Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of New Mexico

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 451 - 480 of 562

Full-Text Articles in Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr. Aug 1997

Plaintiff's Reply To Defendants' Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment, And Plaintiff's Response To Defendants' Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, Peter T. Grossi Jr.

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen Jun 1997

Federal Defendants' Statement Of Genuine Issues In Response To Plaintiff's Statement Of Undisputed Facts, Andrew M. Eschen

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments To Act Of 1992, 1997 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, 105th Congress Jun 1997

San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments To Act Of 1992, 1997 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, 105th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: Department of the Interior, General Provisions - San Carlos Apache Tribe Amendments to Act of 1992, Chapter 5 of Emergency Supplemental Appropriations For Recovery From Natural Disasters, And For Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those In Bosnia, PL 105-18, 111 Stat. 158, 181-187 (Jun. 12, 1997). Parties: US & San Carlos Apache Tribe. 1992 Settlement Act amended 3711 to move deadline to Mar. 31, 1999 & effect on deadline of submission of a proposed Settlement Agreement to Gila Adjudication court; and addition of certain parties & definitions to the 1992 Settlement Agreement. The provisions address the transfer of the …


Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Compact, Mt, Chippewa-Cree Tribe Apr 1997

Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation Compact, Mt, Chippewa-Cree Tribe

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Settlement - State Legislation: There is no stand alone settlement agreement: Water Rights Compact - MT, Chippewa-Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation & US of 1997 (MCA 85-20-601) This Compact arose out of a MT state court water rights adjudication. It serves both as settlement agreement and state legislation. The Compact sets forth the Tribe’s rights and involve Stoneman Reservoir, East Fork Reservoir, Gravel Coulee, Lower Big Sandy Creek, Ancestral Missouri River Channel Aquifer, Box Elder Creek, Beaver Creek, Camp Creek, Duck Creek, Gorman Creek, Lake Elwell, Bonneau Reservoir, Brown’s Reservoir, and new impoundments. It identifies rights in groundwater and …


Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene Feb 1997

Order Granting Motion To Intervene, Harold H. Greene

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen Feb 1997

Stipulation For Enlargement Of Time To Answer Complaint, Andrew M. Eschen

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments, Kevin Washburn Jan 1997

Recent Developments, Kevin Washburn

Faculty Scholarship

Summary of cases in the areas of environmental law, taxation of natural resources, and water rights cases involving Native American tribes.


Land Grants In A Nutshell, Malcolm Ebright Jan 1997

Land Grants In A Nutshell, Malcolm Ebright

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


Opinion Denying Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Harold H. Greene Dec 1996

Opinion Denying Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Harold H. Greene

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


1996 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, United States 104th Congress Oct 1996

1996 Amendment To The San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement, United States 104th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: 1996 Amendment to the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992, PL 104-261, § 3,100 Stat. 3176 (Oct. 9, 1996). Parties San Carlos Apache Tribe & US. Section 3711(b)(1) of Title XXXVII of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement of 1992 (106 Stat. 4752) is amended by striking `December 31, 1996' and inserting `June 30, 1997'. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=GPO&browsePath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1992&searchPath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1992&leafLevelBrowse=false&isCollapsed=false&isOpen=true&ancestors=root&packageid=STATUTE-106&ycord=1248]


Jicarilla Apache Water Rights Settlement Act Amendment Of 1996, United States 104th Congress Oct 1996

Jicarilla Apache Water Rights Settlement Act Amendment Of 1996, United States 104th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal legislation: Act of October 9, 1996 - Sec. 2, Amendment to the Jicarilla Apache Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992, PL 104-261 §2, 110 Stat. 3176. Parties: Jicarilla Apache Nation and US. An amendment to the Settlement Act of 1992 to move the adjudication decree deadline from December 31, 1996 to December 31, 1998. Related to rights in the Rio Chama drainage. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=GPO&browsePath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1992&searchPath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1992&leafLevelBrowse=false&isCollapsed=false&isOpen=true&ancestors=root&packageid=STATUTE-106&ycord=1248]


Implementing The Public Welfare Requirement In New Mexico's Water Code, Consuelo Bokum Oct 1996

Implementing The Public Welfare Requirement In New Mexico's Water Code, Consuelo Bokum

Publications

Despite the fact that the New Mexico legislature added a public welfare criterion to the water code over 10 years ago, the State Engineer Office has not addressed the application of the criterion by regulation and has only addressed the public welfare briefly in a few decisions. There is almost no case law in New Mexico addressing this issue. More and more participants, however, are raising public welfare in water rights protests. This paper addresses how the public welfare criterion has developed in western water law and proposes an approach for use of the criterion in New Mexico.


Errata--Motion For A Status Conference, Thomas R. Bartman Jun 1996

Errata--Motion For A Status Conference, Thomas R. Bartman

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of L. Lamar Parrish, L. Lamar Parrish Jun 1996

Affidavit Of L. Lamar Parrish, L. Lamar Parrish

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Elizabeth A. Brandt, Ph.D. (With Resume), Elizabeth A. Brandt Jun 1996

Affidavit Of Elizabeth A. Brandt, Ph.D. (With Resume), Elizabeth A. Brandt

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Rick Hendricks, Ph.D. (With Resume), Rick Hendricks May 1996

Affidavit Of Rick Hendricks, Ph.D. (With Resume), Rick Hendricks

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


History Of The Boundaries Of The Pueblo Of Sandia, 1748-1860, Stanley M. Hordes Mar 1996

History Of The Boundaries Of The Pueblo Of Sandia, 1748-1860, Stanley M. Hordes

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

The purposes of this report are threefold: (1) to analyze the boundaries of the Pueblo of Sandia, as articulated and interpreted by Spanish, Mexican and U.S. Territorial authorities from the establishment of Sandia Pueblo in 1748 until the marking of the boundaries by the Office of Surveyor General in 1860; (2) to define the term, sierra madre in its proper historical context; and (3) to ascertain whether in 1748 Sandia Pueblo was populated by descendants of the original Sandia Pueblo people who had migrated to the Hopi country after the Pueblo Revolt of 1680, or, on the other hand, the …


San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of 1992, Amendment Of 1996, United States 104th Congress Jan 1996

San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of 1992, Amendment Of 1996, United States 104th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: Jan. 1996 Amendment to the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992, PL 104-91, § 202| 110 Stat. 7, 14 (Jan. 6, 1996) Parties: US & San Carlos Apache Tribe. Extends Sec. 3711(b)(1) of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 (title XXXVII of Public Law 102–575) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 1996’’. The effective date of changes is Dec. 31, 1995. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ91/pdf/PLAW-104publ91.pdf]


Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of 1994, Amendment Of 1996, United States 110th Congress Jan 1996

Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of 1994, Amendment Of 1996, United States 110th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: An Act to require the Secretary of Commerce to Convey to the Commonwealth of MAs the National Marine Fisheries Service Laboratory Located on Emerson Avenue in Gloucester, MA, PL 104-91, § 201, 110 STAT. 7, 14 (Jan. 6, 1996). Parties: Yavapai-Prescott Tribe, AZ, Prescott, Chino Valley Irrigation District and US. Title II amends the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1994 by extending the effective date to June 30, 1996 and reviving a contract. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ91/pdf/PLAW-104publ91.pdf]


Review Essay: “Indians Are Us?: Culture And Genocide In Native North America" By Me Monroe, John P. Lavelle Jan 1996

Review Essay: “Indians Are Us?: Culture And Genocide In Native North America" By Me Monroe, John P. Lavelle

Faculty Scholarship

Indians Are Us? is a collection of commentaries on American Indian political and social affairs, written in the truculent tone that readers have come to expect from writer Ward Churchill. Like its predecessors, Fantasies of the Master Race and Struggle far the Land, this latest Churchill project consists largely of polemical pieces hastily compiled from obscure leftist publications.


Energy And Water Development Appropriations Act Of 1996, Title V, General Provisions, Sec 507, United States 104th Congress Nov 1995

Energy And Water Development Appropriations Act Of 1996, Title V, General Provisions, Sec 507, United States 104th Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1996, General Provisions (Nov. 13, 1995) (PL 104-46, Title V, § 507, 109 Stat. 402, 419 )The DOI Secretary is to proceed with construction of facilities in conformance with the Oct. 25, 1991 final Biological Opinion for the Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado and New Mexico. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ46/pdf/PLAW-104publ46.pdf]


Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of June 29, 1995, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Et Al Jun 1995

Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Of June 29, 1995, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Et Al

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Settlement Agreement: Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement of June 29, 1995. Parties: Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, AZ, US, City of Prescott & Chino Valley Irrigation District (CVID). The Tribe Prescott under a Water Services Agreement. The Tribe has the right to develop groundwater resources in accordance with a groundwater management plan developed by the Tribe for on-Reservation use. Reservation effluent may be used on Reservation or sold to off-reservation users. The Tribe’s use of settlement water on-reservation is unrestricted. Shortage management is addressed. The Tribe may develop a tribal water code. The Tribe may sell its CAP contract entitlement which …


State Ex Rel. Martinez V. Kerr-Mcgee, New Mexico Court Of Appeals Apr 1995

State Ex Rel. Martinez V. Kerr-Mcgee, New Mexico Court Of Appeals

Law of the Rio Grande

No abstract provided.


Certificate Of Conference, Kimberly Z. Lesniak Jan 1995

Certificate Of Conference, Kimberly Z. Lesniak

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

Pursuant to Local Rule 108(m), I certify that, as attorney for Intervenors Sandia Mountain Coalition, et al., I had conferences by telephone with attorney for Plaintiff Pueblo of Sandia on January 13 and 17, 1995, and conferences by telephone with counsel for Defendants on January 11, 1995, and January 12, 1995, to determine whether either party would oppose this Motion to Intervene.


Affidavit Of Shannon Gurbaxani, Shannon Gurbaxani Jan 1995

Affidavit Of Shannon Gurbaxani, Shannon Gurbaxani

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Viola Miller, Viola Miller Jan 1995

Affidavit Of Viola Miller, Viola Miller

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Anita P. Miller, Anita P. Miller Jan 1995

Affidavit Of Anita P. Miller, Anita P. Miller

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Kate Goldblum, Kate Goldblum Jan 1995

Affidavit Of Kate Goldblum, Kate Goldblum

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Affidavit Of Kenneth Goldblum, Kenneth Goldblum Jan 1995

Affidavit Of Kenneth Goldblum, Kenneth Goldblum

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.


Law School Training Of American Indians As Legal-Warriors, Gloria Valencia-Weber Jan 1995

Law School Training Of American Indians As Legal-Warriors, Gloria Valencia-Weber

Faculty Scholarship

This article explores four areas involved in training lawyers appropriate to the needs of tribal nations. First, the American Indian tribes, as the indigenous sovereigns, present legal needs and opportunities unique from other minority groups. Development of Indian law depends on the exercise of sovereign power by the Indian nations, not constitutional equal protection of an ethnic minority. The architectural work of developing the governments, i.e., creating tribal law and operating tribal courts, calls for the legal-warrior's critical ability to meld customary perspectives with knowledge and skills acquired in legal professional training. Second, the specialty of American Indian law as …