Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Intellectual Property Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Science and Technology Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 2341 - 2370 of 2855

Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law

Biotechnology Unglued: Science, Society, And Social Cohesion By Michael D. Mehta, Ed. (Vancouver: Ubc Press, 2005), Chidi Oguamanam Apr 2005

Biotechnology Unglued: Science, Society, And Social Cohesion By Michael D. Mehta, Ed. (Vancouver: Ubc Press, 2005), Chidi Oguamanam

Canadian Journal of Law and Technology

In Biotechnology Unglued, Mehta and his thirteen-member interdisciplinary team, comprising mainly of social scientists using a number of ‘‘case studies’’, explore in nine essays ‘‘how advances in agricultural, medical, and forensic biotechnology may threaten the social cohesiveness of different kinds of communities and at different scales’’. In a way, the project is a successful attempt to underscore the theme of (and imperative for) social accountability of science and bio/technological innovations. This 208-page collection of nine essays in a corresponding number of chapters is a remarkable effort. It is a departure from the traditional concerns regarding biotechnology innovations which, hitherto, emphasized …

Go to article

Material Vulnerabilities: Data Privacy, Corporate Information Security And Securities Regulation, Andrea M. Matwyshyn Mar 2005

Material Vulnerabilities: Data Privacy, Corporate Information Security And Securities Regulation, Andrea M. Matwyshyn

ExpressO

This article undertakes a normative and empirical legal inquiry into the manner information security vulnerabilities are being addressed through law and in the marketplace. Specifically, this article questions the current legislative paradigm for information security regulation by presenting a critique grounded in information security and cryptography theory. Consequently, this article advocates shifting our regulatory approach to a process-based security paradigm that focuses on improving security of our system as a whole. Finally, this article argues that in order to accomplish this shift with least disruption to current legal and economic processes, expanding an existing set of well-functioning legal structures is …

Go to article

Why "Bad" Patents Survive In The Market And How Should We Change?--The Private And Social Costs Of Patents, Jay P. Kesan Mar 2005

Why "Bad" Patents Survive In The Market And How Should We Change?--The Private And Social Costs Of Patents, Jay P. Kesan

ExpressO

In this paper, we formally demonstrate that incorrectly issued patents can survive in the market without judicial review, even when the invention is neither novel nor non-obvious. We support this contention by presenting a game theoretic model that studies the interaction between the patentee and an alleged infringer/challenger. Using this model, we demonstrate the impact of the transaction costs in the patent system at the administrative stage in the Patent Office and at the enforcement stage in the courts, and highlight the inability in our current system to mount effective challenges to improperly granted patents in the current system. We …

Go to article

Willful Infringement And The Evidentiary Value Of Opinion Letters After Knorr–Bremse V. Dana, Joshua Stowell Mar 2005

Willful Infringement And The Evidentiary Value Of Opinion Letters After Knorr–Bremse V. Dana, Joshua Stowell

Duke Law & Technology Review

Recently, the Federal Circuit in Knorr-Bremse v. Dana overruled almost twenty years of precedent by striking down the adverse inference doctrine, which had created a negative presumption against any alleged patent infringer for failing to obtain and disclose a patent opinion letter at trial. The decision, while strongly supported by numerous intellectual property and business associations, has created uncertainty for patent attorneys regarding the use of opinion letters in litigation and the acceptable methods for proving willful infringement. This iBrief addresses two specific questions left unanswered by the decision. It concludes that (1) Federal Circuit precedent strongly suggests that the …

Go to article

Patent Damage Strategies And The Enterprise License: Constructive Notice, Actual Notice, No Notice, James W. Soong Feb 2005

Patent Damage Strategies And The Enterprise License: Constructive Notice, Actual Notice, No Notice, James W. Soong

Duke Law & Technology Review

For the patent owner, early provision of patent notice can help maximize recoverable infringement damages during subsequent litigation. This iBrief recognizes a growing trend of infringement suits predicated on patented enterprise software technology, and analyzes application of patent notice principles against industry convention. This iBrief examines the licensing paradigm of enterprise software and questions whether mechanical compliance with the marking statute should qualify as constructive notice. Borrowing from analogous Federal Circuit principles, this iBrief concludes by proposing alternate notice theories that would empower patentees to seek increased remedies consistent with industry reality, case law, and fundamental statutory purpose.

Go to article

Genetic Use Restriction (Or Terminator) Technologies (Gurts) In Agricultural Biotechnology: The Limits Of Technological Alternatives To Intellectual Property, Chidi Oguamanam Jan 2005

Genetic Use Restriction (Or Terminator) Technologies (Gurts) In Agricultural Biotechnology: The Limits Of Technological Alternatives To Intellectual Property, Chidi Oguamanam

Canadian Journal of Law and Technology

This article examines the adequacy of terminator technology as a potential substitute for traditional intellectual property. It acknowledges that the technology provides a stronger protection and reward mechanism than that offered by the traditional intellectual property rights regime. However, terminator technology or any other technology for that matter, is outside the pantheon of intellectual property regimes. Fundamentally, terminator is a technological answer to the quest by private sector interests to improve appropriability of returns on investments in agrobiotech. It potentially represents a panacea to the long standing industry struggle over the profitability of private research in agrobiotech and the need …

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005), Sarah B. Deutsch, Roderick G. Dorman, Michael A. Geist, Hugh C. Hansen, Howard P. Knopf, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim, John G. Palfrey Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Copyright Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 212 (2005), Sarah B. Deutsch, Roderick G. Dorman, Michael A. Geist, Hugh C. Hansen, Howard P. Knopf, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim, John G. Palfrey

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

This panel examines the recent litigation by the recording industry against peer-to-peer (“P2P”) users in the U.S. and Canada. How are users’ identities being obtained? Is the process working well enough or too well? What are the technical, evidentiary, procedural, privacy and substantive copyright issues in play?

Go to article

Yours For Keeps: Mgm V. Grokster, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 209 (2005), Max Stul Oppenheimer Jan 2005

Yours For Keeps: Mgm V. Grokster, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 209 (2005), Max Stul Oppenheimer

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

Millions of people download billions of music files over the Internet, using peer-to-peer ("P2P") services such as Grokster, StreamCast, Morpheus, and Kazaa. This practice has been challenged as violative of copyright and, it has been argued, the magnitude of copyright violations facilitated by P2P services justifies banning the services entirely. This argument has been based on the assumption that most transfers over P2P services violate copyright. The starting point for this discussion is the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court to grant the certiorari petition of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios et al. to review the Ninth Circuit decision in MGM …

Go to article

"Electronic Voting Rights And The Dmca: Another Blast From The Digital Pirates Or A Final Wake Up Call For Reform?", 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 533 (2005), Doris E. Long Jan 2005

"Electronic Voting Rights And The Dmca: Another Blast From The Digital Pirates Or A Final Wake Up Call For Reform?", 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 533 (2005), Doris E. Long

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

Electronic voting machines are the new version of pirated music. Like digital music, electronic voting was designed to make voting rights easily available to the masses. However, technology has once again demonstrated how easy it is to circumvent a good idea through better “hacker” technology. In reality, any electronic voting software can be hacked no matter how good the encryption technology protecting it. The issue is not creating a fool-proof anti-circumvention system – an impossible task – but creating the necessary digital safeguards to make circumvention difficult, to make security breaches more readily detectable, and to provide back-up systems to …

Go to article

Reforming Patent Law Reform, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 336 (2005), Donald S. Chisum Jan 2005

Reforming Patent Law Reform, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 336 (2005), Donald S. Chisum

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The current proposals to change the patent laws are described by proponents as patent law “reform.” In the 215 year history of the United States patent system, Congress has rarely purported to “reform” the system. Indeed, I am not sure that it has ever done so since the 1836 Act—or even since the 1793 Act. If we are to have “reform,” Congress should reform the system for the better of all concerned according to neutral principles.

Go to article

Gonna Wash That Right Of Publicity Right Out Of My Hair –Life After Toney V. L’Oreal, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 349 (2005), Edwin F. Mcpherson Jan 2005

Gonna Wash That Right Of Publicity Right Out Of My Hair –Life After Toney V. L’Oreal, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 349 (2005), Edwin F. Mcpherson

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

There were very few problems with preemption of the state right of publicity by the Copyright Act; that is, until the Seventh Circuit changed everything in Toney v.L’Oreal U.S.A., Inc. This article focuses on the Toney case, the Baltimore Orioles,Inc. v. Major League Basball Players Association case that spawned Toney, and the devastating effect the law from these cases will have on the right of publicity, the entertainment industry as a whole, and many other areas of civil and criminal law, if Toney is allowed to stand.

Go to article

China's Struggle To Maintain Economic Viability While Enforcing International And Domestic Intellectual Property Rights, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 608 (2005), Randal S. Alexander Jan 2005

China's Struggle To Maintain Economic Viability While Enforcing International And Domestic Intellectual Property Rights, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 608 (2005), Randal S. Alexander

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The development of global intellectual property rights (“IPRs”) can lead to complex issues regarding conformity with international standards of IP protection and enforcement. Although each country willing to become a WTO signatory is tasked with the development of such a regime, each country’s domestic affairs and economic survival competes with the burden of adhering to those international standards. This struggle provides the potential for many countries to confuse the boundaries of protection and create a fog of marginal infringement. In China, this fog is heavier because of local protectionism and judicial disincentives to enforce IPRs.

Go to article

How We Lost Our Moral Rights And The Door Closed On Non-Economic Values In Copyright, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2005), Susan P. Liemer Jan 2005

How We Lost Our Moral Rights And The Door Closed On Non-Economic Values In Copyright, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2005), Susan P. Liemer

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Visual Artists Rights Act (“VARA”) is a piece of modern legislation preceded by a rich history, with a significant gap. As early as the 1400’s, patents were offered as economic incentive to develop new processes in the trades and applied arts. By the 1700’s, the Statute of Anne became the first statute to protect the literary work of individual creators. The Engravers’ Act of 1735 soon followed, expanding this protection to include the first works of visual art and providing the precursor to the modern right of integrity. Millar v. Taylor was the landmark case that alluded to moral …

Go to article

Fifth Avenue And The Patent Lawyer: Strategies For Using Design Patents To Increase The Value Of Fashion And Luxury Goods Companies, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 40 (2005), Scott D. Locke Jan 2005

Fifth Avenue And The Patent Lawyer: Strategies For Using Design Patents To Increase The Value Of Fashion And Luxury Goods Companies, 5 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 40 (2005), Scott D. Locke

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Design patents occupy a peculiar niche in intellectual property law. For instance, they are different from copyrights in that an accused infringer has no defense of independent creation, different from utility patents in that there is no prerequisite of a useful function, and different from trade dress in that there is no issue of secondary meaning. Design patents also contain only one claim, which makes the applicant’s drafting task particularly challenging—she must strike a delicate balance between claiming broad protection and establishing novelty. Furthermore, in litigation, the design patent plaintiff must satisfy two tests of infringement: the ordinary observer and …

Go to article

American Courts Are Drowning In The "Gene Pool": Excavating The Slippery Slope Mechanisms Behind Judicial Endorsement Of Dna Databases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2005), Meghan Riley Jan 2005

American Courts Are Drowning In The "Gene Pool": Excavating The Slippery Slope Mechanisms Behind Judicial Endorsement Of Dna Databases, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 115 (2005), Meghan Riley

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera Jan 2005

Public Use Or Experimental Use: Are Clinical Trials Susceptible To Another Attack Similar To That In Smithkline Beecham Corp. V. Apotex Corp., 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 149 (2005), Nimalka Wickramasekera

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Planting A Standard: Proposing A Broad Reading Of In Re Elsner, Alicia L. Frostick Jan 2005

Planting A Standard: Proposing A Broad Reading Of In Re Elsner, Alicia L. Frostick

Michigan Law Review

This Note will show that one can read Elsner broadly to encompass both plant-type and widget-type inventions, and that applying Elsner to both plants and widgets is within the current statutory framework and case law. Such a reading would change the § 102 bar for inventions patentable under § 10i29 (hereinafter referred to as "widgets") as well as for plants. Part I of this Note argues that congressional sources require a flexible test-one that does not prejudice any objects under the Patent Act. Part II discusses the judicial interpretation of the Patent Act prior to Elsner in order to argue …

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Legislative Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 266 (2005), Marybeth Peters Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Legislative Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 266 (2005), Marybeth Peters

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Honorable Marybeth Peters, who has served since 1994 as the Register of Copyrights for the United States Copyright Office of the Library of Congress, presented a post-election report on the legislative agenda in Washington, D.C. regarding rejected, pending and future amendments to the copyright law of the United States. Register Peters also discussed the current policy role of the United States Copyright Office and several court actions that contest the constitutionality of various provisions of the copyright law.

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Technology Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 242 (2005), Michael A. Geist, Doris E. Long, Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Fred Von Lohmann Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Technology Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 242 (2005), Michael A. Geist, Doris E. Long, Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Fred Von Lohmann

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

How is new technology impacting on the more general question of privacy in cyberspace? Is the original notion of an expectation of anonymity on the internet still viable? Can technology pierce through the expectation of privacy even without judicial interference? Do individuals need protection from such technology? Is there technology available to protect the individual? Should these technological tools be regulated? Should the law differentiate between various types of alleged “illegal” behavior; e.g., IP infringement, defamation, possession of pornography and terrorism? Are there international standards that can assist in regulating the intersection between technology and privacy in cyberspace?

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Political Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 306 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Hugh C. Hansen, Christopher Jay Hoofnagle, Howard P. Knopf, Declan Mccullagh, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Political Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 306 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Hugh C. Hansen, Christopher Jay Hoofnagle, Howard P. Knopf, Declan Mccullagh, Ralph Oman, Matthew J. Oppenheim

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Veteran beltway players discuss the politics of P2P technology and Privacy. How far can or should Congress go? Can the United States export its values or its laws in this area? Are content owners in a losing Luddite struggle? What is the role of litigators, lobbyists and legislators in this war?

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Privacy Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 273 (2005), Julie E. Cohen, David E. Sorkin, Peter P. Swire

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

What legal tools do privacy advocates have available to defend an individual’s right to privacy? How far does this right go? How should these rights be defended—or if necessary—curtailed? What is the role of Government, of the practicing bar and of academics?

Go to article

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese Jan 2005

Copyright & Privacy - Through The Wide-Angle Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 285 (2005), William W. Fisher Iii, Howard P. Knopf, Fred Von Lohmann, William B.T. Mock, Marybeth Peters, R. Anthony Reese

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Some have proposed “alternative compensation schemes” as a means of compensating copyright owners and creators for P2P activity while avoiding litigation. Some have proposed a streamlined dispute resolution system that would allow for enforcement in a manner analogous to the UDRP model. Others question whether private copying should necessarily be viewed as illegal and whether any alternative compensation scheme is viable. With all of these proposals, the question remains as to whether “alternative compensation” is really alternative.

Go to article

Transaction Costs And Antitrust Concerns In The Licensing Of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005), Richard A. Posner Jan 2005

Transaction Costs And Antitrust Concerns In The Licensing Of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005), Richard A. Posner

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

High transaction costs incurred in the licensing of intellectual property create a pressure on legal principles ranging from the fair use doctrine of copyright law to the tying doctrine in antitrust law. It appears, with some exceptions, that antitrust law is imposing excessive restrictions on the licensing of intellectual property. The effect of these restrictions, combined with the high transaction costs inherent in the licensing of intellectual property, is to prevent the maximally efficient allocation of IP resources.

Go to article

Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger Jan 2005

Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Supreme Court’s continued trend of refining trademark rights combined with a new concern for free speech and expression brings current and unresolved trademark issues to light. The large amount of activity in the development of trademark law in 2004 has brought additional uncertainty to trademark law. This article discusses recent Supreme Court trademark jurisprudence refining trademark rights, the development of recent trademark dilution cases, the role of use in commerce as applied to internet search engines and keyword issues, and the emphasis on free speech and expression.

Go to article

Intellectual Property Implications In A Virtual Reality Environment, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 483 (2005), Timir Chheda Jan 2005

Intellectual Property Implications In A Virtual Reality Environment, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 483 (2005), Timir Chheda

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

What will become of intellectual property interests in a world where virtual reality is a fact of life? To ponder this question we must step back from the sophisticated judicially created tests built around a framework of policy suited for modern reality and first consider whether such policy is viable given a virtual reality environment. Only then may we consider if the tests appropriately further such policy, and if not, modify the tests accordingly. This comment considers the policy and tests implicated when copyright, trademark, and patent law pass through the looking-glass and enter the realm of virtual reality.

Go to article

Placing The Burden Back Where It Belongs: A Proposal To Eliminate The Affirmative Duty From Willful Infringement Analyses, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 509 (2005), Kevin J. Kelly Jan 2005

Placing The Burden Back Where It Belongs: A Proposal To Eliminate The Affirmative Duty From Willful Infringement Analyses, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 509 (2005), Kevin J. Kelly

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In order to further the objective of the patent system and maximize the public’s incentive to innovate, it is imperative that the patent laws maintain a balance between the interests of patent owners in excluding others from their patents and the interests of society in the continual progress of technology. The current law in willful infringement analysis upsets this balance with the affirmative duty of due care, which shifts the burden of proof in patent infringement suits from the plaintiff to the alleged infringer. The affirmative duty places a heavy burden on the public and is inconsistent with various common …

Go to article

University Of Rochester V. G.D. Searle & Co.: Writing On The Wall, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 406 (2005), N. Scott Pierce Jan 2005

University Of Rochester V. G.D. Searle & Co.: Writing On The Wall, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 406 (2005), N. Scott Pierce

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In patent law, the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is currently interpreted to include a written description requirement that is distinct from the requirement of enabling a person skilled in the art to make and use an invention. However, analyses of patent specifications under the “written description requirement” have relied on determinations of whether one skilled in the art would comprehend the scope of the claimed invention in view of the description provided, in effect continuing use of enablement as the statutory threshold for description purposes. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in University of Rochester …

Go to article

Congress Wants To Give The Riaa Control Of Your Ipod: How The Induce Act Chills Innovation And Abrogates Sony, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 534 (2005), Michael Raucci Jan 2005

Congress Wants To Give The Riaa Control Of Your Ipod: How The Induce Act Chills Innovation And Abrogates Sony, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 534 (2005), Michael Raucci

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The addition of “active inducement” to the Copyright Act would compliment the doctrine of contributory liability by punishing those who actively encourage copyright infringement. Actively inducing infringement can include advertising an infringing use or other affirmative acts. Therefore, active inducement provides a technology-neutral standard that would not look to punish bad technology but rather bad actions by the technology distributor. In contrast, the reasonable person standard of the Inducing Infringement of Copyright Act of 2004 (“Induce Act”) permits an inappropriate extension of the exclusive rights given to copyright holders by lowering the threshold for litigation. Consequently, the Induce Act improperly …

Go to article

"As The Federal Circuit Turns": The Supreme Court's Consideration Of Merck V. Integra And The Safe Harbor Provision, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 368 (2005), Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick Jan 2005

"As The Federal Circuit Turns": The Supreme Court's Consideration Of Merck V. Integra And The Safe Harbor Provision, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 368 (2005), Blair M. Jacobs, Christina A. Ondrick

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

The Hatch-Waxman Act was enacted to balance the competing interests in the pharmaceutical marketplace between brand name and generic drug manufacturers. In the twenty years since its inception, the safe harbor provision contained in § 271(e)(1), has been interpreted to provide broad protection to those involved in research activities. However, in 2003, the Federal Circuit narrowly interpreted the safe harbor provision in a move that could potentially frustrate future research and improvements on patented technologies. Merck v. Integra is currently before the United States Supreme Court, who has the challenge of unraveling the competing interests involved. In order to encourage …

Go to article

Abuse Of Public Use? Exploring The Smithkline V. Apotex Decision And The Future Of Public Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 559 (2005), Artem N. Sokolov Jan 2005

Abuse Of Public Use? Exploring The Smithkline V. Apotex Decision And The Future Of Public Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 559 (2005), Artem N. Sokolov

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

In SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotx Corp., the court incorrectly applied the statutory public use bar and held the clinical trials did not constitute an experimental use. This ruling set the bar too high. Applying a narrow construction of the law, the CAFC invalidated a claim in a clear case of experimental use. The decision not only misapplied the precedent defining an “inherent” feature of the invention, but also essentially eliminated the need for applying the policies that underlie and define the public use bar under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).

Go to article

First Prev Next Last