Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1448)
- Criminal Procedure (1358)
- Constitutional Law (947)
- Courts (768)
- Litigation (643)
-
- Civil Procedure (525)
- Science and Technology Law (458)
- State and Local Government Law (452)
- Torts (436)
- Jurisprudence (411)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (411)
- Fourth Amendment (391)
- Supreme Court of the United States (386)
- Judges (374)
- Law and Society (368)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (347)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Contracts (334)
- Legislation (334)
- Legal Profession (331)
- Family Law (329)
- Intellectual Property Law (321)
- Administrative Law (320)
- Law and Psychology (316)
- Internet Law (308)
- Medical Jurisprudence (305)
- International Law (298)
- Legal History (297)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (840)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (380)
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- West Virginia University (218)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (205)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- William & Mary Law School (157)
- University of Richmond (150)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (143)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Kentucky (133)
- Mercer University School of Law (117)
- University of Washington School of Law (112)
- Cleveland State University (111)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (106)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (96)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- University of Miami Law School (91)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (83)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (81)
- American University Washington College of Law (80)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- UIC School of Law (78)
- Cornell University Law School (77)
- Fordham Law School (77)
- University of Georgia School of Law (68)
- Duke Law (65)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (63)
- Brooklyn Law School (56)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (1364)
- Testimony (238)
- Hearsay (223)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (214)
- Admissibility (203)
-
- Witnesses (187)
- Expert testimony (121)
- Discovery (115)
- Criminal law (114)
- Litigation (110)
- Sixth Amendment (106)
- Confrontation Clause (105)
- United States Supreme Court (101)
- Police (87)
- Cross-examination (86)
- Exclusionary rule (85)
- Scientific evidence (84)
- Law (83)
- Expert evidence (81)
- Trials (78)
- Criminal procedure (76)
- Due process (76)
- Criminal Law (73)
- Witness (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Daubert (65)
- Juries (64)
- Courts (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (542)
- Faculty Scholarship (310)
- Articles (241)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- West Virginia Law Review (215)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Faculty Publications (198)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (132)
- Indiana Law Journal (131)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (127)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (122)
- Mercer Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (115)
- Kentucky Law Journal (109)
- Cleveland State Law Review (98)
- Buffalo Law Review (93)
- University of Richmond Law Review (82)
- Washington Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (68)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (67)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Maryland Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (60)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (59)
- University of Miami Law Review (58)
- All Faculty Scholarship (56)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (55)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (51)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (50)
- Akron Law Review (47)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3841 - 3870 of 5952
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman
Comment On Edwards: Ward Edwards And The New Bayesian Software, David T. Wasserman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard O. Lempert
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
There are three ways in which stories may figure prominently at trials. First, litigants may tell stories to jurors. Not only is there some social science evidence that this happens, but trial lawyers have an instinctive sense that this is what they do. Ask a litigator to describe a current case and she is likely to reply, "Our story is ... " Second, jurors may try to make sense of the evidence they receive by fitting it to some story pattern. If so, the process is likely to feed back on itself. That is, jurors are likely to build a …
Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard O. Lempert
Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard O. Lempert
Articles
The conference panel at which this paper was originally presented was structured along the lines of a debate. The three speakers who were supposed to advocate the use of DNA evidence were labeled, as is customary, Proponents. But those who were supposed to take the negative side were not called Opponents. Rather they were labeled Caveators. I do not know who is responsible for this label, but I think it gets things exactly right. To my mind anyone considering DNA as criminal identification evidence should be a Caveator. The promise and utility of DNA analysis in identifying the perpetrators of …
Reply To Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics, David T. Wasserman
Reply To Cohen: Common Sense About Naked Statistics, David T. Wasserman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen
The Nature Of Juridicial Proof, Ronald J. Allen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Reply To Allen, L. Jonathan Cohen
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Refocusing The New Evidence Scholarship, Terence J. Anderson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incentives To Spoliate Evidence In Civil Litigation: The Need For Vigorous Judicial Action, Charles R. Nesson
Incentives To Spoliate Evidence In Civil Litigation: The Need For Vigorous Judicial Action, Charles R. Nesson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability, David T. Wasserman
The Morality Of Statistical Proof And The Risk Of Mistaken Liability, David T. Wasserman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kicking Rocks With Dr. Johnson: A Comment On Professor Allen’S Theory, Craig R. Callen
Kicking Rocks With Dr. Johnson: A Comment On Professor Allen’S Theory, Craig R. Callen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mistrial By Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets The F-Word, Paul Bergman, Al Moore
Mistrial By Likelihood Ratio: Bayesian Analysis Meets The F-Word, Paul Bergman, Al Moore
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Decision, Disciplined Inferences And The Adversary Process, Robert S. Thompson
Decision, Disciplined Inferences And The Adversary Process, Robert S. Thompson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Decision And Inference, Peter Tillers
Expert-Novice Differences And Implications For Choice Of Bench Versus Jury Trial, Anne W. Martin
Expert-Novice Differences And Implications For Choice Of Bench Versus Jury Trial, Anne W. Martin
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers
Marshalling Evidence For Adversary Litigation, David Schum, Peter Tillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard Lempert
Telling Tales In Court: Trial Procedure And The Story Model, Richard Lempert
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Credal Probablity, D. H. Kaye
Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson
Marshalling Information Prior To Litigation, Bernard Robertson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment On Professor Nesson’S Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: A Comment On Professor Nesson’S Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman
Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler
What Dna “Fingerprinting” Can Teach The Law About The Rest Of Forensic Science, Michael J. Saks, Jonathan J. Koehler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Comment On Nesson, Joseph Gastwirth
The Admissibility Of Dna Testing, D. H. Kaye
The New Criminal Discovery Code In Oklahoma: A Two Way Street In The Wrong Direction, Rodney J. Uphoff
The New Criminal Discovery Code In Oklahoma: A Two Way Street In The Wrong Direction, Rodney J. Uphoff
Faculty Publications
This article first examines criminal discovery in Oklahoma prior to the Allen decision. Next, section II of the article explores Allen and the court’s justifications for creating a reciprocal discovery system. The article reviews the Allen procedures and similar pre-trial discovery provisions contained in the American Bar Association’s Standards for Criminal Justice and questions whether Allen’s new discovery system will achieve the desired results. Section II also focuses on the constitutionality of the defendant’s disclosure obligations and the adverse effects of mandating such disclosures on the adversary system. Finally, section III of the article proposes an alternative discovery code based …
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony In Criminal Trials, Gary Shaw
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Evidence, Marc T. Treadwell
Mercer Law Review
The Georgia lawyers among the readers of this Article likely are somewhat familiar with efforts over the past several years to adopt a new Georgia Evidence Code based upon the Federal Rules of Evidence (the "Rules"). The Georgia Evidence Code is Sorely in need of revision. It can be argued that there is no Georgia Evidence Code as such. Indeed, Georgia lawyers must grapple with an amorphous amalgam of disjointed statutes and thousands of judicial decisions that constitute our body of evidence law.
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Modern Confession Law After Duckworth V. Eagan: What's The Use Of Explaining?, Julia C. Weissman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.