Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (249)
- DePaul University (26)
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- Duke Law (14)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (14)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (13)
- University of New Hampshire (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (9)
- BLR (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (6)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- University of Minnesota Law School (4)
- Winthrop University (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Keyword
-
- Patent and Trademark Office (31)
- Patents (24)
- Administrative law (20)
- Administrative Law (19)
- Patent law (19)
-
- Copyright (17)
- Intellectual property (17)
- Regulation (15)
- Patent laws and legislation (14)
- USPTO (14)
- Law (13)
- PTO (13)
- Patent (12)
- Federal agencies (11)
- Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Patent practice (11)
- Technology (11)
- Administrative Procedure Act (10)
- Food and Drug Administration (10)
- Judicial review (10)
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board (10)
- APA (9)
- Antitrust (9)
- Corporations (8)
- Drugs (8)
- Federal Circuit (8)
- Innovation (8)
- PTAB (8)
- Pharmaceuticals (8)
- AIA (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- American Indian Law Journal (37)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (24)
- Faculty Scholarship (18)
-
- Articles (13)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (9)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (8)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (7)
- ExpressO (7)
- Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal (6)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (6)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (5)
- Publications (5)
- Testimony Before Congress (5)
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business (4)
- Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 421 - 450 of 502
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Substance, Procedure, And The Divided Patent Power, Joseph S. Miller
Substance, Procedure, And The Divided Patent Power, Joseph S. Miller
Scholarly Works
The Patent Office has the power to issue rules that “shall govern the conduct of proceedings in the Office,” 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2), but not the power to issue substantive rules. It has been this way since 1870, when Congress first granted the Office this regulatory power, in nearly these same words. Just how broad is this grant? How should a reviewing court determine whether a challenged Patent Office rule is procedural (and thus valid) or substantive (and thus invalid)? It is remarkable that in 2010, 140 years after Congress gave the Patent Office this power, the proper sorting standard …
Thwack!! Take That, User-Generated Content!: Marvel Enterprises V. Ncsoft, Carl Michael Szabo
Thwack!! Take That, User-Generated Content!: Marvel Enterprises V. Ncsoft, Carl Michael Szabo
Federal Communications Law Journal
Comic-book heroes show us how to be valiant, how to fight for those less fortunate, and, in some circumstances, how to combat those who break the law. Such is the situation in the case of Marvel Enterprises, Inc. v. NCSofl Corp., a battle between user-generated content and the copyright violations that resulted.
While the issue of copyright liability has been seen in hundreds of comments and notes from courts and attorneys alike, the issue of copyright liability on the internet remains an open question that if not addressed, could endanger the protection afforded to authors. Federal and state suits have …
The Sound Of Money: Securing Copyright, Royalties, And Creative "Progress" In The Digital Music Revolution, Armen Boyajian
The Sound Of Money: Securing Copyright, Royalties, And Creative "Progress" In The Digital Music Revolution, Armen Boyajian
Federal Communications Law Journal
Academics and popular critics alike want to distill, reform, or altogether destroy U.S. copyright law as we know it. Much of this stems from animosity toward the old-guard record industry's alleged practices of overcharging consumers, underpaying royalties to artists, and suing teenagers and grandmas. But what those calling for reform all seem to neglect is a tiny but inevitable fact: for the first time in history, composers and recording artists can keep their copyrights.
Tangible media sales are being replaced by P2P file sharing, retail downloads, and streaming Webcasts. Digital technologies and wireless networks have opened prime channels for music …
Does Ip Need Ip? Accommodating Intellectual Production Outside The Intellectual Property Paradigm, Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss
Does Ip Need Ip? Accommodating Intellectual Production Outside The Intellectual Property Paradigm, Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Striking A Balance: When Should Trade-Secret Law Shield Disclosures To The Government?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Striking A Balance: When Should Trade-Secret Law Shield Disclosures To The Government?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
UF Law Faculty Publications
In 2010, Toyota issued recalls on over eight million vehicles because of faulty acceleration. Assume that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) requests that Toyota allow the government access to the data in black boxes on the recalled cars. The black boxes are operated by proprietary software and can only be accessed with special codes by Toyota. Assume further that Toyota refuses to provide the Black Box data to the government, claiming that it would reveal its trade secrets. How should courts approach what I coin these refusal-to-submit cases? There is a void in the literature and the case …
Can The Law Track Scientific Risk And Technological Innovation?: The Problem Of Regulatory Definitions And Nanotechnology, David A. Dana
Can The Law Track Scientific Risk And Technological Innovation?: The Problem Of Regulatory Definitions And Nanotechnology, David A. Dana
Faculty Working Papers
The functioning of a regulatory regime often turns on what is defined to be included in the scope of regulation and what is defined to be outside. In constructing the definitions of what is regulated, two key challenges are to align the defintions with the risks that motivated the establishment of the regulatory regime and to build in dynamism into the defintions so that they adapt to changes in scientific understanding and technology. This Chapter of a forthcoming book from Cambridge University Press (David Dana, ed., The Nanotechnology Challenge), explores these challnegs in the context of nanotechnology.
It Is Time: Why The Fda Should Start Disclosing Drug Trial Data, Mustafa Ünlü
It Is Time: Why The Fda Should Start Disclosing Drug Trial Data, Mustafa Ünlü
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Although [drug] manufacturers bear the cost of research data generation, it is oftentimes a worthwhile investment that also confers significant commercial advantages. Consequently, they have argued that research data should be considered a trade secret and kept confidential. The FDA's longstanding position has been to accept this proposition. Even when Congress appeared to mandate disclosure or weaken the underlying rationale for secrecy, the FDA has continued to treat research data as confidential. A strong argument against a default posture of confidentiality is that research data disclosure would promote broad public interests by eliminating the societal costs brought about by keeping …
Whose Burden Is It Anyway? Addressing The Needs Of Content Owners In Dmca Safe Harbors, Greg Janson
Whose Burden Is It Anyway? Addressing The Needs Of Content Owners In Dmca Safe Harbors, Greg Janson
Federal Communications Law Journal
Much of today's network neutrality debate addresses concerns that cable providers will limit access to competing Web-based services delivering multimedia content. While proposals to mandate nondiscrimination for all Internet traffic surely will help create a competitive environment where online entertainment providers can prosper, ISP interference is not the only threat. Online entertainment sites that relay user-generated content are threatened by crippling litigation brought by copyright holders for actions taken by third parties using their services. Reliance on the safe harbors provided in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act has, in most cases, proved unsuccessful. This Note addresses the concerns of both …
The Riaa, The Dmca, And The Forgotten Few Webcasters: A Call For Change In Digital Copyright Royalties, Kellen Myers
The Riaa, The Dmca, And The Forgotten Few Webcasters: A Call For Change In Digital Copyright Royalties, Kellen Myers
Federal Communications Law Journal
Emerging webcasting technology is playing an increasing role in modem society. The ease of use of webcast technology has brought about an increased user base as well as an increased viability for small webcasting businesses. However, the mix-tape genre of independent Internet radio has been financially and legislatively abused as a forerunner of rapidly advancing digital technology and concerns over protecting copyright royalties. This Note argues for a revision of the DMCA to provide a middle ground between protecting copyrighted works and allowing the continued existence of Internet radio.
The Contextual Rationality Of The Precautionary Principle, David A. Dana
The Contextual Rationality Of The Precautionary Principle, David A. Dana
Faculty Working Papers
This article defines the precautionary principle (PP) primarily based on what it is not: it is not quantitative cost-benefit analysis (CBA) or cost-cost analysis of the sort we associate with the Office of Management and Budget in the United States and U.S. policymaking and policy discourse generally. In this definition, the PP is a form of analysis in which the costs of a possible environmental or health risk are not quantified, or if they are, any quantification is likely to be inadequate to capture the full extent of the costs of not taking regulatory measures to mitigate or avoid the …
A New Deal For End Users? Lessons From A French Innovation In The Regulation Of Interoperability, Jane K. Winn, Nicolas Jondet
A New Deal For End Users? Lessons From A French Innovation In The Regulation Of Interoperability, Jane K. Winn, Nicolas Jondet
Articles
In 2007, France created the Regulatory Authority for Technical Measures (lAutoritj de Rdgulation des Mesures Techniques or ARMT), an independent regulatory agency charged with promoting the interoperability of digital media distributed with embedded "technical protection measures" (TPM), also known as "digital rights management" technologies (DRM). ARMT was established in part to rectify what French lawmakers perceived as an imbalance in the rights of copyright owners and end users created when the European Copyright Directive (EUCD) was transposed into French law as the "Loi sur le Droit d'Auteur et les Droits Voisins dans la Société de l'Information" (DADVSI).
ARMT is both …
The Role Of The Office Of The Administrative Law Judges Within The United States International Trade Commission, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 216 (2009), Carl C. Charneski
The Role Of The Office Of The Administrative Law Judges Within The United States International Trade Commission, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 216 (2009), Carl C. Charneski
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 makes unlawful, specifically, the importation of products that infringe intellectual property rights. The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is the forum in which all section 337 proceedings are adjudicated and, within the ITC, the Office of Administrative Law Judges handles all these proceedings. Section 337 cases can be exceedingly complex and technical, and the Administrative Law Judges (“ALJ”) are the initial triers of fact, administrators, and decision makers in every case. Thus, the amount of work that the ALJs—along with their staff—must meet to see these cases to completion can be substantial. …
A Discourse On The Public Nature Of Research In Contemporary Life Science: A Law-Policy Proposal To Promote The Public Nature Of Science In An Era Of Academia-Industry Integration, Michael J. Malinowski
A Discourse On The Public Nature Of Research In Contemporary Life Science: A Law-Policy Proposal To Promote The Public Nature Of Science In An Era Of Academia-Industry Integration, Michael J. Malinowski
Journal Articles
This article addresses the impact of integration of academia, industry, and government on the public nature of research. The article concludes that, while the integration has benefited science immensely, regulatory measures should be taken to restore the public nature of research in an age of integration.
Does The Supreme Court Still Matter?, Timothy B. Dyk
Does The Supreme Court Still Matter?, Timothy B. Dyk
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The U.S. Patent And Trademark Office's Proposed Information Disclosure Statement Rules: Too Novel And Nonobvious, Russell S. Magaziner
The U.S. Patent And Trademark Office's Proposed Information Disclosure Statement Rules: Too Novel And Nonobvious, Russell S. Magaziner
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
First Things First: A Principled Approach To Patent Administrative Law, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 29 (2008), Kali Murray
First Things First: A Principled Approach To Patent Administrative Law, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 29 (2008), Kali Murray
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Darden V. Peters: Giving Deference Where Deference May Not Be Due, Raisa L. Michalek
Darden V. Peters: Giving Deference Where Deference May Not Be Due, Raisa L. Michalek
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Process Patents: Hearing Before The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 110th Cong., May 1, 2007 (Statement Of John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas
Process Patents: Hearing Before The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 110th Cong., May 1, 2007 (Statement Of John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
The Patent Reform Act Of 2007: Hearing Before The Subcomm. On Courts, The Internet, And Intellectual Property Of The H. Comm. On The Judiciary, 110th Cong., April 26, 2007 (Statement Of John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
Full Committee Hearing On The Importance Of Patent Reform On Small Business: Hearing Before The H. Comm. On Small Business, 110th Cong., Mar. 29, 2007 (Statement Of Professor John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.
When Second Comes First: Correcting Patent’S Poor Secondary Incentives Through An Optional Patent Purchase System, Jordan Barry
When Second Comes First: Correcting Patent’S Poor Secondary Incentives Through An Optional Patent Purchase System, Jordan Barry
ExpressO
As research has advanced, technologies have become more closely knit, and the relationships between them—both complementary and competitive—have become increasingly important. Unfortunately, the patent system’s use of monopoly power to reward innovators creates inefficient results by overly encouraging the development of substitute technologies and discouraging the development of complementary technologies. This paper explains how an optional patent purchase system could help ameliorate such problems and discusses the implications of such a system.
Pharmaceutical Lemons: Innovation And Regulation In The Drug Industry, Ariel Katz
Pharmaceutical Lemons: Innovation And Regulation In The Drug Industry, Ariel Katz
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Before a new drug can be marketed, the Food and Drug Administration must be satisfied that it is safe and effective. According to conventional wisdom, the cost and delay involved in this process diminish the incentives to invest in the development of new drugs. Accordingly, several reforms aimed at restoring such incentives have been implemented or advocated. This Article challenges the central argument that drug regulation and drug innovation are necessarily at odds with one another. Although intuitively appealing, the argument that drug regulation negatively affects the incentives to innovate does not fully capture the role that regulation plays in …
The Role Of The Fda In Innovation Policy, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
The Role Of The Fda In Innovation Policy, Rebecca S. Eisenberg
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
This Article reexamines the role of FDA regulation in motivating investment in biopharmaceutical innovation. I begin by challenging the standard story that it is the patent system that makes drug development profitable, and drug regulation that makes it costly, by showing how patents add to costs and how drug regulation works in tandem with patents to protect profits. I then compare FDA-administered exclusive rights to patents as a means of fortifying drug development incentives, suggesting ways that FDA-administered rights might be preferable both from the perspective of policy makers and from the perspective of firms. In the remainder of the …
Compulsory Patent Licensing: Is It A Viable Solution In The United States, Carol M. Nielsen, Michael R. Samardzija
Compulsory Patent Licensing: Is It A Viable Solution In The United States, Carol M. Nielsen, Michael R. Samardzija
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
As technology continues to advance at a rapid pace, so do the number of patents that cover every aspect of making, using, and selling these innovations. In 1996, to compound the rapid change of technology, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that business methods are also patentable. Hence in the current environment, scores of patents, assigned to many different parties, may cover a single electronic device or software--making it increasingly impossible to manufacture an electronic device without receiving a cease and desist letter or other notice from a patentee demanding a large royalty or threatening an injunction. Companies, particularly those in …
Fixing Fair Use, Michael W. Carroll
Fixing Fair Use, Michael W. Carroll
Working Paper Series
The fair use doctrine in copyright law balances expressive freedoms by permitting one to use another’s copyrighted expression under certain circumstances. The doctrine’s extreme context-sensitivity renders it of little value to those who require reasonable ex ante certainty about the legality of a proposed use. In this Article, Professor Carroll advances a legislative proposal to create a Fair Use Board in the U.S. Copyright Office that would have power to declare a proposed use of another’s copyrighted work to be a fair use. Like a private letter ruling from the IRS or a “no action” letter from the SEC, a …
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
The Fcc's Indecent Proposal: Copyright Implications Of The Proposed "Record And Retain" Rule, Christopher S. Reed
The Fcc's Indecent Proposal: Copyright Implications Of The Proposed "Record And Retain" Rule, Christopher S. Reed
Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Scientific Expertise In Policymaking: The Case For Open Review And Patent Reform, Beth Simone Noveck
Scientific Expertise In Policymaking: The Case For Open Review And Patent Reform, Beth Simone Noveck
ExpressO
The Energy Research Advisory Board, the group of external scientific advisors that provided impartial expert advice to the Secretary of Energy since 1978, was disbanded this May. The Administration, like its predecessors, regularly replaces experts on agency advisory panels with ideologues and political allies. We are at the nadir of a historical progression since World War II away from trust in and use of scientific expertise in policymaking. This shift however, has not been countered with greater public participation. Instead, administrative law and theory have developed a model of the managerial administrative authority. The "expertocratic" agency relies on internal expertise …
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
Bond Repudiation, Tax Codes, The Appropriations Process And Restitution Post-Eminent Domain Reform, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
This brief comment suggests where the anti-eminent domain movement might be heading next.
Perspectives On Patents: Post-Grant Review Procedures And Other Litigation Reforms: Hearing Before The Subcomm. On Intellectual Property Of The S. Comm. On The Judiciary, 109th Cong., May 23, 2006 (Statement Of Professor John R. Thomas, Geo. U. L. Center), John R. Thomas
Testimony Before Congress
No abstract provided.