Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (838)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (83)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (82)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (30)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (5)
- The University of Akron (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- BLR (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (74)
- Constitution (69)
- Federal (58)
-
- State (57)
- New York (48)
- Supreme Court (47)
- Student comment (46)
- Texas (43)
- Defendant (35)
- Texas Supreme Court (35)
- Due process (33)
- 1990) (31)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- § 6 (29)
- § 1 (27)
- Fourteenth Amendment (26)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (26)
- First Amendment (25)
- Federalism (24)
- Constitutional law (23)
- Criminal law (23)
- Jurisprudence (23)
- Litigation (23)
- Negligence (22)
- Discrimination (21)
- Law (21)
- Judge (20)
- United States Supreme Court (20)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (835)
- Seattle University Law Review (217)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- UIC Law Review (81)
-
- Northwestern University Law Review (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (11)
- American University Law Review (9)
- Arkansas Law Review (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (7)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- Journal of Law and Policy (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (5)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (5)
- Texas A&M Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Drafting Model Laws on Indoor Pollution for Developing and Developed Nations (July 12-13) (4)
- ExpressO (4)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (4)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 1291 - 1320 of 1597
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
Florida Star V. B.J.F.: The Rape Of The Right To Privacy, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1990), Barbara Lynn Pedersen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Edmonson V. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.: Can The "No State Action" Shibboleth Legitimize The Racist Use Of Peremptory Challenges In Civil Actions, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1990), David Park
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
New York V. Sullivan: Shhh .... Don't Say The A Word - Another Outcome-Oriented Abortion Decision, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 753 (1990), Christopher C. Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Back To Open Season On American Product Ingenuity: Bonito Boats, Inc. V. Thunder Craft, Inc., 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1990), Alex Devience Jr.
Back To Open Season On American Product Ingenuity: Bonito Boats, Inc. V. Thunder Craft, Inc., 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1990), Alex Devience Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limitation Of Liability Of Limited Partners While Affording Control Of Partnership Affairs To Limited Partners., Kenneth L. Bennight Jr., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii
Limitation Of Liability Of Limited Partners While Affording Control Of Partnership Affairs To Limited Partners., Kenneth L. Bennight Jr., Troy (Trey) S. Martin Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
This article examines the liability provisions of the Texas Revised Act Section 3.03 and compares it with other uniform limited partnership acts. It attempts to ascertain the amount of control a limited partner can exercise over the partnership without risking unlimited liability as a general partner. Limited partners invest capital and share in the profits of the business, but their liability is limited to the amount of capital they invest. If the limited partners exercise control over the business, however, the limited partners may forfeit their limited liability and become liable as general partners. In the last century, the law …
Prenatal V. Parental Rights: What A Difference An A Makes., Ali Gallagher
Prenatal V. Parental Rights: What A Difference An A Makes., Ali Gallagher
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Lust - Deep In The Heart Of Texas: Federal Epa Regulations Affecting Underground Storage Tanks - The Texas Statutory And Regulatory Counterparts., Blaine D. Edwards
Lust - Deep In The Heart Of Texas: Federal Epa Regulations Affecting Underground Storage Tanks - The Texas Statutory And Regulatory Counterparts., Blaine D. Edwards
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
1989 Texas Dtpa Reform: Closing The Dtpa Loophole In The 1987 Tort Reform Laws And The Ongoing Quest For Fairer Dtpa Laws., John T. Montford, Will G. Barber, Robert L. Duncan
1989 Texas Dtpa Reform: Closing The Dtpa Loophole In The 1987 Tort Reform Laws And The Ongoing Quest For Fairer Dtpa Laws., John T. Montford, Will G. Barber, Robert L. Duncan
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Dedication., James P. White
Dedication., Sam S. Crutchfield
Commanding Respect: Criminal Sanctions For Environmental Crimes., Eva M. Fromm
Commanding Respect: Criminal Sanctions For Environmental Crimes., Eva M. Fromm
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Standards Of Appellate Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
Standards Of Appellate Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Punitive Damages For Breach Of Contract - A Principled Approach., Frank J. Cavico Jr.
Punitive Damages For Breach Of Contract - A Principled Approach., Frank J. Cavico Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Reasonable Belief That A Third Party Had Authority To Consent To A Search Is An Exception To The Warrant Requirement., S. Jeffrey Gately
A Reasonable Belief That A Third Party Had Authority To Consent To A Search Is An Exception To The Warrant Requirement., S. Jeffrey Gately
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether a warrantless search is valid when police rely on consent of a third party whom they reasonably believe had common authority over an area but does not. A reasonable belief that a third party had authority to consent to a search is an exception to the warrant requirement. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects people and their possessions by prohibiting unreasonable searches by government authorities. Although this protection extends to any place where a person may claim a reasonable expectation of privacy, it especially protects …
Under The Boren Amendment, Health Care Providers Have An Enforceable Right, Actionable Under 42 U.S.C. 1983, To Challenge A State's Reimbursement Plan Under The Medicaid Act., C. Lee Cusenbary
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Allowing A Child Abuse Victim To Testify Via One-Way Closed-Circuit Television Does Not Violate A Criminal Defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause Right If The Trial Court Specifically Finds Such A Procedure Necessary To Protect The Child's Welfare., Lisa R. Miller
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Maryland v. Craig, the Supreme Court held allowing child abuse victims to testify via one-way closed-circuit television does not violate a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right if the trial court finds the procedure necessary to protect the child’s welfare. Although “confront” has generally been interpreted to mean “face-to-face,” on occasion, it may yield to public policy considerations and the compelling necessities of particular cases. The original purpose of the confrontation right was to prevent the accusers in a criminal proceeding from using ex parte affidavits or depositions against a defendant, in lieu of personal testimony. The Craig …
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements., Jeffrey W. Stempel
Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements., Jeffrey W. Stempel
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Protecting The Fetus From Maternal Drug And Alcohol Abuse: A Proposal For Texas., Tom Rickhoff, Curtis L. Cukjati
Protecting The Fetus From Maternal Drug And Alcohol Abuse: A Proposal For Texas., Tom Rickhoff, Curtis L. Cukjati
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
You Should See Your Irs File: Access To Irs Information - What Are A Taxpayer's Rights., Richard J. Wood
You Should See Your Irs File: Access To Irs Information - What Are A Taxpayer's Rights., Richard J. Wood
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Estate Planning For The Non-Taxable Estate., Mcken V. Carrington
Estate Planning For The Non-Taxable Estate., Mcken V. Carrington
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Government Regulations Authorizing M.Andatory Alcohol And Drug Testing Of Private Railroad Employees On Less Than Individualized Suspicion To Enhance Safety Are Constitutional, Keith Dorsett
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
42 U.S.C. 1981 Does Not Provide A Remedy For Racial Harassment During Employment., Jeffrey A. Lacy
42 U.S.C. 1981 Does Not Provide A Remedy For Racial Harassment During Employment., Jeffrey A. Lacy
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the United States Supreme Court held 42 U.S.C. § 1981 does not provide a remedy for racial harassment during employment. In 1976, in Runyon v. McCrary, the Court expanded the scope of § 1981 to cover private discrimination in contractual settings, including racial discrimination in private schools, when previously unavailable. More than a decade after the Runyon decision, the Supreme Court in Patterson, established that there were limits to § 1981’s applicability in private racial discrimination claims. Specifically, the Court held while § 1981 prohibits discriminatory conduct while entering into or enforcing a contract, …
Dtpa In The Courts: Two Empirical Studies And A Proposal For Change., Nancy Friedman Atlas, Scott J. Atlas, Raymond T. Nimmer
Dtpa In The Courts: Two Empirical Studies And A Proposal For Change., Nancy Friedman Atlas, Scott J. Atlas, Raymond T. Nimmer
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Recognizing An Implied Warranty That Professional Services Will Be Performed In A Good And Workmanlike Manner., Mark L. Kincaid
Recognizing An Implied Warranty That Professional Services Will Be Performed In A Good And Workmanlike Manner., Mark L. Kincaid
St. Mary's Law Journal
Although the Court received a deluge of amicus curiae briefs after its initial ruling in Melody Home ushering the Court to reevaluate the consequences of its decision, there is no sound basis for excluding professional services from the implied warranty recognized by the Texas Supreme Court that services will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. The issue of what is properly considered a “professional” service or what definition is to be applied to distinguish “non-professional” and “professional” services if the latter were to be excluded from the implied warranty. Instead of differentiating between “non-professional” and “professional” services in …
Personal Injury Actions Under The Dtpa., Paul N. Gold, George (Tex) Quesada
Personal Injury Actions Under The Dtpa., Paul N. Gold, George (Tex) Quesada
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct: Additional Liability For Texas Lawyers., Xavier G. Medina, Virginia Coyle
Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct: Additional Liability For Texas Lawyers., Xavier G. Medina, Virginia Coyle
St. Mary's Law Journal
As a result of the enactment of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules”), Texas lawyer no longer practice under guidelines which include aspirational goals and discretionary moral choices. The Rules are mandatory in nature and depict a minimum standard of professional conduct which, if violated, could subject the offending lawyer to disciplinary action. Although the Rules provide a disclaimer stating that they “do not undertake to define standards of civil liability of lawyers for professional conduct,” Texas lawyers fear the Rules will be utilized as an independent basis for liability, or a standard of care for malpractice. The …
Dedication., Ernest A. Raba
Dedication., Orville C. Walker
Dedication., Jack Pope