Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Labor and Employment Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legislation

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 751 - 780 of 830

Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law

A Touchstone For Labor Board Remedies, Theodore J. St. Antoine Jan 1968

A Touchstone For Labor Board Remedies, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Articles

Fashion dictates what lawyers argue about, and law professors write about, more than we may care to admit. In labor law, especially, the styles change with a rapidity that would impress a Paris couturier. During the past decade the spotlight has moved from union democracy to labor contract enforcement to the union organizing campaign. Today the "in" topic is National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) remedies. Yet if any subject deserves immunity from the vagaries of fashion, this is the one; for all rights acquire substance only insofar as they are backed by effective remedies. Coke said it long ago: "[W]ant …

Go to article

Legislation: Public Employee Labor Relations / Removal Of Federal Judges, Law Review Staff Apr 1967

Legislation: Public Employee Labor Relations / Removal Of Federal Judges, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

One of the most striking developments in labor relations during the past fifteen years has been the rapid increase of both employment and union organization in the public sector. In 1950, there were approximately 6 million public employees; today there are over 10 million, over three quarters of whom work on the state and local level. It is estimated that 1.5 million of these government employees are members of various union organizations, a sixty per cent increase over the past ten years. As a result of this growth, public employees have increasingly sought and gained organizational and bargaining rights parallel …

Go to article

The Protection Of Economic Pressure By Section 7 Of The National Labor Relations Act, Julius G. Getman Jan 1967

The Protection Of Economic Pressure By Section 7 Of The National Labor Relations Act, Julius G. Getman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Product Picketing-A New Loophole In Section 8(H) (4) Of The National Labor Relations Act?, Michael A. Warner Feb 1965

Product Picketing-A New Loophole In Section 8(H) (4) Of The National Labor Relations Act?, Michael A. Warner

Michigan Law Review

Legal writers have been intrigued for years by the challenge of classifying and identifying the resulting incidents of the joint and survivor bank deposit when an attempt is made to use it as a mode of effectuating a donor depositor's intention to confer benefits on a donee co-depositor. Much in their discussions is useful to one who is concerned with the concept that has evolved in Michigan, where a 1909 statute states that some co-depositors are presumed to be joint tenants. Michigan judges and practitioners must determine, however, whether comment about national trends is applicable here, for in many respects …

Go to article

Power And Politics In Labor Legislation, By Alan K. Mcadams, Byrum E. Carter Jul 1964

Power And Politics In Labor Legislation, By Alan K. Mcadams, Byrum E. Carter

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Procedural Arbitrability Under Section 301 Of The Lmra, Alan Schwartz Jan 1964

Procedural Arbitrability Under Section 301 Of The Lmra, Alan Schwartz

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Introduction, Joseph O'Meara Jan 1964

Introduction, Joseph O'Meara

Journal Articles

A symposium was held on February 29, 1964, devoted to the constitutional amendments proposed by the Council of State Governments. Very briefly these amendments would (1) vest power to amend the Constitution in State legislatures; (2) set up a "Court of the Union," composed of the chief justice of the supreme court of each of the 50 states, which would have authority to review "any judgment of the Supreme Court relating to the rights reserved to the states or to the people by this Constitution"; (3) take from the federal courts all jurisdiction over the apportionment of representation in State …

Go to article

No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart Mar 1961

No-Strike Clauses In The Federal Courts, Frank H. Stewart

Michigan Law Review

One consideration will support several promises. A promisor may extract more than one promise in return for his single undertaking to do - or not to do. It depends upon his bargaining power. His single undertaking may be so valuable that several promises are necessary to induce him to act, or not to act. He is privileged to hold out for the best deal. The law does not examine his motives or reduce his demands. And from this arises the common- law principle that one consideration may support several promises.

Go to article

Unemployment Compensation - Labor Dispute Disqualification - Public Policy And The "Establishment", William G. Thursby Jun 1960

Unemployment Compensation - Labor Dispute Disqualification - Public Policy And The "Establishment", William G. Thursby

Michigan Law Review

Claimants brought suit for unemployment compensation allegedly due them for a period of temporary unemployment. Their employer manufactured spark plugs which were assembled at its Ohio plant using component parts made at its Michigan plant some 50 or 60 miles distant. The parts were transported daily by truck to the Ohio plant, and the Michigan plant was under the direct supervision of the Ohio plant. When a labor dispute occurred at the Michigan plant, lack of parts forced the lay-off of claimants at the Ohio plant. Upon termination of the labor dispute and a resumption of production the claimants resumed …

Go to article

Internal Affairs Of Labor Unions Under The Labor Reform Act Of 1959, Archibald Cox Apr 1960

Internal Affairs Of Labor Unions Under The Labor Reform Act Of 1959, Archibald Cox

Michigan Law Review

The Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 has two main divisions. One deals with the internal affairs of labor organizations and, incidentally, with certain dishonest practices in labor-management relations tending to corrupt union officials. The other deals with labor-management relations as such. This article is confined to the first branch.

Go to article

Book Reviews, O. Kahn-Freund, Saul Medlovitz, Charles D. Kelso, J. Francis Paschal, Thomas A. Cowan, Lowell Turrentine, Richard S. Sullivan, G. Robert Ellegaard, Richard Arens, Ilmar Tammelo, J. Myron Jacobstein, Paul O. Proehl Mar 1960

Book Reviews, O. Kahn-Freund, Saul Medlovitz, Charles D. Kelso, J. Francis Paschal, Thomas A. Cowan, Lowell Turrentine, Richard S. Sullivan, G. Robert Ellegaard, Richard Arens, Ilmar Tammelo, J. Myron Jacobstein, Paul O. Proehl

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Constitutionality Of The Emergency Strike Provisions, James N. Adler Feb 1960

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Constitutionality Of The Emergency Strike Provisions, James N. Adler

Michigan Law Review

In an effort to settle a nationwide steel strike the President invoked the "national emergency" provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act. Having made the requisite finding that the strike would "imperil the national health or safety," he appointed a board of inquiry to investigate the dispute. Upon receipt of the board's report the President directed the Attorney General to seek an injunction against the strike. Basing its determination largely upon the strike's hindrance of the national defense program, the district court found the strike would "imperil the national health or safety" and granted the injunction The court of appeals, affirming, rejected …

Go to article

The National Labor Relations Act And Collective Bargaining, Nathan P. Feinsinger Apr 1959

The National Labor Relations Act And Collective Bargaining, Nathan P. Feinsinger

Michigan Law Review

The purpose of this paper has been to review the policy-making decisions of the National Labor Relations Board in seeking to effectuate the duty "to bargain collectively" under the National Labor Relations Act, in order to ascertain and appraise their direction.

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor Management Relations Act - Linking "Employer Free Speech" To No-Solicitation Rule, Barbara Burger Feb 1959

Labor Law - Labor Management Relations Act - Linking "Employer Free Speech" To No-Solicitation Rule, Barbara Burger

Michigan Law Review

During an organizational campaign the employer prohibited any dissemination of literature on company property and soliciting or campaigning on company time by employees while itself distributing within the plant non-threatening, anti-union literature. General Counsel for the NLRB contended that by this conduct the employer "interfered with, restrained or coerced" employees in their exercise of the right to self-organization. This contention was rejected by the NLRB, but on appeal was accepted by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, reversed, two justices dissenting. Even if an employer could commit …

Go to article

Whither Hurried Hence -- The New Right To Work Amendment, Dan Hopson Jr. Jan 1959

Whither Hurried Hence -- The New Right To Work Amendment, Dan Hopson Jr.

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Background And Public Policy Of Pennsylvania Law On Collective Bargaining Agreements - Unshackling The Hold Of The Common Law, I. Herman Stern Jan 1958

The Background And Public Policy Of Pennsylvania Law On Collective Bargaining Agreements - Unshackling The Hold Of The Common Law, I. Herman Stern

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue May 1957

Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue

Michigan Law Review

It is the purpose of this article to review judicial standards applicable to the determination of rights in inventions made by employees of the federal government, to note statutory provisions affecting the problem, to examine the content and effect of the present Executive program for determining such rights, to review and evaluate two fundamental and conflicting theories in this field, and to propose legislation establishing appropriate standards and procedures. This topic is believed to have general interest because, in addition to the urgencies suggested above, the problem touches some of the basic legal philosophy underlying the United States patent system.

Go to article

Lecht: Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation, Sylvester Petro Apr 1957

Lecht: Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation, Sylvester Petro

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation. By Leonard A. Lecht.

Go to article

The Status Of The Collective Labor Agreement In France, Robert J. Nye Mar 1957

The Status Of The Collective Labor Agreement In France, Robert J. Nye

Michigan Law Review

This paper is intended to outline in historical perspective the statutory, judicial, administrative and social developments which have made the collective agreement an indispensable accessory to legislative and judicial regulation in France.

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor - Management Relations Act - Further Comments On Federalism, Robert B. Olsen S.Ed. Feb 1956

Labor Law - Labor - Management Relations Act - Further Comments On Federalism, Robert B. Olsen S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Until a decade ago, the nation's lawyers paid little attention to the status of federal-state relations in the regulation of labor disputes. Today there hardly appears a volume of a legal journal that does not contain the product of new efforts to bring order out of the chaos that prevails in this area. A number of writers have apparently given up the task of reconciling statutory provisions with case law and case law with sound federal policy, and have resorted to the simpler, yet challenging, method of proposing amendments to existing federal statutes. Worthy as these efforts may be in …

Go to article

Labor Law - Lmra - Status Of Union Official As An "Employee Representative" For Purposes Of Prosecution Under Section 302, George E. Ewing Jan 1956

Labor Law - Lmra - Status Of Union Official As An "Employee Representative" For Purposes Of Prosecution Under Section 302, George E. Ewing

Michigan Law Review

The appellant was president of the International Longshoreman's Association, the recognized bargaining agent for longshore labor in the Port of New York. An officer of several of the employer members of the New York Shipping Association paid the appellant $5500 in six yearly "Christmas presents." The appellant was convicted of violating section 302 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, which makes it a misdemeanor for "any representative of any employees" to receive or agree to receive money from his employer, subject to certain exceptions. On appeal, held, reversed. The word "representative" is a term of art used throughout the act …

Go to article

Proposed Procedure For Administering Heart Cases Under The Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Ivan C. Rutledge Jan 1956

Proposed Procedure For Administering Heart Cases Under The Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Ivan C. Rutledge

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Labor Law - Collective Bargaining - Enforceability Of Collective Agreements Under Section 301(A), Douglas Peck S.Ed. Nov 1955

Labor Law - Collective Bargaining - Enforceability Of Collective Agreements Under Section 301(A), Douglas Peck S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a collective bargaining agreement with defendant. The complaint alleged that defendant was obligated by the agreement to pay employees represented by the plaintiff their full salary for the month of April 1951 regardless of the fact that they had been absent on certain working days. The suit was brought under section 301 (a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947.On appeal from a court of appeals decision directing dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, held, affirmed, two justices dissenting. An action by a labor organization to enforce …

Go to article

Labor Law - State Jurisdiction Over Acts Which Are Unfair Labor Practices Under Federal Labor Legislation, Eugene Alkema S.Ed. Feb 1955

Labor Law - State Jurisdiction Over Acts Which Are Unfair Labor Practices Under Federal Labor Legislation, Eugene Alkema S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Extensive federal labor legislation under the commerce clause has created a perplexing jurisdictional problem in the state courts, which are confronted increasingly with the critical issue of possible conflict with a federal preemptive area of operation. The extent to which the federal government has superseded state jurisdiction over labor matters has remained unsettled under the current case law and the legislative history of the federal acts, and the need for clarification is apparent at a time when labor cases are reaching the courts in increasing numbers. It is natural for unions to raise the issue of lack of jurisdiction in …

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Applicable Remedies When An Employer Transers To A New Location To Avoid Dealing With A Union, John F. Dodge, Jr. S.Ed. Feb 1955

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Applicable Remedies When An Employer Transers To A New Location To Avoid Dealing With A Union, John F. Dodge, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

An interstate trucking concern with depots in numerous cities, was approached by a union seeking recognition as the bargaining representative of the office and clerical workers at one of the depots. The employer, after interrogating the employees involved as to their union affiliation, transferred the clerical work done at that depot to an office in a different city, but continued operating the trucking depot itself. The clerical employees were discharged but were offered reinstatement at the new location, together with reimbursement of the expenses of moving to the new location. Held, the employer violated sections 8(a)(1), 8(a)(3), and 8(a)(5) …

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Right Of Union To Sue On Collective Agreement Under Section 301, Robert C. Fox S.Ed. Nov 1954

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Right Of Union To Sue On Collective Agreement Under Section 301, Robert C. Fox S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff union brought suit in a federal district court under section 301 of the LMRA alleging that defendant employer had breached the collective agreement between them by failing to· pay some four thousand employees covered by the agreement for a day on which they did not work. Section 301(a) permits suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a union without respect to the amount in controversy or the citizenship of the parties. Plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment as to the rights of the parties under the agreement, an accounting to determine the amounts of the wages withheld, and …

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Interrogation Concerning Union Membership As An Unfair Labor Practice, John H. Leddy S.Ed. Nov 1954

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Interrogation Concerning Union Membership As An Unfair Labor Practice, John H. Leddy S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Concerned about possible loss of Allied Trades Council approval if a union not a member of the council should be elected by Syracuse Color Press employees in a forthcoming representation election, the plant superintendent called five employees into his private office. He and the general manager questioned them concerning membership and meetings of the nonmember union, and about employee sympathy regarding that union. The nonmember union filed a complaint and the trial examiner of the National Labor Relations Board found a violation of section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, although he found no actual coercion of the employees. …

Go to article

Venue-The Need For A Change In The Venue Provisions Of The Federal Employers' Liability Act, S. I. Shuman S.Ed. Jun 1954

Venue-The Need For A Change In The Venue Provisions Of The Federal Employers' Liability Act, S. I. Shuman S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In response to the need created by a highly dangerous era of railroad employment, and subsequent to the passage of similar legislation in Europe, there was enacted in 1906 a Federal Employers' Liability Act. The attempted coverage of the first FELA was too broad to withstand the constitutional scrutiny of a five-to-four Supreme Court, and it consequently remained for the Congress of 1908 to enact valid legislation for the protection of the railroad employee. Whether or not: the FELA is the most efficacious solution to the problem of the injured railroad employee continues to be warmly debated, but for the …

Go to article

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Availability Of Injunctive Relief Under Section 301, George B. Berridge S.Ed. Jan 1954

Labor Law - Labor-Management Relations Act - Availability Of Injunctive Relief Under Section 301, George B. Berridge S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff union brought suit in a federal district court under section 301 of the LMRA to enjoin defendant employer from violating a collective bargaining agreement by refusing to give effect to an arbitration award directing the reinstatement of certain employees. On appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the complaint on the ground that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prevented the court from issuing an injunction, held, reversed. Section 301(a) of the LMRA authorizes federal courts to enjoin violations of collective agreements, and the Norris-LaGuardia Act does not forbid the granting of such relief. Milk and Ice Cream Drivers …

Go to article

Civil Procedure - Power Of State To Enjoin Its Citizens From Suing In Another State Under The Federal Employers' Liability Act, John S. Slavens S.Ed. Jan 1954

Civil Procedure - Power Of State To Enjoin Its Citizens From Suing In Another State Under The Federal Employers' Liability Act, John S. Slavens S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner was injured in the course of employment with respondent, an interstate railroad, in Ben Hill County, Georgia, the residence of petitioner. Invoking the Federal Employers' Liability Act, petitioner filed suit in Jefferson County, Alabama, where respondent was doing business. Respondent, relying on section 1404(a) of the Judicial Code, initiated an equity action in Ben Hill County, Georgia, to restrain petitioner from continuing his action in Alabama. The trial court sustained a demurrer to respondent's petition. The Georgia Supreme Court reversed, holding that Georgia law gave its courts power to prevent its citizens from bringing vexatious suits. On certiorari from …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last