Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (838)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (83)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (82)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (30)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (5)
- The University of Akron (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- BLR (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Inc. (74)
- Constitution (69)
- Federal (58)
-
- State (57)
- New York (48)
- Supreme Court (47)
- Student comment (46)
- Texas (43)
- Defendant (35)
- Texas Supreme Court (35)
- Due process (33)
- 1990) (31)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- § 6 (29)
- § 1 (27)
- Fourteenth Amendment (26)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (26)
- First Amendment (25)
- Federalism (24)
- Constitutional law (23)
- Criminal law (23)
- Jurisprudence (23)
- Litigation (23)
- Negligence (22)
- Discrimination (21)
- Law (21)
- Judge (20)
- United States Supreme Court (20)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (835)
- Seattle University Law Review (217)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (81)
- UIC Law Review (81)
-
- Northwestern University Law Review (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (11)
- American University Law Review (9)
- Arkansas Law Review (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (7)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Akron Law Review (5)
- Journal of Law and Policy (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (5)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (5)
- Texas A&M Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Drafting Model Laws on Indoor Pollution for Developing and Developed Nations (July 12-13) (4)
- ExpressO (4)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (4)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 1597
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Entering The Thicket - Mandamus Review Of Texas District Court Witness Disclosure Orders., David W. Holman, Byron C. Keeling
Entering The Thicket - Mandamus Review Of Texas District Court Witness Disclosure Orders., David W. Holman, Byron C. Keeling
St. Mary's Law Journal
In the absence of statutory authorization of interlocutory appeal, the writ of mandamus usually is the sole convenient remedy for an egregious trial court decision prior to judgment. The increasing number of mandamus petitions which annually invade the Texas appellate courts reflects the importance of the writ of mandamus. While once described as the “extraordinary” remedy, it is not uncommon for proceedings in a trial court to cease while a party seeks mandamus review of a controversial discovery ruling. One type of discovery rule which has not escaped mandamus review is the admission or exclusion of the testimony of witnesses …
The Texas Tax Relief Act After Twelve Years: Adoption, Implementation &(And) Enforcement., Michael Weiss
The Texas Tax Relief Act After Twelve Years: Adoption, Implementation &(And) Enforcement., Michael Weiss
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Texas Tax Reform Act, an amendment to the Texas constitution, undertook to create and enforce spending limits. The Texas Government first followed the spending limits in the 1982-1983 biennium. The threat of veto from Governor Clemments forced the legislature to adopt a budget below the limit. Unfortunately, Texas taxpayers did not see the savings of 1982 repeated in subsequent years. Meaning, the amendment, which passed by an eighty-four percent majority, failed in its purpose for limiting the government growth and spending. The noncompliance of the LBB is in contravention of the people’s will and the laws established to set …
The Carryforward Of Net Operating Losses And Other Tax Attributes After Bankruptcy Reorganizations., Martin M. Van Brauman
The Carryforward Of Net Operating Losses And Other Tax Attributes After Bankruptcy Reorganizations., Martin M. Van Brauman
St. Mary's Law Journal
When stock is exchanged for debt in a bankruptcy reorganization, potentially abusive tax situations can result if the reorganization occurs strictly for the carryforward of tax attributes to the acquiring corporation. The basic question is to what extent the discharge of indebtedness provisions, the application of the various statutory and judicial requirements, and the consolidated return regulations prohibit or restrict the carryforward of the tax history of the debtor corporation. Bankruptcy reorganization for a corporation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code can take the form of either a recapitalization or a reorganization. Because a “G” reorganization involves a discharge …
Nude Dancing Conveying A Message Or Eroticism And Sexuality Is Protected By The First Amendment But Can Be Limited Under State Police Powers Provided The Government Establishes A Substantial, Content-Neutral Purpose., Fred S. Wilson
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protects nude dancing as conveying an expressive message, but state police powers may limit protection if the government establishes a substantial, content-neutral purpose. It is a principal of constitutional law where an actor intends to convey a message by expressive conduct, the First Amendment protection extends to that expression. Traditionally, time, place, and manner regulations restricting expressive conduct based on either the subject-matter of the message or the viewpoint of the actor receive content-based classification. However, content-based regulation of expressive conduct is constitutional only when narrowly drawn …
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Validity Of New York State Ethics Commission Rule 932.2 Barring Public Officers From Holding Political Party Office, William Josephson, Beverly Jean Ross
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Interaction Between State And Federal Right To Counsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeounsel: The Overruling Of Bartolomeo, Joseph D. Sullivan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
What is the meaning and content of the "liberty" protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment? In Michael H. v. Gerald D. Justices Brennan and Scalia spelled out what at first blush appear to be sharply contrasting understandings of the meaning of liberty and of the substantive limits liberty imposes on state action. Justice Scalia argued that the "liberty" protected by a substantive interpretation of due process is only the liberty to engage in activities historically protected against state intervention by firmly entrenched societal traditions. I will sometimes call this the "traditionalist" interpretation of liberty. Justice Brennan, …