Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1448)
- Criminal Procedure (1358)
- Constitutional Law (947)
- Courts (768)
- Litigation (643)
-
- Civil Procedure (525)
- Science and Technology Law (458)
- State and Local Government Law (452)
- Torts (436)
- Jurisprudence (411)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (411)
- Fourth Amendment (391)
- Supreme Court of the United States (386)
- Judges (374)
- Law and Society (368)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (347)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Contracts (334)
- Legislation (334)
- Legal Profession (331)
- Family Law (329)
- Intellectual Property Law (321)
- Administrative Law (320)
- Law and Psychology (316)
- Internet Law (308)
- Medical Jurisprudence (305)
- International Law (298)
- Legal History (297)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (840)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (380)
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- West Virginia University (218)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (205)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- William & Mary Law School (157)
- University of Richmond (150)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (143)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Kentucky (133)
- Mercer University School of Law (117)
- University of Washington School of Law (112)
- Cleveland State University (111)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (106)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (96)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- University of Miami Law School (91)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (83)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (81)
- American University Washington College of Law (80)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- UIC School of Law (78)
- Cornell University Law School (77)
- Fordham Law School (77)
- University of Georgia School of Law (68)
- Duke Law (65)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (63)
- Brooklyn Law School (56)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (1364)
- Testimony (238)
- Hearsay (223)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (214)
- Admissibility (203)
-
- Witnesses (187)
- Expert testimony (121)
- Discovery (115)
- Criminal law (114)
- Litigation (110)
- Sixth Amendment (106)
- Confrontation Clause (105)
- United States Supreme Court (101)
- Police (87)
- Cross-examination (86)
- Exclusionary rule (85)
- Scientific evidence (84)
- Law (83)
- Expert evidence (81)
- Trials (78)
- Criminal procedure (76)
- Due process (76)
- Criminal Law (73)
- Witness (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Daubert (65)
- Juries (64)
- Courts (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (542)
- Faculty Scholarship (310)
- Articles (241)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- West Virginia Law Review (215)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Faculty Publications (198)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (132)
- Indiana Law Journal (131)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (127)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (122)
- Mercer Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (115)
- Kentucky Law Journal (109)
- Cleveland State Law Review (98)
- Buffalo Law Review (93)
- University of Richmond Law Review (82)
- Washington Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (68)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (67)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Maryland Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (60)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (59)
- University of Miami Law Review (58)
- All Faculty Scholarship (56)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (55)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (51)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (50)
- Akron Law Review (47)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 4261 - 4290 of 5952
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Subsidence Of Land Caused By Ground-Water Pumping, Thomas L. Holzer
Subsidence Of Land Caused By Ground-Water Pumping, Thomas L. Holzer
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
22 pages (includes illustration).
Contains references (pages 2-6).
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Groundwater: Allocation, Development And Pollution, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
Even before the [Natural Resources Law] Center was established [in the fall of 1981], the [University of Colorado] School of Law was organizing annual natural resources law summer short courses. To date four programs have been presented:
- July 1980: "Federal Lands, Laws and Policies-and the Development of Natural Resources"
- June 1981: "Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues"
- June 1982: "New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: lnterbasin Transfers"
- June 1983: "Groundwater: Allocation; Development and Pollution"
(Reprinted from Resource Law Notes, no. 1, Jan. 1984, at 1.)
University of Colorado School of Law professors …
Legal Systems For Allocating Groundwater And Controlling Its Extraction, Charles F. Wilkinson
Legal Systems For Allocating Groundwater And Controlling Its Extraction, Charles F. Wilkinson
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
22 pages (includes illustration).
Contains research sources list (pages 1-2).
Hydrology: Unraveling The Mysteries Of Groundwater Occurrence And Movement, Thomas M. Stetson
Hydrology: Unraveling The Mysteries Of Groundwater Occurrence And Movement, Thomas M. Stetson
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
31 pages (includes illustrations).
Glossary omitted.
Observations On Groundwater Law From The Federal Perspective, Carol E. Dinkins
Observations On Groundwater Law From The Federal Perspective, Carol E. Dinkins
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
66 pages.
Contains several cases and US Congress bills as supplemental materials.
Digitized copy lacks the Memorandum Opinion for City of El Paso v. Reynolds (563 F.Supp 379 (D. New Mexico 1983)).
Sustaining Aquifer Productivity, Harrison C. Dunning
Sustaining Aquifer Productivity, Harrison C. Dunning
Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9)
12 pages.
Includes full text of the Owens Valley Groundwater Management Referendum Measure A, which is an ordinance to regulate the extraction of groundwater within the Owens Valley groundwater basin.
Evidentiary Issues, John M. Purcell
Evidence - Incidents Of Shoplifting Not Probative Of Truthfulness Under Rule 608(B), Shelly Kim Kritz
Evidence - Incidents Of Shoplifting Not Probative Of Truthfulness Under Rule 608(B), Shelly Kim Kritz
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Government Compensation For The Costs Of Producting Subpoenaed Documents: A Proposal For Legislative Reform, Norman Gross
Government Compensation For The Costs Of Producting Subpoenaed Documents: A Proposal For Legislative Reform, Norman Gross
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Current statutory and case law provide for the compensation of select categories of persons and entities that provide evidence to the federal government. This compensation scheme is inequitable insofar as it treats similarly situated persons and entities dissimilarly. This Note advocates the adoption of a blanket statutory provision to compensate all third party custodians for incurred costs in producing documents in compliance with a subpoena duces tecum issued on behalf of a federal authority. Part I describes the current federal reimbursement scheme. Part II examines the inequities that the current statutory scheme imposes upon similarly situated entities and argues for …
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article establishes that the government has a right to search for and seize evidence of crime. Part II develops the corollary proposition that the fourth amendment does not protect the right to secrete evidence of crime. Part III explores the impact of the reasonable expectation of privacy concept on the innocent. Part IV evaluates consent searches and their effect on the innocent. Finally, Part V considers the exclusionary rule as a device for protecting the innocent.
Good Faith, The Exclusionary Remedy, And Rule-Oriented Adjudication In The Criminal Process, Gerald G. Ashdown
Good Faith, The Exclusionary Remedy, And Rule-Oriented Adjudication In The Criminal Process, Gerald G. Ashdown
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Michigan Law Review
Most contemporary discussions of the "exclusionary rule" assume or assert that this "rule" is not part of the fourth amendment, nor required by its terms, but is rather a judicial "remedy" that was fashioned to protect those rights (against unreasonable search and seizure) that actually are granted by the fourth amendment. The protection is said to work by "deterring" official violations; this is, however, an odd use of the word, for the rule does not punish violations but merely deprives the government of some of the benefits that might ensue from them, namely the use in the criminal case of …
Evidence: Making The Record, Margaret G. Stewart
Evidence: Making The Record, Margaret G. Stewart
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Legal Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony--Jury Behavior, Michigan Law Review
Legal Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony--Jury Behavior, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Legal Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony--Jury Behavior by L. Craig Parker
Watching The Judiciary Watch The Police, Jon O. Newman
Watching The Judiciary Watch The Police, Jon O. Newman
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Police Practices and the Law: Essays from the Michigan Law ReviewThe University of Michigan Press
The Quantum Of Evidence Required To Extradite From The United States, Robert J. Rosoff
The Quantum Of Evidence Required To Extradite From The United States, Robert J. Rosoff
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article argues that it is appropriate to require that requesting countries meet the uniform federal bindover standard to obtain extradition from the United States, rather than a more stringent state standard. The federal bindover standard of probable cause accomplishes the purpose of United States extradition procedure better than any other evidentiary standard. It affords an alleged fugitive more protection from unjustified extradition than is available in most countries. Furthermore, the reasons advanced by advocates of a more stringent bindover standard in the domestic criminal setting do not apply to extradition hearings.
Hypnotic Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
The Pitfalls Of Will Contest Litigation, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1983), Peter I. Mason, Mark W. Weisbard
The Pitfalls Of Will Contest Litigation, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 499 (1983), Peter I. Mason, Mark W. Weisbard
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Proposal For Discovery Depositions For Criminal Cases In Illinois, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 547 (1983), James J. Graney
A Proposal For Discovery Depositions For Criminal Cases In Illinois, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 547 (1983), James J. Graney
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
People V. Eichelberger: Police-Created Probable Cause As An Exigent Circumstance, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (1983), Leslie B. Wulfsohn
People V. Eichelberger: Police-Created Probable Cause As An Exigent Circumstance, 16 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (1983), Leslie B. Wulfsohn
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Memory Restored Or Confabulated By Hypnosis—Is It Competent?, James E. Beaver
Memory Restored Or Confabulated By Hypnosis—Is It Competent?, James E. Beaver
Seattle University Law Review
This article examines the scientific basis of hypnosis and concludes that previously hypnotized witnesses are incompetent to testify concerning matters discussed under hypnosis. Unbiased examination of scientific literature discloses that persons under hypnosis are highly motivated to please the hypnotist and therefore are likely to fantasize rather than accurately recall lost memories. After hypnosis these false impressions are fixed as true and the witness is unshakable on cross-examination. Therefore, the McCormick relevancy test is inadequate, and hypnosis tainted testimony, like other scientific evidence, must meet the stricter Frye standard before being presented to the finder of fact. Hypnosis presently does …
The Standard For Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique From The Perspective Of Juror Psychology, Edward J. Imwinkelried
The Standard For Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique From The Perspective Of Juror Psychology, Edward J. Imwinkelried
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Evidence - Privilege Against Adverse Spousal Testimony - A Testifying Spouse May Invoke The Privilege Against Adverse Spousal Testimony In A Grand Jury Proceeding Even Though The Government Has Promised That The Nontestifying Spouse Will Not Be Indicted By That Particular Grand Jury If The Nontestifying Spouse Is A Target Of The Underlying Investigation, Gary S. Lewis
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Evidence - Independent Auditor's Tax Accrual Workpapers Shielded From Irs Summons Power By Accountant Work-Product Privilege, Jeffrey Markowitz
Evidence - Independent Auditor's Tax Accrual Workpapers Shielded From Irs Summons Power By Accountant Work-Product Privilege, Jeffrey Markowitz
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Confessions, Yale Kamisar
Confessions, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
The entry for 'Confessions' in the Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice, 1983
International Cooperation In Penal Matters: The "Lockheed Agreements", Bruno A. Ristau
International Cooperation In Penal Matters: The "Lockheed Agreements", Bruno A. Ristau
Michigan Journal of International Law
In February 1976, officials of the Lockheed Aircraft Corporation testified before a Senate committee that their company had paid $12.6 million in bribes, commissions and fees to Japanese businessmen and government officials to promote sales of Lockheed planes. News of these bribes rocked Japan's political establishment and governmental institutions. The Japanese Diet (parliament) passed a resolution urging that the United States government disclose to the Diet the names of the Japanese officials involved in these bribes. Prime Minister Takeo Mild sent a personal letter to President Ford requesting that the United States make available all information in its possession bearing …
Witness Explanations During Cross-Examination: A Rule Of Evidence Examined, Jeffrey A. Boyll
Witness Explanations During Cross-Examination: A Rule Of Evidence Examined, Jeffrey A. Boyll
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
International Exchange Of Information In Criminal Cases, Michael E. Tigar, Austin J. Doyle Jr.
International Exchange Of Information In Criminal Cases, Michael E. Tigar, Austin J. Doyle Jr.
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article describes some of the means by which police and prosecutors obtain information in international criminal matters. An exhaustive catalog is not presented; rather, examples of international cooperation and conflict are dwelled upon to illustrate the need for systematic development of international law principles governing the interpretation and application of treaties, and the enforcement in both the demanding and the rendering state of rules concerning information exchange. These rules and principles should honor expectations of privacy and confidentiality, make dear the obligations of foreign persons and entities, including financial institutions, and ensure mutual respect for the sovereign interests of …
Statistical Significance And The Burden Of Persuasion, David H. Kaye
Statistical Significance And The Burden Of Persuasion, David H. Kaye
Faculty Scholarship
In most endeavors concerned with the acquisition of knowledge, quantitative information is welcomed. In law, however, it appears sometimes that scientific or numerical evidence makes cases harder, not easier. Nevertheless, there are many cases and administrative proceedings, in such areas as environmental law, food and drug regulation, and civil rights, in which statistical data obtained by observation or experiment are readily accepted as assisting in the proper resolution of disputed issues of fact. When courts or administrators confront scientific and statistical evidence in these proceedings, they are not always certain of how to weigh the evidence or whether they should …