Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Science and Technology Law (24)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (23)
- International Law (13)
- Law and Society (12)
- Commercial Law (11)
-
- Health Law and Policy (11)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (10)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Internet Law (8)
- International Trade Law (7)
- Legal History (6)
- Litigation (6)
- Privacy Law (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Contracts (5)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Food and Drug Law (5)
- Law and Gender (5)
- Computer Law (4)
- Conflict of Laws (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Medical Jurisprudence (4)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- Tax Law (4)
- Banking and Finance Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
- Courts (3)
- Keyword
-
- Patent (78)
- Copyright (63)
- Trademark (45)
- Intellectual Property (41)
- Patents (24)
-
- Intellectual property (23)
- Innovation (20)
- Infringement (15)
- IP (14)
- Inc. (13)
- Patentability (13)
- Trademarks (13)
- Copyright Infringement (12)
- Internet (12)
- European Union (11)
- Lanham Act (11)
- DMCA (10)
- Licensing (10)
- Technology (10)
- Trade Dress (10)
- Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (10)
- United States (10)
- Antitrust (9)
- Artificial Intelligence (9)
- Copyrights (9)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (9)
- Patent Act (9)
- TRIPs Agreement (9)
- Berne Convention (8)
- Copyright Act (8)
- Publication Year
Articles 361 - 385 of 385
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Dickinson V Zurko: An Amicus Brief, Thomas G. Field, Craig Allen Nard, John F. Duffy
Dickinson V Zurko: An Amicus Brief, Thomas G. Field, Craig Allen Nard, John F. Duffy
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professors Field, Nard, and Duffy submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case of Dickinson v. Zurko. In Dickinson, the Federal Circuit concluded that the Patent and Trademark Office's factual findings must be reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard and not the substantial evidence standard set out in the Administrative Procedure Act. However, the amicus brief asserted that the PTO is subject to the standards of judicial review set forth in the APA.
No Trade Dress Protection For Anything Disclosed In A Patent: A Defense Of The Supreme Court's Per Se Restriction, Glen A. Weitzer
No Trade Dress Protection For Anything Disclosed In A Patent: A Defense Of The Supreme Court's Per Se Restriction, Glen A. Weitzer
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Conflicts between patent and trademark law arise when the owner of a patent seeks to protect the physical configuration disclosed in a patent. Patent law requires that information in a patent be dedicated to the public upon expiration of the patent; however, trademark law can be used upon expiration of the patent to continue to exclude certain aspects of the art disclosed in the patent. This note explores existing jurisprudence on the conflict between patent and trademark law and proposes a remedy to this conflict.
Using Alternative Dispute Resolution To Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey Of Patent Litigators , Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
Using Alternative Dispute Resolution To Resolve Patent Litigation: A Survey Of Patent Litigators , Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Mr. Quinn provides an empirical overview of patent litigation, after which, he notes that the true growth in patent litigation has not occurred in the courtroom trial of disputes, but in the pretrial process. He concludes that increasing reliance on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation, is responsible for both the dramatic number of cases terminating during the pretrial process and the constant number of patent trials. The author reports the results of a survey taken of over one hundred patent litigators. The focus of the survey was to determine the attitude of patent litigators toward mediation or arbitration and their …
The Supreme Court And Patent Law: Does Shallow Reasoning Lead To Thin Law, Donald S. Chisum
The Supreme Court And Patent Law: Does Shallow Reasoning Lead To Thin Law, Donald S. Chisum
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Chisum explains that the role of the Federal Circuit Court as the "Supreme Court" of patent law may be changing. He notes the significance of recent United States Supreme Court cases addressing patent law issues. In addition, Professor Chisum evaluates the quality of recent landmark decisions in which the Court has examined patent issues. Chisum first notes that the general attitude of the Court reflects skepticism and hostility toward the patent system. In addition, Chisum considers the quality of reasoning undertaken by the Supreme Court and argues that, as opposed to the Federal Circuit, it is often weak, illogical, …
Is This Conflict Really Necessary?: Resolving An Ostensible Conflict Between Patent Law And Federal Trademark Law, Thomas F. Cotter
Is This Conflict Really Necessary?: Resolving An Ostensible Conflict Between Patent Law And Federal Trademark Law, Thomas F. Cotter
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Cotter discusses the inherent conflict between patent and trademark law in product configuration - a species of trade dress - that is disclosed within the text of a utility patent or on which the claims of a utility patent read. Commentators have disagreed as to whether or not such disclosed features should enter the public domain upon expiration of the patent, regardless of whether they would otherwise qualify for trademark protection. Professor Cotter illustrates why the conventional belief that patents are monopolies is, in general, false. He then provides a brief overview of relevant trademark law principles. Professor next …
A Right Without A Remedy: The Unenforceable Medical Procedure Patent , Scott D. Anderson
A Right Without A Remedy: The Unenforceable Medical Procedure Patent , Scott D. Anderson
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Mr. Anderson discusses the current status of medical procedure patents in the United States through the examination of a survey conducted on patent law and the patentability of inventions. Mr. Anderson examines the history of medical process patents and the controversy surrounding such patents and offers an analysis of current law. The analysis focuses on the Pallin v. Singer decision and the congressional reaction to the holding that eventually led to the passage of 35 U.S.C. § 287(c). As a result of the Pallin decision and 35 U.S.C. § 287(c), a patent may be granted for a medical procedure, but …
March-In Rights Under The Bayh-Dole Act: Public Access To Federally Funded Research , Mary Eberle
March-In Rights Under The Bayh-Dole Act: Public Access To Federally Funded Research , Mary Eberle
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Ms. Eberle examines the Bayh-Doyle Act of 1980, which allows small entities to retain patent title to inventions arising from federally funded research. The Act includes a march-in rights provision, which permits a petitioning third party to force the small entity to grant the petitioner a license where the original licensee fails to commercialize the technology. Ms. Eberle discusses the substance of the Act, focusing on its march-in rights provision. Next, Eberle chronicles a march-in rights attempt by the biotechnology company CellPro to obtain a license to Johns Hopkins University patents and the subsequent court battle. After offering an analysis …
The Doctrine Of Equivalents Into The Year 2000: The Line Is Becoming Brighter For Some But Remains Dim For Others, William T. Kryger
The Doctrine Of Equivalents Into The Year 2000: The Line Is Becoming Brighter For Some But Remains Dim For Others, William T. Kryger
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Under the holding of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton-Davis Chemical Co., a court will not limit an inventor to the sole remedy of literal infringement. The inventor may also rely on the "doctrine of equivalents," which permits finding of infringement if there is equivalence between the elements of the accused product and the claimed elements of the patented invention. With this backdrop, Mr. Kryger analyzes the courts' struggle in developing a bright-line rule to protect patentees from piracy and fraud on their patents. Mr. Kryger first chronicles the evolution of the doctrine of equivalents through caselaw, particularly Graver Tank v. Linde …
Deserved Deference: Reconsidering The De Novo Standard Of Review For Claim Construction, M. Reed Staheli
Deserved Deference: Reconsidering The De Novo Standard Of Review For Claim Construction, M. Reed Staheli
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. (Markman II) concluded that patent claim construction is "exclusively within the province of the court," not the jury. However, it did not mention the appropriate standard for appellate review of claim construction, and the Federal Circuit has disagreed on the proper standard of review. As such, Mr. Staheli examines the evidentiary principles of claim construction adopted by the Federal Circuit and explores the inherent reliance a court places upon technical evidence when interpreting a complex claim, focusing on the factual disputes and determinations of credibility that result from a dependence on technical evidence. After a …
The New World Of International Trademark Law, Marshall A. Leaffer
The New World Of International Trademark Law, Marshall A. Leaffer
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Leaffer discusses how the globalization process has forced evolution of international norms and favorably changed the face of trademark law. Professor Leaffer reviews the new developments in major treaties, the Madrid Protocol and the Trademark Law Treaty, and regional treaties, such as the new Community Trademark, and how they continue to build upon the progress of the Paris Convention toward harmonization in the world of international trademark law. Professor Leaffer explains that the benefits from the trend toward harmonization will be enjoyed not only by trademark owners, but also by consumers whose welfare will be enhanced by harmonization.
Trademark Harmonization: Norms, Names & Nonsense, Kenneth L. Port
Trademark Harmonization: Norms, Names & Nonsense, Kenneth L. Port
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Port provides a comment on Marshall A. Leaffer's article that offers another viewpoint on the important issue of the globalization process and trademark law. Rather than seeking ideals of international trademark laws through harmonization, Professor Port suggests that a better objective is internationalization. Professor Port explains that harmonization of international trademark law will be impossible as long as world communities adhere to territorial justifications for sovereignty and jurisdiction. Because goods flow in the reality of an international market, Professor Port reasons that initiatives to avoid inefficiencies and uncertainties of global trademark laws should be directed toward internationalization.
Trade Secrets And The New Realities Of The Internet Age, Ari B. Good
Trade Secrets And The New Realities Of The Internet Age, Ari B. Good
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
The author discusses the risks of industrial espionage and the misappropriation of trade secrets in view of the explosive growth of the internet. Good examines the legal challenges facing the evolution of trade secret law and proposes measures that will promote continued protection of proprietary information.
The Smell Of Success: Trade Dress Protection For Scent Marks, Faye M. Hammersley
The Smell Of Success: Trade Dress Protection For Scent Marks, Faye M. Hammersley
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
The author discusses the implications of the United States Patent and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision In re Clarke, where the Patent and Trademark Office first issued trademark registration for a fragrance. Hammersley discusses expanding trade dress protection to include scents, the positive aspects of scent protection, and the potential of registering scents under current legal standards.
No Protection, No Progress For Graphical User Interfaces, Jane M. Rolling
No Protection, No Progress For Graphical User Interfaces, Jane M. Rolling
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
The Author examines the courts' reluctance to grant intellectual property protection to graphic user interfaces, the visual elements of computer software. Rolling suggests that software manufacturers should seek trade dress protection of graphic user interfaces.
"Gathering His Beames With A Christall Glass": The Intellectual Property Jurisprudence Of Stephen G. Breyer, Gordon R. Shea
"Gathering His Beames With A Christall Glass": The Intellectual Property Jurisprudence Of Stephen G. Breyer, Gordon R. Shea
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Focusing on Qualitex v. Jacobs Products, an opinion authored by Supreme Court Justice Breyer that extends trademark protection to colors, the Author examines Justice Breyer's attitude toward intellectual property law, how Justice Breyer's views were extended in Qualitex, and how Justice Breyer's views may affect intellectual property law in the future.
The European "Community Trade Mark": Is It Worth The Bother?, Daniel G. Radler
The European "Community Trade Mark": Is It Worth The Bother?, Daniel G. Radler
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
In growing regional societies such as the European Union, there is a recognized need for standardization of trademark protection. Radler discusses the recent creation of the "Community Trade Mark" ("CTM") and analyzes the pros, the cons, and the alternatives to regional trademark protection within the EU. Concluding that the CTM is the most appropriate alternative, Radler suggests that the CTM provides uniformity, efficiency, and a means for further harmonization.
Of Moral Right And Righteousness, Sharon W. Halpern
Of Moral Right And Righteousness, Sharon W. Halpern
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
In response to Professor Kwall's article, Professor Halpern provides an exploration of the differences between European countries that provide broad moral right protection and the United States. Professor Halpern recommends an examination of the role artists and creators of intellectual property play in the culture of the United States in order to form a consensus on which a United States moral right regime may be built.
How Fine Art Fares Post Vara, Roberta Rosenthal Kwall
How Fine Art Fares Post Vara, Roberta Rosenthal Kwall
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Kwall discusses the implications of the recently enacted Visual Artists Rights Act ("VARA"). VARA, the only U.S. statute addressing the issue of moral rights, attempts to protect an artist's personal rights in his own works. Kwall details the effectiveness of the Act in a society that has not traditionally recognized such rights. Professor Kwall examines the many flaws of VARA and supports further legislation to strengthen the protection of artists' moral rights.
United States' Moral Right Developments In European Perspective, Marina Santilli
United States' Moral Right Developments In European Perspective, Marina Santilli
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
Professor Santilli provides a European perspective on the United States' recent enactment of VARA. She questions the United States' commitment to the recognition of moral rights by scrutinizing the effectiveness of the Act. Her article provides commentary on Professor Kwall's article and a comparative analysis of moral rights.
Do Your Means Claims Mean What You Meant?, Jeffery N. Costakos, Walter E. Zimmerman
Do Your Means Claims Mean What You Meant?, Jeffery N. Costakos, Walter E. Zimmerman
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
The authors review recent decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning "means claims" in order to provide practical guidelines and reduce the confusion surrounding 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 6.
Procd, Inc. V. Zeindenberg: An Emerging Trend In Shrinkwrap Licensing?, Jerry David Monroe
Procd, Inc. V. Zeindenberg: An Emerging Trend In Shrinkwrap Licensing?, Jerry David Monroe
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
The author discusses the implications of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's decision in ProCD, Inc. v. Zeindenberg. As Monroe explains, until this decision, the courts have been reluctant to uphold the legal consequences of shrinkwrap licenses. Monroe provides an analysis of the interplay between contract law and copyright law to provide a thorough understanding of this emerging trend in intellectual property.