Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1448)
- Criminal Procedure (1358)
- Constitutional Law (947)
- Courts (768)
- Litigation (643)
-
- Civil Procedure (525)
- Science and Technology Law (458)
- State and Local Government Law (452)
- Torts (436)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (411)
- Jurisprudence (410)
- Fourth Amendment (391)
- Supreme Court of the United States (386)
- Judges (374)
- Law and Society (368)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (347)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Contracts (334)
- Legislation (334)
- Legal Profession (331)
- Family Law (329)
- Administrative Law (320)
- Intellectual Property Law (320)
- Law and Psychology (316)
- Internet Law (307)
- Medical Jurisprudence (305)
- International Law (298)
- Legal History (297)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (840)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (380)
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- West Virginia University (218)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (205)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- William & Mary Law School (157)
- University of Richmond (150)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (142)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Kentucky (133)
- Mercer University School of Law (117)
- University of Washington School of Law (112)
- Cleveland State University (111)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (106)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (96)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- University of Miami Law School (91)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (83)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (81)
- American University Washington College of Law (80)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- UIC School of Law (78)
- Cornell University Law School (77)
- Fordham Law School (77)
- University of Georgia School of Law (68)
- Duke Law (65)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (63)
- Brooklyn Law School (56)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (1364)
- Testimony (238)
- Hearsay (223)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (214)
- Admissibility (202)
-
- Witnesses (187)
- Expert testimony (121)
- Discovery (115)
- Criminal law (114)
- Litigation (110)
- Sixth Amendment (106)
- Confrontation Clause (105)
- United States Supreme Court (101)
- Police (87)
- Cross-examination (86)
- Exclusionary rule (85)
- Law (83)
- Scientific evidence (83)
- Expert evidence (81)
- Trials (78)
- Criminal procedure (76)
- Due process (76)
- Criminal Law (73)
- Witness (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Daubert (64)
- Juries (64)
- Courts (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (542)
- Faculty Scholarship (310)
- Articles (241)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- West Virginia Law Review (215)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Faculty Publications (197)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (132)
- Indiana Law Journal (131)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (127)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (122)
- Mercer Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (115)
- Kentucky Law Journal (109)
- Cleveland State Law Review (98)
- Buffalo Law Review (93)
- University of Richmond Law Review (82)
- Washington Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (68)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (67)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Maryland Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (60)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (59)
- University of Miami Law Review (58)
- All Faculty Scholarship (56)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (55)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (51)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (50)
- Akron Law Review (47)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 4921 - 4950 of 5950
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Evidence--Federal Shop-Book Rule--Admissibility Of Hospital Records, Eugene Triplett Hague Jr.
Evidence--Federal Shop-Book Rule--Admissibility Of Hospital Records, Eugene Triplett Hague Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Conflict of Laws--Workmen's Compensation--Forum's Use of Foreign State's Tort Law for Recovery Against Third Party Does Not Require Forum's Use of Foreign State's Election Provision in Workmen's Compensation Suit
==============================
Constitutional Law--Advertising-Statute Restricting Size,Number, and Location of Gasoline Price Signs Is Unconstitutional
===============================
Evidence-Attorney--Client Privilege--Applicability When a Corporation Is the Client
===============================
Evidence--Attorney-Client Privilege-Doctor's Report to Attorney on Condition of Client Is Within Privilege
===============================
Federal Jurisdiction--In Federal Question Action Federal Court Is Competent To Exercise In Personam Jurisdiction Over Corporation if It Has Sufficient Contacts With United States
===============================
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--Counterclaim Not Compulsory in First Suit …
Admitting Lie-Detector Results By Stipulation
Admitting Lie-Detector Results By Stipulation
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disposition Of Physical Exhibits Used In Criminal Trials
Disposition Of Physical Exhibits Used In Criminal Trials
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Can Wiretapping Be Utilized And Controlled?
How Can Wiretapping Be Utilized And Controlled?
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
Michigan Law Review
Conventional doctrine does not address itself directly to the choice among valuation techniques, although the various parochial damage formulae give some clues. Underlying this series of articles is an assumption that the doctrine makes more sense when restated in valuation terms. These articles involve an effort to restate in such terms one sector of expectation damage law-the part that governs cases in which plaintiff is a "seller."
Evidence--Attorney-Corporation Client Privilege, Thomas Edward Mchugh
Evidence--Attorney-Corporation Client Privilege, Thomas Edward Mchugh
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence--Witnesses--Impeachment Of Court Witness By Prior Statements, Thomas Richard Ralston
Evidence--Witnesses--Impeachment Of Court Witness By Prior Statements, Thomas Richard Ralston
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privilege - Extension Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Thomas J. Bradley
Privilege - Extension Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Thomas J. Bradley
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Corroboration Of Accomplice Testimony In Federal Criminal Cases, Lester B. Orfield
Corroboration Of Accomplice Testimony In Federal Criminal Cases, Lester B. Orfield
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Admission Into Evidence Of Extra-Judicial Confession Of Guilt Made By Third Parties - Brady V. State, D. William Simpson
The Admission Into Evidence Of Extra-Judicial Confession Of Guilt Made By Third Parties - Brady V. State, D. William Simpson
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Re-Evaluation Of The Attorney-Client Privilege (Part Ii), James A. Gardner
A Re-Evaluation Of The Attorney-Client Privilege (Part Ii), James A. Gardner
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Psychiatrist-Patient Privilege, Jonas R. Rappeport
Psychiatrist-Patient Privilege, Jonas R. Rappeport
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure - Dismissal - Eavesdropping By Sheriff On Consultations Between Criminal Defendant And His Attorney Requires Dismissal Of Charges Against Defendant, James L. Griffith
Criminal Procedure - Dismissal - Eavesdropping By Sheriff On Consultations Between Criminal Defendant And His Attorney Requires Dismissal Of Charges Against Defendant, James L. Griffith
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Subjective Complaints V. Objective Signs, David I. Sindell, Irwin N. Perr
Subjective Complaints V. Objective Signs, David I. Sindell, Irwin N. Perr
Cleveland State Law Review
The word "versus" in the title presents what we think is one of the most important problems of plaintiff trial lawyers today. After years of preparation, we submit our case to a jury; our medical witnesses offer testimony based on long time observation, treatment and evaluation. Then, in walks the defendant's doctor and proceeds to plunge a dagger into our case by calling our client either a malingerer or a neurotic, or just a plain liar. He testifies that he saw none of the objective signs that our medical examiners found, and concludes that all of the subjective complaints are …
Semantics Of Traumatic Causation, Richard M. Markus
Semantics Of Traumatic Causation, Richard M. Markus
Cleveland State Law Review
Sometime before the trial of every personal injury case, each lawyer involved must make sure that the physicians whom he will call to testify understand the legal meaning of certain medical words. Counsel have not sufficiently prepared their case from a medical viewpoint, when they have ascertained the trauma sustained and its medical consequences. The lawyer must also educate the doctor about legal technicalities which will control the significance of the doctor's testimony. Among the most important formal requirements on the physician's testimony are those which relate to the language of causation. This article will discuss the views of various …
Privileges In The Law Of Evidence: The Realities Of Attorney-Client Confidences, Robert Allen Sedler, Joseph J. Simeone
Privileges In The Law Of Evidence: The Realities Of Attorney-Client Confidences, Robert Allen Sedler, Joseph J. Simeone
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure--Evidence--Wiretapping--Admissibility In State Courts, George W. Mills
Criminal Procedure--Evidence--Wiretapping--Admissibility In State Courts, George W. Mills
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Re-Evaluation Of The Privilege Against Adverse Spousal Testimony In The Light Of Its Purpose, Paul F. Rothstein
A Re-Evaluation Of The Privilege Against Adverse Spousal Testimony In The Light Of Its Purpose, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The recent development in American federal criminal evidence law to be examined and compared with English law in this paper, is a new evolutionary turn taken by the husband-wife privilege against adverse spousal testimony, manifest in the Supreme Court decision of Wyatt v. United States. The House of Lords, in Rumping v. D.P.P., just decided, suggests that the English spousal privileges might be susceptible of similar development.
Federal Civil Procedure-Discovery-Availability Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Stephen M. Wittenberg
Federal Civil Procedure-Discovery-Availability Of Attorney-Client Privilege To Corporations, Stephen M. Wittenberg
Michigan Law Review
During the pre-trial stage of a civil antitrust suit, plaintiff sought inspection of certain documents in the files of the corporate defendants' outside counsel. The defendant contended that these documents were protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege. Upon motion for inspection, held, granted. The attorney-client privilege is not available to any of the corporate parties in this action. Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass'n, 207 F. Supp. 771, aff'd on rehearing, 209 F. Supp. 321 (N.D. Ill. 1962).
Testimony In Virginia On The Ultimate Fact In Issue, James W. Payne Jr.
Testimony In Virginia On The Ultimate Fact In Issue, James W. Payne Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
In a series of recent decisions the Court of Appeals has rejected opinion evidence for the reason, among others, that the opinion related to the ultimate fact in issue, or for the synonymous reason that it invaded the province of the jury. These decisions relate to opinion testimony offered by lay witness and expert alike, although an objection to expert testimony on the ground that it relates to the ultimate fact in issue is normally weaker in force than the same objection when it is advanced to rule out lay testimony. When the expert testifies, by hypothesis, the lay judge …
Recent Cases
University of Richmond Law Review
This article provides a list of the recent cases and their summaries for the year of 1963.
Opinion Testimony And Ultimate Issues: Incompatible?, Frank N. King Jr.
Opinion Testimony And Ultimate Issues: Incompatible?, Frank N. King Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Re-Evaluation Of The Attorney-Client Privilege (Part I), James A. Gardner
A Re-Evaluation Of The Attorney-Client Privilege (Part I), James A. Gardner
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Evidence - Privilege - Statutory Privilege Against Disclosure Of Reporter's Sources Should Be Liberally Construed To Include Information In Documents, Robert L. Berchem
Evidence - Privilege - Statutory Privilege Against Disclosure Of Reporter's Sources Should Be Liberally Construed To Include Information In Documents, Robert L. Berchem
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Is Necessity Alone Sufficient Basis For Hearsay Exception? - Moore V. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Wilbur E. Simmons Jr.
Is Necessity Alone Sufficient Basis For Hearsay Exception? - Moore V. Atlanta Transit System, Inc., Wilbur E. Simmons Jr.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence--Lie Detector Testimony Admissible On Stipulation, John Everett Busch
Evidence--Lie Detector Testimony Admissible On Stipulation, John Everett Busch
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence--Identity Of Driver In Absence Of Direct Evidence, William Thomas Harrison
Evidence--Identity Of Driver In Absence Of Direct Evidence, William Thomas Harrison
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Betts V. Brady Twenty Years Later: The Right To Counself And Due Process Values, Yale Kamisar
Betts V. Brady Twenty Years Later: The Right To Counself And Due Process Values, Yale Kamisar
Michigan Law Review
I am quite distressed by talk that the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio "suggests by analogy" that the Court may now overrule Betts v. Brady. For whether one talks about the fourth or the sixth amendment, there is much to be said for Justice Harlan's dissenting views in Mapp. "[W]hatever configurations ... have been developed in the particularizing federal precedents" should not be "deemed a part of 'ordered liberty,' and as such ... enforceable against the States .... [W]e would not be true to the Fourteenth Amendment were we merely to stretch the general principle [ of …
Packer: Ex-Communist Witnesses, Malcolm Sharp
Packer: Ex-Communist Witnesses, Malcolm Sharp
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Ex-Communist Witnesses. By Herbert L. Packer