, to propose legislation for a new rule independent of the rules regarding class actions, a remedy which would more effectively permit the dispatch of numerous claims arising from similar fact patterns.
Civil Aeronautics Act-Discrimination-Private Cause Of Action For Punitive Damages, L. B. Hirsch
Civil Aeronautics Act-Discrimination-Private Cause Of Action For Punitive Damages, L. B. Hirsch
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff held a reconfirmed tourist reservation on one of defendant's St. Louis-to-Los Angeles flights. Defendant oversold the flight and subsequently "bumped" the plaintiff from the flight in favor of a first-class passenger who was given plaintiff's accommodations in the tourist section. Defendant's agent booked a reservation for the plaintiff aboard another airline and provided plaintiff with lunch. The only expense incurred by the plaintiff as a result of being removed from defendant's flight was the cost of a telephone call to inform his wife of his new arrival time; and plaintiff was inconvenienced by a delay of four hours on …
Restitution--Quasi-Contract--Non-Conformance With State Building Contractors Licensing Statute As Basis For Denial Of Restitution, Stefan Tucker
Restitution--Quasi-Contract--Non-Conformance With State Building Contractors Licensing Statute As Basis For Denial Of Restitution, Stefan Tucker
Michigan Law Review
Defendants, owners of an apartment building containing stores and living units, contracted with plaintiff to replace the roof of the building. Pursuant to the contract plaintiff replaced the roof, and when defendants refused to pay for the work done, plaintiff sued in the alternative for damages on the contract or for restitution on an implied contract. Defendants moved for dismissal at pre-trial, contending that plaintiff was a residential alteration contractor and as such was required by state statute to have a license in order to bring an action for the collection of compensation. On appeal from pre-trial orders dismissing the …