Evidence Commons^™

Case Preparation: The Expert Witness’ Role, Bruce E. Kroeker

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

9 pages.

The View From The Bench: The Perspective Of A Water Judge, Robert A. Behrman

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

9 pages.

Data, Correspondence, Reports, And Exhibits For Ground Water Rights Cases (Or, Challenges In Developing And Presenting Data To Support A Ground Water Rights Case), Robert E. Brogden

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

17 pages.

Data, Correspondence, Reports And Exhibits For Groundwater Quality/Hazardous Waste Cases: File Preparation And Maintenance, James M. Kerr, Jr.

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

7 pages.

Agenda: Uncovering The Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology And Policy In The 1990s, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference (1992), Colorado Ground-Water Association

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

Sponsored by Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law and the Rocky Mountain Ground-Water Conference, organized by the Colorado Ground-Water Association.

Faculty for the conference included University of Colorado School of Law professor Lawrence J. MacDonnell.

Nearly half the people in the United States rely on groundwater as their primary water source. As demands for groundwater grow, it becomes increasingly important for lawyer and technical professionals to understand the legal and hydrologic issues arising in groundwater development, use, and protection. These issues will be the focus of the Center's thirteenth annual summer program, June 15-17, 1992.

This …

Practical Considerations For Effective Use Of Expert Witnesses And Computer Models In Complex Groundwater Litigation, William A. Paddock

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

14 pages.

The Legal Framework For Aquifer Issues, Douglas L. Grant

Uncovering the Hidden Resource: Groundwater Law, Hydrology, and Policy in the 1990s (Summer Conference, June 15-17)

20 pages.

Contains references.

The Worst Evidence Principle: The Best Hypothesis As To The Logical Structure Of Evidence Law, Edward J. Imwinkelried

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science In The Courtroom, John F. Baughman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom by Peter W. Huber

The Garner Exception To Attorney-Client Privilege: A New Approach To “Good Cause”, Victoria A. Kummer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

When The Blue Bus Crashes Into The Gate: The Problem With People V. Collins In The Probabilistic Evidence Debate, Mark L. Huffman

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson

Scholarly Works

The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record is a microcosm of a larger debate. The larger question is whether judicial review of expert testimony should be passive, or whether the expert witness process should be marked by active judicial policing. Does the plethora of expert opinions presently being offered in modern trials merit special scrutiny by the courts?

Some scholars urge that courts must accommodate experts. Proponents of this view favor few challenges to the unrestricted rendition of opinions by an expert, whether the expert is real or self-proclaimed. Under this …

On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, Brief Of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., National Association Of Manufacturers, Business Roundtable, And Chemical Manufacturers Association As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent, William Daubert And Joyce Daubert, Individually And As Guardians Ad Litem For Jason Daubert, And Anita De Young, Individually And As Gaurdian Ad Litem For Eric Schuller V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Paul F. Rothstein, Victor E. Schwartz, Robert P. Charrow, Scott L. Winkelman, Edward C. Wu, Richard Duesenberg, David F. Zoll, Donald D. Evans, Jan S. Amundson, Edward P. Good

U.S. Supreme Court Briefs

The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude expert scientific testimony when it has been developed without regard for accepted scientific methods.

This case focuses on expert scientific evidence. Such evidence plays a vital and often dispositive role in modern litigation. For scientific evidence to be helpful to the factfinder it must meet some minimal threshold of reliability. To hold otherwise would be to allow a system of adjudication based more on chance than on reason.

Civil Forfeiture Of Property For Drug Offenders Under Illinois And Federal Statute: Zero Tolerance, Zero Exceptions, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1992), T. J. Hiles

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Oops - We Forgot To Put It In The Refrigerator: Dna Identification And The State's Duty To Preserve Evidence, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 809 (1992), Albert M.T. Finch Iii

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Mental Anguish And Humiliation Suffered By Victims Of Housing Discrimination, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 39 (1992), Larry Heinrich

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Should Defense Counsel Interview Plaintiffs' Treating Physician Ex Parte: Physician-Patient Privilege V. Discovery, Diane Davis

St. Thomas Law Review

This article first discusses the physician's ethical and legal obligations towards the patient and society. Second, it explores cases in which a patient's right to claim the physician-patient privilege was at issue, and why courts permitted or prohibited ex parte interviews. The article concludes that the courts prohibiting ex parte interviews of treating physicians reach the proper result based on the public policy favoring the physician-patient privilege.

Constitutional Admissibility Of Hearsay Under The Confrontation Clause: Reliability Requirement For Hearsay Admitted Under A Non-"Firmly Rooted" Exception - Idaho V. Wright, A. Perry Wadsworth Jr.

Campbell Law Review

This note discusses the facts of Idaho v. Wright, examines the history of the admissibility of hearsay under the Confrontation Clause, and analyzes the Wright decision. This note concludes that by excluding the use of corroborative evidence in determining the trustworthiness of non-firmly rooted hearsay, the Court enhances Confrontation Clause protection for criminal defendants, but perhaps at the expense of some crime victims, such as sexually abused children.

A First Amendment-Sixth Amendment Dilemma: Manuel Noriega Pushes The American Judicial System To The Outer Limits Of The First Amendment, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 563 (1992), Lance R. Peterson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dental And Bite Mark Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Understanding Responses To Hearsay: An Extension Of The Comparative Analysis, Dale A. Nance

Faculty Publications

Response to Professor Damaska's presentation at the Hearsay Reform Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1992.

Toxic Torts - Evidence - Third Circuit Recognizes Medical Monitoring Tort And Makes Significant Rulings Concerning Expert Testimony In Toxic Tort Cases, Noel C. Birle

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Standards Of Review In Illinois Criminal Cases: The Need For Major Reform, 17 S. Ill. U. L.J. 51 (1992), Timothy P. O'Neill

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Rationalizing Hearsay: A Proposal For A Best Evidence Hearsay Rule, Michael L. Seigel

UF Law Faculty Publications

The enterprise of this article is the theoretical construction of an optimal solution to the hearsay conundrum. Its first task is the elucidation of the premises upon which a rational hearsay rule can be built. Thus, the article starts by exploring the relationship between hearsay doctrine and the foundation of all rational truth-seeking enterprises, inductive logic. The article continues with an examination of the relationship between hearsay evidence and trial dynamics, for a workable rule must take into account the actual functioning of our adversary system.'" This two-pronged analysis leads to the proposal of a "best evidence hearsay rule."

"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Evidence Of Religion And The Religion Of Evidence, Michael Ariens

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Milton's Contract, Peter Lindenbaum

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Authority And Authenticity: Scribbling Authors And The Genius Of Print In Eighteenth-Century England, Marlon B. Ross

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Notes: Criminal Law — Evidence — Evidence Of Refusal To Submit To Chemical Breath Test For Alcohol Admissible Only When Relevant To Matters Other Than Defendant's Innocence Or Guilt. Krauss V. State, 322 Md. 376, 587 A.2d 1102 (1991), Howard S. Cohen

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.