Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (69)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (60)
- Internet Law (48)
- Computer Law (38)
- Communications Law (24)
-
- International Law (22)
- Privacy Law (18)
- International Trade Law (17)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Courts (10)
- Law and Economics (10)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (8)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Legal History (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (8)
- Food and Drug Law (7)
- Arts and Humanities (6)
- Economics (6)
- Litigation (6)
- Administrative Law (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Life Sciences (5)
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Institution
-
- BLR (28)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (25)
- Fordham Law School (23)
- UIC School of Law (21)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (17)
-
- Marquette University Law School (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- UC Law SF (11)
- University of Richmond (11)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Boston University School of Law (9)
- Duke Law (9)
- Santa Clara Law (9)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- University of New Hampshire (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (3)
- University of Denver (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (37)
- Intellectual property (33)
- Intellectual Property Law (30)
- Patent (17)
- Trademark (15)
-
- Internet (14)
- Patent law (12)
- Patents (12)
- Copyright law (11)
- International Law (11)
- Law (11)
- Copyright infringement (10)
- Journal (10)
- Legal (10)
- NJTIP (10)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (10)
- Technology (10)
- Google (9)
- Science and Technology (9)
- Intellectual Property (8)
- Trademarks (8)
- Adwords (7)
- Biotechnology (7)
- Federal Circuit (7)
- International Trade (7)
- Law and Society (7)
- Software (7)
- DMCA (6)
- Fair use (6)
- Infringement (6)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (34)
- ExpressO (26)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (23)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (17)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (16)
-
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (14)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (10)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (10)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (9)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (9)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (8)
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (8)
- Articles (7)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (7)
- William Mitchell Law Review (7)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (4)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (3)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 180 of 341
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
A "Patent" Restriction On Research & Development: Infringers Or Innovators?, Srividhya Ragavan
A "Patent" Restriction On Research & Development: Infringers Or Innovators?, Srividhya Ragavan
Faculty Scholarship
The Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights ("TRIPS") requires developing nations to harmonize patent regimes as a means to achieve stronger industrial growth. Countries, however, need to adopt effective patent procedures in order to successfully institute a patent regime. In spite of this, international treaties like TRIPS do not properly assist developing nations in establishing appropriate procedural mechanisms capable of complimenting a sophisticated patent regime. Consequently, developing nations may embrace ineffective patent procedures that can eventually further limit industrial growth despite establishing a TRIPS compliant patent regime. The paper uses India as a case study to demonstrate the detriments …
The Escalating Copyright Wars, Peter K. Yu
The Escalating Copyright Wars, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
Piracy is one of the biggest threats confronting the entertainment industry today. Every year, the industry is estimated to lose billions of dollars in revenue and faces the potential loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs. To protect itself against Internet pirates, the entertainment industry has launched the latest copyright war. So far, the industry has been winning. Among its trophies are the enactment of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Vivendi Universal's defeat and purchase of MP3.com, the movie studios' victory in the DeCSS litigation, the bankruptcy and subsequent sale of Napster and its recent relaunch as a legitimate subscription-based …
Adrift On A Sea Of Uncertainty: Preserving Uniformity In Patent Law Post-Vornado Through Deference To The Federal Circuit, Larry D. Thompson
Adrift On A Sea Of Uncertainty: Preserving Uniformity In Patent Law Post-Vornado Through Deference To The Federal Circuit, Larry D. Thompson
Scholarly Works
Congress created the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1982, and granted that court exclusive appellate jurisdiction over civil actions arising under patent law. Congress's primary goals in creating the Federal Circuit were to produce a more uniform patent jurisprudence and to reduce forum shopping based on favorable patent law. But in the 2002 decision of Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, the Supreme Court held that patent counterclaims alone could not create Federal Circuit jurisdiction. This decision not only overruled the Federal Circuit's longstanding jurisdictional rule, but also opened the door for Regional …
Patents And The Diffusion Of Technical Information, James Bessen
Patents And The Diffusion Of Technical Information, James Bessen
Faculty Scholarship
Does the disclosure requirement of the patent system encourage the diffusion of inventions? This paper builds a simple model where firms choose between patents and trade secrecy to protect inventions. Diffusion is not necessarily more likely with a patent system nor is the market for technology necessarily greater.
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 30 - Document Google Trademark Policy Task Force, Google
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 30 - Document Google Trademark Policy Task Force, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xxiii, Tab 60 - Ex. 7 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Vol. Xxiii, Tab 60 - Ex. 7 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Who Owns The 'First Rough Draft Of History'? Reconsidering Copyright In News, Eric B. Easton
Who Owns The 'First Rough Draft Of History'? Reconsidering Copyright In News, Eric B. Easton
ExpressO
Who Owns the ‘First Rough Draft of History’? suggests the withdrawal of copyright protection from hard-news journalism as a mechanism for “rescuing” the news from the inexorable downward spiral in quality and diversity caused by excessive media concentration. Although copyright represents just one of the factors contributing to the “commodification” of news today, it is a significant factor, and one with a long, unsavory relationship with censorship and monopoly.
The article asserts that newspapers’ quest for copyright protection was an early step onto a slippery slope toward a property-based, rather than service-based ethos, and that removing protection may mark a …
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 38 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 38 - Email From Prashant Fuloria (Google Product Management Director), Prashant Fuloria
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Invasion Of The Clones: Animal Cloning And The Potential Implications On The Future Of Human Cloning And Cloning Legislation In The United States, The United Kingdom, And Internationally, Adrienne N. Calhoun
Invasion Of The Clones: Animal Cloning And The Potential Implications On The Future Of Human Cloning And Cloning Legislation In The United States, The United Kingdom, And Internationally, Adrienne N. Calhoun
ExpressO
Cloning is an area of science that changes daily; with advances being made constantly. This technology has caused great controversy in the United States and across the world. The issue has raised religious, ethical, technical and legal concerns. This paper is broken into four parts in order to best address the complex area of cloning technology. Part one will be a review of the history of the science of cloning and the history of animal cloning. Part two will be a discussion of the risks and benefits of cloning. Part three will address ethical and religious concerns surrounding human cloning. …
Uk’S Implementation Of The Anti-Circumvention Provisions Of The Eu Copyright Directive: An Analysis, Aashit Shah
Uk’S Implementation Of The Anti-Circumvention Provisions Of The Eu Copyright Directive: An Analysis, Aashit Shah
Duke Law & Technology Review
The debate surrounding utilization of technological protection measures to secure copyrighted works in the digital arena has raised many an eyebrow in the past few years. Technological protection measures are broadly bifurcated into two categories: access control measures such as cryptography, passwords and digital signatures that secure the access to information and protected content, and copy control measures such as the serial copy management system for audio digital taping devices and content scrambling systems for DVDs that prevent third parties from exploiting the exclusive rights of the copyright owners. Copyright owners have been wary of the digital environment to exploit …
The “Commercial Offer For Sale” Standard After Minnesota Mining V. Chemque, Campbell Chiang
The “Commercial Offer For Sale” Standard After Minnesota Mining V. Chemque, Campbell Chiang
Duke Law & Technology Review
The Supreme Court established a two-part test for determining when an invention is "on sale" under 35 U.S.C. §102(b) in Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. For the on-sale bar to be triggered, the invention must be "ready for patenting" and subject of a "commercial offer for sale." In Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. Chemque, Inc., the Federal Circuit expounded on what constitutes a commercial offer for sale. This iBrief explores what is considered a "commercial offer for sale."
Are You Still Settling For Cable? A Case For Broader Application Of The Fcc’S Over-The-Air Reception Devices Rule, Lavonda N. Reed-Huff
Are You Still Settling For Cable? A Case For Broader Application Of The Fcc’S Over-The-Air Reception Devices Rule, Lavonda N. Reed-Huff
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Many renters in the United States have no choice when it comes to selecting a video or communications service provider for their residence, due to their inability to install satellite dishes on their rental property. Because of this lack of choice, many must rely on traditional broadcast television, cable service and traditional telephone dial-up for receiving video programming and accessing advanced technologies such as the Internet. Others simply go without service altogether. While the FCC has attempted to address this problem, the rule they have promulgated, known as the "OTARD Rule," fails to go far enough to make video and …
Intellectual Property And Indigenous Peoples: Adapting Copyright Law To The Needs Of A Global Community, Megan M. Carpenter
Intellectual Property And Indigenous Peoples: Adapting Copyright Law To The Needs Of A Global Community, Megan M. Carpenter
Law Faculty Scholarship
The definition and scope of intellectual property and associated laws are under intense debate in the emerging discourse surrounding intellectual property and human rights. These debates primarily arise within the context of indigenous peoples' rights to protection and ownership of culturally specific properties. It is true that intellectual property laws are based on Western, developed markets, Western concepts of creation and invention, and Western concepts of ownership. But whatever their origins, those laws have been, and currently are, the primary vehicle for the protection of artistic, literary, and scientific works worldwide. To segregate indigenous interests from this international legal regime, …
Copyright Protection For Perfumes, Thomas G. Field Jr
Copyright Protection For Perfumes, Thomas G. Field Jr
Law Faculty Scholarship
In June 2004, the Lancome opinion from the Netherlands held that perfume compositions are copyrightable. NautaDutilh, the firm that represented Lancome, claimed the ruling was "internationally groundbreaking."
The thesis of this paper is that the Dutch Court erred in protecting compositions rather than scents or fragrances. As discussed below, such an approach runs afoul of basic copyright principles here and abroad.
Judicial Review Of Copyright Examination, Thomas G. Field Jr
Judicial Review Of Copyright Examination, Thomas G. Field Jr
Law Faculty Scholarship
Copyright in qualifying United States works has always arisen upon creation. For many years, however, rights could be lost by failing to, e.g., provide notice, register and deposit copies when works were first published. In 1909 formal requirements were reduced, and the Supreme Court, in 1939, concluded that registration with the U.S Copyright Office was unnecessary to retain rights. Despite that, owners could not sue infringers without having registered.
Regarding registration as helpful if not obligatory, this paper compares the burden on moving parties in circumstances in which registration decisions may be challenged in courts.
Zurko, Gartside, And Lee: How Might They Affect Patent Prosecution?, Thomas G. Field Jr
Zurko, Gartside, And Lee: How Might They Affect Patent Prosecution?, Thomas G. Field Jr
Law Faculty Scholarship
Interactions between the PTO and the courts are more complex than for most agencies. PTO decisions may be challenged not only directly but also collaterally. In the latter context, the Supreme Court has sometimes been critical of the lax standards applied when issuing patents.
While being upheld in collateral review is the ultimate issue of concern to patentees, patents must first be obtained. Thus, this paper focuses on direct challenges to PTO actions--and more specifically, on the review arising under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141-44 as addressed in Zurko, Gartside, and Lee.
Since the Supreme Court reversed the …
The Hegemony Of The Copyright Treatise, Ann Bartow
The Hegemony Of The Copyright Treatise, Ann Bartow
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article asserts that major conceptions about the appropriate structure, texture, and span of copyright protections and privileges have been fashioned by copyright treatises, particularly the various editions of Nimmer on Copyright. Copyright treatises function in concert with the machinations of Congress, the courts, and custom, but their role is not often scrutinized.
Because copyright treatises typically do a far better job than Congress or the courts of explicating copyright law in straightforward and accessible language, such treatises can not only communicate the copyright law, but also influence its development and direction. Policy makers no doubt understand that content owners …
Growing Pains: Intellectual Property Considerations For Illinois Small Businesses Seeking To Expand, William Lynch Schaller
Growing Pains: Intellectual Property Considerations For Illinois Small Businesses Seeking To Expand, William Lynch Schaller
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Territoriality Waning? Patent Infringement For Offering In The United States To Sell An Invention Abroad, Timothy R. Holbrook
Territoriality Waning? Patent Infringement For Offering In The United States To Sell An Invention Abroad, Timothy R. Holbrook
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Undeniably, intellectual property law is increasingly an issue of international law. With respect to patents, recent developments have resulted in the incorporation of international patent standards into U.S. domestic law. In 1994, Congress added a new form of infringement - for offering to sell an invention in the United States - to the Patent Act. Congress failed to provide guidance as to how that provision was to be interpreted, leaving open the following question: is there infringement if the offer is made in the United States but the contemplated sale occurs outside of the United States? This Article addresses this …
The Treaty Power And The Patent Clause: Are There Limits On The United States’ Ability To Harmonize?, Timothy R. Holbrook
The Treaty Power And The Patent Clause: Are There Limits On The United States’ Ability To Harmonize?, Timothy R. Holbrook
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
The latter part of the twentieth century saw considerable efforts at the harmonization of international intellectual property laws through international agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). Efforts at harmonizing international intellectual property laws are nothing new, however. Countries have been attempting to harmonize their laws since the nineteenth century. Increasingly, the United States has altered its intellectual property laws in order to comport with international standards. All of these treaties and agreements retain a key feature of intellectual property: the rights afforded are territorial in nature. …
Market Definition In Intellectual Property Law: Should Intellectual Property Courts Use An Antitrust Approach To Market Definition?, Anna F. Kingsbury
Market Definition In Intellectual Property Law: Should Intellectual Property Courts Use An Antitrust Approach To Market Definition?, Anna F. Kingsbury
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
In her Article, Ms. Kingsbury notes that American courts do not use antitrust law's market definition approach in intellectual property cases. She discusses five potential rationales for this dichotomy: (1) intellectual property cases involve new products without defined markets; (2) market definition limits judicial flexibility; (3) courts do not want to burden intellectual property litigants with the time and expense of economic evidence; (4) judges reason from precedent, and that precedent did not consider market definition; and (5) "market" conveys a different meaning in intellectual property law than it does in antitrust law. Kingsbury presents counterarguments to these rationales and …
Panel I: Trademark Dilution: Moseley And Beyond., Ceceelia Dempsy, Marie Driscoll, Hugh C. Hansen, Susan Progoff
Panel I: Trademark Dilution: Moseley And Beyond., Ceceelia Dempsy, Marie Driscoll, Hugh C. Hansen, Susan Progoff
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Nathan Burkan Writing Competition/Memorial Award 1964-2004, Notre Dame Law School, American Society Of Composers, Authors And Publishers
Nathan Burkan Writing Competition/Memorial Award 1964-2004, Notre Dame Law School, American Society Of Composers, Authors And Publishers
Student, Faculty, and Staff Awards
The Nathan Burkan Competition is a national writing competition designed to promote better understanding of the development of copyright law.
Individual law schools select the best paper which are then submitted to a special committee appointed by the American Bar Association to judge the entries.
Distinguished lawyers, jurists, and public officials read and judge the essays. Monetary awards are provided for the first through fifth prize papers.
For Of All Sad Words Of Tongue Or Pen, The Saddest Are “It Might Have Been”—Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology And The Law To Lock Down Culture And Control Creativity, Katherine Kelly
William Mitchell Law Review
Review of Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. By Lawrence Lessig. Penguin Press, 2004. 348 pages, $24.95
A Guide To U.S. Intellectual Property Searching Online, Jennifer L. Selby
A Guide To U.S. Intellectual Property Searching Online, Jennifer L. Selby
Law Librarian Scholarship
The disadvantage to searching intellectual property online, patents in particular, is that the available online databases do not encompass the array and extent of tools needed to conduct a comprehensive search.7 Essentially, you can search patents on the web, but you cannot do a true patent search. A complete patentability search must include not only U.S. patents, but foreign patents and all relevant non-patent literature also (all resources together are referred to as ‘‘prior art’’ for an invention).8 These additional resources can be researched at the Patent Office Library in Washington D.C., and, on a more limited basis, at a …
Through The Years:The Supreme Court And The Copyright Clause, Ruth L. Okediji
Through The Years:The Supreme Court And The Copyright Clause, Ruth L. Okediji
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Acpa A Safe Haven For Trademark Infringers? - Rethinking The Unilateral Application Of The Lanham Act, 22 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 655 (2004), Jinku Hwang
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) was enacted in 1999 as a response to international disputes over Internet domain names because according to the Congress’ point of view, courts could not successfully protected American businesses in cases where nothing more that the registration of a trademark or its variation in a domain name had occurred. This article analyzes recent court decisions regarding domain name disputes after the enactment of ACPA focusing on reverse domain name hijacking in international, trademark related and gTLD disputes. The author argues that the in rem jurisdiction provided by the ACPA and the consequent extraterritorial effect …
Protection For Indigenous Peoples And Their Traditional Knowledge: Would A Registry System Reduce The Misappropriation Of Traditional Knowledge?, Thomas J, Krumenacher
Protection For Indigenous Peoples And Their Traditional Knowledge: Would A Registry System Reduce The Misappropriation Of Traditional Knowledge?, Thomas J, Krumenacher
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
This Comment examines the controversy over whether a registry system is the best way to prevent Western inventors from obtaining intellectual property protection for traditional knowledge that has been misappropriated from underdeveloped parts of the world. This dilemma exists because traditional knowledge often constitutes patentable subject matter, most indigenous peoples do not subscribe to a Western "property rights" view of the world, and exploitation of traditional knowledge has become easier through improved communication capabilities. This Comment argues in favor of a registry system to catalog traditional knowledge; patent examiners would deny patent protection to any invention that replicates traditional knowledge. …
Patenting The Biological Bounty Of Nature: Re-Examining The Status Of Organic Inventions As Patentable Subject Matter, Burton T. Ong
Patenting The Biological Bounty Of Nature: Re-Examining The Status Of Organic Inventions As Patentable Subject Matter, Burton T. Ong
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Mr. Ong discusses the controversy regarding biotechnology patents. Opponents of biotechnology patents are concerned that these patents show disrespect for life and nature, expropriate the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities, and encourage practices that threaten the environment. Proponents of biotechnology patents argue that patents are, at worst, neutral on such issues because they only grant a right to exclude; moreover, such patents encourage innovation in the public interest. Ong focuses instead on whether an individual inventor deserves an intellectual property right based on his contributions to a modified living organism or an organic substance derived from a living organism. He …
Trade Dress: Should Only The Secondary Meaning Trade Dress Standard Apply To Product Packaging? Or Should Courts Continue To Use The Inherently Distinctive Standard?, Jennifer L. Barwinski
Trade Dress: Should Only The Secondary Meaning Trade Dress Standard Apply To Product Packaging? Or Should Courts Continue To Use The Inherently Distinctive Standard?, Jennifer L. Barwinski
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
This Comment discusses the controversy over whether secondary meaning should be a prerequisite for trademark protection of product packaging, in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros. The United States Supreme Court held in Wal-Mart that secondary meaning is a prerequisite for trademark protection of product design, limiting its earlier decision in Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. In discussing Wal-Mart's application to trademark protection for product packaging, this Comment focuses on the difficulty of distinguishing between product packaging and product design. This Comment argues that secondary meaning should be a prerequisite for trademark protection of product packaging; …