Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

The Nation's Broadband Success Story: The Secrecy Of Fcc Broadband Infrastructure Statistics, Benjamin W. Cramer

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The Federal Communications Commission regularly promotes the competitiveness of the American broadband market and the availability of robust services to consumers. Since 2000, the Commission has reported on broadband deployment by zip code, and by late 2006 broadband was supposedly available in 99% of American zip codes, with those zip codes representing 99% of the population. However, the viability of the FCC's zip code-based measurement methodology has long been a matter of controversy, because until recently broadband was counted as "available" in a zip code even if as few as one household in the area has obtained service. This paper …

How Hands-On Will Regulation Of Hands-Free Be - An Analysis Of Sb 1613 And The Effectiveness Of Its Proposed Regulation, Jessica Croze

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In order to prepare for the consequences of this new law, it will be extremely valuable to understand how "hands-free laws" are regulated in other states. Comparing California's new regulations to these existing laws and recognizing the history behind its inaction are crucial. An analysis of these previous attempts to regulate cell phone use while driving will ease the adoption of this new legislation in California. Since California's legislation, Bill 1613, regarding the ban on hand-held cellular devices while driving, was enacted the resulting public effect may have failed to fulfill the intention of the law.

The Politics Of Power: A Social Architecture Analysis Of The 2005-2008 Federal Shield Law Debate In Congress, Cathy Packer

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Would a federal shield law hamper the U.S. Department of Justice's power to combat terrorism and other crimes? Would the law protect the media from the chilling effects of federal subpoenas? Or would the law unwisely grant the already powerful media legal rights denied to other citizens? And who should have the power to decide whether to allow the media to refuse to comply with federal subpoenas? These and similar questions about how power should be distributed among branches of the federal government and the media were at the center of the Congressional hearings and debate on the proposed federal …

Is Free Riding Aided By Parody To Sneak Between The Cracks Of The Trademark Dilution Revision Act, Corina I. Cacovean

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Dilution as a form of intrusion on a trademark has been the object of intense consumer and competition discourses in United States. From the United States Supreme Court decision in Moseley v. VSecret Catalogue, in 2003, to the Fourth Circuit's decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, in 2006, the concept of dilution has become more sophisticated and its intersection with unfair competition and First Amendment law is far from being settled. This note is an attempt to answer the questions of whether the courts, by broadly interpreting the TDRA as being designed to protect freedom …

Intellectual Property Infringement: The Question Of Advertising Injury, Hilary Ditch

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Over the past several decades, business entities have increasingly relied on Commercial General Liability insurance for coverage and protection against the significant costs of defending against intellectual property lawsuits. However, despite this increased usage, the coverage provided for intellectual property infringement claims by Commercial General Liability insurance policies remains uncertain and indeterminate. This frustrating conclusion, reached by numerous courts, legal scholars and insurance practitioners, captures the current state of the law as it applies to coverage for intellectual property infringement claims. Consequently, many business entities seeking to apply their insurance policies to defend against intellectual property claims may face uncertainty …

Targeting Bad Behavior: Why Federal Regulators Must Treat Online Behavioral Marketing As Spyware, Heather Ng Osborn

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The FTC has sanctioned more than a dozen companies during the past two years for privacy violations involving the improper installation of spyware software on personal computers. The spyware software allowed companies to watch and control consumers' online activities, either without the consumer's knowledge or with the consumer's knowledge but without reasonable means for the consumer to stop it. The practice of online targeted advertising raises similar privacy issues as the use of spyware software because it also involves behind-the-scenes tracking, which most consumers never notice. Online targeted advertising allows marketing companies to engage in the same behavior as companies …

Trademark Battles In A Barbie-Cyber World: Trademark Protection Of Website Domain Names And The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, Kiran Nasir Gore

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Mattel's Barbie doll is more than just a trademarked toy produced for child consumption-Barbie has entered public discourse and taken on a life of her own as a cultural phenomenon. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has referred to Mattel's Barbie doll as "possibly the most famous toy in history." With this popularity, also comes unwanted attention. She has become an American icon and taken on additional meanings and status at a societal level; attracting the attention of artists, writers, academics, and commentators in a way that is beyond the scope of Mattel's trademark property rights. The tension between Mattel's …

The Friends Creative Exemption: How Stereotypes Play A Role In Objectivity Standards, Jessica N. Leal

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The recent, controversial California Supreme Court holding in Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions is illustrative of whether the pervasiveness of sexually explicit conduct is insufficient as a matter of law or should be sent to the trier of fact. The court held that a former writer's assistant for the popular, adult-oriented television show Friends failed to establish actionable harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"). According to the court, the circumstances did not establish a prima facie case of hostile workplace environment sexual harassment, even though there was no dispute that sexually coarse and vulgar language …

Parental Rights In Myspace: Reconceptualizing The State's Parens Patriae Role In The Digital Age, Sheerin N. S. Haubenreich

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Generally, parents have a great deal of leeway in their childrearing decisions, including choices in the content of their children's internet use. But there is a harm about which many parents and state and federal governments are unaware: reputational harm. Children and teenagers' current internet use puts them at risk of permanently harming their reputations, and there are no protective measures in place, whether educational or regulatory. They are posting personal information on the internet at an alarming rate mostly via social networking sites like MySpace.com and Facebook.com without an awareness of the present and long-term consequences, such as the …

I'M A Highway Star: An Outline For A Federal Right Of Publicity, Sean D. Whaley

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The federal government has failed to codify a federal publicity right. This has caused numerous problems recently, as varying state laws unevenly restrain the commercial speech of many actors in interstate commerce. However, the nature of the publicity right as a property right and its essential function in interstate commerce calls for Congress to adopt a federal publicity right. Similar to the dual system of trademark protection, a federal publicity right will not preempt such rights at the state level. Rather, establishing such a right will detail proper justification and contours of the right. By establishing a federal right, the …

The Supreme Court As The Grand Mediator In Social Regulation Of The Media - De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est: Or Are They, Richard J. Hunter, Ann M. Mayo, Hector R. Lozada

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article presents a study of administrative and statutory schemes designed to regulate various aspects of the media in considering broad questions of indecency, obscenity, and societal and parental controls over content in various forms of media broadcasting. The article then provides an important historical back-drop by referencing Burstyn v. Wilson (a 1950s case involving an alleged "secular sacrilege") and Pacifica Foundation (the George Carlin "Filthy Words" monologue case). It then turns to a discussion of the litigation and controversy spurred by passage of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 as the …

Actual Interpretation Yields Actual Dissemination: An Analysis Of The Make Available Theory Argued In Peer-To-Peer File Sharing Lawsuits, And Why Courts Ought To Reject It, Shana Dines

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The Recording Industry Association of America has sued thousands of individuals for peer-to-peer file sharing in an attempt to save the failing music industry and resist new technology. The lawsuits rely on an interpretation of copyright law that making a work available to the public is an infringement of the distribution right. The recording industry has vigorously argued this "make available" theory because it is easy to prove, given the limited evidence obtainable in peer-to-peer file sharing cases. However, the district courts in various federal circuits are split on accepting this theory, some holding that actual dissemination is required to …

Mobile Messaging Making E-Discovery Messy: Mobile Messaging And Electronic Discovery, Daniel B. Garrie, Maureen Duffy-Lewis, Richard L. Gillespie, Mari Joller

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Mobile e-discovery spans the globe and creates a multitude of issues for litigants and the courts. The issue of privacy, jurisdiction, privilege, and consent intersect in the mobile space with users sending text messages, twittering, posting notes and videos on-line, and sharing pictures all in the span of a work day. Of course this is further complicated by the integration of the 24/7 workplace and the electronic discovery issues of retention, preservation, and production of the data that mobile devices create. This article examines these issues and provides an overview of some of the more common underlying mobile telecommunication technologies.

Avatar Rights In A Constitutionless World, Tiffany Day

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Courts will face novel issues in constitutional law when the virtual world begins to resemble the real world. Virtual world platforms, such as Second Life, offer a glimpse into the problems that online players face, as well as a look at how some of these problems can be handled in real life. While courts have largely ignored in-game legal issues and have left game creators with the power to decide punishment and distribution of rights, as online commerce and business models begin to grow these issues become more relevant to today's society.

This Note examines the various theories of player …

When Sex And Cell Phones Collide: Inside The Prosecution Of A Teen Sexting Case, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The high-tech phenomenon of teen "sexting," which is now garnering mainstream media attention, is pushing and straining traditional legal notions of what constitutes child pornography. As teens take sexually provocative photos of themselves and send them off to other teens via cell phones, some prosecutors are charging them as child pornographers. This article pivots on an exclusive, in-person interview conducted in Florida by the authors in May 2009 with attorney Lawrence Walters and his client Phillip Alpert, who sexted a nude photo of his girlfriend when he was 18 years old. Alpert was charged under child pornography laws and, today, …

"It's Third And Eight!": The Third Circuit Adopts An Eight-Factor Test For Likelihood Of Confusion In False Enforcement Cases And Flags Related Defenses In Facenda V. Nfl Films, Justin Kerner

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Due to the increased importance of celebrity in American culture, the volume of false endorsement claims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act has risen steadily in the last twenty years. In the third circuit, courts have adopted a three-element test for false endorsement cases: plaintiffs must prove that (1) the mark in question is valid and legally protectable; (2) the plaintiff owns the mark; and (3) the defendant's use of the mark will likely create confusion. In Facenda v. NFL Films, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals adopted a eight-factor test for the third element, likelihood of confusion. This …

Plain Language Patents, Robin Feldman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

What Is A Rate - The Distinction Between Descriptions And Charges, And This Distinction's Impact On Federal Preemption For Wireless Truth In Billing, R. Matthew Warner

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In 1993 Congress passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which placed a limitation on state power to regulate rates of wireless carriers. This legislation explicitly reserved to the states the power to adjust the "terms and conditions" of a wireless provider's service. The FCC, however, interpreted the act as preempting states from requiring or prohibiting explicit line items. While many of the theoretical grounds for the FCC's 2005 Truthin- Billing Declaratory Ruling are correct, the empirical examples cited seem to conflict with its theoretical rulings, causing some of the Ruling to violate 5 U.S.C. § 706. Moreover, the two courts …

The Dmca And The Privatization Of Copyright, Dave Hauser

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

With the support of recent case law, statistics, and legal analysis, this note defends the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and its copyright protection mechanisms. The DMCA should be readily acknowledged as a push toward the privatization of copyright. Furthermore, the vast amount of criticism surrounding the DMCA wrongly shifts the focus away from what its provisions have accomplished.

This note addresses three main challenges to the DMCA's constitutionality: (1) that it exceeds the scope of Congressional authority as restrained by the Intellectual Property Clause, (2) that it oversteps the boundaries of First Amendment protection, and (3) that the doctrine …

Money Ruins Everything, John Quiggin, Dan Hunter

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The statement, "it's hard to compete with free," encapsulates the most important recent developments in intellectual property policy and some of the most significant social trends of our time. Because amateur creators produce content for the love it and are prepared to work for free-or even to lose money to feed their desire to create-their existence threatens the economic assumptions of commercial providers of content. As a result, the rise of amateurism calls into question some fundamental assumptions we have about the public policy of innovation, the way that innovation occurs within society, and the incentives necessary to produce valuable …

The Antithesis Of Originality: Bridgeman, Image Licensors, And The Public Domain, Mary Campbell Wojcik

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Under the explicit terms of both the Copyright Act and the Constitution, everyone-scholars and laypeople alike-should be free to "reproduce, prepare derivative works from, [or] distribute" copies of Eakins paintings. But, contrary to the Copyright Act, some art institutions are legally requiring its image users to agree that, "any reproduction or use of the Photographs or Reproductions" contrary to the terms of its licensing agreements, "will be an infringement of copyright." Beginning with an analysis of the Southern District's holding in the two Bridgeman opinions, this article examines the reaction that the decisions have incited among various art image licensors, …

Piggy Backing On The Web 2.0 Internet: Copyright Liability And Web 2.0 Mashups, Lisa Veasman

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Today's Web allows anyone to "influence the duplication and dissemination of information around the world." User-generated content and applications, where users can combine web applications and synchronize one website's information with another's, comprise much of Web 2.0's Internet. This note investigates whether generative web applications can "piggy back" on the initial websites' safe harbor protections, provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or whether such applications are liable for primary infringement themselves. Such web applications, like the Web 2.0 mashup ("mashup"), face potential liability because they display user-generated, infringing material, which users originally uploaded onto one of the previously existing …

Accepting Droit De Site As An Equal And Fair Measure Under Intellectual Property Law And Contemplation Of Its Implementation In The United States Post Passage Of The Eu Directive, Mara Grumbo

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This note will argue that while many criticisms against droit de suite legislation are based on economic grounds, these grounds are not those on which the royalty is and should be based. These arguments miss the mark by focusing on the inadequacy of the economic value of the royalty rather than viewing droit de suite as a "moral rights" based measure, providing visual artists fair and equal protection under intellectual property law. Once one accepts the latter view and understands the royalty as a measure necessary to remedy the unjust treatment of visual artists under copyright law, the inadequate state …

Broadcast Profanity And The Right To Be Let Alone: Can The Fcc Regulate Non-Indecent Fleeting Expletives Under A Privacy Model, Edward L. Carter, R. Trevor Hall, James C. Phillips

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This manuscript examines the issue of broadcast profanity regulation in light of the Supreme Court's March 2008 decision to grant certiorari in an appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit in 2007 held that the FCC was arbitrary and capricious in its decision to begin prohibiting single profanities, or fleeting expletives, on broadcast television. However, the common law of nuisance and the law of privacy may provide justification for the FCC to regulate broadcast profanity under 18 U.S.C. § 1464. Although some argue that regulating broadcast profanity would induce a chilling effect on …

Can Intellectual Property Laws Stem The Rising Tide Of Art Forgeries, Joseph C. Gioconda

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Forged works of art have infiltrated the global marketplace at unprecedented levels during the past decade. Artists, museums, dealers, brokers and law enforcement have struggled to stop forgeries using traditional legal theories such as contract breach and fraud. These legal theories, however, have not been entirely successful at stopping the widespread global and online sale and distribution of art forgeries. Likewise, the prevalence of counterfeit merchandise has surged, undermining consumer confidence in the authenticity of luxury goods, pharmaceuticals and other consumer products. While those industries have lobbied successfully for stricter penalties against counterfeiting and have invested substantial resources in enforcement, …

Pathways To Patents: Applying The Written Description Requirement Doctrine To Patents On Biological Pathways, Shengfeng Chen

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Research tool and "research-through" patents have become increasing concerns in recent years, particularly in pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields. In response to the impacts of these patents, courts have responded with a series of judicial decisions, and attempted to regulate these patents using the written description doctrine. However, these decisions have been confusing and inconsistent. After an examination of the Federal Circuit's written description jurisprudence and scholastic responses to these decisions, this article proposes a new standard of meeting the written description requirement to provide a workable solution for regulating research tool and "research-through" patents.

Signaling New Barriers: Implications Of The Wipo Broadcasting Treaty For Public Use Of Information, Lisa Mak

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Since November 1998, the Standing Committee on Copyright Related Rights of the World Intellectual Property Organization has been drafting a new Treaty on the Protection of Broadcasting Organizations that would provide copyright-like protection to broadcasting entities in signatory countries. As currently drafted, it would introduce a new layer of intellectual property rights that would be separate from, and in addition to, the rights of copyright holders. If implemented in the United States, the Treaty would represent a substantial shift from the norms and traditions of U.S. copyright law. This note will analyze how the Treaty might negatively impact the public's …

Authors And Readers: Conceptualizing Authorship In Copyright Law, Alina Ng

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Copyright law recognizes authors as the first owners of copyright. However, there is paucity in literature in copyright analysis of the author and the rights which should be granted by virtue of the very act of creativity in the production of literary and artistic works. This indicates insufficient attention paid to a concept that is so central to a law that primarily aims to encourage authorship for society's benefit. The idea of the author and authorship as a creative process is central to copyright analysis. Deeper analysis of the author and creative authorship will provide insights into how the law …

Greenberg V. National Geographic Society: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies The Privileged Revision Doctrine Of The Copyright Act, Joseph Siprut

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This case comment discusses the landmark decision of the Eleventh Circuit, Greenberg v. National Geographic Society, in which the court clarified the privileged revision doctrine of the Copyright Act. This case comment specifically discusses the many implications resulting from this decision and navigates the reader through the current doctrinal landscape pertaining to privileged revisions of published works under Section 201(c) of the Copyright Act. Unlike existing commentary pieces announcing the result of this case, this piece examines the underlying legal doctrines and complicated procedural backstory to the case because of the extensive research gathered from copies of unpublished opinions and …

Keeping The Internet Neutral: Net Neutrality And Its Role In Protecting Political Expression On The Internet, Jennifer L. Newman

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court found that discussion of public issues and debate on the qualifications of candidates is essential to the operation of the U.S. government. The Internet has become an important medium of political communication and this can arguably be attributed to its open nature and the large amount of control afforded to its users in selecting content. This note suggests that Congress must create proper regulations to ensure protection of political expression on the Internet. While discussing the two competing lobbying campaigns, net neutrality and net competition, this note ultimately promotes legislation currently pending in …