Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (721)
- Computer Law (196)
- Internet Law (196)
- Privacy Law (148)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (90)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (67)
- Marketing Law (50)
- International Trade Law (43)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (40)
- International Law (40)
- Courts (31)
- Cultural Heritage Law (31)
- Legislation (30)
- Transnational Law (29)
- Litigation (26)
- Food and Drug Law (25)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Consumer Protection Law (18)
- First Amendment (17)
- Legal History (17)
- Judges (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (16)
- Business Organizations Law (14)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (13)
- Labor and Employment Law (13)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Contracts (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 829
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Paying It Forward: The Case For A Specific Statutory Limitation On Exclusive Rights For User-Generated Content Under Copyright Law, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 240 (2011), Warren B. Chik
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article examines user-generated content (“UGC”) and the significance of re-inventions in the context of an increasingly user-centric internet environment and an information sharing society. It will explain the need to provide a statutory limitation in the form of an exception or exemption for socially beneficial UGC on the exclusive rights under copyright law. This will also have the effect of protecting the internet intermediary that hosts and shares UGC. Nascent but abortive attempts have been made by Canada to introduce just such a provision into her copyright legislation, while some principles and rules have also emerged from various interest …
Honey Get My Gun, The Transgenic Seeds Are In The Field Again, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 439 (2011), Christian B. Miller
Honey Get My Gun, The Transgenic Seeds Are In The Field Again, 11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 439 (2011), Christian B. Miller
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The proliferation of genetically modified (“GM”) crops in the United States has dramatically increased in the past two decades. This increase has led to fears of dwindling biodiversity in this country’s staple crops. Consumer health and environmental advocates have attempted to slow the deregulation of such crops through administrative challenges. Such tactics were largely undermined in the 2010 Supreme Court case of Monsanto Co. v. Geertson. Anti-GM groups have subsequently attempted to invalidate patents for GM crops on moral grounds. This comment explores the futility of administrative and moral challenges to GM crop proliferation, and looks ahead to the proper …
Foreword, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 278 (2011), Meredith Martin Addy
Foreword, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 278 (2011), Meredith Martin Addy
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Comments On Paul R. Michel's Contributions To Justice, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 279 (2011), James F. Holderman
Comments On Paul R. Michel's Contributions To Justice, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 279 (2011), James F. Holderman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Paul Michel: A Patriot And A Mentor, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 282 (2011), Matthew J. Dowd
Paul Michel: A Patriot And A Mentor, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 282 (2011), Matthew J. Dowd
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Paul Michel You Never Knew, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 286 (2011), Lindsay Androski Kelly
The Paul Michel You Never Knew, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 286 (2011), Lindsay Androski Kelly
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Clarifying The Doctrine Of Inequitable Conduct, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 290 (2011), Elizabeth I. Winston
Clarifying The Doctrine Of Inequitable Conduct, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 290 (2011), Elizabeth I. Winston
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Chief Judge Michel's Current And Future Contributions To Improving U.S. Intellectual Property Rights, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 299 (2011), Herbert C. Wamsley
Chief Judge Michel's Current And Future Contributions To Improving U.S. Intellectual Property Rights, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 299 (2011), Herbert C. Wamsley
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
In His Own Words: The Career Of Chief Judge Paul Michel, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 301 (2011), Gene Quinn
In His Own Words: The Career Of Chief Judge Paul Michel, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 301 (2011), Gene Quinn
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Ip Legal Ethics In The Everyday Practice Of Law: An Empirical Perspective On Patent Litigators, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 309 (2011), William T. Gallagher
Ip Legal Ethics In The Everyday Practice Of Law: An Empirical Perspective On Patent Litigators, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 309 (2011), William T. Gallagher
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article presents preliminary findings from a qualitative empirical study of patent litigators. Part of a larger and ongoing project studying intellectual property lawyers in patent, trademark, and copyright enforcement and litigation actions, this article focuses on ethical decision-making by patent litigators in the pretrial discovery process. The article is based on data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with fifty-five patent litigators and from a detailed case study of the infamous Qualcomm patent sanctions case. The article critically examines how patent litigators perceive of and respond to ethical issues that arise in the discovery process. It also analyzes the structural and …
Ethical Issues In U.S. Trademark Prosecution And Ttab Practice, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 365 (2011), Linda K. Mcleod, Stephanie H. Bald
Ethical Issues In U.S. Trademark Prosecution And Ttab Practice, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 365 (2011), Linda K. Mcleod, Stephanie H. Bald
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The conduct of practitioners and agents before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO” or “Office”) is subject to regulation by the Office under 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2)(D). This provision grants the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and the Director of the USPTO the authority to establish regulations to govern the conduct of agents, attorneys, or other representatives before the Office, including establishing disciplinary measures for non-compliance with those regulations. The USPTO regulations governing conduct include the Patent and Trademark Office Code of Professional Responsibility. This article summarizes the key canons and disciplinary rules applicable to trademark practitioners …
International Arbitration Of Patent Disputes, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 384 (2011), Wei-Hua Wu
International Arbitration Of Patent Disputes, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 384 (2011), Wei-Hua Wu
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This paper discusses the concept of using international arbitration as a method of resolving patent disputes. First, this paper examines the arbitrability of patent validity disputes from a public policy viewpoint. The question is whether, or to what extent, the subject matter of patent validity disputes may be settled by international commercial arbitration. Second, this paper provides suggestions on strategies for organizational decision-makers to consider whether it is proper to choose arbitration as a more favorable tool when confronted with a patent dispute. Finally, this paper discusses how to choose the seat of arbitral institution and the applicable law.
Acceptable Fraud? How Falsities And Misstatements Can Escape The Scope Of The New Fraud Standard, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 410 (2011), Jacobi M. Fields
Acceptable Fraud? How Falsities And Misstatements Can Escape The Scope Of The New Fraud Standard, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 410 (2011), Jacobi M. Fields
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Accuracy is crucial to the trademark registration process. Registrants are required to submit truthful applications to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) or face fraud liability. Pursuant to the Lanham Act, fraud liability is initiated by the submission of “false or fraudulent” statements in a trademark application. This language presents a critical problem for registrants because the terms false and fraudulent are not synonymous, and it is unclear what actually triggers fraud liability. As a result, the requirements for fraud liability and the corresponding standards for fraud have been in fluctuation over the past ten years. In 2009, …
Patent Office As Biosecurity Gatekeeper: Fostering Responsible Science And Building Public Trust In Diy Science, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 423 (2011), Brian J. Gorman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
When the fields of intellectual property law and biotechnology intersect, most analysis is driven byeconomic and ethical issues. This article examines these factors, but in relation to the emerging security threat posed by biohackers, or do-it-yourself (“DIY”) scientists, who operate free from oversight and industry norms at the fringes of the biotechnology community. Public health risks are poised to grow as these citizen-scientists race for lucrative discoveries in the new frontier of syntheticbiology. This article proposes that the existing paradigm adjust accordingly to leverage regulatory compliance from the most ambitious biohackers looking to benefit from patent protection. The U.S. government …
Do You Mind My Smoking? Plain Packaging Of Cigarettes Under The Trips Agreement, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 450 (2011), Alberto Alemanno, Enrico Bonadio
Do You Mind My Smoking? Plain Packaging Of Cigarettes Under The Trips Agreement, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 450 (2011), Alberto Alemanno, Enrico Bonadio
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Plain packaging, a new tobacco control tool that a growing number of countries are considering, mandates the removal of all attractive and promotional aspects of tobacco product packages. As a result of plain packaging, the only authorized feature remaining on a tobacco package is the use of the brand name, displayed in a standard font, size, colour and location on the package. In opposing this new strategy, the tobacco industry is particularly keen on emphasizing the uselessness of plain packaging in reducing smoking rates and its incompatibility with trade mark provisions of international treaties. In particular, the tobacco industry and …
The Application Of Data Access Policies Designed For Genome-Wide Association Studies To Smaller Scale Databases, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 476 (2011), Donna M. Gitter
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Scientific progress thrives with open discussion of new ideas and supporting data. To this end, researchers traditionally publish their results in scientific papers—papers that contain the new ideas and the underlying data supporting those ideas. With the advent of large-scale and high-throughput data analysis, however, the creation of scientific databases have replaced the traditional model. For such publically-funded, data-intensive projects, funding agencies typically require that all relevant data be made available on a publicly accessible website at the time of the paper’s publication. Against the backdrop of the public accessibility model used in the 1000 Genomes Project, the author recommends …
Interpreting Myriad: Acquiring Patent Law's Meaning Through Contemporary Jurisprudence And Humanistic Viewpoint Of Common Heritage Of Dna, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 508 (2011), Saby Ghoshray
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Until Judge Sweet’s decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (Myriad), gene patentability in the United States has evaded prohibition for more than three decades since Diamond v. Chakrabarty. The Myriad decision has captured the imagination of the legal community—but not in isolation. This article examines Myriad through the lens of two contemporary European decisions related to gene patenting, Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences, Inc and Monsanto Technology LLC v. Cefetra BV, suggesting that Myriad is a narrative that evolves at the intersection of law’s aspiration, humanity’s common heritage, and corporate realities …
Biotech Patent Infringement In Europe: The "Functionality" Gatekeeper, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 540 (2011), Vid Mohan-Ram, Richard Peet, Philippe Vlaemminck
Biotech Patent Infringement In Europe: The "Functionality" Gatekeeper, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 540 (2011), Vid Mohan-Ram, Richard Peet, Philippe Vlaemminck
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Court of Justice of the European Union recently concluded in Monsanto Technology LLC v. Cefetra BV that a patent with claims drawn to isolated DNA, or transgenic products containing that sequence, cannot be infringed if the DNA is not functional at the time of the alleged infringement.This paper discusses how the Cefetra judgment may unintentionally inflict serious economic harm on the European biotechnology industry because countless biotechnology products may no longer be protected by what are otherwise valid and enforceable patent claims. After Cefetra, an accused infringer may deny infringement by simply asserting that the patented sequence does not …
Trademark Protection Of Live Animals: The Bleat Goes On, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 715 (2011), Lee B. Burgunder
Trademark Protection Of Live Animals: The Bleat Goes On, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 715 (2011), Lee B. Burgunder
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that the owner of a Swedish restaurant was suing other businesses for violating its registered trademark, which surprisingly consists of live goats on a grass roof. The PTO and the courts have steadily enlarged the set of trade dress features that might serve as trademarks, and there is no reason, in theory, to treat live animals differently. Nevertheless, the PTO likely made a mistake in this instance when it agreed to register the mark. This article evaluates the requirements for protecting trade dress with trademarks, and explains why a Swedish restaurant should not have …
Recognition And Presentation Of A “New Result” To Reach A Safe Harbor, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2011), Hal Milton
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
A safe harbor where a patent has the best chance of survival in a litigation storm is only established by dividing the preparation of a patent application into two separate categories: the recognition of the new result and the presentation of the new result throughout the patent application. The two famous cases of Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. and Graham v. John Deere Co. illustrate how the implementation of recognition and presentation might have prevented litigation or saved the patents.
Notice That Registered Trademark In The Window?, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 736 (2011), James Juo
Notice That Registered Trademark In The Window?, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 736 (2011), James Juo
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The letter R enclosed in a circle (i.e., the “®” symbol) is a well-known form of statutory notice for a trademark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. This helps ensure that the public will identify a mark as a source identifier rather than as a generic term for a product or service. Although not mandatory, failure to display the registration symbol or another form of statutory notice with a registered trademark may limit the monetary remedies recoverable in a lawsuit for infringement of that registered mark under the Lanham Act. Absent statutory notice, damages for infringements and …
University Initiation Of Patent Infringement Litigation, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 623 (2011), Jacob H. Rooksby
University Initiation Of Patent Infringement Litigation, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 623 (2011), Jacob H. Rooksby
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
While the literature examining university engagement in patenting and technology transfer is quite developed, commentators largely have overlooked university involvement in patent litigation. This article focuses on one aspect of that involvement—initiation of patent infringement litigation—by providing a quantitative and textual analysis of patent infringement actions initiated by universities from 2009 through 2010. Suing for-profit actors for money may seem antithetical to the mission of not-for-profit universities, but in fact universities filed over fifty such cases in the studied time period. Examination of these cases reveals a remarkable similarity between the litigation behavior of universities and for-profit actors, as well …
You Don’T Own Me: Why Work For Hire Should Not Be Applied To Sound Recordings, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 695 (2011), William Henslee, Elizabeth Henslee
You Don’T Own Me: Why Work For Hire Should Not Be Applied To Sound Recordings, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 695 (2011), William Henslee, Elizabeth Henslee
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Many recording artists and songwriters never reap the rewards of their work. America’s first professional songwriter died in poverty at the age of thirty-seven. At the Congressional level the situation has described recording artists as “one group of creators who get ripped off more than anybody else in any other industry”. As we approach 2013, there will be a new line of cases that deal with authors of sound recordings attempting to terminate their copyright assignment to the record companies. While the most efficient and frugal solution would be legislative action, the most probable outcome is expensive, fact-intensive litigation. Congress …
The Utilitarian Fruits Approach To Justifying Patentable Subject Matter, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 753 (2011), Emir Aly Crowne
The Utilitarian Fruits Approach To Justifying Patentable Subject Matter, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 753 (2011), Emir Aly Crowne
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article proposes an approach to justifying patentable subject matter that uses Locke as its starting point, and utilitarianism as its end. The patent eligibility of any given subject matter must be a mixture of labour and certain utilitarian incentives. If these elements are present—and if the subject matter in question can be made to fit within the definition of invention (even if slightly uncomfortably)—then courts and tribunals should aim to accommodate it.
Twitter's Trademark Problems: Is The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Outdated?, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 764 (2011), Cole C. Hardy
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Under the Lanham Act there is no remedy for individuals when imposters register user names with corresponding post-domain paths containing protected trademarks on social network websites. While Twitter temporarily experimented with its own verification process, it currently does not help users of its site distinguish trademark owners’ pages from the imposters’ pages. Current law discouraging such activity only applies to domain names. This article proposes that with a minor change to the ACPA, the Lanham Act could be updated to help trademark owners protect their rights when infringing activity is experienced with social networking handles and the corresponding post-domain paths.
The Cathedral And The Bizarre: An Examination Of The "Viral" Aspects Of The Gpl, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 349 (2010), Michael F. Morgan
The Cathedral And The Bizarre: An Examination Of The "Viral" Aspects Of The Gpl, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 349 (2010), Michael F. Morgan
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
While there is a growing body of literature dealing with the General Public License (“GPL”), the potential viral effects of the GPL do not appear to have been analyzed in a detailed technical manner. This paper will attempt to demonstrate that a proper legal analysis of the viral effects of the GPL is dependent on a detailed technical understanding of the specific mechanisms used for each type of program-to-program interaction. Once these technical mechanisms are properly understood it will then be possible to identify the applicable copyright law needed to assess the viral effects of the GPL.
Increasing Access To Startup Financing Through Intellectual Property Securitization, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 613 (2010), Kyle Tondo-Kramer
Increasing Access To Startup Financing Through Intellectual Property Securitization, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 613 (2010), Kyle Tondo-Kramer
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This paper will discuss how a private company running a single, nationwide database for filing financing agreements can ease the burden on creditors and pave the way for more creditors to enter this market. Part two offers a brief overview of how intellectual property securitization works and some of the impediments to using this type of securitization. Part three proposes a possible solution to the problem creditors face regarding the filing of a financing statement when attempting to securitize intellectual property, and provides an in depth analysis as to why the suggestion that a private company runs a single, nationwide …
300 Years Of Copyright Law? A Not So Modest Proposal For Reform, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2010), James Gh Griffin
300 Years Of Copyright Law? A Not So Modest Proposal For Reform, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2010), James Gh Griffin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
2010 sees the three hundredth anniversary of the U.K.'s Statute of Anne 1710. This paper suggests that with the increased ability of content recipients to re-use works, there is a need to readdress the concerns of stakeholders, namely authors, publishers and content recipients. The paper sets out in detail how this should be achieved. To do so, it utilises the notion of creativity as the benchmark by which to balance the interests of stakeholders. This has been used in early eighteenth century case law in the U.K., and there are also other historical and theoretical justifications. The paper then proceeds …
Safeguarding "The Precious": Counsel On Law Journal Publication Agreements In Digital Times, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 217 (2010), Michael N. Widener
Safeguarding "The Precious": Counsel On Law Journal Publication Agreements In Digital Times, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 217 (2010), Michael N. Widener
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Heaping scholarship fills the academic print and online press about where legal scholars should publish and how to have one’s paper accepted for publication. But there is scarce writing about the contractual relationship between the law journal and the author of an accepted paper. This may be due in part to broadly misconstrued or ignored publication agrees, or perhaps that the business relationship is unworthy of scholarly attention. Regardless, this paper introduces a pragmatist’s perspective on evaluating and revising publication agreements, and informs student editors how publication agreements accomplish a journal’s objectives, based on current copyright law. Finally, this paper …
Patent Law, Hippo, And The Biodiversity Crisis, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 624 (2010), Andrew W. Torrance
Patent Law, Hippo, And The Biodiversity Crisis, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 624 (2010), Andrew W. Torrance
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Planet earth is host to a dazzling variety of living organisms. This diversity of life, or “biodiversity,” is vital to the survival and prosperity of humanity, supplying such vital amenities as food, clothing, shelter, natural biochemicals useful in medicine, industry, and agriculture, and even irreplaceable ecosystem services, such as clean air and water. Despite the prodigious amount of biodiversity on earth, human activities have been depleting it at an accelerating rate that has now reached the level of a mass extinction event. The five greatest threats to biodiversity can be summarized by the “HIPPO” acronym: (1) Habitat loss, (2) Invasives, …