Evidence Commons^™

What Is This Thing Called Hearsay?, John W. Reed

Articles

This article is based on an address delivered at the 1956 Advocacy Institute at the University of Michigan. A re-examination of elementary principles, the discussion proceeds on the express assumption that much of the uncertainty and confusion in usa of the hearsay rule is unnecessary because it is due to failure to recall and employ these principles.

Evidence--Effect Of Comment On Refusal Of Co-Indictee To Testify, L. F. Martin Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence--Use Of Truth Serum Statements In Substantiating The Testimony Of An Impeached Witness, Wayne J. Carroll

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Evidence--Does The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Extend To Incrimination Under The Laws Of Another Jurisdiction?, James Park Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law—Evidence—Circumstantial, Peter Todoro

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Leyra, 1 N. Y. 2d 199, 134 N. E. 2d 475 (1956).

Criminal Law—Evidence—Impeachment, George Gibson

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Cannizarro, 1 N. Y. 2d 167, 134 N. E. 2d 206 (1956).

Criminal Law—Evidence—False Testimony Of Witness, Robert Casey Jr.

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Savvides, 1 N. Y. 2d 554, 136 N. E. 2d 853 (1956).

Criminal Law—Evidence—Prosecuting Attorney As Unsworn Witness, Robert Casey Jr.

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Lovello, 1 N. Y. 2d 436, 136 N. E. 2d 483 (1956).

Causation: A Medico-Legal Battlefield, Albert Averbach

Cleveland State Law Review

In the court room, the trial lawyer strives to introduce medical testimony as to the cause of a condition or disease. Resort in many instances is made, through a hypothetical question to a non-attending physician, as to whether or not the accident described was a competent cause of a later-described or assumed condition, or "might," "could, "would," or "was" competent to have caused it. A great conflict exists in the various states as to the permissible range of inquiry in such cases, depending upon the particular jurisdiction's interpretation of the requirement that medical opinions must be reasonably certain or reasonably …

Compelling The Testimony Of Political Deviants, O. John Rogge

Michigan Law Review

Besides the two specific problems which the new federal act presents, namely, whether it imposes nonjudicial functions on federal courts, and whether it should, does and can protect against the substantial danger of state prosecution, there is a general objection that one can raise against it, and to other acts of the same type: they relate to the area of belief and opinion, the very area which was involved when the English people, spearheaded by the Puritans, engaged in the struggle with the Crown that finally resulted in the establishment of a right of silence. At least if we are …

Book Reviews, John P. Frank, Malcolm P. Sharp, Edward S. Stimson, Oliver Schroeder Jr., Clarence J. Morrow, Bertram K. Wolfe, Malcolm D. Talbott, William H. Agnor, Clarence M. Updegraff

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Compelling The Testimony Of Political Deviants, O. John Rogge

Michigan Law Review

At the last term the United States Supreme Court in Ullmann v. United States upheld the constitutionality of paragraph (c) of a federal act of August 1954 which seeks to compel the testimony of communists and other political deviants. Paragraph (c) relates to witnesses before federal courts and grand juries. The Court specifically left open the question of the validity of paragraphs (a) and (b) relating to congressional witnesses. Justice Frankfurter delivered the Court's opinion. Justice Douglas, with the concurrence of Justice Black, wrote a dissent.

It is our purpose to consider the background, history and terms of this compulsory …

Constitutional Law - Privilege Against Self-Incrimination -Effect Of Immunity Statute, Paul A. Heinen S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner was brought before a federal grand jury and questioned as to his and other persons' membership in the Communist Party. After petitioner refused to answer the questions on the ground that the answers would be self-incriminating and therefore his refusal was privileged under the Fifth Amendment, the United States attorney, proceeding under the provisions of the Immunity Act of 1954, filed an application in the United States district court requesting that petitioner be required to answer the questions. The district court, upholding the constitutionality of the act, ordered petitioner to answer the questions, and petitioner's appeal from this order …

Morgan: Some Problems Of Proof Under The Anglo-American System Of Litigation, Roy R. Ray

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Some Problems of Proof Under the Anglo-American System of Litigation. By Edmund Morris Morgan.

Constitutional Law - Grand Jury Under The Fifth Amendment Indictments Not Subject To Attack On Evidentiary Ground, Jerome K. Walsh, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was indicted by a grand jury on four counts of willfully evading federal income taxes due for the years 1946, 1947, 1948 and 1949. His motion before trial to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was firmly convinced that there could have been no legal or competent evidence before the grand jury was denied by the trial court. At the conclusion of the government's case, and again just before the case went to the jury, counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that only hearsay evidence offered by three revenue agents had …

Civil Procedure And Evidence—Evidence—Hospital Records, Richard G. Birmingham

Buffalo Law Review

Williams v. Alexander, 309 N.Y. 283, 129 N.E. 2d 417 (1955).

Civil Procedure And Evidence—Evidence—Hearsay Rule, Robert Miller

Buffalo Law Review

Swenson v. New York, Albany Despatch Co., 309 N.Y. 497, 131 N.E. 2d 902 (1956).

Criminal Law—Evidence, Richard F. Griffin

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Travato, 309 N. Y. 382, 131 N. E. 2d 557 (1955); People v. Namer, 309 N. Y. 458, 131 N. E. 2d 734 (1956).

Civil Procedure And Evidence—Evidence—State Retirement System, Vincent P. Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Owens v. McGovern, 309 N.Y. 449, 131 N.E. 2d 729 (1956).

Criminal Law—Wiretapping, Robert Rosinski

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Abelson, 309 N. Y. 643, 132 N. E. 2d 884 (1956).

Book Reviews, Ralph C. Barnhart, Leonard F. Manning, Coleman Karesh, Wilfred J. Ritz, Edward J. Freeman, Thomas Broden Jr., E. C. Bolmeier, A. Kenneth Pye, Philip K. Yonge, Joseph T. Tinnelly C.M., Thomas I. Emerson

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Procedure And Evidence -- 1956 Tennessee Survey, Edmund M. Morgan

Vanderbilt Law Review

To one who has not inherited the Tennessee system of procedure and has not yet "first endured, then pitied, then embraced" it, it presents some startling contrasts. There is an astounding inter-mingling of the modern, which seeks to make procedure the servant of substance, with the ancient, that has in most jurisdictions been relegated to the legal attic or to a museum of procedural antiques. In an action instituted by warrant in the Court of General Sessions of Shelby County and tried de novo on appeal in the circuit court, the warrant is a summons and cannot serve as a …

Evidence--Privilege Against Self-Incrimination--Constitutionality Of Immunity Statute, R. W. F.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Evidence, Gordon L. Walgren

Washington Law Review

Covers cases on best evidence rule—tape recording competent evidence where made from original wire recording.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Constitutional Law--Congressional Investigations --Relevancy of Required Testimony

========================

Constitutional Law--State Taxation of Interstate Commerce--Sales Taxation of Income from Trans-Shipment of Goods within State

========================

Criminal Law--Felony Murder Doctrine--Co-Felon Killed by Victim of Crime

========================

Evidence--Judicial Admissions--Testimony as to Objective Facts

========================

Federal Tort Claims Act--"Private Individual" Clause--Uniquely Governmental Activity

========================

Income Taxation--Capital Gains and Losses--Business Purpose for Contracting in Commodity Futures

========================

Labor Law--Taft-Hartley Act--Discharge of Employees because of Union Membership

========================

Negligence--High Tension Power Lines--Duty to Warn of Dangerous Condition

========================

Real Property--Joint Tenancy--Severance of Estate by Murder of Co-Tenant

========================

Torts--Landowner--Duty to Social Guest

========================

Wills--Pretermitted Heir Statue--Sole …

Evidence (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), Richard H. Lewis

William and Mary Review of Virginia Law

No abstract provided.

Social Scientists Take The Stand: A Review And Appraisal Of Their Testimony In Litigation, Jack Greenberg

Michigan Law Review

"How to inform the judicial mind, as you know, is one of the most complicated problems,'' said Justice Frankfurter during argument of the school segregation cases. And as law deals more and more with issues of great public consequence the judiciary's need for knowledge increases. Much of this knowledge is within the realm of what are called the social sciences.

Although jurisprudents and social scientists have long complained of a gulf between law and social science, little notice has been given to the recent, recurrent collaboration between the two at the trial level. In a variety of cases social scientists' …

Evidence - Admissibility - Extent To Which Juror's Affidavit May Be Used To Impeach Verdict, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and made a motion for a new trial on the basis of a juror's affidavit which asserted that the jury had been divided eight to four in favor of life imprisonment over the death sentence, that subsequently several jurors introduced into the deliberations the fact that the defendant had been charged, in another indictment, with assault with intent to kill, that this became a part of the jury's deliberation, and that, as a result, the jury did not recommend life imprisonment and, instead, the death sentence was imposed. On appeal, held …

Admissibility Of Wire-Tapped Evidence At Common Law, J. K. B.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Due Process - Use Of Habeas Corpus To Allow Federal Court To Review State Court Jury Determination Of Voluntariness Of Confession, Herbert R. Brown S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The prisoner had been convicted of murder in the state court. He brought a habeas corpus proceeding in federal district court to secure his release from custody on the ground that the conviction was based on a confession which was obtained by physical violence. The confession had been submitted to the jury, which was instructed to consider it only if it found that it was not obtained by duress or fear produced by threats. The district court granted the writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, held, affirmed. The district court could determine the facts of the case for itself. …