Labor and Employment Law Commons^™

Employment Law: O'Connor V. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. --Eliminating The Replacement Outside The Protected Class Element In Adea Hiring And Replacement Cases, David G. Harris

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law: Board Of County Commissioners V. Umbehr And O'Hare Truck Service V. City Of Northlake--The Extension Of First Amendment Protection To Independent Contractors--The Garbage Man Can Now Talk Trash!, Brent C. Eckersley

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Employment Law: Report A Crime, Lose Your Job: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Reins In The Public Policy Exception In Hayes V. Eateries, Inc., M. Derek Zolner

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Age Discrimination In Employment Act At Thirty: Where It's Been, Where It Is Today, Where It's Going, Howard C. Eglit

University of Richmond Law Review

Thirty-three years ago, in the course of debating the legislation that eventually was enacted into law as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Congress began-albeit very tentatively-to address age discrimination in the workplace. While it rejected attempts to amend the 1964 bill to include age within the then-pending menu of proscribed bases for workplace decision-making, i.e., race, color, national origin, religion, and sex, Congress did direct the Secretary of Labor to undertake a study to ascertain the nature and extent of age bias in employment and to make recommendations for dealing with this discrimination, if it in fact existed.

Does Pretext Plus Age Equal The Sum Of The Judgement?, Susan Childers North

University of Richmond Law Review

In deciding cases under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), several circuit courts of appeals have interpreted the tripartite test set forth in McDonnell Douglas v. Green to mean that a plaintiff could prevail in proving individual disparate treatment by proving a prima facie case and that the employer's proffered reasons were a pretext. The Third, Seventh and Eighth Circuits concluded that a showing that a proffered justification is pretextual is equivalent to a finding that the employer intentionally discriminated. In other words, "the plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law when, in the third stage …

Adea Doctrinal Impediments To The Fulfillment Of The Wirtz Report Agenda, Michael C. Harper

University of Richmond Law Review

Ideally, this symposium marking the three-decade anniversary of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) would present an opportunity to assess how well the ADEA has achieved its plausible goals. However, I recognize that any definitive assessment of the success of a statute like the ADEA, which requires the modification of the behavior of social actors, must depend on the kind of sophisticated empirical study for which I have neither the time, resources or capability. I also recognize that defending my identification of the goals of the ADEA might itself require an entire essay.

Wards Cove Packing Or Not Wards Cove Packing? That Is Not The Question: Some Thoughts On Impact Analysis Under The Age Discrimination In Employment Act, Mack A. Player

University of Richmond Law Review

Assume two employers, A and B. Each gives a separate objective test to select employees for a particular position. Employer A utilizes a pen-and-paper, multiple choice examination that has questions in three major categories: 1) biology and genetics which includes DNA theory, cloning, etc.; 2) astrophysics, with questions about time, space, light relationships, "black holes," novas, etc. and 3) microprocessor engineering, the internet, silicon chips, and the like.

Organized Labor As Shareholder Activist: Building Coalitions To Promote Worker Capitalism, Marleen A. O'Connor

University of Richmond Law Review

In the past, the traditional question posed by unions was: "which side are you on?"--presenting a clear choice between labor and capital. As membership and bargaining power fall, however, unions are asserting their rights as shareholders to influence corporate decision making outside the conventional labor law framework. Because the National Labor Relations Act does not adequately protect workers' rights, unions have devised innovative methods as shareholders to exercise unprecedented power over managers. In only a few years, labor-shareholders have become highly visible players in the institutional shareholder movement. As a group, labor-shareholders submit one of the largest numbers of shareholder …

Unjust Dismissal And The Contingent Worker: Restricting Doctrine For The Restructured Employee, Mark Berger

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Building Trust In The Workplace, Carlton J. Snow

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protection Of Existing Workers And The Implementation Of "Workfare", Patricia A. Quigley

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Remembrance Of Samuel M. Kaynard, Stuart Rabinowitz, Eric J. Schmertz, William B. Gould Iv

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Where Are We Now?: Life After Electromation, Rafael Gely

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Principles Of Agency Permit The Nlrb To Consider Additional Factors Of Entrepreneurial Independence And The Relative Dependence Of Employees When Determining Independent Contractor Status Under Section 2(3), Ruth Burdick

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Why Doma And Not Enda?: A Review Of Recent Federal Hostility To Expand Employment Rights And Protection Beyond Traditional Notions, Pat P. Putignano

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Human Genome Project: The Road To Our Improved Health Or The New Civil Rights Movement, Danielle Leventhal

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Mahoney V. Rfe/Rl: An Unexpected Direction For The Foreign Laws Defense, Thomas Wang

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

A law is only as good, or as powerful, as its exceptions allow it to be. Unless carefully drawn, an exception intended to avoid unjust or impractical applications of a rule can consume the rule itself. In the case of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII, which were amended to apply to U.S. citizens working abroad, the "foreign laws defense," as interpreted in Mahoney v. RFE/RL, threatens to defeat the application of the general rule prohibiting discrimination. This Note briefly traces the history of the extraterritorial application of U.S. law and the interests that were served by …

Brown V. Pro Football, Inc.: You Make The Call, Denise K. Bryant

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Collective Bargaining In The National Football League: A Historical And Comparative Analysis, C. Peter Goplerud Iii

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Strife, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Money: Labor Relations In Professional Sports, Craig W. Palm

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Labor Or Antitrust - Let The Players Choose, Robert A. Mccormick

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Major League Baseball's Labor Turmoil: The Failure Of The Counter-Revolution, Jeffrey S. Moorad

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Retirement Incentives In The Twenty First Century: The Move Toward Employer Control Of The Adea, Judith A. Mcmorrow

University of Richmond Law Review

Retirement has become an increasingly important topic of public policy discussion in the United States, as well as an accepted, and even cherished, goal for many American workers. Consequently, it is not surprising that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) recognized, somewhat inartfully, the importance of retirement. When originally passed, the ADEA expressly provided an exemption for any bona fide employee benefit plan such as a retirement, pension, or insurance plan, which is not a subterfuge to evade the purposes of the ADEA. In 1986, Congress amended the ADEA to eliminate mandatory retirement, but made clear in its legislative …

Economically Targeted Investments: A Critical Analysis, Edward A. Zelinsky

Articles

No abstract provided.

Bargaining With Imperfect Information: A Study Of Worker Perceptions Of Legal Protection In An At-Will World, Pauline Kim

Scholarship@WashULaw

This Article presents empirical evidence on an issue at the heart of the academic controversy over the at-will rule -- namely, whether employees have sufficient information to effectively negotiate issues of job security. Using a written survey to collect data from several hundred workers, the study documents a widespread misunderstanding of the basic default rule of employment at will. The results indicate that workers consistently overestimate their legal rights, with overwhelming majorities (as high as 89%) believing that they are legally protected against arbitrary and unjust discharges when in fact they can be dismissed at will.

These findings directly contradict …

Insurance Coverage Of Employment Discrimination Claims, Francis J. Mootz Iii

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

Kalanke V. Freie Hansestadt Bremen: The Significance Of The Kalanke Decision On Future Positive Action Programs In The European Union, Rebecca Means

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

In the landmark case Kalanke v. Freie Hansestadt Bremen, the European Court of Justice held that a German state law giving women an "absolute and unconditional priority" in the labor market was inconsistent with the European Equal Treatment Directive. Although many Europeans vehemently criticized the Kalanke decision initially, the furor now appears to have subsided. As a result of this decision, however, the European Union is currently re-examining equal treatment policies and will likely provide further guidance to Member States attempting to formulate positive action programs.

This Note first discusses the institutions of the European Union as they relate to …

The Scope Of Employer Liability For Employee Exposure To A Hazardous Substance: No Harm, No Foul? An Analysis Of Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co. V. Buckley, Barbara J. Fick

Journal Articles

This article previews the Supreme Court case Metro-North Commuter R.R. Co. v. Buckley, 521 U.S. 424 (1997). The author expected the Court to decide whether a railroad worker who is covered by the Federal Employer's Liability Act who has been exposed to asbestos because of employer negligence but who has not developed an asbestos-related disease can recover damages for emotional distress caused by the exposure.

Chadris, Inc. V. Latsis And The Test For Seaman Status: The Supreme Court Muddies The Waters Again, Anne Norris Graham

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Learning Disabilities In The Workplace: A Guide To Ada Compliance, Hilary Greer Fike

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment is a guide for both employers and employees in successfully complying with the ADA's provisions, as they relate to persons with learning disabilities. Part II of this paper examines the types of employment discrimination that individuals with learning disabilities encounter in the application, daily work, and promotion processes. Part III provides an overview of the employment discrimination provisions of the ADA and how those provisions apply to people with learning disabilities. To illustrate how different people with learning disabilities fare in the workforce, Part IV includes narratives of two learning disabled people attempting to find equal employment and …