Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Intellectual Property Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Science and Technology Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 2371 - 2400 of 2867

Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Political Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 306 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Hugh C. Hansen, Christopher Jay Hoofnagle, Howard P. Knopf, Declan Mccullagh, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Political Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 306 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Hugh C. Hansen, Christopher Jay Hoofnagle, Howard P. Knopf, Declan Mccullagh, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Veteran beltway players discuss the politics of P2P technology and Privacy. How far can or should Congress go? Can the United States export its values or its laws in this area? Are content owners in a losing Luddite struggle? What is the role of litigators, lobbyists and legislators in this war?

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

What legal tools do privacy advocates have available to defend an individual’s right to privacy? How far does this right go? How should these rights be defended—or if necessary—curtailed? What is the role of Government, of the practicing bar and of academics?

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Some have proposed “alternative compensation schemes” as a means of compensating copyright owners and creators for P2P activity while avoiding litigation. Some have proposed a streamlined dispute resolution system that would allow for enforcement in a manner analogous to the UDRP model. Others question whether private copying should necessarily be viewed as illegal and whether any alternative compensation scheme is viable. With all of these proposals, the question remains as to whether “alternative compensation” is really alternative.

Go to article

Transaction Costs And Antitrust Concerns In The Licensing Of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005), Richard A. Posner Jan 2005

Transaction Costs And Antitrust Concerns In The Licensing Of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005), Richard A. Posner

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

High transaction costs incurred in the licensing of intellectual property create a pressure on legal principles ranging from the fair use doctrine of copyright law to the tying doctrine in antitrust law. It appears, with some exceptions, that antitrust law is imposing excessive restrictions on the licensing of intellectual property. The effect of these restrictions, combined with the high transaction costs inherent in the licensing of intellectual property, is to prevent the maximally efficient allocation of IP resources.

Go to article

Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger Jan 2005

Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Supreme Court’s continued trend of refining trademark rights combined with a new concern for free speech and expression brings current and unresolved trademark issues to light. The large amount of activity in the development of trademark law in 2004 has brought additional uncertainty to trademark law. This article discusses recent Supreme Court trademark jurisprudence refining trademark rights, the development of recent trademark dilution cases, the role of use in commerce as applied to internet search engines and keyword issues, and the emphasis on free speech and expression.

Go to article

Intellectual Property Implications In A Virtual Reality Environment, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 483 (2005), Timir Chheda Jan 2005

Intellectual Property Implications In A Virtual Reality Environment, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 483 (2005), Timir Chheda

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

What will become of intellectual property interests in a world where virtual reality is a fact of life? To ponder this question we must step back from the sophisticated judicially created tests built around a framework of policy suited for modern reality and first consider whether such policy is viable given a virtual reality environment. Only then may we consider if the tests appropriately further such policy, and if not, modify the tests accordingly. This comment considers the policy and tests implicated when copyright, trademark, and patent law pass through the looking-glass and enter the realm of virtual reality.

Go to article

Placing The Burden Back Where It Belongs: A Proposal To Eliminate The Affirmative Duty From Willful Infringement Analyses, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 509 (2005), Kevin J. Kelly Jan 2005

Placing The Burden Back Where It Belongs: A Proposal To Eliminate The Affirmative Duty From Willful Infringement Analyses, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 509 (2005), Kevin J. Kelly

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In order to further the objective of the patent system and maximize the public’s incentive to innovate, it is imperative that the patent laws maintain a balance between the interests of patent owners in excluding others from their patents and the interests of society in the continual progress of technology. The current law in willful infringement analysis upsets this balance with the affirmative duty of due care, which shifts the burden of proof in patent infringement suits from the plaintiff to the alleged infringer. The affirmative duty places a heavy burden on the public and is inconsistent with various common …

Go to article

University Of Rochester V. G.D. Searle & Co.: Writing On The Wall, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 406 (2005), N. Scott Pierce Jan 2005

University Of Rochester V. G.D. Searle & Co.: Writing On The Wall, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 406 (2005), N. Scott Pierce

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In patent law, the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is currently interpreted to include a written description requirement that is distinct from the requirement of enabling a person skilled in the art to make and use an invention. However, analyses of patent specifications under the “written description requirement” have relied on determinations of whether one skilled in the art would comprehend the scope of the claimed invention in view of the description provided, in effect continuing use of enablement as the statutory threshold for description purposes. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in University of Rochester …

Go to article

Congress Wants To Give The Riaa Control Of Your Ipod: How The Induce Act Chills Innovation And Abrogates Sony, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 534 (2005), Michael Raucci Jan 2005

Congress Wants To Give The Riaa Control Of Your Ipod: How The Induce Act Chills Innovation And Abrogates Sony, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 534 (2005), Michael Raucci

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The addition of “active inducement” to the Copyright Act would compliment the doctrine of contributory liability by punishing those who actively encourage copyright infringement. Actively inducing infringement can include advertising an infringing use or other affirmative acts. Therefore, active inducement provides a technology-neutral standard that would not look to punish bad technology but rather bad actions by the technology distributor. In contrast, the reasonable person standard of the Inducing Infringement of Copyright Act of 2004 (“Induce Act”) permits an inappropriate extension of the exclusive rights given to copyright holders by lowering the threshold for litigation. Consequently, the Induce Act improperly …

Go to article

"As The Federal Circuit Turns": The Supreme Court's Consideration Of Merck V. Integra And The Safe Harbor Provision, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 368 (2005), Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick Jan 2005

"As The Federal Circuit Turns": The Supreme Court's Consideration Of Merck V. Integra And The Safe Harbor Provision, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 368 (2005), Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Hatch-Waxman Act was enacted to balance the competing interests in the pharmaceutical marketplace between brand name and generic drug manufacturers. In the twenty years since its inception, the safe harbor provision contained in § 271(e)(1), has been interpreted to provide broad protection to those involved in research activities. However, in 2003, the Federal Circuit narrowly interpreted the safe harbor provision in a move that could potentially frustrate future research and improvements on patented technologies. Merck v. Integra is currently before the United States Supreme Court, who has the challenge of unraveling the competing interests involved. In order to encourage …

Go to article

Abuse Of Public Use? Exploring The Smithkline V. Apotex Decision And The Future Of Public Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 559 (2005), Artem N. Sokolov Jan 2005

Abuse Of Public Use? Exploring The Smithkline V. Apotex Decision And The Future Of Public Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 559 (2005), Artem N. Sokolov

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotx Corp., the court incorrectly applied the statutory public use bar and held the clinical trials did not constitute an experimental use. This ruling set the bar too high. Applying a narrow construction of the law, the CAFC invalidated a claim in a clear case of experimental use. The decision not only misapplied the precedent defining an “inherent” feature of the invention, but also essentially eliminated the need for applying the policies that underlie and define the public use bar under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).

Go to article

Is The Federal Circuit Ready To Accept Plenary Authority For Patent Appeals?, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2005), Meredith Martin Addy Jan 2005

Is The Federal Circuit Ready To Accept Plenary Authority For Patent Appeals?, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2005), Meredith Martin Addy

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Congress formed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in 1982 in part to improve uniformity in the interpretation of patent law and to eliminate forum shopping. However, in 2002, the Federal Circuit’s ability to achieve that goal was reduced when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Holmes Group v. Vornado, held that the Federal Circuit would not have jurisdiction in cases where a federal patent law issue arises only in a responsive pleading. Many commentators have argued that the Holmes decision runs afoul of the congressional mandate in forming the Federal Circuit. With the hope of addressing this …

Go to article

The Third Door Is Off The Hinges: A Prospective Study On The Effects Of The Create Act Against Federal Patent Policies, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 597 (2005), Shane M. Popp Jan 2005

The Third Door Is Off The Hinges: A Prospective Study On The Effects Of The Create Act Against Federal Patent Policies, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 597 (2005), Shane M. Popp

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The CREATE Act has amended § 103 of the Patent Act to expand the definition of common ownership such that a claimed invention is deemed to be commonly owned with other subject matter when the two arise from the same “joint research agreement.” With the CREATE Act, Congress intended to promote research among inventive entities, but instead, Congress has relaxed the conditions for patentability to the point where a contract can circumvent an obviousness inquiry.

Go to article

Pondering A “Baffling” Situation: The “Reconstruction” Of Claim Construction, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 623 (2005), Karen C. Mitch Jan 2005

Pondering A “Baffling” Situation: The “Reconstruction” Of Claim Construction, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 623 (2005), Karen C. Mitch

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Through an iterative use of the ordinary dictionary, claim construction would be more simple, cost effective and efficient in serving the public notice function of the claim. Since the decision in Markman, two divergent methods of claim construction have emerged; one referring to dictionary definitions first, the other referring to parts of the patent such as the specification first. Due to the confusion and differing outcomes the two methods bring about, there came a call by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for clarification. The recent en banc decision in Phillips reverted claim interpretation back to …

Go to article

Is The Cure Worse Than The Disease? An Overview Of The Patent Reform Act Of 2005, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 55 (2005), James G. Mcewen Jan 2005

Is The Cure Worse Than The Disease? An Overview Of The Patent Reform Act Of 2005, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 55 (2005), James G. Mcewen

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

As a result of pressures from various groups and issues surrounding the current patent system, representative Lamar Smith introduced a bill which overhauls multiple aspects of patent practice. The patent reform act is designed to please or compromise between various industry groups while at the same time invigorating the patent system. Specifically, the Patent Reform Act proposes changes to the procedures for filing application, how the applications are filed and even how patents are enforced. In addition to the major publicized changes the Patent Reform Act proposes other alterations that, while receiving less notice, have just as much practical effect. …

Go to article

Patent Tying Agreements: Presumptively Illegal?, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 94 (2005), Alison K. Hayden Jan 2005

Patent Tying Agreements: Presumptively Illegal?, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 94 (2005), Alison K. Hayden

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

On January 25, 2005, the CAFC decided the case of Independent Ink, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., holding that market power will be presumed in a tying agreement whenever a tying product is patented. This rule puts patent holders at a disadvantage, and will increase the amount of antitrust lawsuits brought against patent holders and holders of other exclusive intellectual property rights. Indeed, this rule conflicts with the intended effect of antitrust law. This comment proposes that tying agreements involving a patented product be evaluated the same way as all other tying agreements, and that the presumption of market …

Go to article

Claim Preambles And The Unassailable Patent Claim, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 121 (2005), Kyle D. Petaja Jan 2005

Claim Preambles And The Unassailable Patent Claim, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 121 (2005), Kyle D. Petaja

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In order to diminish the extensive confusion surrounding claim preambles, one must not consider what a preamble should do; rather, it is helpful to consider what a preamble should not do. Traditionally, a preamble is defined as an introduction to a statute or deed stating the document’s basis, purpose, aim, justification, and objective. However, in patents, a claim preamble does not serve this purpose. While a preamble undeniably functions as an introduction to the rest of the claim, that claim is limited in scope and therefore, so too, is the preamble. The basis, purpose, aim, justification, and objective of the …

Go to article

To Be Presumed Or Not To Be Presumed . . . That Is The Enablement Question, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 140 (2005), Kristina A. Walker Jan 2005

To Be Presumed Or Not To Be Presumed . . . That Is The Enablement Question, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 140 (2005), Kristina A. Walker

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In 2003, the Federal Circuit in Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. placed the burden of proving a prior art patent’s § 112 nonenablement on the patentee instead of the accused infringer. The patentee even bears this burden when the unclaimed subject matter is asserted to anticipate the patent at issue. This comment focuses on three questions that were created by the decision in Amgen. First, is material in a printed publication equivalent to unclaimed material in a patent? Second, is the holding in Amgn based on a false premise because it may accord a presumption of § 112 …

Go to article

Collateral Damage: The Effect Of The Database Debate On Other Acts Of Congress, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 78 (2005), Christopher A. Mohr Jan 2005

Collateral Damage: The Effect Of The Database Debate On Other Acts Of Congress, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 78 (2005), Christopher A. Mohr

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Under the reasoning in Unied States v. Martingon, declaring the federal bootlegging statute unconstitutional, databases, as “non-writings,” could not be protected under Congress’s copyright power or commerce power. In other words, Congress’s power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 serves to limit its ability to act under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. Marignon’s rationale raises questions about a variety of prospective and existing legislation that protects “non-writings” for an unlimited time, such as the trademark dilution statute. This article examines the merits of this contention, arguing that the manner in which the Supreme Court has handled overlapping Article …

Go to article

A Proposed Quick Fix To The Dmca Overprotection Problem That Even A Content Provider Could Love . . . Or At Least Live With, Devon Thurtle Jan 2005

A Proposed Quick Fix To The Dmca Overprotection Problem That Even A Content Provider Could Love . . . Or At Least Live With, Devon Thurtle

Seattle University Law Review

This article explains the evolution of the fair use doctrine, which historically prevented copyright holders from having too much control over their works by allowing certain legal and non-infringing fair uses of protected works. Part II explains how the United States Supreme Court developed the Betamax standard to apply the doctrine of fair use to a new technology: home video recorders. Part II also addresses how fair use and the Betamax standard might apply to digital technologies. Part III explains how the DMCA effectively abolished the defense of fair use and its application under the Betamax standard. Finally, Part IV …

Go to article

Note: Exclusive Licensing Of Dna Diagnostics: Is There A Negative Effect On Quantity And Quality Of Healthcare Delivery That Compels Nih Rulemaking?, Edward Weck Jan 2005

Note: Exclusive Licensing Of Dna Diagnostics: Is There A Negative Effect On Quantity And Quality Of Healthcare Delivery That Compels Nih Rulemaking?, Edward Weck

William Mitchell Law Review

This comment surveys the costs of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) diagnostic tests and argues in favor of non-exclusive licensing as a means to provide broad access to affordable DNA diagnostic testing. Part II provides background information on genetic testing, patenting genes as applied to genetic testing, the Bayh-Dole Act, and technology transfer. In addition, Part II summarizes academic commentary regarding the implications of exclusive licensing for biotechnology. Scholars propose a number of solutions, including expanding the experimental use exception. Part III details proposed rulemaking for DNA diagnostics. Part IV reviews anecdotal examples of genetic testing for breast cancer, hereditary hemochromatosis, and …

Go to article

When Will We Have Cross-Border Licensing Of Copyright And Related Rights In Europe?, Lucie Guibault Jan 2005

When Will We Have Cross-Border Licensing Of Copyright And Related Rights In Europe?, Lucie Guibault

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

In Europe, much has been written recently about the collective management of copyright and related rights. April 2004 saw the publication of the European Commission’s Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the Management of Copyright and Related Rights in the Internal Market. This communication confirms the Commission’s intention to adopt, in the not too distant future, a directive on the governance of the societies for collective management of copyright and related rights (collecting societies) in Europe. In addition to describing the current situation in the area of collective management of copyright and related rights in the European …

Go to article

God In The Machine: A New Structural Analysis Of Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, Matthew Sag Jan 2005

God In The Machine: A New Structural Analysis Of Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, Matthew Sag

Faculty Articles

Recognition of the structural role of fair use has the potential to mitigate some of the uncertainty of current fair use jurisprudence. The statutory framework for fair use both mitigates and causes uncertainty. It mitigates uncertainty by providing a consistent framework of analysis the four statutory factors. However, when judges apply the statutory factors without articulating or justifying their own assumptions, they increase uncertainty. The statutory factors mean nothing without certain a priori assumptions as to the scope of the copyright owner's rights. A more stable and predictable fair use jurisprudence would begin to emerge if those assumptions were made …

Go to article

A Quick And Inexpensive System For Resolving Peer-To-Peer Copyright Disputes, Mark A. Lemley, R. Anthony Reese Jan 2005

A Quick And Inexpensive System For Resolving Peer-To-Peer Copyright Disputes, Mark A. Lemley, R. Anthony Reese

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Planting A Standard: Proposing A Broad Reading Of In Re Elsner, Alicia L. Frostick Jan 2005

Planting A Standard: Proposing A Broad Reading Of In Re Elsner, Alicia L. Frostick

Michigan Law Review

This Note will show that one can read Elsner broadly to encompass both plant-type and widget-type inventions, and that applying Elsner to both plants and widgets is within the current statutory framework and case law. Such a reading would change the § 102 bar for inventions patentable under § 10i29 (hereinafter referred to as "widgets") as well as for plants. Part I of this Note argues that congressional sources require a flexible test-one that does not prejudice any objects under the Patent Act. Part II discusses the judicial interpretation of the Patent Act prior to Elsner in order to argue …

Go to article

Rewriting Fair Use And The Future Of Copyright Reform, Michael J. Madison Jan 2005

Rewriting Fair Use And The Future Of Copyright Reform, Michael J. Madison

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Digital First Sale: Friend Or Foe?, Eurie Hayes Smith Iv Jan 2005

Digital First Sale: Friend Or Foe?, Eurie Hayes Smith Iv

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

A Comment: Riaa V. Verizon And How The Dmca Subpoena Power Became Powerless, Katherine Raynolds Jan 2005

A Comment: Riaa V. Verizon And How The Dmca Subpoena Power Became Powerless, Katherine Raynolds

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Leveraging Knowledge Assets: Can Law Reform Help?, Margaret Ann Wilkinson, Mark Perry Jan 2005

Leveraging Knowledge Assets: Can Law Reform Help?, Margaret Ann Wilkinson, Mark Perry

Canadian Journal of Law and Technology

This paper asks whether there is a need for law-makers to aid in the efficient transition to a new knowledge-based economic and social environment through the use of intellectual property devices. The use of such devices was effective in assisting with the transition to an industrial society that, combined with developments in commercial law and secured transactions, further fuelled economic growth in Canada. Can these disparate areas of law be brought together to provide opportunities for the growth of knowledge-based business? The Law Commission of Canada instigated a two-part investigation into these questions. The investigation culminated in the Commission's report …

Go to article

"Tpms": A Perfect Storm For Consumers: Replies To Professor Geist, Barry Sookman Jan 2005

"Tpms": A Perfect Storm For Consumers: Replies To Professor Geist, Barry Sookman

Canadian Journal of Law and Technology

This article has its origins in an article written by Professor Michael Geist and published in the Toronto Star entitled ‘‘‘TPMs’: A perfect storm for consumers’’. Following the publication of the article, John Gregory made a posting to the e-commerce listserv he moderates asking if anyone had any comments to the article. I responded on February 13, 2005 with a reply to John’s request. Professor Geist replied to my comments on February 17, 2005. On March 9, 2005 I posted a further reply to Professor Geist. The article set out below is based substantially on my two postings to John …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last