Evidence Commons^™

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, L. S. D.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Should The Admissibility Of Dying Declarations In Evidence Be Limited To Homicide Cases, J. C. W. Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, Ernest F. Roberts

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Admissibility Of Extrajudicial Identification As Substantive Evidence, Martin A. Dyer

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Husband-Wife Privileged Communications Summarized, Donald L. Guarnieri

Cleveland State Law Review

Courts and legislatures of the United States generally view communications between husband and wife as privileged against court-room disclosure. The protection which the courts, legislatures and text writers' have favored seems to stem from the basic premise "that the privilege against court-room disclosure is needed for the encouragement of marital confidences, which confidences in turn promote harmony between husband and wife." Affection and understanding between husband and wife seem far more important for marital harmony than confidence based on a legal rule of evidence.

Hospital Records As Evidence, Robert B. Dunsmore

Cleveland State Law Review

Court decisions are not in harmony as to the admissibility of hospital charts and records as evidence in a court of law. At common law they are not recognized as valid evidence. In the absence of a statute requiring hospitals to keep clinical charts or records, many courts adopt the view that such a chart or record is admissible as evidence only under some exception to the Hearsay Rule and after a proper foundation has been laid for bringing the case within the particular exception. If such a foundation is laid, a hospital chart or record is, according to the …

Medical Evidence And Testimony, Robert V. Lamppert

Cleveland State Law Review

It is the purpose of this article to explain the various ways in which medicine becomes involved in the law and to point out the problems and difficulties involved. Since this article is written for both medical doctors and attorneys, the detailed explanations and terminology of each profession will necessarily be kept at a basic level. It is hoped that a forthright demonstration of the basic factors involved, along with an attempt to explain the problems complicating the points of controversy and misunderstanding, will help somewhat in creating a better understanding between the two professions and enable them to better …

Evidence--Search And Seizure--Admissibility Of Evidence Obtained In Search Incidental To Lawful Arrest, William A. Logan

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Corroboration Of Confessions In A Criminal Case In Virginia, James W. Payne Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

The purpose of this brief note is to examine the Virginia rules relating to the requirement of corroboration of an extrajudicial, confession as a basis for conviction of a criminal offense. The rules discussed herein do not, of course, apply to a plea of guilty in open court, and it might be noted too that the title selected by the author may be misleading in that, as a general rule, the rules discussed do apply to incriminating admissions of fact (except those occurring before the alleged criminal act) as well as full confessions. "A confession is the admission of guilt …

Physician-Patient Privilege In Ohio, Naoma Lee Stewart

Cleveland State Law Review

Throughout its history the physician-patient privilege has been the subject of controversial discussion, and in recent years these discussions have been dominated by voices of bitter disapproval and severe criticism. Judges, lawyers, textwriters, and teachers have denounced the privilege by characterizing it as everything from a "monumental hoax" to a "clever legerdemain loaned by the law to the parties to suppress the truth." Critics maintain that in the majority of reported cases the patient invoked the privilege, not to protect his privacy or to prevent the disclosure of humiliating personal facts (supposedly the purpose for the creation of the privilege), …

Labor Law - Evidence- Production Of Pre-Trial Statements For Purpose Of Cross-Examination In Nlrb Proceeding, Bruce L. Bower

Michigan Law Review

Respondent was accused of unfair labor practices. At the hearing before the trial examiner, respondent requested pre-trial statements of the general counsel's witnesses who testified, for the purpose of impeaching their credibility on cross-examination. The trial examiner's refusal was upheld by the NLRB. Upon motion to reopen the record, held, the record is reopened and further proceedings are to be held before the trial examiner. The holding of Jencks v. United States applies to NLRB proceedings; hence respondent has the right for cross-examination purposes to production of pre-trial statements made by the general counsel's witnesses which directly relate to …

The Use Of Expert Evidence In Res Ipsa Loquitor Cases, Graham L. Fricke

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, Dale F. Stansbury, Malcolm P. Sharp, Arthur T. Von Mehren, John S. Bradway, James D. Ghiardi, Thomas H. Eliot, Julius Paul, W. Howard Mann

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, A. G. H.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Scientific Investigation And Defendants' Rights, B. J. George Jr.

Michigan Law Review

Advances in science, medicine and industry have made much of the world a more pleasant place in which to live. In general more men are living a physically more satisfying life in more comfortable surroundings than preceding generations. But with this has come a parallel increase in criminality to the point that the term "crime wave" is heard with increasing frequency. Many crimes are facilitated in their commission by adaption or application of new scientific discoveries by criminal elements. A natural consequence is that already overburdened police departments turn as quickly as is financially possible to new scientific techniques in …

Evidence—Hospital Records Not Admissible To Establish Manner Of Occurrence Of Injury To Patient, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

Cox v. State, 3 N.Y.2d 693, 171 N.Y.S.2d 818 (1958).

Evidence—Presumption Of Continuity Of Ownership, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Scandore, 3 N.Y.2d 681, 171 N.Y.S.2d 808 (1958).

Evidence—Admissibility Of Radar Findings, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Magri, 3 N.Y.2d 562, 170 N.Y.S.2d 335 (1958).

Evidence—Admissibility Of Confession, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Scully, 4 N.Y.2d 453, 176 N.Y.S.2d 300 (1958).

Slough, M. C.-Impeachment Of Witnesses: Common Law Principles And Modern Trends, M. C. Slough

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

An Introduction To The Study Of Presumptions, E. F. Roberts

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Domestic Relations—Custody Of Children—Per Curiam, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

Gluckstern v. Gluckstern, 4 N.Y.2d 521, 176 N.Y.S. 352 (1958).

Evidence—Privileged Communications—Per Curiam, Buffalo Law Review

Buffalo Law Review

People v. Runion, 3 N.Y.2d 637, 170 N.Y.S.2d 836 (1958).

Annual Survey Of Tennessee Law, Harold Seligman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Of particular significance in this field during the survey year has been the decision of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co. v. Tennessee Pub. Serv. Comm'n. Several aspects of administrative law are involved in this holding, including scope of review, evidence to be considered by the court on review, and the rate-making function...

==================================

In Flowers v. Benton County Beer Board, the license of a beer permit holder was revoked by a county beer board due to the holder's plea of guilty to driving an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant in …

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1958 Tennessee Survey, Charles H. Miller

Vanderbilt Law Review

In surveying the field of criminal law and procedure the cases presented to the supreme court during the year were little more than normal or typical. Several of the criminal cases are not presented in detail in this article, as they are dealt with in other survey sections.

Procedure And Evidence -- 1958 Tennessee Survey, Edmund M. Morgan

Vanderbilt Law Review

Construction and Sufficiency on Demurrer: A pleading must be construed in the light of matters judicially noticed; an allegation of facts from which the inference of the existence of an essential fact is no more reasonable or is less reasonable than an inference of its non-existence is not the equivalent of an allegation of that essential fact. ...

Thus in an action against a Pension Board for money due, a demurrer to the bill of complaint specifying only the failure to allege a ground of recovery does not raise the question whether the decision of the Pension Board is made …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Recent Cases

Conflict of Laws--Jurisdiction--Assumption of Personal Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Insurer on the basis of a Single Insurance Contract

================================

Constitutional Law--Taxation--Tax Immunity of Federal Government not Infringed by Local Taxes upon Possession of Government Property

================================

Evidence--Hearsay--Utterance of Employee under Emotional Stress Admissible to Establish Scope of Employment and Render Employer Vicariously Liable

================================

Insurance--Automobile--Duplicating Recoveries allowed under Liability and Medical Payment Clauses of Automobile Liability Insurance Policy

================================

Insurance--Business Indemnity--Radiation Decontamination Expenses not Recoverable under a Business Interruption Clause

=================================

Insurance--Life--Variable Annuity Contracts not Subject to Regulation by Securities and Exchange Commission

=================================

Physicians--Unprofessional Conduct--Willful Evasion of Federal …

Variable Verbalistics -- The Measure Of Persuasion In Tennessee, Kenneth L. Roberts, William M. Sinrich

Vanderbilt Law Review

In a trial one party always has the affirmative burden of persuading the finder of fact to adopt his allegations as true. This burden is met by inducing a particular degree of belief in the mind of the fact finder.'Manifestly, absolute truth is not attainable in a lawsuit. Rather certain facts are found to exist from all the evidence presented and these findings labeled true for the purposes of the case. Since different factual situations require different measures of persuasion, it is necessary that the fact finder, whether judge or jury, know and understand the particular measure applicable in order …

Book Review, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

The National Probation and Parole Association has been working for over 35 years to improve the administration of justice and in the publication of "Guides for Sentencing" it has provided one of its most important services to judges who are charged with the administration of criminal justice and to juvenile and domestic relations courts. The book is the first of a series of practical manuals for all of the above named courts and it is the result of the combined labors of 37 specially selected United States, state and juvenile judges for a period of about five years. Bolitha J. …

The Law And Behavioral Science Project At The University Of Pennsylvania: Evidence, A. Leo Levin

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.