Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (154)
- UIC School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (126)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (92)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- BLR (71)
- American University Washington College of Law (64)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (56)
- University of Colorado Law School (54)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (43)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (39)
- Duke Law (35)
- University of Georgia School of Law (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Notre Dame Law School (32)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (29)
- Liberty University (27)
- Fordham Law School (26)
- The University of Akron (26)
- Barry University School of Law (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (24)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (23)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (22)
- Cleveland State University (21)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (21)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (20)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (301)
- Constitutional Law (202)
- Constitutional law (189)
- Constitution (173)
- Supreme Court (146)
-
- First Amendment (83)
- Judicial review (67)
- United States Supreme Court (61)
- Originalism (59)
- Judges (57)
- Federal (56)
- State (56)
- Courts (53)
- Federalism (53)
- Constitutional interpretation (51)
- New York (47)
- Fourteenth Amendment (46)
- Due process (43)
- Law (41)
- Legal History (41)
- Legislation (41)
- Law and Society (40)
- Separation of powers (40)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (36)
- Defendant (34)
- Court of Appeals (31)
- Interpretation (31)
- 1990) (30)
- Equal protection (30)
- Textualism (30)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- UIC Law Review (138)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Faculty Scholarship (118)
- Touro Law Review (108)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (94)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (90)
- ExpressO (69)
- Michigan Law Review (64)
- Publications (54)
- Articles (47)
- Northwestern University Law Review (45)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (43)
- American University Law Review (31)
- Scholarly Works (30)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Akron Law Review (25)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (24)
- Barry Law Review (21)
- Arkansas Law Review (20)
- Working Paper Series (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (17)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (17)
- Brooklyn Law Review (16)
- Catholic University Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Journal Articles (15)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1651 - 1680 of 2122
Full-Text Articles in Jurisprudence
Righting Illinois' Wrongs: Suggestions For Reform And A Call For Abolition, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2001), Sharone Levy
Righting Illinois' Wrongs: Suggestions For Reform And A Call For Abolition, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2001), Sharone Levy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bad Medicine: Erisa's Equitable Remedies And The Preemption Of Fundamental Legal Rights, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2001), Marilyn Lablaiks
Bad Medicine: Erisa's Equitable Remedies And The Preemption Of Fundamental Legal Rights, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2001), Marilyn Lablaiks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punishing Thought: A Narrative Deconstructing The Interpretive Dance Of Hate Crime Legislation, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 123 (2001), Anne B. Ryan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata And Full Faith And Credit, Stewart E. Sterk
The Muddy Boundaries Between Res Judicata And Full Faith And Credit, Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to respect and recognize the legal decisions of other states, but its application is limited when it comes to judgments that attempt to control future behavior or infringe on a state's sovereignty. The article argues that while the clause ensures finality and uniformity, it does not obligate states to enforce sister-state injunctions or orders that dictate conduct beyond their borders. This distinction is particularly evident in cases involving family law, where states retain flexibility to modify or ignore prior judgments based on evolving circumstances, such as the best …
Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters, Erwin Chemerinsky
Getting Beyond Formalism In Constitutional Law: Constitutional Theory Matters, Erwin Chemerinsky
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Replies To Professor Chemerinsky, David W. Levy, Harry F. Tepker Jr., Arthur G. Lefrancois, Kevin W. Saunders, Michael A. Scaperlanda, Katheleen R. Guzman, Lindsay G. Robertson
Replies To Professor Chemerinsky, David W. Levy, Harry F. Tepker Jr., Arthur G. Lefrancois, Kevin W. Saunders, Michael A. Scaperlanda, Katheleen R. Guzman, Lindsay G. Robertson
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Further Thoughts, Erwin Chemerinsky
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Michigan Law Review
Ages ago, I had the excellent luck to fall into a collaboration with Terrance Sandalow to produce a casebook now long forgotten. There could have been no more bracing or beneficial learning experience for a fledgling legal scholar (meaning me). What brought us together indeed was luck from my standpoint, but it was enterprise, too - the brokerage of an alert West Publishing Company editor picking up on a casual remark of mine as he made one of his regular sweeps through Harvard Law School. A novice law professor, I mentioned to him how much I admired a new essay …
"Shut Up He Explained", Mark V. Tushnet
"Shut Up He Explained", Mark V. Tushnet
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Part I of this Commentary examines the conversational model of politics. I argue that the virtues Bennett finds in the conversational model exist only when, and to the extent that, participants in civil and political society can engage in undominated conversation. The requirement that conversation be undominated generates a substantial set of social prerequisites, mostly dealing with equality. And yet, determining what social arrangements actually satisfy those prerequisites is itself a matter of constitutional controversy. Resolving such controversies through politics is no solution, because the political arena is where we seek to ensure that nondomination prevails in civil society, and, …
Cook V. Gralike: Easy Cases And Structural Reasoning, Vicki C. Jackson
Cook V. Gralike: Easy Cases And Structural Reasoning, Vicki C. Jackson
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In Cook v Gralike, the Court - unanimous as to result - struck down a Missouri initiative amending the state constitution to require that the failure of candidates for U.S. Congress to support a particular term-limits amendment to the United States Constitution be noted on the ballot. In an opinion joined by seven Justices, the Court held that the Missouri law exceeded the scope of states' powers to regulate the "time, place and manner" of holding congressional elections . . . The opinions are analyzed preliminarily in Part I. Part II below suggests that even if there were no Elections …
The Most Dangerous Justice Rides Again: Revisiting The Power Pageant Of The Justices, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
The Most Dangerous Justice Rides Again: Revisiting The Power Pageant Of The Justices, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Who is the most powerful Supreme Court Justice? In 1996 we measured voting power on the Court according to each Justice's ability to form five-member coalitions. From the set of all coalitions formed by the Court during its 1994 and 1995 Terms, we developed a generalized Banzhaf index of the Justices' relative strength. Generally speaking, participating in a greater number of unique coalitions translates into greater judicial voting power. To supplement the small number of decisions then available, we derived hypothetical five-Justice coalitions from the intersections of actually observed coalitions involving more than five members. Professor Lynn Baker contested our …
Reconceptualizing Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners: How Should Aedpa's Standard Of Review Operate After Williams V. Taylor?, Adam N. Steinman
Reconceptualizing Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners: How Should Aedpa's Standard Of Review Operate After Williams V. Taylor?, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
This Article aims to expand the debate over the proper standard of review that applies in state prisoner habeas corpus actions in federal court. To date, this debate has centered on whether federal habeas courts should defer to the state court's resolution of federal legal questions, or whether federal habeas courts should assess and apply federal law de novo. However, in Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), the Supreme Court held that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) imposes a deferential standard of review that precludes a federal habeas court from granting relief based simply on its …
Why The Eleventh Amendment Always Matters, Even When Transaction Costs Are Zero: A Reply To Professor Farber, Neil S. Siegel
Why The Eleventh Amendment Always Matters, Even When Transaction Costs Are Zero: A Reply To Professor Farber, Neil S. Siegel
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Part Ii, Curtis A. Bradley
The Treaty Power And American Federalism, Part Ii, Curtis A. Bradley
Michigan Law Review
In an article published in this Review two years ago, I described and critiqued what I called the "nationalist view" of the treaty power. Under this view, the national government has the constitutional power to enter into treaties, and thereby create binding national law by virtue of the Supremacy Clause, without regard to either subject matter or federalism limitations. This view is reflected in the writings of a number of prominent foreign affairs law scholars, as well as in the American Law Institute's Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States. In my article, I argued that this …
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
Assessing The New Judicial Minimalism, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
In this article, which has been published in slightly revised form at 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1454 (2000), I critique some recently prominent arguments for "judicial minimalism" in constitutional decisionmaking. Current minimalist arguments, I contend, are primarily "policentric," that is, focused on the role the judiciary can play in bolstering the accountability and deliberativeness of the political branches. Drawing in part on a previous article, I offer an alternative approach to minimalism that is "juricentric" - focused on the inherent democratic legitimacy of the adjudicative process and the unique competence of that process to produce decisions about individual rights. I …
Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, Jim Rossi, Susan G. Rose-Ackerman
Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, Jim Rossi, Susan G. Rose-Ackerman
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Constitutional takings protections, such as those in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, create a potential for state liability for changes in regulatory policy by governments. This Article critiques takings jurisprudence in the context of two infrastructure investment issues: the stranded cost problem facing United States utility industries, which has given rise to claims of compensation for deregulatory takings; and the development of standards to protect direct foreign investment in developing countries. In both contexts, traditional legal doctrines do not adequately provide for the type of remedy sought so courts are in need of standards to assist them …
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Christians And The Military, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Christians And The Military, Jeffrey C. Tuomala
Faculty Publications and Presentations
No abstract provided.
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Michigan Law Review
If one wishes to revisit a classic, Albert Crunus's The Fall is a riskier choice than Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, which Steven Lubet eloquently discussed last year in these pages. It is not only that Camus's work will be less familiar to legal audiences than Lee's, despite the fact that The Fall is becoming recognized through critical "revisitation" as perhaps Crunus's greatest novel. It is also that the legal protagonist of The Fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, does not have Atticus Finch's immediate appeal. Finch is idealistic, Clamence is existential; Finch is pious, Clamence is debauched; Finch is hopeful, Clamence …
Schmittian Positions On Law And Politics?: Cls And Derrida, John P. Mccormick
Schmittian Positions On Law And Politics?: Cls And Derrida, John P. Mccormick
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt And The Three Moments Of Democracy, Andreas Kalyvas
Carl Schmitt And The Three Moments Of Democracy, Andreas Kalyvas
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Exile Of The Nomos: For A Critical Profile Of Carl Schmitt, Giacomo Marramao
The Exile Of The Nomos: For A Critical Profile Of Carl Schmitt, Giacomo Marramao
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt And His Influence On Historians, Reinhard Mehring
Carl Schmitt And His Influence On Historians, Reinhard Mehring
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Schmitt, History, And Habermas: Comments On Mehring And Rasch, Joseph W. Bendersky
Schmitt, History, And Habermas: Comments On Mehring And Rasch, Joseph W. Bendersky
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Normless And Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt's Theory Of Emergency Powers And The "Norm-Exception" Dichotomy, Oren Gross
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Andreas Kalyvas, Jan Müller
Schmitt Reads Marx, Jorge E. Dotti
Carl Schmitt's Antiliberalism: Its Theoretical And Historical Sources And Its Philosophical And Political Meaning, Carlo Galli
Carl Schmitt's Antiliberalism: Its Theoretical And Historical Sources And Its Philosophical And Political Meaning, Carlo Galli
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carl Schmitt: The Defective Guidance For The Critique Of Political Liberalism, Emanuel Richter
Carl Schmitt: The Defective Guidance For The Critique Of Political Liberalism, Emanuel Richter
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.