Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (135)
- Constitutional Law (108)
- Civil Procedure (76)
- State and Local Government Law (75)
- Supreme Court of the United States (57)
-
- Conflict of Laws (51)
- Litigation (49)
- Torts (48)
- Contracts (47)
- Estates and Trusts (46)
- Legislation (41)
- Labor and Employment Law (39)
- Family Law (36)
- Criminal Law (35)
- Tax Law (35)
- Bankruptcy Law (33)
- Business Organizations Law (33)
- Property Law and Real Estate (32)
- Evidence (31)
- Admiralty (28)
- Insurance Law (27)
- International Law (27)
- Administrative Law (24)
- Securities Law (24)
- Commercial Law (23)
- Transportation Law (23)
- Legal History (22)
- Fourteenth Amendment (21)
- Keyword
-
- New York (28)
- Due process (19)
- Federalism (18)
- Domicile (16)
- Venue (16)
-
- Illinois (15)
- Liability (14)
- Choice of law (13)
- Diversity jurisdiction (13)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (13)
- Federal courts (12)
- National Labor Relations Act (12)
- Ohio (12)
- Judicial review (11)
- Judicial Code (10)
- Forum non conveniens (9)
- Injunction (9)
- Interstate commerce (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Diversity of citizenship (8)
- Pennsylvania (8)
- Personal jurisdiction (8)
- Res judicata (8)
- United States Supreme Court (8)
- California (7)
- Clayton Act (7)
- Delaware (7)
- Domiciles (7)
- Due Process Clause (7)
- English law (7)
- Publication Year
Articles 421 - 450 of 541
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Procedure - Service Of Process - Jurisdiction Conferred By Consent
Procedure - Service Of Process - Jurisdiction Conferred By Consent
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a resident of England, and defendant, a resident of New York, entered into a contract for the sale and delivery of zinc. By a clause in the contract the parties agreed that all differences arising thereunder should be arbitrated at London pursuant to the arbitration law of Great Britain. Differences arose, and the plaintiff requested the defendant in New York to concur in the selection of an arbitrator, serving notice that, in the event of failure so to do, application would be made for appointment of one as provided by statute. This notice was ignored, and a form of …
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Michigan Law Review
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the federal court by defendant. Plaintiff's counsel in his opening statement said that as the result of the injuries one plaintiff was unable to work for two weeks and visited his doctor seven times and that the other was away from work for three weeks and also saw his doctor seven times. The wages of the first plaintiff were $55 a week; those of the second averaged $75 a week. He further stated that the injuries were not permanent, and that, except …
Creditors' Rights In Equity
Michigan Law Review
There is a great deal of confusion in the decided cases as to the jurisdiction of equity to protect creditors. Historically we must separate the jurisdiction of equity over decedents' estates. According to Langdell, a creditor's bill is a bill filed by a creditor of a deceased debtor, against the personal or real representative, or against the personal and real representatives, of the latter to compel the payment of a debt. When an execution upon a judgment has been returned unsatisfied, and the judgment creditor files a bill in equity to obtain satisfaction of the judgment out of assets belonging …
Bases Of Jurisdiction In State Taxation Of Inheritances And Property, Charles L.B. Lowndes
Bases Of Jurisdiction In State Taxation Of Inheritances And Property, Charles L.B. Lowndes
Michigan Law Review
Theoretically there is an accepted distinction between jurisdiction to exact an inheritance tax and a property tax. Is this distinction of practical significance? Does it influence a court in the concrete decision of a case?
Corporations-Liquidation-Jurisdiction Of Court
Corporations-Liquidation-Jurisdiction Of Court
Michigan Law Review
A recent New Jersey case, Naspo v. Summits Sweet Shoppe, Inc., suggests interesting questions of the jurisdiction of equity over insolvent corporations. In that case, a bill was brought under section 69 of the New Jersey code, by a simple contract creditor with a small claim of $75 praying for the appointment of a receiver and the distribution of the assets. After the court had heard the parties on a motion for the appointment of a receiver, new counsel for the defendant corporation came in at a later hearing, offered to pay plaintiff's claim and asked for a dismissal …
Federal Practice--Unconstitionality Of A State Statutye-Requirement Of A Three-Judge Court
Federal Practice--Unconstitionality Of A State Statutye-Requirement Of A Three-Judge Court
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff corporation applied for a preliminary injunction in a suit to restrain the collection of a state franchise tax on the ground that the tax law was unconstitutional under the federal Constitution. After the complaint had been filed and a temporary restraining order had been granted, the defendant moved to dismiss the bill for want of equity, and upon a hearing of the motion the bill was dismissed. The plaintiff then appealed to the circuit court of appeals where the law was held to be unconstitutional and the judgment was reversed. Held, the single judge had no jurisdiction …
Administative Tribunals-Judicial Review Of Legislative Functions
Administative Tribunals-Judicial Review Of Legislative Functions
Michigan Law Review
On refusal of the Federal Radio Commission to renew its license for a broadcasting station with the existing terms, on the ground that public convenience and necessity did not require it, the applicant company availed itself of a statutory appeal to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia which reversed the finding as to public convenience and necessity. The commission applied to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Held, writ dismissed on the theory that the court had no jurisdiction to review the exercise pf an administrative or legislative power, and that the …
Admirality-Jurisdiction-Suit Between Foreigners
Admirality-Jurisdiction-Suit Between Foreigners
Michigan Law Review
Claimant sought to have the libel by the Ford Motor Company of Australia dismissed on the grounds, among others, that the suit was between foreigners and that the assumption of jurisdiction by this court would cause the Canadian ship owner great expense and inconvenience. The court, in denying the motion, held that the expense and inconvenience of trial in this forum would be no greater than in Canada, and that the retention of jurisdiction of admiralty suits between foreigners is within the discretion of the court. The Canadian Commander, 43 F.(2d) 857.
Prohibition-Against Enforcement Of Order To Produce Documents-Availability Of Other Appellate Relief
Prohibition-Against Enforcement Of Order To Produce Documents-Availability Of Other Appellate Relief
Michigan Law Review
Application was made to the circuit court of appeals for a writ of prohibition against a district judge to restrain him from compelling petitioner to allow an inspection of his ledger. Held, that although in the opinion of the court the order had been entered improperly, the circuit court of appeals had no jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition against enforcement of the order. Keaton v. Kennamer (C. C. A. 10th, 1930) 42 F.(2d) 814.
Arbitration And Award-Effectof Foreign Arbitration Statute
Arbitration And Award-Effectof Foreign Arbitration Statute
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff contracted to furnish and defendant to exhibit a number of motion pictures. The contract included an arbitration agreement in which the parties agreed to submit all disputes arising under the contract to a specified board of arbitration and to abide by its award. The arbitration agreement was to be governed by the laws of New York, by which it would have been valid, irrevocable and specifically enforceable. Defendant breached the contract, refused to submit the dispute to arbitration, and failed to comply with the award when plaintiff did so. Plaintiff then brought suit in Ohio to enforce the award. …
Broad Counterclaims As Means Of Obtaining Jurisdiction Over Nonresidents
Broad Counterclaims As Means Of Obtaining Jurisdiction Over Nonresidents
Michigan Law Review
Broad counterclaim statutes are desirable because they allow cross demands to compensate each other, and because they avoid multiplicity of suits. These two advantages are alone sufficient to justify broad counterclaims, but there is a further advantage in that a broad counterclaim statute permits a resident in a suit brought against him by a nonresident to set up any independent claim against that nonresident which-he may have without prosecuting a separate action. Not only is it a heavier expense to bring a separate action, but it is often impossible to do so without going to the domicil of the nonresident …
Admiralty-Jurisdiction-Workmen's Compensation
Admiralty-Jurisdiction-Workmen's Compensation
Michigan Law Review
The question of what remedies should be available to maritime workers for injuries in the course of their employment has received much attention from the courts during the last fifteen years. This has resulted in some conflicts of the federal maritime jurisdiction with the jurisdiction of the states, and particularly' with the workmen's compensation acts enacted by them. The history of this situation was reviewed in 27 MICH. L. Rev. 191, December, 1928, in a note by G [errit] D [emmink]. In view of three decisions rendered last spring by the United States Supreme Court, it has seemed well to …
Some Comments On The Reserved Power To Alter, Amend And Repeal Corporate Charters, Gustavus Ohlinger
Some Comments On The Reserved Power To Alter, Amend And Repeal Corporate Charters, Gustavus Ohlinger
Michigan Law Review
The old theories as to the nature, creation and powers of corporations which during the last hundred years have been obscured, but today are coming more and more to the fore in legal literature, in the adjudications of the courts, and in recent revisions of corporation acts suggest a re-examination of the power of state legislatures to alter, amend and repeal corporate charters under the reservations contained in many state constitutions and statutes, both as related to those theories and as they apply to recent and impending social and economic changes.
Equity Jurisdiction As Affected By Adequacy Of The Remedy At Law
Equity Jurisdiction As Affected By Adequacy Of The Remedy At Law
Michigan Law Review
A Michigan case, decided December 3, 1929, presents an interesting problem concerning the status of equity jurisdiction when the relief at law is adjudged adequate. Plaintiff and defendant owned adjoining lots, and disagreed as to the location of the true boundary line between them. Plaintiff was in possession of the disputed strip. Defendant started an ejectment suit, whereupon plaintiff brought a bill in equity to enjoin defendant's suit at law and to have title decreed to be in himself. Defendant answered denying that there was any equity in the bill, and moved to dismiss. Later counsel agreed that the entire …
Crimes-Former Jeopardy-Prosecution In Two Counties For A Continuous Act
Crimes-Former Jeopardy-Prosecution In Two Counties For A Continuous Act
Michigan Law Review
Defendants transported liquor by a single, uninterrupted act from A county to B county in the same state. Having been convicted and fined in B county for the transportation within its boundaries, they were later indicted in A county for that part of the transportation which took place in that territory. A plea of former jeopardy was sustained by the trial judge, and on appeal this holding was affirmed by a divided court, which held, the act constituted a single offense, punishable in either county, but not in both. State v. Shimman et al. (Ohio, 1930) 172 N.E. 367.
Crimes - Venue- Non-Support, Abandonment, And Desertion
Crimes - Venue- Non-Support, Abandonment, And Desertion
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was divorced by his wife in A county in 1926. In 1929, defendant was indicted for non-support of his children, in B county, where his former wife and the children had maintained their home since the divorce. An objection to the venue was raised by the defense, on the ground that, if a crime was committed, it was consummated in A county, where defendant had been living during the time he was charged with non-support. Held, that "the venue of non-support is where that support should be rendered." State v. Anderson (Or. 1930) 290 Pac. 1904
Corporations-Right Of General Creditors, After Appointment Of Receiver In Suit Brought For Foreclsoure Of Mortgage Covering Major Portion Of Assets, To Have Receivership Extended For Protection And Eventual Liquidation Of Unmortgaged Assets
Michigan Law Review
When the affairs of a corporation become so involved that it is not able to meet its maturing obligations as they become due and it is necessary either that the corporation be reorganized on a more sound financial basis or that its assets be liquidated in an orderly manner, to the best advantage of its creditors and stockholders, it is customary, as a basis for such reorganization or liquidation, to have a receiver appointed of all the property and assets of the corporation. Such receivership is usually precipitated by the filing in the federal court of a bill of complaint …
Jurisdiction For The Purpose Of Imposing Inheritance Taxes, David R. Mason
Jurisdiction For The Purpose Of Imposing Inheritance Taxes, David R. Mason
Michigan Law Review
For nearly half a century so-called inheritance tax laws of the states of the United States have been predicated upon two distinct theories of jurisdiction, many states embodying both theories into their statutes. Recent decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States, however, challenge the constitutionality of such a scheme and indicate the expediency of a review of the extent of state jurisdiction for the purpose of imposing such taxes.
Venue--Waiver Of Objection In Federal Courts
Venue--Waiver Of Objection In Federal Courts
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, a fireman for the defendant railroad, was injured by a defective "chafing-block" while engaged in switching cars onto a siding, in order to permit an interstate train to pass. The injury took place in West Virginia, where the plaintiff was a resident. The defendant was incorporated under the laws of Maryland. Suit was brought in the federal court of the northern district of Ohio. The plaintiff based his right to recover on the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A. sec. 51-59, and the Federal Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U. S. C. A. sec. 22 et …
Constitutional Law-Crimes-Waiver Of Jury
Constitutional Law-Crimes-Waiver Of Jury
Michigan Law Review
The accused, on trial for a felony, was permitted by the trial judge to waive a jury. The trial before the judge alone resulted in an acquittal. The state's attorney petitioned for a writ of mandamus to expunge from the record the orders to dispose of the cause without a jury and for discharge of the accused, on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause. Held, writ of mandamus denied. People ex rel. Swanson v. Fisher (Ill., 1930) 172 N.E. 722.
Taxation-Jurisdiction To Tax Intangibles
Taxation-Jurisdiction To Tax Intangibles
Michigan Law Review
Until recently the fact that one state had jurisdiction to tax intangibles was no basis for asserting that another state did not, there being apparently no constitutional impediment to double taxation. Nor did the fact that a state lacked jurisdiction to tax property in intangibles necessarily imply an absence of power to tax succession to that property. Both doctrines have been repudiated by the United States Supreme Court in Farmer's Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota and Baldwin v. Missouri, decided during the last term.
Conflict Of Laws-Jurisdiction
Michigan Law Review
Appellant, a resident of Iowa, was ordered by the military department of the United States to take his troops to Fort Snelling, Minnesota, for a training period, during which time he was served with summons to appear in the district court of Ramsey county. Appellant filed a motion to quash, on the grounds that the Minnesota court had no jurisdiction since he was on a military reservation belonging to the United States and claimed privilege from service because he was involuntarily there in obedience to orders. The motion was overruled and judgment was entered against him. Held, if the …
Taxation-Exemption Of Sovereign Instrumentality-Effect Of Imposing Tax
Taxation-Exemption Of Sovereign Instrumentality-Effect Of Imposing Tax
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff corporation brought suit against the collector of internal revenue for federal income taxes paid under protest. The taxes were assessed upon the net income derived from the sale of oil and gas produced on lands which the plaintiff held under lease from the state of Texas. A legislative act provided for the leasing of the lands to further the development of their natural resources, the lessees paying a royalty on oil and gas. The statutory leases had been previously held to constitute a sale of the minerals. Theisen v. Robison, 117 Tex. 489, 8 S.W. (2d) 646. The statute …
Mortgages - Equity Jurisdiction - Personal Decrees Against The Mortgagor
Mortgages - Equity Jurisdiction - Personal Decrees Against The Mortgagor
Michigan Law Review
The Michigan supreme court recently held that the jurisdiction of equity in proceedings for the foreclosure of mortgages is governed by statute, and that equity can only render a personal decree against the mortgagor where the statute expressly permits it. This view, if correct, must be recognized as an exception to the well settled doctrine that a court of equity which has obtained jurisdiction of a controversy on any ground or for any purpose, may retain such jurisdiction for the purpose of administering complete relief. Michigan has repeatedly affirmed this general doctrine.
Conflict Of Laws: Recent Development Concerning Marriage, Francis Deak
Conflict Of Laws: Recent Development Concerning Marriage, Francis Deak
Michigan Law Review
Anglo-American writers on the conflict of laws and Continental writers on private international law emphasize, with equal strength, the importance of the rules regulating marriage. Marriage is the most important of the social institutions; it is, in fact, the very foundation of the present social order. The legal system of civilized states, which is called upon to maintain this social order, contains an elaborate body of rules, protecting the institution of marriage. It is noteworthy, indeed, that mature legal systems secure best interests involved in domestic relations, besides interests of substance such as property and contract. Each legal system developed …
The Doctrine Of "Hot Pursuit"--A New Application
The Doctrine Of "Hot Pursuit"--A New Application
Michigan Law Review
A recent decision of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina involves a point apparently unique in the records of international law. The Vinces, a schooner of British registry, laden with a cargo of intoxicating liquors not under seal, was discovered by the United States Coast Guard cutter Mascoutin seven and one-half miles off the coast and within one hour's sailing distance from the United States headed in the direction of land. On being hailed by the Mascoutin, the Vinces turned about and headed for the high seas. The cutter followed in continuous chase and overtook …
International Law-Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction
International Law-Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction
Michigan Law Review
The importance of assertions of the right to punish extraterritorial crime is directly related to the advance of international commercial and social intercourse. The earliest serious attempts to assert such a jurisdiction date only from the eighteenth century. Now, practically every state exercises some degree of jurisdiction over offenses committed abroad. But the extent of the power claimed by the different nations varies so as to cause doubt as to what is the international rule on the subject.
The Case Of The S. S. "Lotus", George Wendell Berge
The Case Of The S. S. "Lotus", George Wendell Berge
Michigan Law Review
A momentous judgment was rendered by the Permanent Court of International Justice, sitting at the Hague, on September 7, 1927, in the Case of the S.S. Lotus. Interest in the case is especially manifest among students of international and maritime law, as well as others, because it is perhaps the first case to come before the Permanent Court in which the question for decision was a point of general international law. Thorough analysis and comment on the questions involved would fill a good-sized volume. Only a few observations can be made in this article on the merits of the …
The Institute's Restatement And The Michigan Law, Herbert F. Goodrich
The Institute's Restatement And The Michigan Law, Herbert F. Goodrich
Michigan Law Review
The task which the American Law Institute has undertaken is to make a statement of the common law, in its various branches. The end in view is not codification; indeed the idea is directly opposed to codification. It is hoped to have, when the work is completed, an accurate statement of existing common law, carefully and systematically made, from which local variations and peculiarities have been ironed out. It is hoped, in other words, to restore both accuracy and continuity to the pattern of the common law fabric as it is woven in our judicial mills.