Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1449)
- Criminal Procedure (1359)
- Constitutional Law (947)
- Courts (768)
- Litigation (643)
-
- Civil Procedure (525)
- Science and Technology Law (458)
- State and Local Government Law (452)
- Torts (436)
- Jurisprudence (411)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (411)
- Fourth Amendment (391)
- Supreme Court of the United States (386)
- Judges (374)
- Law and Society (368)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (348)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Contracts (334)
- Legislation (334)
- Legal Profession (331)
- Family Law (329)
- Intellectual Property Law (321)
- Administrative Law (320)
- Law and Psychology (316)
- Internet Law (308)
- Medical Jurisprudence (305)
- International Law (298)
- Legal History (297)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (840)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (380)
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- West Virginia University (218)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (205)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- William & Mary Law School (157)
- University of Richmond (150)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (145)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Kentucky (133)
- Mercer University School of Law (117)
- University of Washington School of Law (112)
- Cleveland State University (111)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (106)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (96)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- University of Miami Law School (91)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (83)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (81)
- American University Washington College of Law (80)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- UIC School of Law (78)
- Cornell University Law School (77)
- Fordham Law School (77)
- University of Georgia School of Law (68)
- Duke Law (65)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (63)
- Brooklyn Law School (56)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (1364)
- Testimony (238)
- Hearsay (223)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (214)
- Admissibility (203)
-
- Witnesses (187)
- Expert testimony (121)
- Discovery (115)
- Criminal law (114)
- Litigation (110)
- Sixth Amendment (106)
- Confrontation Clause (105)
- United States Supreme Court (101)
- Police (87)
- Cross-examination (86)
- Exclusionary rule (85)
- Scientific evidence (84)
- Law (83)
- Expert evidence (81)
- Trials (78)
- Criminal procedure (76)
- Due process (76)
- Criminal Law (73)
- Witness (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Daubert (65)
- Juries (64)
- Courts (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (542)
- Faculty Scholarship (310)
- Articles (241)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- West Virginia Law Review (215)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Faculty Publications (200)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (132)
- Indiana Law Journal (131)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (127)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (122)
- Mercer Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (115)
- Kentucky Law Journal (109)
- Cleveland State Law Review (98)
- Buffalo Law Review (93)
- University of Richmond Law Review (82)
- Washington Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (68)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (67)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Maryland Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (60)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (59)
- University of Miami Law Review (58)
- All Faculty Scholarship (56)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (55)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (51)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (50)
- Akron Law Review (47)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3661 - 3690 of 5954
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Confrontation Issues In Child Abuse Cases, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Limits Of Double Jeopardy: A Course Into The Dark, Anne Bowen Poulin
The Limits Of Double Jeopardy: A Course Into The Dark, Anne Bowen Poulin
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Dangers Of "General Observations" On Expert Scientific Testimony: A Comment On Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Robert F. Blomquist
The Dangers Of "General Observations" On Expert Scientific Testimony: A Comment On Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Robert F. Blomquist
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Confrontation And Hearsay: New Wine In An Old Bottle, The Honorable Anthony M. Brannon
Confrontation And Hearsay: New Wine In An Old Bottle, The Honorable Anthony M. Brannon
Campbell Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Prior Acquittal Evidence - Has North Carolina Adopted The "Minority View?" - The Effect Of State V. Scott, Matthew S. Sullivan
The Admissibility Of Prior Acquittal Evidence - Has North Carolina Adopted The "Minority View?" - The Effect Of State V. Scott, Matthew S. Sullivan
Campbell Law Review
This Note will examine the court's decision in State v. Scott. First, the Note will address the facts of the case. Second, it will set out the background on how courts decide whether evidence of this nature should be admitted, mainly focusing on Rules 403 and 404(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. Next, the Note will analyze how the court arrived at this "bright-line" rule as well as the effect it will have in future cases. Finally, the Note will conclude that even though North Carolina adopted the "minority rule", this approach is proper under the concept …
Employee Dishonesty And The After-Acquired Evidence Doctrine: Why Honesty Is The Best Policy, Georgia Stanaitis
Employee Dishonesty And The After-Acquired Evidence Doctrine: Why Honesty Is The Best Policy, Georgia Stanaitis
Cleveland State Law Review
The Eleventh Circuit has stated that application of the after-acquired evidence doctrine as a complete defense is too rigid and that it produces harsh, inequitable results. At the same time, the Eleventh Circuit has voted to rehear the case setting forth this view. Until the rehearing, the Eleventh Circuit's principles are sound.13 Specifically, the Eleventh Circuit has criticized Summers as being antithetical to the principal purposes of Title VII which are to achieve equality of employment opportunity and make whole, so far as is possible, the individual or class affected by the discrimination. The Eleventh Circuit and arbitral forums, such …
A Pragmatic Critique Of Modern Evidence Scholarship, Michael L. Seigel
A Pragmatic Critique Of Modern Evidence Scholarship, Michael L. Seigel
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article contends that strict adherence to optimistic rationalism has blinded evidence scholars to the reality that the law of evidence is as indeterminate as all other areas of the law. At its core is not a single goal -- the attainment of truth -- but a number of important, complex, and, alas, competing considerations. Answers to questions concerning the appropriate configuration of evidence doctrine cannot be deduced from a unitary principle; indeed, they cannot be deduced at all. Rather, arguments about evidence doctrine must be conducted in the realm of "practical reason." Practical reason is the process through which …
Controversial Science In The Courtroom: Daubert And The Law's Hubris, Paul S. Milich
Controversial Science In The Courtroom: Daubert And The Law's Hubris, Paul S. Milich
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
The Title Vii Pretext Question: Resolved In Light Of St. Mary's Honor Center V. Hicks, Robert J. Smith
The Title Vii Pretext Question: Resolved In Light Of St. Mary's Honor Center V. Hicks, Robert J. Smith
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Foreword Evidence Symposium: A Comparative Study Of Federal And New York Evidence Practice, Honorable Frank X. Altimari
Foreword Evidence Symposium: A Comparative Study Of Federal And New York Evidence Practice, Honorable Frank X. Altimari
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, The , Michael M. Martin
Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, The , Michael M. Martin
Faculty Scholarship
Reliability has been defined as "worthy of dependence" or "of proven consistency in producing satisfactory results." It is a common concept as well as a quality for which individuals search in their everyday transactions, such as purchasing a car or selecting an express delivery service. It similarly shapes the rules of evidence pertaining to hearsay. Beth common law and modem evidentiary codes ban the admission of extrajudicial statements offered to prove the truth of a matter asserted because they are not made under oath, in the presence of the trier of fact, and subject to cross-examination. Without these safeguards, the …
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
The Death And Transfiguration Of Frye, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The rule of Frye v. United States was seventy years old, and had long dominated American law on the question of how well established a scientific principle must be for it to provide the basis for expert testimony. Even after the passage of the Federal Rules of Evidence, several of the federal circuits, as well as various states, purported to adhere to Frye's "general acceptance" standard. But now, unanimously, briefly, and with no apparent angst, the United States Supreme Court has held in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. that the Frye rule is incompatible with the Federal Rules.
Balancing The Scales: Limiting The Prejudicial Effect Of Evidence Rule 404(B) Through Stipulation, Daniel J. Buzzetta
Balancing The Scales: Limiting The Prejudicial Effect Of Evidence Rule 404(B) Through Stipulation, Daniel J. Buzzetta
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note argues that, in a prosecution for a violation of a specific intent criminal statute, the government must accept a defendant’s clear and unambiguous stipulation to possessing the requisite intent for the crime charged. The trial court must ensure that the proffered stipulation is voluntarily given, unambiguous, and comprehensive, so as not to deprive the prosecution from presenting forceful, significant, and probative evidence. Once a defendant offers such an acceptable stipulation, however, the government’s introduction of prior bad acts to prove intent becomes extremely prejudicial, while any probative value the evidence may have is dissipated entirely. Part II of …
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Character Impeachment Evidence: The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality And Situation, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In Part I of this Comment, I present a short version of my argument against the admissibility of character impeachment evidence of criminal defendants, showing how the key elements ofthis argument are present in Professor Uviller's own Article. In Part II, I suggest that, notwithstanding Professor Uviller's comments to the contrary, an asymmetrical result-never admitting character evidence to impeach criminal defendants but admitting such evidence in some circumstances to impeach other witnesses- is perfectly reasonable. Finally, in Part III, I contend that Professor Uviller's interesting judicial surveys support the solution I have proposed for the problem of character impeachment evidence.
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
Impeachment And Rehabilitation Under The Maryland Rules Of Evidence: An Attorney's Guide, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Polygraph Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
University of Richmond Law Review
Drug trafficking in the United States generates millions of dollars in cash profits daily. The cash generated from narcotics trafficking usually follows one of two distinct paths. Domestically, the profits are converted into usable currency by disguising the association between the cash and the narcotics enterprise. Monies not spent domestically are transferred back to the nar- cotics source or drug cartel to be enjoyed by the drug traffickers and to provide operating capital for the enterprise. This conversion and transfer process has become known commonly as money laundering.
Right To Counsel: People V. West
Character Evidence, James L. Kainen
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Testimony, Barry C. Scheck
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw
Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
The Supreme Court Rules On Statements Against Interest, Michael M. Martin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law: Introduction, Honorable George C. Pratt
Symposium Comparing New York And Federal Evidence Law: Introduction, Honorable George C. Pratt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: Should It Apply To Products Liability?, Patricia A. Brass
Federal Rule Of Evidence 407: Should It Apply To Products Liability?, Patricia A. Brass
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Comparison Of The Federal And New York State Rape Shield Statutes, Deborah Stavile Bartel
A Comparison Of The Federal And New York State Rape Shield Statutes, Deborah Stavile Bartel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
University of Richmond Law Review
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court's exclusion of lie detector test results on the ground that such tests had not been "generally accepted" by the scientific community. The Frye rule, or "general acceptance" standard, quickly became the dominant test for the admission of scientific evidence. Decided in 1923, Frye governed evidentiary decisions in a majority of federal circuits for the next seventy years. The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 1975, however, prompted several judges to question the validity of Frye. Since the enactment of the …
The Marginal Relevance Of Choice Of Law Theory, Stewart E. Sterk
The Marginal Relevance Of Choice Of Law Theory, Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
The article critiques the current state of choice of law theory, arguing that existing methodologies, such as interest analysis and territorial approaches, fail to provide a coherent framework for judicial decision-making. It contends that these theories are overly rigid and do not account for the practical, fact-driven nature of how judges make choices. The author proposes a new test based on expressive similarity to address the complexities of modern copyright disputes, aiming to distinguish between protected expression and unprotected ideas. This approach seeks to balance the protection of creative works with the need to prevent overprotection, which could streamline litigation …