Labor and Employment Law Commons^™

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Union national policy grievance dated November 25, 1998, alleging breach of the Collective Agreement between the parties bearing the date January 31, 1995, and in particular of Article 12, in that in announcing the creation of its "Simplified Registered Mail Service" project, the Employer indicated that new positions created under this project would not be preferred assignments although, the Union alleges, the work in question corresponds with the duties of a preferred assignment within the meaning of Article 12. The Union requests a declaratory decision that the work in question be performed in registration sections by PO4's in preferred assignments, …

Employer Liability For Harassment Under Title Vii: A Functional Rationale For Faragher And Ellerth, Michael C. Harper

Faculty Scholarship

In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton' and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth,² the Supreme Court, on the last day of its 1997-1998 term finally articulated coherent vicarious liability rules critical for bounding the scope of the discrimination prohibitions in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.³ The Court did so by explaining the meaning of the inclusion of "any agent" in Title VII's definition of "employer.'" The meaning of "agent" in this definition is critical for establishing employer liability because almost all Title VII-protected employees work for corporations and other …

Toward A Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work And The Nanny Tax Debate, Taunya Lovell Banks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Genetic Monitoring In The Workplace: A Tool Not A Solution, Lillian Trettin, Catherine Musham, Richard Jablonski

RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)

The authors differentiate between genetic monitoring and screening, and discuss the potential risks and benefits of predictive testing technologies.

The Ramification Of National Basketball Association Labor Relations, David L. Gregory, Robert J. Nobile

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Foreward: Discipline In Professional Sports, Alfred G. Feliu

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Some Keys To The Nba Lockout, Grant M. Hayden

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

The 1998-99 NBA lockout, like the 1994 Major League Baseball strike, may have serious consequences for the future of the game. Already, the abbreviated training camps and compressed schedules have produced a spate of injuries and scores of ugly, low-scoring games. And the effects of the dispute on the game over the long run may be more difficult, if not impossible, to predict. But those questions are best left to those who track television ratings and ticket office receipts. The more immediate question-the one put to me by the editors of this journal-is what the lockout contributed to labor law …

Vol. 16, No. 1, Stephen B. Rubin

The Illinois Public Employee Relations Report

Contents:

Disability Issues in Arbitration, by Stephen B. Rubin

Recent Developments, by the Student Editorial Board

Further References, compiled by Margaret A. Chaplan

Determining Reasonable Accommodations Under The Ada: Why Courts Should Require Employers To Participate In An "Interactive Process", Alysa M. Barancik

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Genetic Discrimination In The Workplace: An Overview Of Existing Protections, Melinda B. Kaufmann

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Harassment And Constitutional Tort: The Other Jurisprudence, Mark M. Hager

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evolution In The Civil Rights Revolution: The Survival Of Employment Discrimination Claims For Pain And Suffering, Michael D. Moberly

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Contracting Mediation: The Impact Of Different Statutory Regimes, Ellen J. Dannin

Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal

The United States is commited to increasing institutionalized use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), most often based on the claim that it is superior to and different from traditional litigation. Mediation in particular is supposed in the popular view to be user-friendly, nonadversarial, and conducive to optimal, wholistic resolutions. Litigation, in contrast, is supposed to be slow, costly to all, impersonal, formal, legalistic, and incapable of giving complete or satisfactory resolutions. This implicitly assumes that ADR and litigation are discrete processes, each with uniform and intrinsic natures. This, in turn suggests an assumption that they retain these qualities under all …

Bcgseu: Turning A Page In Canadian Human Rights Law, Dianne Pothier

Dianne Pothier Collection

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in British Columbia Government and Service Employees' Union (BCGSEU) v. British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission)' starts like a classic Lord Denning judgment. Within the first few lines, without even knowing what the legal issue really is, you know who is going to win because of how that person is presented. Justice McLachlin's judgment, speaking for a unanimous nine-person Court, begins by noting that the grievor, Tawney Meiorin, "did her work well" but nonetheless "lost her job."' It was that dissonance that made the facts of the case compelling for reinstatement. But what …

Balancing Efficiency And Justice: In Support Of The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Policy Statement Regarding Mandatory Arbitration And Employment Contracts , Gina K. Janeiro

American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

No abstract provided.

Arthur J. Goldberg's Legacies To American Labor Relations, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 667 (1999), Gerald Berendt, Gil Cornfield, Peter Edelman

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nomadic Notaries, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 985 (1999), Malcolm L. Morris

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Triumph Of Hate Speech Regulation: Why Gender Wins But Race Loses In America, Jon Gould

Michigan Journal of Gender & Law

On March 30, 1995, newspaper headlines declared that hate speech regulations were dead. After six years of litigating over university hate speech codes, Stanford University's rule, one of the most modest and cautiously drafted, had been declared unconstitutional by a California Superior Court. Hate speech regulation is far from over. To the contrary, hate speech rules not only continue to exist, but the courts regularly enforce their provisions. The difference is that these cases are largely restricted to a single category-sexual harassment. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and with the regulatory support of the Equal …

Litigation Against Employment Penalties For Pregnancy, Breastfeeding, And Childcare, Candace Kovacic-Fleischer

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

What Will Diversity On The Bench Mean For Justice?, Theresa M. Beiner

Michigan Journal of Gender & Law

This article is aimed at the general question: whether having a woman judge would make a difference in sexual harassment cases. This article is aimed at this general question, the response to which has been elusive: Does the race, gender, or other background characteristics of a judge make a difference in the outcome of cases? The effects of diversity on the bench are just becoming measurable. Many legal scholars have assumed diversity will make a difference. While this conclusion may seem commonsensical, it is important to be able to support such assertions with actual data. The supposition has been that …

Compulsory Arbitration Of Discrimination Claims And The Civil Rights Act Of 1991: Encouraged Or Proscribed?, Mark Adams

Articles

No abstract provided.

Litigating Against Employment Penalties For Pregnancy, Breastfeeding And Childcare, Candace Saari Kovacic-Fleischer

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

From Madonna To Proletariat: Constructing A New Ideology Of Motherhood In Welfare Discourse, Tonya L. Brito

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Labor Law - The Substance Of Procedure: Defining Judicial Authority And The Role Of The Arbitrator In Independent Association Of Continental Pilots V. Continental Airlines, Wendy A. Tyson

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

A Proposed Code Of Ethics For Employers And Customers Of Notaries: A Companion To The Notary Public Code Of Professional Responsibility, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 887 (1999), John C. Anderson, Michael L. Colsen

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Unraveling The Cloth That Binds Latina Garment Workers In Texas: A Critical Analysis Of The Texas Pay Day Act, Ina M. Minjarez

The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice

Abstract forthcoming

The Warn Act, David A. Santacroce

Book Chapters

Plant closings are devastating for workers, their families and the communities in which they live. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act ("the WARN Act" or "WARN") requires some employers to give their workers sixty days' notice before a plant closing or mass layoff. The purpose of the WARN Act is to provide workers with time to seek alternative employment or retraining and to plan for the transition phase after the layoff.

The WARN Act does not prevent employers from closing a plant; instead it only requires larger employers to give notice, subject to a number of exceptions and exemptions. …

The Limited Vision Of The Family And Medical Leave Act, Michael Selmi

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Labor Law Access Rules And Stare Decisis: Developing A Planned Parenthood-Based Model Of Reform, Rafael Gely, Leonard Bierman

Faculty Publications

This article deals with labor law access rules, particularly the rights of unions to gain access to employers' private property for organizing purposes. Professors Gely and Bierman provide a comprehensive analysis of the access issue and identify two major problems with the manner in which the Supreme Court has approached this area. First, the Supreme Court has dealt piecemeal with the various aspects of this problem without attempting to develop a coherent framework. Second, the Court has been reluctant to analyze the access issue within the context of today's workplace.Professors Gely and Bierman attribute the Supreme Court's flawed approach to …