Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Social Networking And Sexual Predators: The Case For Self-Regulation, Sander J. C. Van Der Heide

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The proliferation of social networking as a means of communicating and organizing online social relationships has created fora for sexual predation, cyberbullying, and harassment. Increasingly, minors are joining social networks, like MySpace and Facebook, which raise several legal and moral issues regarding the obligations and duties social networking sites have to their users. This note provides a history of social networking sites and the dangers associated with their use. After examining various common law and statutory attempts to regulate social networking sites, this note concludes that because of immunity under the Communications Decency Act and the impractibility of regulating the …

Open Source, Open Access, Open Transfer: Market Approaches To Research Bottlenecks, Robin Feldman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Finding Trademark Use: The Historical Foundation For Limiting Infringement Liability To Uses "In The Manner Of A Mark", Margreth Barrett

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Reasonable Foreseeability In Information Security Law: A Forensic Analysis, Meiring De Villiers

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Businesses, non-profit organizations and government agencies regularly compile and maintain electronic databases of information about individuals who interact with these institutions. This article presents an analysis of civil liability for failure to safeguard confidential information. It focuses on the situation where a database owner failed to patch a computer security vulnerability which facilitated compromise of sensitive information. In a civil action against a database owner, foreseeability of exploitation of the vulnerability at issue is a key element of the liability analysis. The article provides judicial decision makers with the theoretical basis and a practical methodology to make an informed and …

Spam Works: Evidence From Stock Touts And Corresponding Market Activity, Laura Frieder, Jonathan Zittrain

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

We assess the impact of spain that touts stocks upon the trading activity of those stocks and sketch how profitable such spamming might be for spammers and how harmful it is to those who heed advice in stock-touting e-mails. We find convincing evidence that stock prices are being manipulated through spam. We suggest that the effectiveness of spamrnmed stock touting calls into question prevailing models of securities regulation that rely principally on the proper labeling of information and disclosure of conflicts of interest as means of protecting consumers, and we propose several regulatory and industry interventions.

Based on a large …

The Federal Communications Commission And The Nsa Call Database: The Duty To Investigate, Alan J. Chang

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In May of 2006, news broke out across the United States that the National Security Agency had compiled a call record database that consisted of numerous American consumers' private phone records. The NSA apparently obtained this data directly from four of the nation's largest phone providers at the time: AT&T, BellSouth, Verizon, and SBC. Although Congress called for an FCC investigation as to whether or not these phone companies broke the law, the Commission ultimately refused to involve itself in the matter despite the potentially immense breach of consumer privacy involved. Based on the minimal precedent to have covered this …

The Taming Of The Internet: A New Approach Third-Party Internet Defamation, Amanda Groover Hyland

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article examines the liability of interactive Internet forum operators for defamatory statements written by third parties. It discusses Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and how the courts have applied it to third-party Internet defamation. The article concludes that the courts' various approaches fail to adequately protect the various interests involved, as immunizing distributors fails to adequately protect defamation victims, and notice-based liability fails to adequately protect free expression on the web. Policy challenges and the constitutional foundations of libel law should be jointly considered to create a new test to evaluate liability for third-party libel on the …

Get Ready Cause Here They Come: A Look At Problems On The Horizon For Authorship And Termination Rights In Sound Recordings, Abbott Marie Jones

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Record companies have long included language in standard recording contracts declaring all sound recordings made by the artist works made for hire. Contractual provisions alone, however, will not be enough to confer work-for-hire status on sound recordings. Thus, record companies also require that artists assign some or all of their copyrights in the recordings to the record company. Beginning in 2013, authors of sound recordings will have the opportunity to exercise their right to terminate and renegotiate those assignments, their bargaining power increased by years of success in the music industry. Whether sound recordings will in fact be considered works …

Network Neutrality And Industry Structure, T. Randolph Beard, George S. Ford, Thomas M. Koutsky, Lawrence J. Spiwak

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In its attempt to establish rules that preserve the "openness" of the Internet, the federal government has recently considered implementing various regulatory constraints on the behavior of broadband service providers in order to ensure that consumers can freely access third-party applications over broadband networks without the fear that the network provider will deteriorate transmission to third-party services in favor of their own. Adopting these proposed "Network Neutrality" requirements, however, could exacerbate the very highly-concentrated industry structure by increasing industry concentration, and plausibly even rendering monopoly. Such forced commoditization of broadband access will leave consumers unambiguously worse off.

Antitrust And Sports League Franchise Relocation: Bringing Raiders I Into The Modern Era Of Antitrust Law, Brett Gibbs

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Sports relocation is traumatic for die-hard sports fans. History and long-standing tradition are often thrust aside in pursuit of lucrative offers of stadium financing. Scholars often cite the leading case on sports relocation, Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum v. National Football League (Raiders I), for the proposition that restrictions on sports franchise relocation are illegal under the Sherman Act. However, since Raiders I, there have been two significant developments in antitrust law: the in-depth rule of reason approach and the "small but significant increase in price" approach. In light of these developments, sports leagues should not blindly rely on Raiders I, …

Who Owns A Home Run - The Battle Of The Use Of Player Performance Statistics By Fantasy Sports Websites, Jason Shane

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Fantasy sports are becoming increasingly popular, and with the increase in popularity comes an increase in legal scrutiny. Fantasy sports trade on the statistics of professional athletes. This raises the question: who owns these statistics? Copyright law, the right to publicity and the First Amendment are all implicated. Ultimately, the public interest in this information trumps assertions of ownership by both the professional athletes and the leagues in which they play.

Fisher Of Genes: Patentability Of Expressed Sequence Tags, Joshua Kim

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The patentability of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs), small fragments of DNA that scientists use to identify genes, has been a topic of heated debate in intellectual property law and the scientific community. Much of the debate encompasses the far-reaching consequences of effectively placing control of thousands of ESTs into the hands of a few patent holders. In re Fisher, a recent Federal Circuit decision, was anticipated to settle the question of EST patentability, but may have failed to establish a decisive standard. A more workable standard calls for a clearer articulation of specific utility requirements as well as non-obviousness standards …

The Fourth Amendment And Cell Phone Location Tracking: Where Are We, Kevin Mclaughlin

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Cell phones are a way of life in our society. While most people readily use their cell phones, they don't realize that cell phones also provide signals to track their location. This manner of cell phone tracking may be a violation of the Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. Under the test developed in Katz and its progeny, depending on a number of factors, cell phone tracking may qualify as a reasonable search. However, because cell phone tracking appears to implicate a number of core Fourth Amendment doctrines, it appears to constitute an unreasonable search.

Evolution In Slow Motion: Opting Into A Digital World, Kristin Richards

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Google's "Library Project" which allows users to view snippets from books that have been scanned from library collections is the subject of two recently filed lawsuits. This article takes an in-depth look at the "Library Project" in light of modem copyright law. The "Library Project" presents courts with the difficult task of balancing consumers' desire for information on demand and authors' legal rights.

An Economic Model For The Incentive/Access Paradigm Of Copyright Propertization: An Argument In Support Of The Orphan Works Act, Sami J. Valkonen, Lawrence J. White

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article proposes an economic model of the incentive-access paradigm for copyright designed to correspond to the goal of maximizing societal welfare.

The article begins with a discussion on the foundations of copyright and the objectives of the Constitution's Copyright Clause. The article adopts the majority view that the Constitution mandates that the copyright regime is designed to optimize the positive welfare impacts from copyright protection. Under this view, similarly as antitrust "protects competition, not competitors," the copyright regime should protect creativity, not creators. The result of this underlying policy objective is that the level of copyright propertization becomes a …

New Architectures For Music: Law Should Get Out Of The Way, Henry H. Perritt Jr.

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Copyright law is constitutionally justifiable only to the extent that it provides incentives for creative effort by reducing the risk of free riding. Technological advances repeatedly have revolutionized the economics of music creation, production and distribution. The latest developments in recording, digital compression, e-commerce and file sharing technologies are only the latest in a long line of disruptive technological developments. These technologies reduce the risk of free riding, thereby justifying a narrowing of the scope of copyright protection for music. The paper carefully examines the elements of production and consumption functions for music, explaining how greatly reduced barriers to entry …

Network Neutrality Or Bias - Handicapping The Odds For A Tiered And Branded Internet, Rob Frieden

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article takes an in-depth look at the clash between "Bellhead" and "Nethead" cultures in the complex world of internet access pricing and cost recovery schemes. In examining Bellhead business models, Rob Frieden identifies what constitutes reasonable price discrimination and what represents unfair trade practice. This article concludes that most Bellhead cost recovery models are lawful even though they will actually be a reduction in perceived value proposition for most consumers.

Imus, Indecency, Violence & (And) Vulgarity: Why The Fcc Must Not Expand Its Authority Over Content, Clay Calvert

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article, pivoting on events and controversies that occurred in 2007, addresses two questions affecting freedom of expression on the broadcast airwaves: (1) Should the regulatory power of the Federal Communications Commission be expanded to include control over racist and sexist language like that used by radio host Don Imus in his infamous "nappy head hos" remark?; and (2) Should the regulatory power of the FCC be expanded, per its request to Congress, to include control over violent imagery and storylines on television, including broadcast, cable and satellite television? This article contends that the answer to both questions is the …

The California Supreme Court's Decision In Barrett V. Rosenthal: How The Court's Decision Could Further Hamper Efforts To Restrict Defamation On The Internet, Joshua Azriel

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In November 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Barrett v. Rosenthal that Internet "users" are immune from liability when they post or forward online information that is defamatory. The court cited section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency (CDA) Act as precedent for its decision. The law grants immunity to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and other "users" for any offensive material posted on their online interactive computer services. This article analyzes the Barrett ruling and argues that it leaves three questions unanswered: (1) How does the CDA apply to conspiracies between two users of the Internet where one is …

Pirates Of The Carribean: Offshore Internet Gambling Sites Cursed B Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, Bunnam Sprehichet

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Internet gambling, once coined the "crack cocaine of gambling," has become somewhat of a reality. The industry has grown exponentially, attracting thousands of offshore Internet gambling operators that are unlicensed, untaxed, and unregulated. Policing these operators under decades old antigambling laws presents a difficult task because such laws were enacted before the advent of the Internet. Policy concerns including gambling by minors, gambling addiction, racketeering, tax preservation, and the recommendations by the National Gambling Impact Study Commission collectively prompted the promulgation of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). The note analyzes the UIGEA to clarify its misconceptions and to …

A Modern Analytical Framework For Monopolization In Innovative Markets For Products With Network Effects, John Mcgaraghan

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In the most recent of three landmark antitrust cases against software giant Microsoft, the company argued that courts should apply a different approach to analyzing monopolization charges against "new economy" industry defendants. The court rejected Microsoft's proposal, and this note explores the merit of some of its foundational principles. The note proposes an analytical framework that employs several mechanisms to address unique features of technology markets, such as the "competition for the field"" and "network effects." Under the proposed model, monopolization analysis would condemn those firms which misuse the power to control innovation in the market over time, rather than …

Constitutionalizing Mandatory Retraction In Defamation Law, Elad Peled

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article discusses mandatory retraction, which court rulings and legal literature rarely have addressed. The article proposes a solution designed to provide adequate protection for the reputation of public figures, which may be defined as "constructive mandatory retraction." Under the proposed solution, courts handling public figures' libel actions against the media would be empowered to grant a new remedy, namely, a declaratory judgment stating that the falsity of the defaming publication has been established by clear and convincing proof, accompanied by an injunctive relief ordering the defendant to report on that decision in a prominent manner. Courts may grant this …

Betting On Success: Can The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Help The United States Achieve Its Internet Gambling Policy Goals, James N. Brenner

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This note addresses the effectiveness of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) in achieving the United States' policy goals on tnternet gambling. This note does not discuss the wisdom of the United States' policy on Internet gambling, or the wisdom of the government's choice to prohibit, instead of regulate, Internet gambling to achieve its policy goals. Rather, this note focuses on whether or not the UIGEA adequately addresses the policy concerns over offshore Internet casinos. First, this note discusses federal laws, treaties, proposed legislation, and policy concerns which address Internet gambling. Second, this note discusses the language of the …

The Measure Of The Doubt: Dissent, Indeterminacy, And Interpretation At The Federal Circuit, Jeffrey A. Lefstin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Claim Construction, Appeal, And The Predictability Of Interpretive Regimes, Jeffrey A. Lefstin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Domain Names, Trademarks, And The First Amendment: Searching For Meaningful Boundaries, Margreth Barrett

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Economics Of Build-Out Rules In Cable Television, George S. Ford, Thomas M. Koutsky, Lawrence J. Spiwak

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Firms that wish to offer wireline, multichannel video programming services in direct competition with cable incumbents are being faced with calls by those incumbents and policymakers to "build-out" to entire communities as a pre-condition to receiving a franchise. This article argues that build-out mandates are actually counter-productive and serve primarily to deter new entry, increase the profits of incumbents, and harm consumers. Using both a theoretical model and an empirical simulation, the article demonstrates that build-out rules cause new video entrants to bypass certain communities entirely and to sharply lower the number of communities in which new network construction would …

Idea Protection In California: Are Writers Too Readily Compensated For Their Screenplays, Kelly Rem

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article argues that the current scope of idea protection in the film industry favors writers over producers. By undervaluing the rights of the producers, the current state of the law could have a chilling effect on film production that is damaging to society as a whole. Requiring a showing of a common element between a writer's work and a producer's alleged copy of the writer's work, and presenting a similarity of subject matter and story line, will strike a better balance between these competing interests.

Catching Up To Our Biometric Future: Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights And Biometric Identification Technology, Rudy Ng

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

As biometric identification technology companies strive to make their products more accurate, faster, and more affordable for the mass market, the public is likely to see an increase in the use of biometrics in the future. While emerging biometric identification technology such as iris scanning and face recognition technology may be a fast, cutting-edge way for law enforcement to keep track of convicted felons and suspected terrorists, the government should not be allowed to unreasonably intrude on individual privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment. Ultimately, the legislature and the courts will need to weigh society's need to feel secure against …

Locking Down The Library: How Copyright, Contract, And Cybertrespass Block Internet Archiving, Rebecca Bolin

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Internet archiving has kept millions of websites from disappearing completely. Yet this ambitious effort, the largest archiving project in history, is neither legal nor comprehensive. Archives are rampant copyright infringers with no recourse to traditional library and affirmative defenses. Further, sophisticated authors have started "protecting" their creations with restrictive contracts, technical restrictions, and the shaky cybertrespass doctrine. Our legal regime has strayed from the constitutional values underlying copyright. Despite the social value in preserving cultural expression, the law has evolved to encompass a de facto right to withdraw and opt out of history itself.