Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Introductory Remarks, Ethan Bordman, Ira S. Dizengoff, Sophie Dizengoff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the legal implications and challenges surrounding college athletes' rights to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL), following the NCAA's 2021 decision to lift its ban on athletes cashing in on their fame. The symposium explores the evolving legal landscape, including regulatory frameworks, equity issues, and the role of collectives, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines to address the complexities arising from this change.

Keynote Address, Andrew Zimbalist

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of name, image, and likeness (NIL) policies in college athletics, highlighting the legal, economic, and educational implications of allowing college athletes to profit from their NIL. It argues that while recent legal cases and state legislation have expanded NIL rights, the lack of enforceable guardrails has created a chaotic system dominated by booster collectives, exacerbating financial and equity issues in college sports. The analysis critiques the NCAA's ineffective oversight and advocates for congressional intervention to establish a national framework addressing these challenges.

Panel 2: Regulations & Other Congressional Concerns, Sam C. Ehrlich, Dan Lust, Matt Mitten, John T. Wolohan, Andrew Zimbalist, Maureen Weston

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of college athletes' name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights, highlighting the shift from NCAA control to a chaotic regulatory landscape influenced by court rulings and state laws. The NCAA seeks Congressional intervention for antitrust immunity to address these challenges.

Ip Law In The Shadow Of Norms, Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the interplay between formal intellectual property (IP) law and social norms in governing creative and innovative communities. It argues that while IP law is essential, it should not overshadow the significant role of norms, which often provide effective governance within specific communities. The author suggests that law should be mindful of diverse norms to promote social justice and innovation, recognizing that norms can both complement and conflict with formal legal frameworks.

Name, Image And Likeness: Giving College Athletes The Clearest Guidance To Best Profit Off Their Nil, Scott Semaya

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Alston has created a legal and regulatory void by invalidating the NCAA's restrictions on student-athletes' ability to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL). While the ruling opened the door for student-athletes to earn compensation, it left unresolved questions about the scope and enforcement of NIL rights. The lack of federal legislation has led to a patchwork of state laws, causing confusion and inequities for student-athletes, schools, and the NCAA. The note advocates for immediate federal intervention to establish uniform guidelines and level the playing field, while also …

The Ftc's "Made In America" Enforcement Policy Is Too Stringent For Small Businesses To Comply With, Jamie Cutler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) "Made in America" policy is overly stringent and disproportionately burdensome for small businesses. The policy requires products labeled as "Made in America" to contain "all or virtually all" parts and processing from the U.S., a standard that is often ambiguous, economically prohibitive, and misaligned with consumer perceptions. The note contends that this strict enforcement creates a "Hobson's choice" for small businesses, making it infeasible for them to comply without suffering financial harm or reputational damage. It advocates for lowering the threshold to allow more flexibility, which would support small businesses, promote …

Fragmented Music Copyright Protection: A Better Arrangement, Matthew B. Goldman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note explores the challenges of music copyright law, particularly in determining the protectability of fragmented elements within musical works. It argues that by applying doctrinal tools such as the idea-expression distinction, merger, scenes a faire, and thin copyright, courts can better balance the protection of original expression with the need to allow future creativity. The analysis focuses on two key cases, Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin and Gray v. Perry, to illustrate how these tools can be effectively used to resolve music copyright disputes.

A Theoretical Analysis Of Orphan Works, Eden Sarid, Omri Ben-Zvi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In American libraries, museums, and archives, there currently are tens of millions of cultural treasures, such as photos, manuscripts, and sound recordings, which hold extraordinary academic, cultural, and historical value. But these valuable items, known as "orphan works, remain out of public reach. Orphan works are subject to copyright, but their copyright owners cannot be located. These works are stuck in limbo-as copyright works, they cannot be used without permission, but permission cannot be granted because the copyright owner is unknown. This exceptional predicament has not escaped the attention of legislators and academics, yet thus far, the United States has …

Randomness, Ai Art, And Copyright, Richard H. Chused

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that art created with the assistance of AI tools should generally be eligible for copyright protection. It posits that human agency is present in the creation of AI-generated art, as traditional artistic works also incorporate randomness and unpredictability. By examining works by artists like Alexander Calder, Robert Rauschenberg, and John Cage, the analysis demonstrates that randomness and unpredictability have long been protected under copyright law, suggesting that AI-generated art should receive similar treatment.

Trademarks And Censorship In The Time Of Covid-19, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

During the devastating year of 2020, China quickly conquered the novel coronavirus and roared back economically while the United States faced staggering deaths and economic losses. But underneath the divergent experience of the two countries is an untold story of trademark and censorship in the time of COVID-19. This Article observes that while the United States Supreme Court has lifted the ban on trademark registrations for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, opening the door for offensive COVID-19 trademark applications, China has transformed trademark law into the law for censorship as Chinese authorities press forward to achieve twin victories over the coronavirus and …

Protecting Ravenstail: Cultural Appropriation And The Outer Limits Of Copyright Law, Nosson Sternbach

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the challenges minority cultures, particularly indigenous communities, face in protecting their cultural heritage through copyright law, focusing on the Sealaska Heritage Institute Inc. v. Neiman Marcus Group LTD, LLC case. It argues that copyright law's requirements—such as fixation, originality, authorship, and duration—create significant barriers for indigenous cultures seeking to safeguard their intellectual property. The note also critiques the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA) for its inefficacy in preventing cultural appropriation, as it requires plaintiffs to prove specific harms and often fails to address the misuse of cultural motifs without explicit tribal names. The Sealaska case highlights …

Dickens V. Lee (1844): A Christmas Tale Of Two Experts Testifying, Mark Rose

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the 1844 case of Dickens v. Lee, highlighting its significance as an early example of the use of expert witnesses in copyright disputes. Dickens successfully sued over the unauthorized adaptation of A Christmas Carol, but the case underscores the challenges of balancing literary and commercial considerations in copyright law. The defense's use of expert testimony to argue market differentiation contrasts with the court's focus on literary similarity, foreshadowing modern debates on substantial similarity in copyright infringement.

How Patents Became Politics, Steven Wilf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Political mobilization in the digital age often coalesces around opposition to the far-reaching protection of intellectual property. Both copyright and patent have materialized as the centerpiece of major political and legal debates that take a variety of forms, including the European pirate parties, NGOs such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the United States, and the call for open source software. The commonplace narrative is that self-interested stakeholders over the past century successfully fashioned an ever-expanding intellectual property system, and that resistance to such legal control of knowledge only emerged in our times. By contrast, this article recovers a littleknown …

100 Years Of International Ip - Reflections On Past, Present And Future, Frederick M. Abbott

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article reflects on the past 100 years of international intellectual property (IP) law, highlighting its evolution from regional agreements to global systems like the TRIPS Agreement. It emphasizes that IP rights are shaped by human policies and societal needs, not inherent qualities, making them adaptable. Current challenges include balancing IP protection with public access, addressing cybercrime, and grappling with AI-generated works.

The Past And Future In International Patent Law, Rochelle C. Dreyfuss

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The organizers of the 2022 International Law Weekend asked us to consider how our fields have changed in the last century and to offer our thoughts about the future. For intellectual property, the changes have been formidable. The Industrial Revolution gave way to an Information Revolution. As a result, knowledge products now constitute a significant share of global wealth. And as the world increasingly endures crises like the recent pandemic, climate change, and food and energy insecurity, technological information will become even more important-indeed, crucial to the survival of the planet.

My own field is international patent law, where there …

The Next 100 Years Of International Intellectual Property: Integrating Human Rights And Corporate Social Responsibility, Julia Janewa Osei-Tutu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article predicts that international intellectual property (IP) law will increasingly integrate human rights and corporate social responsibility (CSR) into its framework over the next century. This shift reflects a broader trend of balancing IP protection with societal concerns, such as public health, cultural heritage, and human development. The author argues that while the TRIPS Agreement established minimum IP standards, future agreements will prioritize equitable access to knowledge, medicines, and traditional knowledge, aligning IP law with global sustainability and human rights goals.

Advances In Patent Rights Acquisition In International Patent Law, Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the significant developments in international patent law over the past century, focusing on how procedural changes facilitated by treaties like the Paris Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) have led to substantive shifts in domestic patent laws. It argues that while these procedural streamlinings aim to enhance efficiency, they have also influenced substantive legal changes, such as the U.S. transition from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file patent system. The author highlights the need to recognize how procedural harmonization can shape substantive patent law and policy.

Three Megatrends In The International Intellectual Property Regime, Peter K. Yu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The international intellectual property (IP) regime has undergone significant transformation over the past century, shaped by three key megatrends: the rise of emerging countries, the increasing complexity of the regime, and spatial transformation driven by new technologies. These trends have reshaped the regime's standards, policies, and challenges, with profound implications for global economic and social welfare. The article critiques the regime's historical bias toward developed nations and its overemphasis on trade interests, advocating for a balanced approach that integrates public welfare and human rights considerations. It concludes that the regime's growing complexity necessitates new institutional frameworks and vocabularies to address …

Nine Copyright Things Every Library And Archive Should Know In 2023, Elizabeth Townsend Gard

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that libraries are currently experiencing a "golden age" of protection from copyright liability, despite ongoing challenges. It highlights recent legal developments, such as the expansion of the public domain, updates to Section 108 of the Copyright Act, and the implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty, which collectively enhance libraries' ability to serve the public. However, the article also acknowledges significant legal setbacks, including adverse court rulings on controlled digital lending and state e-book laws, which complicate the landscape for libraries seeking to balance copyright compliance with public access.

Re-Striping: Predatory Trademarks And Common Signs, Lior Zemer, Or Morag, Yochai Rosner

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Trademark laws were traditionally designed based on the belief that there was an infinite supply of eligible registrable signs. However, current studies show that trademark supply is finite, and that we are close to exhausting it. While trademark protection allows proprietors to distinguish between their goods or services from others, and allowing the public to do the same, the extent of such protection requires constant legal attention and reconsideration which, as contemporary trademark policies show, does not take place in the expected frequency.

One of the immediate consequences from this lack of attention is the rapid growth in strength of …

Should The Ncaa Be Subject To Title Ix?, Sarah Allen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should be held accountable under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, despite its current exemption, due to its significant role in college athletics and the persistent gender disparities in treatment of male and female athletes. It advocates for overturning the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Smith to bring the NCAA under Title IX purview.

Nil Collectives - Title Ix's Latest Challenge, Kassandra Ramsey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the intersection of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Collectives and Title IX, arguing that while NIL Collectives are not directly subject to Title IX, colleges and universities must ensure these organizations comply with Title IX to maintain gender equity. Schools are responsible due to their federal funding and their promotion of these collectives, necessitating guidelines, education, and audits to prevent disparities in opportunities for male and female athletes.

Panel 2: Modern Trends And Internet Speech, Enrique Armijo, Paul M. Barrett, Michael A. Cheah, Zahra Takhshid, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the complexities and future of Section 230, focusing on its role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. Panelists argue that Section 230 is an immunity, not a subsidy, and discuss its implications for content moderation, new technologies, and regulatory oversight. They propose various reforms, including FTC regulation and clarifying Section 230's scope for emerging harms.

Opening Remarks, Christopher J. Buccafusco, Matthew Vernace

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Copyright Neutrality? Lessons From Mein Kampf, Michal Shur-Ofry, Noy Lion

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article explores the copyright story of Hitler's Mein Kampf over the past century and uses this case study to shed new light on one of copyright's foundational doctrines: the principle of copyright neutrality. Relying on primary archival materials from German archives, combined with legal proceedings from the 1930s onwards, secondary historical sources, and in-depth interviews, we trace the copyright trails of Mein Kampf across several jurisdictions and periods of time. This intricate inquiry unravels the surprisingly central role that copyright played in spreading the Nazi ideology and illuminates a structural imbalance within the neutrality principle, which may legitimize and …

#Freebritney: The Importance Of Public Access To The Guardianship System, Cecily D'Amore

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the systemic issues in the U.S. guardianship system, highlighted by Britney Spears' highly publicized conservatorship case, and advocates for increased transparency and accountability. It argues that while guardianship laws are designed to protect vulnerable individuals, cases like Spears' reveal gaps in oversight, inconsistent public access to records, and the need for less restrictive alternatives. The note proposes reforms, including enhanced public access to guardianship case information and the creation of a centralized database, to address these shortcomings and prevent abuse.

Mechanical Licenses And The Willing Buyer/Willing Seller Standard: Establishing Royalty Rates In A Vacuum Of Knowledge, Natalie Linn

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The Music Modernization Act (MMA) introduced a significant shift in determining mechanical royalty rates by replacing the 801(b)(1) standard with the willing buyer-willing seller standard. This change, while aiming to establish fair market value, presents challenges for the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) due to the lack of a comparable market and the influence of statutory licensing. The transition is expected to increase royalty rates, impacting various stakeholders, including copyright owners, streaming services, and consumers, and may lead to heightened disputes and uncertainty in the industry.

Any Port In A Storm: What Social Media Platforms Should Do To Address The Shifting Legal Tides Governing Content Embedding, Laura Cohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Uncovering Patent Prosecution: An Obvious(Ness) Negotiation, Orit Fischman-Afori, Yifat Nahmias, Iris Soroker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Because a patent is a license for a monopoly affecting the public good, the process of patent prosecution deserves close scrutiny. Yet, significant aspects of this process remain unexplored. In particular, two central thresholds for patent eligibility, "novelty" and "nonobviousness," regarded as the bedrock of patent law worldwide, have rarely been examined on an empirical basis. Investigating how these requirements are invoked during the patent prosecution process is critical to understanding how the application of patent law's central tenets affects the quantity and quality of the resulting patents and, ultimately, the public interest.

In this empirical study, we examine a …

Autumn Is Coming: A Novel Liability Theory That May Kill Pharmaceutical Evergreening, Uri Y. Hacohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Pharmaceutical evergreening-attempts by brand-name manufacturers to leverage patent rights to artificially extend legal protection for drugs-is among the most pressing and unresolved public policy challenges of our time. On July 14, 2021, in Sanofi et al. vs. Unipharm Ltd., the Israeli Supreme Court adopted a novel and internationally unprecedented legal policy to combat the evergreening pandemic. By using its equitable powers, the Israeli court empowered a generic manufacturer, Unipharm, to claim on behalf of the public interest the wrongly obtained monopoly profits that a brand-name manufacturer, Sanofi, obtained by improperly leveraging its improvement patent to impair generic market entry. This …