Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1448)
- Criminal Procedure (1358)
- Constitutional Law (947)
- Courts (768)
- Litigation (643)
-
- Civil Procedure (525)
- Science and Technology Law (458)
- State and Local Government Law (452)
- Torts (436)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (411)
- Jurisprudence (410)
- Fourth Amendment (391)
- Supreme Court of the United States (386)
- Judges (374)
- Law and Society (368)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (347)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (343)
- Contracts (334)
- Legislation (334)
- Legal Profession (331)
- Family Law (329)
- Intellectual Property Law (321)
- Administrative Law (320)
- Law and Psychology (316)
- Internet Law (308)
- Medical Jurisprudence (305)
- International Law (298)
- Legal History (297)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (840)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (380)
- Seattle University School of Law (238)
- West Virginia University (218)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (205)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (174)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (164)
- William & Mary Law School (157)
- University of Richmond (150)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (142)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (137)
- University of Kentucky (133)
- Mercer University School of Law (117)
- University of Washington School of Law (112)
- Cleveland State University (111)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (106)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (96)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- University of Miami Law School (91)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (83)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (81)
- American University Washington College of Law (80)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- UIC School of Law (78)
- Cornell University Law School (77)
- Fordham Law School (77)
- University of Georgia School of Law (68)
- Duke Law (65)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (63)
- Brooklyn Law School (56)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (1364)
- Testimony (238)
- Hearsay (223)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (214)
- Admissibility (202)
-
- Witnesses (187)
- Expert testimony (121)
- Discovery (115)
- Criminal law (114)
- Litigation (110)
- Sixth Amendment (106)
- Confrontation Clause (105)
- United States Supreme Court (101)
- Police (87)
- Cross-examination (86)
- Exclusionary rule (85)
- Law (83)
- Scientific evidence (83)
- Expert evidence (81)
- Trials (78)
- Criminal procedure (76)
- Due process (76)
- Criminal Law (73)
- Witness (73)
- Fourth Amendment (71)
- Fifth Amendment (68)
- Constitutional Law (65)
- Daubert (64)
- Juries (64)
- Courts (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (542)
- Faculty Scholarship (310)
- Articles (241)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- West Virginia Law Review (215)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (210)
- Faculty Publications (197)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (132)
- Indiana Law Journal (131)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (127)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (122)
- Mercer Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (115)
- Kentucky Law Journal (109)
- Cleveland State Law Review (98)
- Buffalo Law Review (93)
- University of Richmond Law Review (82)
- Washington Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (68)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (67)
- Scholarly Works (64)
- Maryland Law Review (61)
- UIC Law Review (60)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (59)
- University of Miami Law Review (58)
- All Faculty Scholarship (56)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (55)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (51)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (50)
- Akron Law Review (47)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3121 - 3150 of 5951
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Navigating Between Extremes: The Florida Supreme Court's Rulings On The Admission Of Similar Fact Evidence In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, George Franklin
Navigating Between Extremes: The Florida Supreme Court's Rulings On The Admission Of Similar Fact Evidence In Child Sexual Abuse Cases, George Franklin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Children And The Elderly Are Victims: Balancing The Rights Of The Accused Against Those Of The Victim, Professor Charles W. Ehrhardt
When Children And The Elderly Are Victims: Balancing The Rights Of The Accused Against Those Of The Victim, Professor Charles W. Ehrhardt
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reply To Professor Ehrhardt, George Franklin
Reply To Professor Ehrhardt, George Franklin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Much Is Too Much? Rule 704(B) Opinions On Personal Use Vs. Intent To Distribute, Dana R. Hassin
How Much Is Too Much? Rule 704(B) Opinions On Personal Use Vs. Intent To Distribute, Dana R. Hassin
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response, Dana R. Hassin
Admissibility Of Plea Agreements On Direct Examination: The Limits Vanish, Professor Daniel J. Capra
Admissibility Of Plea Agreements On Direct Examination: The Limits Vanish, Professor Daniel J. Capra
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statements Of Bystanders To Police Officers Containing An Accusation Of Criminal Conduct Offered To Explain Subsequent Police Conduct, Joëlle Hervic
Statements Of Bystanders To Police Officers Containing An Accusation Of Criminal Conduct Offered To Explain Subsequent Police Conduct, Joëlle Hervic
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Out-Of-Court Accusations Offered For "Background": A Measured Response From The Federal Courts, Professor Daniel J. Capra
Out-Of-Court Accusations Offered For "Background": A Measured Response From The Federal Courts, Professor Daniel J. Capra
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Reply To Professor Capra, Joëlle Harvic
A Reply To Professor Capra, Joëlle Harvic
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Exception That Swallows The Rule: The Disparate Treatment Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 804(B)(3) As Interpreted In United States V. Williamson, Richard T. Sahuc
The Exception That Swallows The Rule: The Disparate Treatment Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 804(B)(3) As Interpreted In United States V. Williamson, Richard T. Sahuc
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Future Implications Of Lilly V. Virginia, Jennifer Christianson
The Future Implications Of Lilly V. Virginia, Jennifer Christianson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tales Out Of School-Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Professor Christopher B. Mueller
Tales Out Of School-Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Professor Christopher B. Mueller
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebuttal, Bryant M. Richardson
Admissibility Of Polygraph Evidence And Repressed Memory Evidence When Offered By The Accused, Yvette J. Bessent
Admissibility Of Polygraph Evidence And Repressed Memory Evidence When Offered By The Accused, Yvette J. Bessent
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence Of Innocence Offered By The Criminal Defendant: "Not So Fast"; Response, Professor Kenneth W. Graham Jr.
Evidence Of Innocence Offered By The Criminal Defendant: "Not So Fast"; Response, Professor Kenneth W. Graham Jr.
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response, Yvette J. Bessent
A Response To Professor Graham, Brett C. Powell
A Response To Professor Graham, Brett C. Powell
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Professor Graham, Thomas Dillickrath
A Response To Professor Graham, Thomas Dillickrath
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Preventing The Execution Of The Innocent: Testimony Before The Senate Judiciary Committee, Barry C. Scheck
Preventing The Execution Of The Innocent: Testimony Before The Senate Judiciary Committee, Barry C. Scheck
Articles
The article advocates for federal legislation to address the wrongful conviction of innocent individuals, particularly through postconviction DNA testing. It emphasizes the urgent need for legal reforms to ensure access to DNA testing for all inmates, regardless of their sentence, and highlights the importance of preserving biological evidence, providing adequate funding for competent counsel, and leveraging technological advancements in DNA testing to exonerate the innocent and improve the criminal justice system.
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Introduction: A Personal Perspective On "Artificial Intelligence And Judicial Proof", Peter Tillers
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Artificial Intelligence, Mindreading, And Reasoning In Law, John A. Barnden, Donald M. Peterson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
What Is "Common" About Common Sense?: Cautionary Tales For Travelers Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries, Marilyn Maccrimmon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Theories Of Uncertainty: Explaining The Possible Sources Of Error In Inferences, Vern R. Walker
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Saving Desdemona, Ron A. Shapira
Explaining Relevance, Paolo Garbolino
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Serendipity And Abduction In Proofs, Presumptions, And Emerging Laws, Pek Van Andel, Danièle Bourcier
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
On The Proof Dynamics Of Inference To The Best Explanation, John R. Josephson
Cardozo Law Review
"Inference to the best explanation" - here called "abduction" - is a distinctive and recognizable pattern of evidential reasoning. It is ubiquitous at or near the surface of typical arguments offered in judicial and scientific contexts, and in ordinary life. It is part of "commonsense logic." An abductive argument is open to attack in characteristic ways, and may be defended in characteristic ways by supporting arguments. Abductive arguments are fallible, but there are only a small number of ways in which they can go wrong. This analysis provides a framework for justification, criticism, and dialogue concerning the evaluation of evidence. …
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Abductive Reasoning In Law: Taxonomy And Inference To The Best Explanation, Kola Abimbola
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Computational Inference For Evidential Reasoning In Support Of Judicial Proof, Tod S. Levitt, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Cardozo Law Review
The process of judicial proof accrues evidence to confirm or deny hypotheses about world events relevant to a legal case. Software applications that seek to support this process must provide the user with sophisticated capabilities to manipulate evidential reasoning for legal cases. This requires computational techniques to represent the actors, entities, events, and context of world situations to structure alternative hypotheses interpreting evidence and to execute processes that draw inferences about the truth of hypotheses by assessing the relevance and weight of evidence to confirm or deny the hypotheses. Bayesian inference networks are combined with knowledge representations from artificial intelligence …
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Othello Could Not Optimize: Economics, Hearsay, And Less Adversary Systems, Craig R. Callen
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.